Bulk Fill flow resin contraction using 3D finite element model and calibration by Fiber Bragg Grating measurement

References

• Ausiello P, Apicella A, Davidson CL, Rengo S. 2001. 3D-finite element analysis of cusp movements in a human upper premolar, restored with adhesive resin-based composites. J Biomech. 34(10):1269–1277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ausiello P, Ciaramella S, Fabianelli A, Gloria A, Martorelli M, Lanzotti A, Watts D. 2017. Mechanical behavior of bulk direct composite versus block composite and lithium disilicate indirect class ii restorations by cad-fem modeling. Dent Mater. 33(6):690–701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ausiello P, Ciaramella S, Garcia-Godoy F, Gloria A, Lanzotti A, Maietta S, Martorelli M. 2017. The effects of cavity-margin-angles and bolus stiffness on the mechanical behavior of indirect resin composite class ii restorations. Dent Mater. 33(1):e39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ausiello P, Rengo S, Davidson CL, Watts DC. 2004. Stress distributions in adhesively cemented ceramic and resin-composite Class II inlay restorations: a 3D-FEA study. Dent Mater. 20(9):862–872.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boccaccio A, Lamberti L, Pappalettere C, Carano A, Cozzani M. 2006. Mechanical behavior of an osteotomized mandible with distraction orthodontic devices. J Biomech. 39(15):2907–2918.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braga RR, Meira JB, Boaro LC, Xavier TA. 2010. Adhesion to tooth structure: a critical review of” macro” test method. Dent Mater. 26(2):e38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Causton BE, Miller B, Sefton J. 1985. The deformation of cusps by bonded posterior composite restorations: an in vitro study. Br Dent J. 159(12):397–400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelho PG, Calamia C, Harsono M, Thompson VP, Silva NR. 2008. Laboratory and FEA evaluation of dentin-to-composite bonding as a function adhesive layer thickness. Dent Mater. 24(10):1297–1303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. 1990. Relaxation of polymerization contraction shear stress by hygroscopic expansion. J Dent Res. 69(1):36–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feilzer AJ, Dooren LH, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. 1995. Influence of light intensity on polymerization shrinkage and integrity of restoration-cavity interface. Eur J Oral Sci. 103(5):322–326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiorin R, Franco A, Abreu de Souza M, Fontenele D, Jones I, Kalinowski H, Abe I. 2019. Case study for monitoring the rhythmic masticatory muscle activity during sleep bruxism episodes by using fiber bragg gratings. J Lightwave Technol. 37(18):4823–4829.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franco A, Moura C, Zen Karam L, Kalinowski H. 2017. Properties of bulk dental composites using fiber bragg grating sensors. In: 2017 SBMO/IEEE MTT-S International Microwave and Optoelectronics Conference (IMOC), guas de Lindia: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Ghulman MA. 2011. Effect of cavity configuration (c factor) on the marginal adaptation of low-shrinking composite: a comparative ex vivo study. Int J Dent. 2011:1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Goes MFD, Giannini M, Hipólito VD, Carrilho MR, Daronch M, Rueggeberg FA. 2008. Microtensile bond strength of adhesive systems to dentin with or without application of an intermediate flowable resin layer. Braz Dent J. 19(1):51–56.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ilie N, Jelen E, Clementino-Luedemann T, Hickel R. 2007. Low-shrinkage composite for dental application. Dent Mater J. 26(2):149–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isolan CP, Valente LL, Münchow EA, Basso GR, Pimentel AH, Schwantz JK, da Silva AV, Moraes RR. 2014. Bond strength of a universal bonding agent and other contemporary dental adhesives applied on enamel, dentin, composite, and porcelain. Appl Adhes Sci. 2(1):1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Kamble SS, Kandasamy B, Thillaigovidan R, Goval NK, Talukdar P, Seal M. 2015. In vitro comparative evaluation of tensile bond strength of 6(th), 7(th) and 8(th) generation dentin bonding agents. J Int Oral Health. 7(5):41–43.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidson CL. 1990. Marginal integrity related to bond strength and strain capacity of composite resin restorative systems. J Prosthet Dent. 64(6):658–664.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimmes NS, Barkmeier WW, Erickson RL, Latta MA. 2010. Adhesive bond strengths to enamel and dentin using recommended and extended treatment times. Operative Dent. 35(1):112–119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ko CC, Chu CS, Chung KH, Lee MC. 1992. Effects of posts on dentin stress distribution in pulpless teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 68(3):421–427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koike T, Hasegawa T, Manabe A, Itoh K, Wakumoto S. 1990. Effect of water sorption and thermal stress on cavity adaptation of dental composites. Dent Mater. 6(3):178–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leprince JG, Palin WM, Vanacker J, Sabbagh J, Devaux J, Leloup G. 2014. Physico-mechanical characteristics of commercially available bulk-fill composites. J Dent. 42(8):993–1000.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu B, Lu C, Wu Y, Zhang X, Arola D, Zhang D. 2011. The effects of adhesive type and thickness on stress distribution in molars restored with all-ceramic crowns. J Prosthodont. 20(1):35–44.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McCullock AJ, Smith BG. 1986. In vitro studies of cuspal movement produced by adhesive restorative materials. Br Dent J. 161(11):405–409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meredith N, Setchell DJ. 1997. In vitro measurement of cuspal strain and displacement in composite restored teeth. J Dent. 25(3–4):331–337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortazavi V, Fathi M, Ataei E, Khodaeian N, Askari N. 2012. Shear bond strengths and morphological evaluation of filled and unfilled adhesive interfaces to enamel and dentine. Int J Dent. 2012:858459.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oskui IZ, Hashemi A, Jafarzadeh H, Kato A. 2018. Finite element investigation of human maxillary incisor under traumatic loading: static vs dynamic analysis. Comput Methods Prog Biomed. 155:121–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owens S, Buschang PH, Throckmorton GS, Palmer L, English J. 2002. Masticatory performance and areas of occlusal contact and near contact in subjects with normal occlusion and malocclusion. Am J Orthodontics Dentofacial Orthopedics. 121(6):602–609.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paradella TC, Fava M. 2007. Bond strength of adhesive systems to human tooth enamel. Braz Oral Res. 21(1):4–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Park JH, Bayome M, Zahrowski JJ, Kook YA. 2017. Displacement and stress distribution by different bone-borne palatal expanders with facemask: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 151(1):105–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patil D, Singbal KP, Kamat S. 2011. Comparative evaluation of the enamel bond strength of etch-and-rinse and all-in-one bonding agents on cut and uncut enamel surfaces. J Conserv Dent. 14(2):147–150.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pearson GJ, Hegarty SM. 1987. Cusp movement in molar teeth using dentine adhesives and composite filling materials. Biomaterials. 8(6):473–476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulido CA, de Oliveira Franco APG, Gomes GM, Bittencourt BF, Kalinowski HJ, Gomes JC, Gomes O. 2016. An in situ evaluation of the polymerization shrinkage, degree of conversion, and bond strength of resin cements used for luting fiber posts. J Prosthetic Dent. 116(4):570–576.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajan G, Shouha P, Ellakwa A, Bhowmik K, Xi J, Prusty G. 2016. Evaluation of the physical properties of dental resin composites using optical fiber sensing technology. Dent Mater. 32(9):1113–1123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrigues FP, Silikas N, Watts DC, Ballester RY. 2012. Finite element analysis of bonded model class i 'restorations' after shrinkage. Dent Mater. 28(2):123–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silikas N, Eliades G, Watts DC. 2000. Light intensity effects on resin-composite degree of conversion and shrinkage strain. Dent Mater. 16(4):292–296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sotto-Maior BS, Mercuri EG, Senna PM, Assis NM, Francischone CE, Cury A. 2016. Evaluation of bone remodeling around single dental implants of different lengths: a mechanobiological numerical simulation and validation using clinical data. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 19(7):699–706.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souza-Zaroni WC, Seixas LC, Ciccone-Nogueira JC, Chimello DT, Palma-Dibb RG. 2007. Tensile bond strength of different adhesive systems to enamel and dentin. Braz Dent J. 18(2):124–128.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tiwari U, Mishra V, Bhalla A, Singh N, Jain SC, Garg H, Raviprakash S, Grewal N, Kapur P. 2011. Fiber bragg grating sensor for measurement of impact absorption capability of mouthguards. Dent Traumatol. 27(4):263–268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yazici AR, Celik C, Ozgünaltay G, Dayanga B. 2007. Bond strength of different adhesive systems to dental hard tissues. Oper Dent. 32(2):166–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zorba YO, Ilday NO, Bayindir YZ, Demirbuga S. 2013. Comparing the shear bond strength of direct and indirect composite inlays in relation to different surface conditioning and curing techniques. Eur J Dent. 7(4):436–441.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar