Cell biophysical stimuli in lobopodium formation: a computer based approach

References

• Allena R, Thiam H, Piel M, Aubry D. 2015. A mechanical model to investigate the role of the nucleus during confined cell migration. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 18(sup1):1868–1869.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biot MA. 1941. General theory of three-dimensional consolidation. J Appl Phys. 12(2):155–164.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl KN, Ribeiro AJ, Lammerding J. 2008. Nuclear shape, mechanics, and mechanotransduction. Circ Res. 102(11):1307–1318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeSimone DW, Horwitz AR. 2014. Cell Biology. Many modes of motility. Science. 345(6200):1002–1003.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Discher DE, Janmey P, Wang Y-l. 2005. Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate. Science. 310(5751):1139–1143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsdale T, Bard J. 1972. Collagen substrata for studies on cell behavior. J Cell Biol. 54(3):626–637.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escribano J, Sánchez M, García-Aznar J. 2015. Modeling the formation of cell-matrix adhesions on a single 3d matrix fiber. J Theor Biol. 384:84–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraley SI, Wu P-h, He L, Feng Y, Krisnamurthy R, Longmore GD, Wirtz D. 2015. Three-dimensional matrix fiber alignment modulates cell migration and mt1-mmp utility by spatially and temporally directing protrusions. Sci Rep. 5:14580.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedl P, Wolf K, Lammerding J. 2011. Nuclear mechanics during cell migration. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 23(1):55–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedl P, Wolf K. 2010. Plasticity of cell migration: a multiscale tuning model. J Cell Biol. 188(1):11–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gasser TC, Ogden RW, Holzapfel GA. 2006. Hyperelastic modelling of arterial layers with distributed collagen fibre orientations. J R Soc Interface. 3(6):15–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman R, Williams BR, Piez K. 1979. Collagen fibril formation. evidence for a multistep process. J Biol Chem. 254(1):180–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hervas-Raluy S, Garcia-Aznar J, Gomez-Benito M. 2019. Modelling actin polymerization: the effect on confined cell migration. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 18(4):1177–1111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holzapfel GA, Gasser TC, Ogden RW. 2000. A new constitutive framework for arterial wall mechanics and a comparative study of material models. J Elast Phys Sci Solids. 61(1/3):1–48.
   Google Scholar
• Inoue Y, Deji T, Shimada Y, Hojo M, Adachi T. 2010. Simulations of dynamics of actin filaments by remodeling them in shear flows. Comput Biol Med. 40(11–12):876–882.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang H, Sun SX. 2013. Cellular pressure and volume regulation and implications for cell mechanics. Biophys J. 105(3):609–619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubow KE, Conrad SK, Horwitz AR. 2013. Matrix microarchitecture and myosin II determine adhesion in 3D matrices . Curr Biol. 23(17):1607–1619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauffenburger DA, Horwitz AF. 1996. Cell migration: a physically integrated molecular process. Cell. 84(3):359–369.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Sun SX. 2018. Transition from actin-driven to water-driven cell migration depends on external hydraulic resistance. Biophys J. 114(12):2965–2973.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luque T, Melo E, Garreta E, Cortiella J, Nichols J, Farré R, Navajas D. 2013. Local micromechanical properties of decellularized lung scaffolds measured with atomic force microscopy. Acta Biomater. 9(6):6852–6859.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahaffy R, Park S, Gerde E, Käs J, Shih C. 2004. Quantitative analysis of the viscoelastic properties of thin regions of fibroblasts using atomic force microscopy. Biophys J. 86(3):1777–1793.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malandrino A, Moeendarbary E. 2019. Poroelasticity of living tissues. In: Narayan R, editor. Encyclopedia of biomedical engineering. Oxford: Elsevier; p. 238–245.
   Google Scholar
• Moeendarbary E, Valon L, Fritzsche M, Harris AR, Moulding DA, Thrasher AJ, Stride E, Mahadevan L, Charras GT. 2013. The cytoplasm of living cells behaves as a poroelastic material. Nat Mater. 12(3):253–261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno-Arotzena O, Borau C, Movilla N, Vicente-Manzanares M, García-Aznar JM. 2015. Fibroblast migration in 3d is controlled by haptotaxis in a non-muscle myosin ii-dependent manner. Ann Biomed Eng. 43(12):3025–3039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oria R, Wiegand T, Escribano J, Elosegui-Artola A, Uriarte JJ, Moreno-Pulido C, Platzman I, Delcanale P, Albertazzi L, Navajas D, et al. 2017. Force loading explains spatial sensing of ligands by cells. Nature. 552(7684):219–224.,
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrie RJ, Gavara N, Chadwick RS, Yamada KM. 2012. Nonpolarized signaling reveals two distinct modes of 3d cell migration. J Cell Biol. 197(3):439–455.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrie RJ, Koo H, Yamada KM. 2014. Generation of compartmentalized pressure by a nuclear piston governs cell motility in a 3d matrix. Science. 345(6200):1062–1065.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrie RJ, Koo H. 2014. Direct measurement of intracellular pressure. Curr Protoc Cell Biol. 63(1):12–19.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Petrie RJ, Yamada KM. 2016. Multiple mechanisms of 3d migration: the origins of plasticity. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 42:7–12. cell dynamics.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridley AJ, Schwartz MA, Burridge K, Firtel RA, Ginsberg MH, Borisy G, Parsons JT, Horwitz AR. 2003. Cell migration: integrating signals from front to back. Science. 302(5651):1704–1709.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serrano-Alcalde F, García-Aznar JM, Gómez-Benito MJ. 2017. The role of nuclear mechanics in cell deformation under creeping flows. J Theor Biol. 432:25–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solon J, Levental I, Sengupta K, Georges PC, Janmey PA. 2007. Fibroblast adaptation and stiffness matching to soft elastic substrates. Biophys J. 93(12):4453–4461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturm R. 2011. A computer model for the simulation of fiber-cell interaction in the alveolar region of the respiratory tract. Comput Biol Med. 41(7):565–573.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunyer R, Conte V, Escribano J, Elosegui-Artola A, Labernadie A, Valon L, Navajas D, García-Aznar JM, Muñoz JJ, Roca-Cusachs P, et al. 2016. Collective cell durotaxis emerges from long-range intercellular force transmission. Science. 353(6304):1157–1161.,
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taber L, Shi Y, Yang L, Bayly P. 2011. A poroelastic model for cell crawling including mechanical coupling between cytoskeletal contraction and actin polymerization. J Mech Mater Struct. 6(1–4):569–589.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Te Boekhorst V, Preziosi L, Friedl P. 2016. Plasticity of cell migration in vivo and in silico. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 32:491–526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaziri A, Lee H, Mofrad MK. 2006. Deformation of the cell nucleus under indentation: mechanics and mechanisms. J Mater Res. 21(8):2126–2135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaman MH, Trapani LM, Sieminski AL, Siemeski A, Mackellar D, Gong H, Kamm RD, Wells A, Lauffenburger DA, Matsudaira P. 2006. Migration of tumor cells in 3d matrices is governed by matrix stiffness along with cell-matrix adhesion and proteolysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 103(29):10889–10894.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar