Influence of the dental implant macrogeometry and threads design on primary stability: an in vitro simulation on artificial bone blocks

References

• Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T, Linder E, Lang NP, Lindhe J. 2004. Early bone formation adjacent to rough and turned endosseous implant surfaces. An experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res. 15(4):381–392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abuhussein H, Pagni G, Rebaudi A, Wang H-L. 2010. The effect of thread pattern upon implant osseointegration. Clin Oral Implants Res. 21(2):129–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agabiti I, Botticelli D. 2017. Two-stage ridge split at narrow alveolar mandibular bone ridges. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 75(10):2115.e1–2115.e12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen RF, Baldini NC, Donofrio PE, Gutman EL, Keefe E, Kramer JG. 1998. Standard specification for rigid polyurethane foam for use as a standard material for testing orthopedic devices and instruments (F1839-97). West Conshohocken, PA: Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Medical Devices and Services.
   Google Scholar
• Almutairi AS, Walid MA, Alkhodary MA. 2018. The effect of osseodensification and different thread designs on the dental implant primary stability. F1000Res. 7:1898.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alvira-González J, De Stavola L. 2020. The role of cortical perforations in bone regeneration: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 49(7):945–951.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anitua E, Alkhraisat MH, Piñas L, Orive G. 2015. Efficacy of biologically guided implant site preparation to obtain adequate primary implant stability. Ann Anat. 199:9–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Araújo MG, Silva CO, Misawa M, Sukekava F. 2015. Alveolar socket healing: what can we learn? Periodontol 2000. 68(1):122–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASTM. 1995. ASTM F 67-95: Standard specification for unalloyed titanium for surgical implant applications, in Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Philadelphia, PA, American Society for Testing and Materials.
   Google Scholar
• Baggi L, Cappelloni I, Di Girolamo M, Maceri F, Vairo G. 2008. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 100(6):422–431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berglundh T, Abrahamsson I, Lang NP, Lindhe J. 2003. De novo alveolar bone formation adjacent to endosseous implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 14(3):251–262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borges FL, Dias RO, Piattelli A, Onuma T, Gouveia Cardoso LA, Salomão M, Scarano A, Ayub E, Shibli JA. 2011. Simultaneous sinus membrane elevation and dental implant placement without bone graft: a 6-month follow-up study. J Periodontol. 82(3):403–412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botticelli D, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. 2004. Hard-tissue alterations following immediate implant placement in extraction sites. J Clin Periodontol. 31(10):820–828.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branemark P-I. 1983. Osseointegration and its experimental background. J Prosthet Dent. 50(3):399–410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comuzzi L, Iezzi G, Piattelli A, Tumedei M. 2019. An in vitro evaluation, on polyurethane foam sheets, of the insertion torque (IT) values, pull-out torque values, and resonance frequency analysis (RFA) of nanoshort dental implants. Polymers. 11(6):1020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comuzzi L, Tumedei M, Piattelli A, Iezzi G. 2019. Short vs. standard length cone morse connection implants: an in vitro pilot study in low density polyurethane foam. Symmetry. 11(11):1349.
   Google Scholar
• Comuzzi L, Tumedei M, Pontes AE, Piattelli A, Iezzi G. 2020. Primary stability of dental implants in low-density (10 and 20 pcf) polyurethane foam blocks: conical vs cylindrical implants. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 11:17(8):2617.
   Google Scholar
• Davies JE. 2003. Understanding peri-implant endosseous healing. J Dent Educ. 67(8):932–949.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Deepika-Penmetsa S-L, Thomas R, Baron T-K, Shah R, Mehta D-S. 2017. Cortical lamina technique: a therapeutic approach for lateral ridge augmentation using guided bone regeneration. J Clin Exp Dent. 9(1):e21–e26.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Degidi M, Perrotti V, Piattelli A, Iezzi G. 2010. Mineralized bone-implant contact and implant stability quotient in 16 human implants retrieved after early healing periods: a histologic and histomorphometric evaluation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 25(1):45–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Stefano DA, Arosio P, Gastaldi G, Gherlone E. 2018. The insertion torque-depth curve integral as a measure of implant primary stability: An in vitro study on polyurethane foam blocks. J Prosthet Dent. 120(5):706–714.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Stefano DA, Arosio P, Perrotti V, Iezzi G, Scarano A, Piattelli A. 2019. Correlation between implant geometry, bone density, and the insertion torque/depth integral: a study on bovine ribs. Dent J (Basel). 7(1):1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Falco A, Berardini M, Trisi P. 2018. Correlation between implant geometry, implant surface, insertion torque, and primary stability: in vitro biomechanical analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 33(4):824–830.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fanali S, Tumedei M, Pignatelli P, Inchingolo F, Pennacchietti P, Pace G, Piattelli A. 2020. Implant primary stability with an osteocondensation drilling protocol in different density polyurethane blocks. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 25:1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Fujiwara S, Kato S, Bengazi F, Urbizo Velez J, Tumedei M, Kotsu M, Botticelli D. 2020. Healing at implants installed in osteotomies prepared either with a piezoelectric device or drills: an experimental study in dogs. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 8:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Gehrke A, Mazon P, Del Fabbro M, Tumedei M, Aramburù J, Perez-Diaz L, De Aza P. 2019. Histological and histomorphometric analyses of two bovine bone blocks implanted in rabbit calvaria. Symmetry. 11(5):641–654.
   Google Scholar
• Gehrke SA, Eliers Treichel TL, Pérez-Díaz L, Calvo-Guirado JL, Aramburú Júnior J, Mazón P, de Aza PN. 2019. Impact of different titanium implant thread designs on bone healing: a biomechanical and histometric study with an animal model. JCM. 8(6):777.
   Google Scholar
• Gehrke SA, Tumedei M, Aramburú Júnior J, Treichel TLE, Kolerman R, Lepore S, Piattelli A, Iezzi G. 2020. Histological and histomorphometrical evaluation of a new implant macrogeometry. A sheep study. IJERPH. 17(10):3477.
   Google Scholar
• Gracco A, Giagnorio C, Incerti Parenti S, Alessandri Bonetti G, Siciliani G. 2012. Effects of thread shape on the pullout strength of miniscrews. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 142(2):186–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang H-L, Tsai M-T, Su K-C, Li Y-F, Hsu J-T, Chang C-H, Fuh L-J, Wu AY-J. 2013. Relation between initial implant stability quotient and bone-implant contact percentage: an in vitro model study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 116(5):e356–e361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iezzi G, Pecora G, Scarano A, Perrotti V, Piattelli A. 2009. Immediately loaded screw implant retrieved after a 12-year loading period: a histologic and histomorphometric case report. J Osseointegr. 1(2):54–59.
   Google Scholar
• Inchingolo F, Ballini A, Cagiano R, Inchingolo AD, Serafini M, De Benedittis M, Cortelazzi R, Tatullo M, Marrelli M, Inchingolo AM, et al. 2015. Immediately loaded dental implants bioactivated with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) placed in maxillary and mandibular region. Clin Ter. 166(3):e146–e152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeu S, Guillaud E, Hauret L, Coutant J-C, Ella B. 2015. Assessment of the correlation between the implant distance and primary stability by resonance frequency analysis. J Dent Surg. 2015:1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Jimbo R, Tovar N, Anchieta RB, Machado LS, Marin C, Teixeira HS, Coelho PG. 2014. The combined effects of undersized drilling and implant macrogeometry on bone healing around dental implants: an experimental study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 43(10):1269–1275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joos U, Büchter A, Wiesmann H-P, Meyer U. 2005. Strain driven fast osseointegration of implants. Head Face Med. 1:6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kotsu M, Urbizo VJ, Bengazi F, Tumedei M, Fujiwara S, Kato S, Botticelli D. 2020. Healing at implants installed from ∼ 70- to < 10-Ncm insertion torques: an experimental study in dogs. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 7:1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Maglione M, Bevilacqua L, Dotto F, Costantinides F, Lorusso F, Scarano A. 2019. Observational study on the preparation of the implant site with piezosurgery vs. drill: Comparison between the two methods in terms of postoperative pain, surgical times, and operational advantages. BioMed Res Int. 2019:8483658.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mardinger O, Nissan J, Chaushu G. 2007. Sinus floor augmentation with simultaneous implant placement in the severely atrophic maxilla: technical problems and complications. J Periodontol. 78(10):1872–1877.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misch CE. 1999. Bone density: a key determinant for clinical success. Contemp Implant Dent. 8:109–118.
   Google Scholar
• Misch CE, Judy KW. 1987. Classification of partially edentulous arches for implant dentistry. Int J Oral Implantol. 4(2):7–13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mtm F. 1992. Standard specification for wrought Ti-6A1-4V ELI alloy for surgical implant applications. Annual Book of ASTM Standards. Philadelphia, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials; p. 136–192.
   Google Scholar
• Ryu H-S, Namgung C, Lee J-H, Lim Y-J. 2014. The influence of thread geometry on implant osseointegration under immediate loading: a literature review. J Adv Prosthodont. 6(6):547–554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarano A, Carinci F, Lorusso F, Festa F, Bevilacqua L, Santos de Oliveira P, Maglione M. 2018. Ultrasonic vs drill implant site preparation: post-operative pain measurement through VAS, swelling and crestal bone remodeling: a randomized clinical study. Materials (Basel). 11(12):2516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarano A, Carinci F, Quaranta A, Iezzi G, Piattelli M, Piattelli A. 2007. Correlation between implant stability quotient (ISQ) with clinical and histological aspects of dental implants removed for mobility. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 20(1_suppl):33–36.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scarano A, Crincoli V, Di Benedetto A, Cozzolino V, Lorusso F, Podaliri Vulpiani M, Grano M, Kalemaj Z, Mori G, Grassi FR. 2017. Bone regeneration induced by bone porcine block with bone marrow stromal stem cells in a Minipig model of mandibular “critical size” defect. Stem Cells Int. 2017:9082869.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarano A, Lorusso F, Arcangelo M, D’Arcangelo C, Celletti R, de Oliveira PS. 2018. Lateral sinus floor elevation performed with trapezoidal and modified triangular flap designs: A randomized pilot study of post-operative pain using thermal infrared imaging. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 15(6):1277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarano A, Valbonetti L, Marchetti M, Lorusso F, Ceccarelli M. 2016. Soft tissue augmentation of the face with autologous platelet-derived growth factors and tricalcium phosphate. Microtomography evaluation of mice. J Craniofac Surg. 27(5):1212–1214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarano A, Murmura G, Vantaggiato G, Lauritano D, Silvestre-Rangil J, DI Cerbo A, Lorusso F. 2017. Delayed expansion of atrophic mandible (deam): a case report. Oral Implantol (Rome). 10(2):190–196.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scarano A, de Oliveira PS, Traini T, Lorusso F. 2018. Sinus membrane elevation with heterologous cortical lamina: A randomized study of a new surgical technique for maxillary sinus floor augmentation without bone graft. Materials (Basel). 11(8):1457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarano A, Piattelli A, Assenza B, Carinci F, Di Donato L, Romani GL, Merla A. 2011. Infrared thermographic evaluation of temperature modifications induced during implant site preparation with cylindrical versus conical drills. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 13(4):319–323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarano A, Piattelli A, Quaranta A, Lorusso F. 2017. Bone response to two dental implants with different sandblasted/acid-etched implant surfaces: a histological and histomorphometrical study in rabbits. Biomed Res Int. 2017:8724951.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steigenga J, Al-Shammari K, Misch C, Nociti FH, Wang H-L. 2004. Effects of implant thread geometry on percentage of osseointegration and resistance to reverse torque in the tibia of rabbits. J Periodontol. 75(9):1233–1241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traini T, Mangano C, Perrotti V, Caputi S, Coelho P, Piattelli A, Iezzi G. 2014. Human bone reactions around implants with adverse interfacial bone strain over 20 years. J Biomed Mater Res. 102(6):1342–1352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tumedei M, Piattelli A, Degidi M, Mangano C, Iezzi G. 2020a. A 30-year (1988–2018) retrospective microscopical evaluation of dental implants retrieved for different causes: a narrative review. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 40(6):e211–e227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tumedei M, Piattelli A, Degidi M, Mangano C, Iezzi G. 2020b. A narrative review of the histological and histomorphometrical evaluation of the peri-implant bone in loaded and unloaded dental implants. A 30-year experience (1988–2018). IJERPH. 17(6):2088–2106.
   Google Scholar
• Tumedei M, Savadori PD, Fabbro M. 2019. Synthetic blocks for bone regeneration: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Mol Sci. 20(17):4221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar