Numerical modelling of osteocyte growth on different bone tissue scaffolds

References

• Ali D. 2019. Effect of scaffold architecture on cell seeding efficiency: a discrete phase model CFD analysis. Comput Biol Med. 109:62–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali D, Sen S. 2018. Permeability and fluid flow-induced wall shear stress of bone tissue scaffolds: computational fluid dynamic analysis using Newtonian and non-Newtonian blood flow models. Comput Biol Med. 99:201–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ANSYS. 2015. ANSYS fluent theory guide. Canonsburg: ANSYS Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Babensee JE, Anderson JM, McIntire LV, Mikos AG. 1998. Host response to tissue engineered devices. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 33(1-2):111–139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bassaneze V, Barauna VG, Lavini-Ramos C, Kalil J, Schettert IT, Miyakawa AA, Krieger JE. 2010. Shear stress induces nitric oxide-mediated vascular endothelial growth factor production in human adipose tissue mesenchymal stem. Stem Cells Dev. 19(3):371–378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beskardes IG, Aydin G, Bektas S, Cengiz A, Gümüsderelioglu M. 2018. A systematic study for optimal cell seeding and culture conditions in a perfusion mode bone-tissue bioreactor. Biochem Eng J. 132:100–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown BN, Valentin JE, Stewart-Akers AM, McCabe GP, Badylak SF. 2009. Macrophage phenotype and remodeling outcomes in response to biologic scaffolds with and without a cellular component. Biomaterials. 30(8):1482–1491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campos Marin A, Grossi T, Bianchi E, Dubini G, Lacroix D. 2017. 2D µ-particle image velocimetry and computational fluid dynamics study within a 3D porous scaffold. Ann Biomed Eng. 45(5):1341–1351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cartmell SH, Porter BD, García AJ, Guldberg RE. 2003. Effects of medium perfusion rate on cell-seeded three-dimensional bone constructs in vitro. Tissue Eng. 9(6):1197–1203.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cavo M, Scaglione S. 2016. Scaffold microstructure effects on functional and mechanical performance: Integration of theoretical and experimental approaches for bone tissue engineering applications. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 68:872–879.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Zhou S, Cadman J, Li Q. 2010. Design of cellular porous biomaterials for wall shear stress criterion. Biotechnol Bioeng. 107(4):737–746.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cinbiz MN, Tığli RS, Beşkardeş IG, Gümüşderelioğlu M, Colak U. 2010. Computational fluid dynamics modeling of momentum transport in rotating wall perfused bioreactor for cartilage tissue engineering. J Biotechnol. 150(3):389–395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coletti F, Macchietto S, Elvassore N. 2006. Mathematical modeling of three-dimensional cell cultures in perfusion bioreactors. Ind Eng Chem Res. 45(24):8158–8169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estrada C, Paz AC, López LE. 2006. Ingeniería de tejido óseo: consideraciones básicas. Rev EIA. 1(5):93–100.
   Google Scholar
• Ferroni M, Giusti S, Nascimento D, Silva A, Boschetti F, Ahluwalia A. 2016. Modeling the fluid-dynamics and oxygen consumption in a porous scaffold stimulated by cyclic squeeze pressure. Med Eng Phys. 38(8):725–732.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galban CJ, Locke BR. 1999. Analysis of cell growth kinetics and substrate diffusion in a polymer scaffold. Biotechnol Bioeng. 65(2):121–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• German CL, Madihally SV. 2016. Applications of computational modelling and simulation of porous medium in tissue engineering. Computation 4(1):7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giannitelli SM, Accoto D, Trombetta M, Rainer A. 2014. Current trends in the design of scaffolds for computer-aided tissue engineering. Acta Biomater. 10(2):580–594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez S, Vlad MD, López J, Fernández E. 2016. Design and properties of 3D scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Acta Biomater. 42:341–350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardt N, Essig H. 2018. Bone grafts and specific implants in craniofacial fracture treatment. In: Hardt N, Kessler P, Kuttenberger J, editors. Craniofacial trauma. Berlin: Springer International Publishing; p. 247–271.
   Google Scholar
• Ho S-Y, Chung Ca YM-H. 2009. Simulation of cell growth and diffusion in tissue engineering scaffolds. In: Lim CT, Goh JCH, editors. 13th international conference on biomedical engineering. Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; p. 1745–1748.
   Google Scholar
• Huang S, Ingber DE. 2004. From stem cells to functional tissue architecture. In: Sell S, editor. Stem cells handbook. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; p. 45–56. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-411-5_4.
   Google Scholar
• Kalyanaraman B, Supp DM, Boyce ST. 2008. Medium flow rate regulates viability and barrier function of engineered skin substitutes in perfusion culture. Tissue Eng Part A. 14(5):583–593.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaul H, Ventikos Y, Cui Z. 2016. A computational analysis of the impact of mass transport and shear on three-dimensional stem cell cultures in perfused micro-bioreactors. Chin J Chem Eng. 24(1):163–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawano S, Sonohata M, Eto S, Kitajima M, Mawatari M. 2019. Bone ongrowth of a cementless silver oxide-containing hydroxyapatite-coated antibacterial acetabular socket. J Orthop Sci. 24(4):658–662.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim J, Ma T. 2012. Perfusion regulation of hMSC microenvironment and osteogenic differentiation in 3D scaffold. Biotechnol Bioeng. 109(1):252–261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krühne U, Wendt D, Martin I, Juhl MV, Clyens S, Theilgaard N. 2010. A transient 3D-CFD model incorporating biological processes for use in tissue engineering. MNS. 2(4):249–260.
   Google Scholar
• Lemos CAA, Verri FR, Gomes J. M d L, de Souza Batista VE, Cruz RS, Oliveira HFFE, Pellizzer EP. 2019. Ceramic versus metal-ceramic implant-supported prostheses: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 121(6):879–886.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim K-T, Patel DK, Seonwoo H, Kim J, Chung JH. 2019. A fully automated bioreactor system for precise control of stem cell proliferation and differentiation. Biochem Eng J. 150:1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linkevicius T, Linkevicius R, Alkimavicius J, Linkeviciene L, Andrijauskas P, Puisys A. 2018. Influence of titanium base, lithium disilicate restoration and vertical soft tissue thickness on bone stability around triangular-shaped implants: a prospective clinical trial. Clin Oral Impl Res. 29(7):716–724.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu D, Chua C-K, Leong K-F. 2013. A mathematical model for fluid shear-sensitive 3D tissue construct development. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 12(1):19–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malvé M, Bergstrom DJ, Chen XB. 2018. Modeling the flow and mass transport in a mechanically stimulated parametric porous scaffold under fluid-structure interaction approach. Int Commun Heat Mass. 96:53–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattei G, Vozzi G. 2016. CFD modelling of a mixing chamber for the realisation of functionally graded scaffolds. Comput Chem Eng. 84:43–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCoy RJ, Widaa A, Watters KM, Wuerstle M, Stallings RL, Duffy GP, O'Brien FJ. 2013. Orchestrating osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells-identification of placental growth factor as a mechanosensitive gene with a pro-osteogenic role. Stem Cells. 31(11):2420–2431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mofrad AZ, Mashayekhan S, Bastani D. 2017. Simulation of the effects of oxygen carriers and scaffold geometry on oxygen distribution and cell growth in a channeled scaffold for engineering myocardium. Math Biosci. 294:160–171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mollazadeh S, Bazzaz BF, Kerachian M. 2015. Role of apoptosis in pathogenesis and treatment of bone-related diseases. J Orthop Surg Res. 10:15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neel EAA, Chrzanowski W, Salih VM, Kim H-W, Knowles JC. 2014. Tissue engineering in dentistry. J Dent. 42(8):915–928.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okabe A, Boots B, Sugihara K, Chiu SN. 2000. Spatial tessellations: concepts and applications of voronoi diagrams. Lane B, editor. Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd
   Google Scholar
• Patrachari AR, Podichetty JT, Madihally SV. 2012. Application of computational fluid dynamics in tissue engineering. J Biosci Bioeng. 114(2):123–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paz C, Suárez E, Parga O, Vence J. 2017. Glottis effects on the cough clearance process simulated with a CFD dynamic mesh and Eulerian wall film model. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 20(12):1326–1338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pina S, Ribeiro VP, Paiva OC, Correlo VM, Oliveira JM, Reis RL. 2019. 9 - Tissue engineering scaffolds: future perspectives. In: Mozafari M, Sefat F, Atala A, editors. Handbook of tissue engineering scaffolds: Vol. 1. Woodhead publishing series in biomaterials. Cambridge, England: Woodhead Publishing; p. 165–185.
   Google Scholar
• Provin C, Takano K, Sakai Y, Fujii T, Shirakashi R. 2008. A method for the design of 3D scaffolds for high-density cell attachment and determination of optimum perfusion culture conditions. J Biomech. 41(7):1436–1449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reina-Romo E, Papantoniou I, Bloemen V, Geris L. 2019. 4 - Computational design of tissue engineering scaffolds. In: Mozafari M, Sefat F, Atala A, editors. Handbook of tissue engineering scaffolds. Vol. 1. Woodhead publishing series in biomaterials. Cambridge, England: Woodhead Publishing; p. 73–92.
   Google Scholar
• Santis RD, Guarino V, Ambrosio L. 2019. 10 - Composite biomaterials for bone repair. In: Pawelec KM, Planell JA, editors. Bone repair biomaterials. 2nd ed. Woodhead publishing series in biomaterials. Cambridge, England: Woodhead Publishing; p. 273–299.
   Google Scholar
• Sims NA, Vrahnas C. 2014. Regulation of cortical and trabecular bone mass by communication between osteoblasts, osteocytes and osteoclasts. Arch Biochem Biophys. 561:22–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajsoleiman T, Abdekhodaie MJ, Gernaey KV, Krühne U. 2016. Geometry optimization of a fibrous scaffold based on mathematical modelling and CFD simulation of a dynamic cell culture. In: Kravanja Z, Bogataj M, editors. 26th European symposium on computer aided process engineering. Vol. 38. Computer aided chemical engineering. Portoroz, Slovenia: Elsevier. p. 1413–1418.
   Google Scholar
• Tariverdian T, Sefat F, Gelinsky M, Mozafari M. 2019. 10 - Scaffold for bone tissue engineering. In: Mozafari M, Sefat F, Atala A, editors. Handbook of tissue engineering scaffolds. Vol. 1. Woodhead publishing series in biomaterials. Cambridge, England: Woodhead Publishing; p. 189–209.
   Google Scholar
• Xing X, Chen Y, Yan X-T, Zhang G. 2016. Design of the artificial bone scaffolds based on the multi-field coupling model. Procedia CIRP. 56:95–99.
   Google Scholar
• Zárate-Kalfópulos B, Reyes-Sánchez A. 2006. Injertos óseos en cirugía ortopédica. Cir Cir. 74:217–222.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang F, Yang H, Xin X, Yang S-T. 2019. Engineering stem cell environments in bioreactors. In: Reis RL, editor. Encyclopedia of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Oxford: Academic Press; p. 551–560.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Z, Yuan L, Lee PD, Jones E, Jones JR. 2014. Modeling of time dependent localized flow shear stress and its impact on cellular growth within additive manufactured titanium implants. J Biomed Mater Res. 102(8):1689–1699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao F, Vaughan TJ, Garrigle MJM, McNamara LM. 2017. A coupled diffusion-fluid pressure model to predict cell density distribution for cells encapsulated in a porous hydrogel scaffold under mechanical loading. Comput Biol Med. 89:181–189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao F, Vaughan TJ, McNamara LM. 2016. Quantification of fluid shear stress in bone tissue engineering scaffolds with spherical and cubical pore architectures. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 15(3):561–577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar