Using intravascular ultrasound image-based fluid-structure interaction models and machine learning methods to predict human coronary plaque vulnerability change

References

• Athanasiou LS, Bourantas CV, Rigas G, Sakellarios AI, Exarchos TP, Siogkas PK, Ricciardi A, Naka KK, Papafaklis MI, Michalis LK, et al. 2014. Methodology for fully automated segmentation and plaque characterization in intracoronary optical coherence tomography images. J Biomed Opt. 19(2):026009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bathe KJ. 2002. Theory and modeling guide. Watertown: ADINA R&D.
   Google Scholar
• Bluestein D, Alemu Y, Avrahami I, Gharib M, Dumont K, Ricotta JJ, Einav S. 2008. Influence of microcalcifications on vulnerable plaque mechanics using FSI modeling. J Biomech. 41(5):1111–1118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodnár T, Sequeira A, Prosi M. 2011. On the shear-thinning and viscoelastic effects of blood flow under various flow rates. Appl Math Comput. 217(11):5055–5067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corban MT, Eshtehardi P, Suo J, McDaniel MC, Timmins LH, Rassoul-Arzrumly E, Maynard C, Mekonnen G, King S, 3rd, Quyyumi AA, et al. 2014. Cobination of plaque burden, wall shear stress, and plaque phenotype has incremental value for prediction of coronary atherosclerotic plaque progression and vulnerability. Atherosclerosis. 232(2):271–276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gałecki A, Burzykowski T. 2013. Linear mixed-effects models using R: a step-by-step approach. New York (NY): Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Guo X, Giddens DP, Molony DS, Yang C, Samady H, Zheng J, Mintz GS, Maehara A, Wang L, Pei X, et al. 2018. Combining IVUS and optical coherence tomography for more accurate coronary cap thickness quantification and stress/strain calculations: a patient-specific three-dimensional fluid-structure interaction modeling approach. J Biomech Eng. 140(4):041005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo X, Zhu J, Maehara A, Monoly DS, Samady H, Wang L, Billiar KL, Zheng J, Yang C, Mintz GS, et al. 2017. Quantify patient-specific coronary material property and its impact on stress/strain calculations using in vivo IVUS data and 3D FSI models: a pilot study. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 16(1):333–344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holzapfel GA, Gasser TC, Ogden RW. 2000. A new constitutive framework for arterial wall mechanics and a comparative study of material models. J Elast. 61(1/3):1–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kural MH, Cai M, Tang D, Gwyther T, Zheng J, Billiar KL. 2012. Planar biaxial characterization of diseased human coronary and carotid arteries for computational modeling. J Biomech. 45(5):790–798.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee JM, Choi G, Koo B, Hwang D, Park J, Zhang J, Kim KJ, Tong Y, Kim HJ, Grady L, et al. 2019. Identification of high-risk plaques destined to cause acute coronary syndrome using coronary computed tomographic angiography and computational fluid dynamics. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 12(6):1032–1043.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naghavi MP, Libby E, Falk SW, Casscells S, Litovsky J, Rumberger J, Badimon JJ, Stefanadis C, Moreno P, Pasterkamp G, et al. 2003. From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable patient: a call for new definitions and risk assessment strategies: Part I. Circulation. 108(14):1664–1672.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohayon J, Dubreuil O, Tracqui P, Le Floc’h S, Rioufol G, Chalabreysse L, Thivolet F, Pettigrew RI, Finet G. 2007. Influence of residual stress/strain on the biomechanical stability of vulnerable coronary plaques: potential impact for evaluating the risk of plaque rupture. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 293(3):H1987–H1996.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinto SIS, Romano E, António CC, Sousa LC, Castro CF. 2020. The impact of non-linear viscoelastic property of blood in right coronary arteries hemodynamics – a numerical implementation. Int J Non Linear Mech. 123:103477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samady H, Eshtehardi P, McDaniel MC, Suo J, Dhawan SS, Maynard C, Timmins LH, Quyyumi AA, Giddens DP. 2011. Coronary artery wall shear stress is associated with progression and transformation of atherosclerotic plaque and arterial remodeling in patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation. 124(7):779–788.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stary HC, Chandler AB, Glagov S, Guyton JR, Insull W, Jr, Rosenfeld ME, Schaffer SA, Schwartz CJ, Wagner WD, Wissler RW. 1994. A definition of initial, fatty streak, and intermediate lesions of atherosclerosis. A report from the Committee on Vascular Lesions of the Council on Arteriosclerosis, American Heart Association. Arterioscler Thromb. 14(5):840–856.