Musculoskeletal modeling of user groups for virtual product and process development

References

• Anderson FC, Pandy MG. 1999. A dynamic optimization solution for vertical jumping in three dimensions. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 2(3):201–231.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beijsterveldt CEM, Steenbekkers LPA. 1998. Design-relevant characteristics of ageing users. Backgrounds and guidelines for product innovation. Delft: Delft University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Bosmans L, Valente G, Wesseling M, van Campen A, Groote F, Schutter J, Jonkers I. 2015. Sensitivity of predicted muscle forces during gait to anatomical variability in musculotendon geometry. J Biomech. 48(10):2116–2123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bratley P, Fox BL. 1988. ALGORITHM 659. Implementing Sobol's quasirandom sequence generator. ACM Trans Math Softw. 14(1):88–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbone V, Fluit R, Pellikaan P, van der Krogt M, Janssen D, Damsgaard M, Vigneron L, Feilkas T, Koopman H, Verdonschot N. 2015. TLEM 2.0 - a comprehensive musculoskeletal geometry dataset for subject-specific modeling of lower extremity. J Biomech. 48(5):734–741.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbone V, van der Krogt MM, Koopman H, Verdonschot N. 2012. Sensitivity of subject-specific models to errors in musculoskeletal geometry. J Biomech. 45(14):2476–2480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christophy M, Faruk Senan NA, Lotz JC, O’Reilly OM. 2012. A musculoskeletal model for the lumbar spine. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 11(1–2):19–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damsgaard M, Rasmussen J, Christensen ST, Surma E, de Zee M. 2006. Analysis of musculoskeletal systems in the AnyBody Modeling System. Simul Model Pract Th. 14(8):1100–1111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danneskiold-Samsoe B, Bartels EM, Bulow PM, Lund H, Stockmarr A, Holm CC, Watjen I, Appleyard M, Bliddal H. 2009. Isokinetic and isometric muscle strength in a healthy population with special reference to age and gender. Acta Physiol (Oxf). 197(Suppl 673):1–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delp SL, Anderson FC, Arnold AS, Loan P, Habib A, John CT, Guendelman E, Thelen DG. 2007. OpenSim: open-source software to create and analyze dynamic simulations of movement. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 54(11):1940–1950.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delp SL, Loan JP, Hoy MG, Zajac FE, Topp EL, Rosen JM. 1990. An interactive graphics-based model of the lower extremity to study orthopaedic surgical procedures. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 37(8):757–767.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dempsey PG, McGorry RW, Maynard WS. 2005. A survey of tools and methods used by certified professional ergonomists. Appl Ergon. 36(4):489–503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorschky E, Krüger D, Kurfess N, Schlarb H, Wartzack S, Eskofier BM, van den Bogert AJ. 2019. Optimal control simulation predicts effects of midsole materials on energy cost of running. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 22(8): 869–879.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federal Statistical Office of Germany. 2015. Germany's Population by 2060. Results of the 13th coordinated population projection.
   Google Scholar
• Fluit R, van der Krogt MM, van der Kooij H, Verdonschot N, Koopman H. 2012. A simple controller for the prediction of three-dimensional gait. J Biomech. 45(15):2610–2617.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox MD, Reinbolt JA, Õunpuu S, Delp SL. 2009. Mechanisms of improved knee flexion after rectus femoris transfer surgery. J Biomech. 42(5):614–619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• German Institute for Standardization. 1999. DIN 33411 - Physical strength of man – Part 5: maximal isometric action forces, values. Berlin: Beuth.
   Google Scholar
• German Institute for Standardization. 2005. DIN 33402 - Ergonomics - human body dimensions - part 2: values. Berlin: Beuth.
   Google Scholar
• Hemmelmann C, Brose S, Vens M, Hebebrand J, Ziegler A. 2010. Percentiles of body mass index of 18-80-year-old German adults based on data from the Second National Nutrition Survey. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 135(17):848–852.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicks JL, Uchida TK, Seth A, Rajagopal A, Delp SL. 2015. Is my model good enough? Best practices for verification and validation of musculoskeletal models and simulations of movement. J Biomech Eng. 137(2):020905.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holzbaur KR, Murray WM, Delp SL. 2005. A model of the upper extremity for simulating musculoskeletal surgery and analyzing neuromuscular control. Ann Biomed Eng. 33(6):829–840.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Max Rubner-Institut. 2008. National nutrition survey II - the German survey on diet and nutrition of adolescents and adults. Result Report, Part 1.
   Google Scholar
• McGregor AH, McCarthy ID, Hughes SP. 1995. Motion characteristics of the lumbar spine in the normal population. Spine 20(22):2421–2428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miehling J. 2018. Berücksichtigung biomechanischer Zusammenhänge in der nutzergruppenspezifischen virtuellen Produktentwicklung. Fortschritt-Berichte VDI, Reihe 1, Nr. 445. Düsseldorf: VDI Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Miehling J, Geissler B, Wartzack S. 2013. Towards Biomechanical Digital Human Modeling of Elderly People for Simulations in Virtual Product Development. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 57th Annual Meeting, Sept 30–Oct 4; San Diego. p. 813–817.
   Google Scholar
• Miehling J, Wartzack S. 2015. Strength mapping algorithm (SMA) for biomechanical human modelling using empirical population data. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 15) Vol 10: Design Information and Knowledge Management; Jul 27–30; Milan.
   Google Scholar
• Modenese L, Ceseracciu E, Reggiani M, Lloyd DG. 2016. Estimation of musculotendon parameters for scaled and subject specific musculoskeletal models using an optimization technique. J Biomech. 49(2):141–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray MP, Gore DR, Gardner GM, Mollinger LA. 1985. Shoulder motion and muscle strength of normal men and women in two age groups. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 192:268–273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porsa S, Lin YC, Pandy MG. 2016. Direct Methods for predicting movement biomechanics based upon optimal control theory with implementation in OpenSim. Ann Biomed Eng. 44(8):2542–2557.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roach KE, Miles TP. 1991. Normal hip and knee active range of motion: the relationship to age. Phys Ther. 71(9):656–665.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sepic SB, Murray MP, Mollinger LA, Spurr GB, Gardner GM. 1986. Strength and range of motion in the ankle in two age groups of men and women. Am J Phys Med. 65(2):75–84.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sobol I. 1967. On the distribution of points in a cube and the approximate evaluation of integrals. USSR Comput Math Math Phys. 7:86–112.
   Google Scholar
• Soucie JM, Wang C, Forsyth A, Funk S, Denny M, Roach KE, Boone D. 2011. Range of motion measurements: reference values and a database for comparison studies. Haemophilia 17(3):500–507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thelen DG. 2003. Adjustment of muscle mechanics model parameters to simulate dynamic contractions in older adults. J Biomech Eng. 125(1):70–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valente G, Pitto L, Stagni R, Taddei F. 2015. Effect of lower-limb joint models on subject-specific musculoskeletal models and simulations of daily motor activities. J Biomech. 48(16):4198–4205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasavada AN, Li S, Delp SL. 1998. Influence of muscle morphometry and moment arms on the moment-generating capacity of human neck muscles. Spine 23(4):412–422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Virmavirta M, Isolehto J. 2014. Determining the location of the body’s center of mass for different groups of physically active people. J Biomech. 47(8):1909–1913.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winby CR, Lloyd DG, Kirk TB. 2008. Evaluation of different analytical methods for subject-specific scaling of musculotendon parameters. J Biomech. 41(8):1682–1688.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamaguchi GT, Zajac FE. 1989. A planar model of the knee joint to characterize the knee extensor mechanism. J Biomech. 22(1):1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar