A simple and effective 1D-element discrete-based method for computational bone remodeling

References

• Abboud FH. Rami 2018. Biomechanics of the foot and ankle. Orthopaed Knowled Update Foot Ankle. 5:3–12.
   Google Scholar
• Annicchiarico W, Martinez G, Cerrolaza M. 2007. Boundary elements and β-spline surface modeling for medical applications. Appl Math Modell. 31 (2):194–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaupre GS, Orr TE. 1990. An approach for time-dependent bone modeling and remodeling—application: A preliminary remodeling simulation. J Orthopaed. 8 (5):662–670. .
   Google Scholar
• Belinha J, Natal Jorge RM, Dinis LMJS. 2012. Bone tissue remodelling analysis considering a radial point interpolator meshless method. Eng Anal Boundary Elem. 36 (11):1660–1670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buenzli PR, Pivonka P, Smith DW. 2011. Spatio-temporal structure of cell distribution in cortical bone multicellular units: A mathematical model. Bone. 48 (4):918–926.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerrolaza M, Nieto F, González Y. 2018. Computation of the dynamic compression effects in spine discs using integral methods. J Mech Med Biol. 18 (05):1750103–1750116.
   Google Scholar
• Cesar R, Boffa RS, Fachine LT, Leivas TP, Silva AMH, Pereira CAM, Reiff RBM, Rollo JMDA. 2013. Evaluation of trabecular microarchitecture of normal osteoporotic and osteopenic human vertebrae. Procedia Eng. 59:6–15.
   Google Scholar
• Cha YH, Yoo JI, Hwang SY, Kim KJ, Kim HY, Choy WS, Hwang SC. 2019. Biomechanical Evaluation of internal fixation of pauwels type III femoral neck fractures: A systematic review of various fixation methods. Clin Orthop Surg. 11 (1):1–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowin SC. 1986. Wolff's law of trabecular architecture at remodeling equilibrium. J Biomech Eng. 108 (1):83–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daxner T. 2010. Finite element modeling of cellular materials. In: Altenbach H, Öchsner A, editors. Cellular and porous materials in structures and processes. CISM International Centre for Mechanical Sciences, Vol 521. Vienna: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ganghoffer JF, Goda I. 2018. Prediction of size effects in bone brittle and plastic collapse. Multiscale Biomech. 345–388.
   Google Scholar
• Garzón-Alvarado DA, Linero D. 2012. Comparative analysis of numerical integration schemes of density equation for a computational model of bone remodelling. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 15 (11):1189–1196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geris L, Vander Sloten J, Van Oosterwyck H. 2010. Connecting biology and mechanics in fracture healing: an integrated mathematical modeling framework for the study of nonunions. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 9 (6):713–724.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González Y, Cerrolaza M, González C. 2009. Poroelastic analysis of bone tissue differentiation by using the boundary element method. Eng Anal Boundary Elem. 33 (5):731–740.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guevara JM, Moncayo MA, Vaca-González JJ, Gutiérrez ML, Barrera LA, Garzón-Alvarado DA. 2015. Growth plate stress distribution implications during bone development: A simple framework computational approach. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 118 (1):59–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch JC. 1993. The laws of bone architecture. From the Department of Anatomy. Johns Hopkins Medical School. 2(6):444–454. Baltimore, Md.
   Google Scholar
• Komarova SV, Smith RJ, Jeffrey Dixon S, Sims SM, Wahl LM. 2003. Mathematical model predicts a critical role for osteoclast autocrine regulation in the control of bone remodeling. Bone. 33 (2):206–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemaire V, Tobin FL, Greller LD, Cho CR, Suva LJ. 2004. Modeling the interactions between osteoblast and osteoclast activities in bone remodeling. J Theor Biol. 229 (3):293–309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenthe G. H v, Müller R. 2006. Prediction of failure load using micro-finite element analysis models: Toward in vivo strength assessment. Drug Discov Today Technol. 3 (2):221–229.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Luxner MH, Woesz A, Stampfl J, Fratzl P, Pettermann HE. 2009. A finite element study on the effects of disorder in cellular structures. Acta Biomater. 5 (1):381–390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makris PA, Provatidis CG, Rellakis DA. 2006. Discrete variable optimization of frames using a strain energy criterion. Struct Multidisc Optim. 31 (5):410–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marco M, Giner E, Caeiro-Rey JR, Henar Miguélez M, Larraínzar-Garijo R. 2019. Numerical modelling of hip fracture patterns in human femur. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 173:67–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martín RÁS, Kochen JAV. 2011. Anatomía de La Cabeza Femoral Humana: Consideraciones En Ortopedia, Parte II. Biomecánica y Morfología Microscópica. Int J Morphol. 29 (2):371–376.
   Google Scholar
• Martínez G, Cerrolaza M. 2006. A bone adaptation integrated approach using BEM. Eng Anal Boundary Elem. 30 (2):107–115..
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metcalf LM, Dall'Ara E, Paggiosi MA, Rochester JR, Vilayphiou N, Kemp GJ, McCloskey EV. 2018. Validation of calcaneus trabecular microstructure measurements by HR-PQCT. Bone. 106:69–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nackenhorst U. 1997. Numerical simulation of stress stimulated bone remodeling. Techn Mech. 17 (1):31–40
   Google Scholar
• Pawlikowski M, Jankowski K, Skalski K. 2018. New microscale constitutive model of human trabecular bone based on depth sensing indentation technique. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 85:162–169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng MJQ, Xu HW, Chen HY, Lin Z, Li XX, Shen CL, Lau YQ, He EX, Guo YM. 2020. Biomechanical analysis for five fixation techniques of Pauwels-III fracture by finite element modeling. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 193:105491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pivonka P, Zimak J, Smith DW, Gardiner BS, Dunstan CR, Sims NA, Martin TJ, Mundy GR. 2008. Model structure and control of bone remodeling: A theoretical study. Bone. 43 (2):249–263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raggatt LJ, Partridge NC. 2010. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of bone remodeling. J Biol Chem. 285 (33):25103–25108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruff1 R,D, Van Lenthe GH. 2017. 3.10 Finite element analysis in bone research: A computational method relating structure to mechanical function. Comprehensive Biomaterials II vol. 3 (Elsevier Ltd., 2017).oni, D., and G. H. Van Lenthe. 3.10 Finite Element Analysis in Bone Research: A Computational Method Relating Structure to Mechanical Function. Comprehensive Biomaterials II. Vol. 3. Elsevier Ltd..
   Google Scholar
• Sozen T, Ozisik L, Basaran NC. 2017. An overview and management of osteoporosis. Eur J Rheumatol. 4 (1):46–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun X, Kang Y, Bao J, Zhang Y, Yang Y, Zhou X. 2013. Modeling vascularized bone regeneration within a porous biodegradable CaP scaffold loaded with growth factors. Biomaterials. 34 (21):4971–4981.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valdez SI, Botello S, Ochoa MA, Marroquín JL, Cardoso V. 2017. Topology optimization benchmarks in 2D: Results for minimum compliance and minimum volume in planar stress problems. Arch Computat Methods Eng. 24 (4):803–839.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanegas-Acosta JC, Landinez P NS, Garzón-Alvarado DA, Casale R MC. 2011. A finite element method approach for the mechanobiological modeling of the osseointegration of a dental implant. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 101 (3):297–314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walton D, Moztarzadeh H. 2017. Design and development of an additive manufactured component by topology optimisation. Proc CIRP. 60:205–210.
   Google Scholar
• Weinans H, Huiskes R, Grootenboer HJ. 1992. The behavior of adaptive bone-remodeling simulation models. J Biomech. 25(12):1425–1441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar