134
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Test-retest validation of a cranial deformity index in unilateral coronal craniosynostosis

, , , &
Pages 1247-1259 | Received 09 Jan 2020, Accepted 08 Jul 2020, Published online: 21 Jul 2020

References

  • Alberta Health. 2018. Analytics and performance reporting branch [Internet]. Government of Alberta; [cited 2019 Mar 13]. Available from: http://www.ahw.gov.ab.ca/IHDA_Retrieval/selectSubCategoryParameters.do#.
  • Alford J, Derderian CA, Smartt JM. 2018. Surgical treatment of nonsyndromic unicoronal craniosynostosis. J Craniofac Surg. 29(5):1199–1207.
  • Barbero-García I, Lerma JL, Marqués-Mateu Á, Miranda P. 2017. Low-cost smartphone-based photogrammetry for the analysis of cranial deformation in infants. World Neurosurg. 102:545–554.
  • Beckett JS, Persing JA, Steinbacher DM. 2013. Bilateral orbital dysmorphology in unicoronal synostosis. Plast Reconstructive Surg. 131:125–130.
  • Burton HE, Peel S, Eggbeer D. 2018. Reporting fidelity in the literature for computer aided design and additive manufacture of implants and guides. Addit Manuf. 23:362–373.
  • Campbell C, Derderian C, Janis E (Ed.) 2014. Craniosynostosis. In: Essentials of plastic surgery. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis Group; p. 237.
  • Chim H, Wetjen N, Mardini S. 2014. Virtual surgical planning in craniofacial surgery. Semin Plast Surg. 28(3):150–158.
  • Dangi S, Shah H, Porras AR, Paniagua B, Linte CA, Linguraru M, Enquobahrie A. 2017. Robust head CT image registration pipeline for craniosynostosis skull correction surgery. Healthcare Technol Lett. 4(5):174–178.
  • de Jong G, Tolhuisen M, Meulstee J, van der Heijden F, van Lindert E, Borstlap W, Maal T, Delye H. 2017. Radiation-free 3D head shape and volume evaluation after endoscopically assisted strip craniectomy followed by helmet therapy for trigonocephaly. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 45(5):661–671.
  • Delgado-Rodriguez M. 2004. Bias. J Epidemiol Community Health. 58(8):635–641.
  • Fearon J. 2014. Evidence-based medicine: craniosynostosis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 133(5):1261–1275.
  • Fedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Finet J, Fillion-Robin J-C, Pujol S, Bauer C, Jennings D, Fennessy F, Sonka M, et al. 2012. 3D slicer as an image computing platform for the quantitative imaging network. Magn Reson Imaging. 30(9):1323–1341.
  • Fisher M, Medina M, Bojovic B, Ahn E, Dorafshar AH. 2016. Indications for computer-aided design and manufacturing in congenital craniofacial reconstruction. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 9(3):235–241.
  • Hinkle DE, Wiersma W, Jurs SG. 2003. Applied statistics for the behavioral sciences. 5th ed. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Khechoyan DY, Saber NR, Burge J, Fattah A, Drake J, Forrest CR, Phillips JH. 2014. Surgical outcomes in craniosynostosis reconstruction: the use of prefabricated templates in cranial vault remodelling. J Plast Reconstructive Aesthetic Surg. 67(1):9–16.
  • Liu MT, Khechoyan DY, Susarla SM, Skladman R, Birgfeld CB, Gruss JS, Lee A, Ellenbogen RG, Pet MA, Hopper RA, et al. 2019. Evolution of bandeau shape, orbital morphology, and craniofacial twist after fronto-orbital advancement for isolated unilateral coronal synostosis: a case-control study of 2-year outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 143(6):1703–1711.
  • LoPresti M, Daniels B, Buchanan EP, Monson L, Lam S. 2017. Virtual surgical planning and 3D printing in repeat calvarial vault reconstruction for craniosynostosis: technical note. J Neurosurg: Pediatr. 19(4):490–494.
  • Mardini S, Alsubaie S, Cayci C, Chim H, Wetjen N. 2014. Three-dimensional preoperative virtual planning and template use for surgical correction of craniosynostosis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 67(3):336–343.
  • Martelli N, Serrano C, van den Brink H, Pineau J, Prognon P, Borget I, El Batti S. 2016. Advantages and disadvantages of 3-dimensional printing in surgery: a systematic review. Surgery. 159(6):1485–1500.
  • Masserano B, Woo AS, Skolnick GB, Naidoo SD, Proctor MR, Smyth MD, Patel KB. 2018. The temporal region in unilateral coronal craniosynostosis: fronto-orbital advancement versus endoscopy-assisted strip craniectomy. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial J. 55(3):423–429.
  • Mazzaferro DM, Wes AM, Naran S, et al. 2017. A volumetric and craniometric analysis of cranial base differences in unicoronal craniosynostosis. J Craniofacial Surg. 28:1725–1729.
  • McKay DR, Davidge KM, Williams SK, Ellis LA, Chong DK, Teixeira RP, Greensmith AL, Holmes AD. 2010. Measuring cranial vault volume with three-dimensional photography: a method of measurement comparable to the gold standard. J Craniofacial Surg. 21(5):1419–1422.
  • Mendoza CS, Safdar N, Okada K, Myers E, Rogers GF, Linguraru MG. 2014. Personalized assessment of craniosynostosis via statistical shape modeling. Med Image Anal. 18(4):635–646.
  • Porras AR, Tu L, Tsering D, et al. 2019. Quantification of head shape from three-dimensional photography for presurgical and postsurgical evaluation of craniosynostosis. Plast Reconstructive Surg. 144:1051e–1060e.
  • Porras AR, Paniagua B, Ensel S, Keating R, Rogers GF, Enquobahrie A, Linguraru MG. 2018. Locally affine diffeomorphic surface registration and its application to surgical planning of fronto-orbital advancement. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 37(7):1690–1700.
  • Porras AR, Zukic D, Equobahrie A, et al. 2016. Personalized optimal planning for the surgical correction of metopic craniosynostosis. In: Shekhar R, Wesarg S, González Ballester MÁ, et al. editors. Clinical image-based procedures translational research in medical imaging [Internet]. Cham: Springer International Publishing; [cited 2019 Jan 18]; p. 60–67. Available from: http://link.springer.com/. 10.1007/978-3-319-46472-5_8.
  • Queiros C, Joly A, Paré A, Listrat A, Travers N, Goga D, Laure B. 2017. Use of cutting guides during craniosynostosis sequelae surgery: a comparative study between computer-assisted planning and post-operative results. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 45(7):1062–1068.
  • Robertson E, Louie G, Kwan P, et al. 2020. Skeletal deformity in patients with unilateral coronal craniosynostosis - perceptions of the general public. J Craniomaxillofacial Trauma Reconstr. 13(2):122–129.
  • Saber NR, Phillips J, Looi T, Usmani Z, Burge J, Drake J, Kim PCW. 2012. Generation of normative pediatric skull models for use in cranial vault remodeling procedures. Childs Nerv Syst. 28(3):405–410.
  • Salazar-Gamarra R, Seelaus R, da Silva JVL, da Silva AM, Dib LL. 2016. Monoscopic photogrammetry to obtain 3D models by a mobile device: a method for making facial prostheses. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 45(1):1–13. [cited 2020 Mar 11]. Available from: http://journalotohns.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40463-016-0145-3.
  • Selber JC, Brooks C, Kurichi JE, Temmen T, Sonnad SS, Whitaker LA. 2008. Long-term results following fronto-orbital reconstruction in nonsyndromic unicoronal synostosis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 121(5):251e–260e.
  • Seruya M, Borsuk DE, Khalifian S, Carson BS, Dalesio NM, Dorafshar AH. 2013. Computer-aided design and manufacturing in craniosynostosis surgery. J Craniofac Surg. 24(4):1100–1105.
  • Soleman J, Thieringer F, Beinemann J, Kunz C, Guzman R. 2015. Computer-assisted virtual planning and surgical template fabrication for frontoorbital advancement. Neurosurg Focus. 38(5):E5–5.
  • Tahiri Y, Bartlett SP, Gilardino MS. 2017. Evidence-based medicine: nonsyndromic craniosynostosis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 140(1):177e–191e.
  • Taylor JA, Paliga JT, Wes AM, Tahiri Y, Goldstein JA, Whitaker LA, Bartlett SP. 2015. A critical evaluation of long-term aesthetic outcomes of fronto-orbital advancement and cranial vault remodeling in nonsyndromic unicoronal craniosynostosis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 135(1):220–231.
  • Tu L, Rogers GF, Linguraru MG, et al. 2019. Quantitative evaluation of local head malformations from 3 dimensional photography: application to craniosynostosis. In: Hahn HK, Mori K, editors. Medical imaging 2019: computer-aided diagnosis [Internet]. San Diego, CA: SPIE; [cited 2020 Feb 9]; p. 113. Available from: https://www.spiedigitallibrary.org/conference-proceedings-of-spie/10950/2512272/Quantitative-evaluation-of-local-head-malformations-from-3-dimensional-photography/10.1117/12.2512272.full.
  • van Nunen DPF, Janssen LE, Stubenitsky BM, Han KS, Muradin MSM. 2014. Stereolithographic skull models in the surgical planning of fronto-supraorbital bar advancement for non-syndromic trigonocephaly. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 42(6):959–965.
  • Wes AM, Mazzaferro D, Naran S, Bartlett SP, Taylor JA. 2017. Nasal root deviation in unicoronal craniosynostosis: a craniometric analysis of early and late postoperative outcomes. J Craniofac Surg. 28(5):1220–1223.
  • Wes AM, Naran S, Sun J, Mazzaferro D, Xu W, Nguyen P, Whitaker LA, Bartlett SP, Taylor JA. 2017. The whitaker classification of craniosynostosis outcomes: an assessment of interrater reliability. Plast Reconstr Surg. 140(4):579e–586e.
  • Whitaker L, Pashayan H, Reichman J. 1981. A proposed new classification of craniofacial anomalies. Cleft Palate J. 18(3):161–176.
  • Wilbrand J-F, Szczukowski A, Blecher J-C, Pons-Kuehnemann J, Christophis P, Howaldt H-P, Schaaf H. 2012. Objectification of cranial vault correction for craniosynostosis by three-dimensional photography. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 40(8):726–730.
  • Wood BC, Mendoza CS, Oh AK, et al. 2016. What’s in a name? Accurately diagnosing metopic craniosynostosis using a computational approach. Plast Reconstr Surg. 137:205–213.
  • Xu W, Gerety PA, Li J, et al. 2017. Frontal sinus volume and frontal bar position are associated in unicoronal craniosynostosis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 139:965e–974e.
  • Yang B, Ni J, Li B. 2018. 3D morphological change of skull base and fronto-temporal soft-tissue in the patients with unicoronal craniosynostosis after fronto-orbital advancement. Childs Nerv Syst. 34(5):947–955.
  • Yu JW, Xu W, Wink JD, Wes AM, Bartlett SP, Taylor JA. 2020. Strabismus in unicoronal craniosynostosis: effect of orbital dysmorphology and fronto-orbital advancement and remodeling. Plast Reconstr Surg. 145(2):382e–390e.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.