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stary HC, Chandler AB, Dinsmore RE, Fuster V, Glagov S, Insull W, Jr, Rosenfeld ME, Schwartz CJ, Wagner WD, Wissler RW. 1995. A definition of advanced types of atherosclerotic lesions and a histological classification of atherosclerosis. A report from the Committee on Vascular Lesions of the Council on Arteriosclerosis, American Heart Association. Circulation. 92(5):1355–1374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone GW, Maehara A, Lansky AJ, de Bruyne B, Cristea E, Mintz GS, Mehran R, McPherson J, Farhat N, Marso SP, et al. 2011. A prospective natural-history study of coronary atherosclerosis. N Engl J Med. 364(3):226–235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone PH, Saito S, Takahashi S, Makita Y, Nakamura S, Kawasaki T, Takahashi A, Katsuki T, Nakamura S, Namiki A, et al. 2012. Prediction of progression of coronary artery disease and clinical outcomes using vascular profiling of endothelial shear stress and arterial plaque characteristics: the PREDICTION Study. Circulation. 126(2):172–181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang D, Kamm RD, Yang C, Zheng J, Canton G, Bach R, Huang X, Hatsukami TS, Zhu J, Ma G, et al. 2014. Image-based modeling for better understanding and assessment of atherosclerotic plaque progression and vulnerability: data, modeling, validation, uncertainty and predictions. J Biomech. 47(4):834–846.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang D, Yang C, Kobayashi S, Ku DN. 2001. Steady flow and wall compression in stenotic arteries: a three-dimensional thick-wall model with fluid-wall interactions. J Biomech Eng. 123(6):548–557.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang D, Yang C, Kobayashi S, Ku DN. 2004. Effect of a lipid pool on stress/strain distributions in stenotic arteries: 3D FSI models. J Biomech Eng. 126(3):363–370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang D, Yang C, Ku DN. 1999. A 3-D thin-wall model with flow-structure interactions for blood flow in carotid arteries with symmetric and asymmetric stenoses. Comput Struct. 72(1–3):357–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang D, Yang C, Zheng J, Woodard PK, Saffitz JE, Sicard GA, Pilgram TK, Yuan C. 2005. Quantifying effects of plaque structure and material properties on stress behaviors in human atherosclerotic plaques using 3D FSI models. J Biomech Eng. 127(7):1185–1194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teng Z, Brown AJ, Calvert PA, Parker RA, Obaid DR, Huang Y, Hoole SP, West NE, Gillard JH, Bennett MR. 2014. Coronary plaque structural stress is associated with plaque composition and subtype and higher in acute coronary syndrome: the BEACON I (Biomechanical Evaluation of Atheromatous Coronary Arteries) study. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 7(3):461–470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Virmani R, Kolodgie FD, Burke AP, Farb A, Schwartz SM. 2000. Lessons from sudden coronary death: a comprehensive morphological classification scheme for atherosclerotic lesions. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 20(5):1262–1275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahle A, Prause PM, DeJong SC, Sonka M. 1999. Geometrically correct 3-D reconstruction of intravascular ultrasound images by fusion with biplane angiography-methods and validation. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 18(8):686–699.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L, Tang D, Maehara A, Wu Z, Yang C, Muccigrosso D, Zheng J, Bach R, Billiar KL, Mintz GS. 2018. Fluid-structure interaction models based on patient-specific IVUS at baseline and follow-up for prediction of coronary plaque progression by morphological and biomechanical factors: a preliminary study. J Biomech. 68:43–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L, Zheng J, Maehara A, Yang C, Billiar KL, Wu Z, Bach R, Muccigrosso D, Mintz GS, Tang D. 2015. Morphological and stress vulnerability indices for human coronary plaques and their correlations with cap thickness and lipid percent: an IVUS-based fluid-structure interaction multi-patient study. PLoS Comput Biol. 11(12):e1004652.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Wang T, Bu J. 2011. Color image segmentation using pixel wise support vector machine classification. Pattern Recognit. 44(4):777–787.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu Z, Yang C, Tang D. 2011. In vivo serial MRI-based models and statistical methods to quantify sensitivity and specificity of mechanical predictors for carotid plaque rupture: location and beyond. J Biomech Eng. 133(6):064503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang C, Bach R, Zheng J, El Naqa I, Woodard PK, Teng Z, Billiar KL, Tang D. 2009. In vivo IVUS-based 3D fluid structure interaction models with cyclic bending and anisotropic vessel properties for human atherosclerotic coronary plaque mechanical analysis. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 56(10):2420–2428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang C, Tang D, Yuan C, Hatsukami TS, Zheng J, Woodard PK. 2007. In vivo/ex vivo MRI-based 3D non-Newtonian FSI models for human atherosclerotic plaques compared with fluid/wall-only models. Comput Model Eng Sci. 19(3):233–246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar