Experimental platform to facilitate novel back brace development for the improvement of spine stability

References

• An N. 2014. Human spine. [accessed 2018 October 01]. https://grabcad.com/library/human-spine-1
   Google Scholar
• ANSYS 2017. Workbench - Mechanical Introduction 18.0.
   Google Scholar
• Bayoglu R, Galibarov PE, Verdonschot N, Koopman B, Homminga J. 2019. Twente Spine Model: A thorough investigation of the spinal loads in a complete and coherent musculoskeletal model of the human spine. Med Eng Phys. 68:35–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonnaire R, Han WS, Molimard J, Calmels P, Convert R. 2014. Biomechanical analysis and modelling of lumbar belt: parametric study. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. S1(62–63):17.
   Google Scholar
• Carboni M, Dal Pozzo E. 2017. Integration of muscle forces and gravity loads in a finite element model of the lumbar spine, s.l. [master’s thesis]. Scuola di Ingegneria Industriale e dell’Informazione Corso di Laurea Magistrale in Ingegneria Biomedica.
   Google Scholar
• Cholewicki J, McGill K, Shah KR, Lee AS. 2010. The effects of a three-week use of lumbosacral orthoses on trunk muscle activity and on the muscular response to trunk perturbations. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 11(1).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cholewicki J, McGill SM, Norman RW. 1995. Comparison of muscle forces and joint load from an optimization and EMG assisted lumbar spine model: Towards development of a hybrid approach. J Biomech. 28(3):321–331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cholewicki J, Reeves NP, Everding VQ, Morrisette DC. 2007. Lumbosacral orthoses reduce trung muscle activity in a postural control task. J Biomech. 40(8):1731–1736.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreischarf M, Zander T, Shirazi-Adl A, Puttlitz CM, Adam CJ, Chen CS, Goel VK, Kiapour A, Kim YH, Labus KM, et al. 2014. Comparison of eight published static finite element models of the intact lumbar spine: predictive power of models improves when combined together. J Biomech. 47(8):1757–1766.,
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisinger DB, Kumar R, Woodrow R. 1996. Effect of lumbar orthotics on trunk muscle strength. Am J Phy Med Rehab. 75(3):194–197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fayolle-Minon I, Calmels P. 2008. Effect of wearing a lumbar orthosis on trunk muscles: study of the muscle strength after 21 days of use on healthy subjects. Joint Bone Spine. 75(1):58–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez F, Lorza R, Bobadilla M, García R. 2017. Improving the process of adjusting the parameters of finite element models of healthy human intervertebral discs by the multi-response surface method. Materials. 10(10):1116–1154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkinson NV. 2016. Back conditions treated by spinal bracing. [accessed 2018 August 13]. https://www.spineuniverse.com/treatments/bracing/back-conditions-treated-spinal-bracing
   Google Scholar
• Hoy D, March L, Brooks P, Blyth F, Woolf A, Bain C, Williams G, Smith E, Vos T, Barendregt J, et al. 2014. The global burden of low back pain: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study. Ann Rheum Dis. 73(6):968–974.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu JD, Michael J, Fisk J. 2008. AAOS Atlas of orthoses and assistive devices e-book. Elsevier Health Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Huynh KT, Gibson I, Gao Z. 2012. Development of a detailed human spine model with haptic interface. In El Saddik, A, editor. Haptics Rendering and Applications. Rijeka, Croatia: InTech; p. 165–194.
   Google Scholar
• Ivancic PC, Cholewicki J, Radebold A. 2002. Effects of the abdominal belt on muscle-generated spinal stability and L4/L5 joint compression force. Ergonomics. 45(7):501–513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawaguchi Y, Gejo R, Kanamori M, Kimura T. 2002. Quantitative analysis of the effect of lumbar orthosis on trunk muscle strength and mussle activity in normal subjects. J Orthop Sci. 7(4):483–489.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kurutz M. 2010. Finite element modelling of human lumbar spine. Finite element analysis. Moratal, D. editor. InTechOpen.
   Google Scholar
• Lariviere C, Caron J-M, Preuss R, Mecheri H. 2014. The effect of different lumbar belt designs on lumbopelvic rhythm in healthy subjects. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 15(307).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longo UG, et al. 2012. Conservative management of patients with an osteoporotic vertebral fracture. A review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg. 94(2):152–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Materialise N. 2018. Materialse mimics. [accessed 2018 October 01]. https://www.materialise.com/en/medical/software/mimics
   Google Scholar
• Morl F, Bradl I. 2013. Lumbar posture and muscular activity while sitting during office work. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 23(2):362–368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Office for National Statistics 2017. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WRMSDs) statistics in Great Britain 2017. London: Office for National Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Panjabi MM, Goel V, Oxland T, Takata K, Duranceau J, Krag M, Price M. 1992. Human lumbar vertebrae. Quantitative three-dimensional anatomy. Spine. 17(3):299–306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putzer M, Auer S., Malpica W, Suess F, and Dendorfer S. 2016. A numerical study to determine the effectof ligament stiffness on kinematics of thelumbar spine during flexion. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 17(95).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohlmann A, Bauer L, Zander T, Bergmann G, Wilke H-J. 2006. Determination of trunk muscle forces for flexion and extension by using a validated finite element model of the lumbar spine and measured in vivo data. J Biomech. 39(6):981–989.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt H, Heuer F, Simon U, Kettler A, Rohlmann A, Claes L, Wilke H-J. 2006. Application of a new calibration method for a three-dimensional finite element model of a human lumbar annulus fibrosus. Clin Biomech. 21(4):337–344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seo K, Cho C, Hong S. 2013. Evaluation of the shock absorption properties of rigid polyurethane and polystyrene foam used in a small transport package. Packag Transp Storage Secur Radioact Mater. 16(2):145–150.
   Google Scholar
• Swamy A. 2014. Material selection for modeling of intervertebral disc. Int J Scientific Eng Res. 2(4):51–53.
   Google Scholar
• Ultimaker, 2017. Technical data sheet ABS. [accessed 2018 August 13]. http://www.farnell.com/datasheets/2310520.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wagnac E, Arnoux P-J, Garo AS, El-Rich MARWAN, Aubin CARL-ERIC. 2011. Calibration of hyperelastic material properties of the human lumbar intervertebral disc under fast dynamic compressive loads. J Biomech Eng. 133(10):101007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang JP, Zhong ZC, Cheng CK, Chen CS, Yu CH, Chang TK, Wei SH. 2006. Finite element analysis of the spondylolysis in lumbar spine. BioMed Mater Eng. 16(5):301–308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolf A, Pfleger B. 2003. Burden of major musculoskeletal conditions. Bull World Health Org. 81:646–656.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamamoto I, Panjabi M, Crisco T, Oxland T. 1989. Three-dimensional movements of the whole lumbar spine and lumbosacral joint. Spine. 14(11):1256–1260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar