Towards optimal toe-clearance in synthesizing polycentric prosthetic knee mechanism

References

• Amador BT, Torrealba RR, Müller-Karger CM. 2011. Conceptual design of a polycentric knee prosthesis for transfemoral amputees in Venezuela. Proceedings of IEEE 2011 Pan American Health Care Exchanges Conference; Mar 28–Apr 1; Rio de Janeiro, p. 260–265.
   Google Scholar
• Anand TS, Sujatha S. 2016. A method for performance comparison of polycentric knees and its application to the design of a knee for developing countries. Prosthet Orthotic Int. 41(4):402–411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrysek J. 2009. Development of prosthetic knee joint technologies for children and youth with above-knee amputations [thesis]. The Netherlands: Utrecht University.
   Google Scholar
• Bonnet X, Pillet H, Fodé P, Lavaste F, Skalli W. 2009. Gait analysis of a transfemoral amputee with a hydraulic polycentric knee prosthesis. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 12(sup1):59–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceri CN. 2013. Design analysis of the four-bar Jaipur-Stanford prosthetic knee for developing countries [Bachelor thesis]. Cambridge (MA): Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Chauhan SS, Bhaduri SC. 2011. Evaluation of the Polycentric above Knee Prosthesis, Proceedings of 15th National Conference on Machines and Mechanisms NaCoMM2011; Nov 30–Dec 2; Chennai. Indian Institute of Technology Madras.
   Google Scholar
• Creylman V, Knippels I, Janssen P, Biesbrouck E, Lechler K, Peeraer L. 2016. Assessment of transfemoral amputees using a passive microprocessor-controlled knee versus an active powered microprocessor-controlled knee for level walking. Biomed Eng. 15(Suppl. 3):142–163. [
   Google Scholar
• de Vries J. 1995. Conventional 4-bar linkage knee mechanisms: a strength-weakness analysis. J Rehabil Res Dev. 32(1):36–42.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• El-Sayed AM, Hamzaid NA, Abu Osman NA. 2014. Nur Azah Hamzaid and Noor Azuan Abu Osman. 2014. Technology efficacy in active prosthetic knees for transfemoral amputees: a quantitative evaluation. Sci World J. 2014:297431. 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Farhat N, Mata V, Rosa D, Fayos J. 2010. A procedure for estimating the relevant forces in the human knee using a four-bar mechanism. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 13(5):577–587.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu H, Zhang X, Wang X, Yang R, Li Wang JL, Zhang Li NG, Liu T, Fan B, Inoue Y. 2016. A novel prosthetic knee joint with a parallel spring and damping mechanism. Int J Adv Rob Syst. 13(4):1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gard SA, Childress DS, Uellendahl JE. 1996. The influence of four-bar linkage knees on the prosthetics swing-phase floor clearance. Prosthet and Orthot Int. 8(2):34–40.
   Google Scholar
• Greene MP. 1983. Four bar linkage knee analysis. Prosthet Orthot Int. 34:15–24.
   Google Scholar
• Hobson DA, Torfason LE. 1974. Optimization of four-bar knee mechanisms—a computerized approach. J Biomech. 7(4):371–376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köhler TM, Bellmann M, Blumentritt S. 2020. Polycentric exoprosthetic knee joints – extent of shortening during swing phase. Can Prosthet Orthot J. 3(1):1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Krishnaraju A, Zubar A. 2021. Design and SAM analysis of reconfigurable four-legged mechanism using single degree of freedom. IJHVS. 28 (2):242–261.
   Google Scholar
• Mangera T, Govender G, Conning M. 2015. Light metals for the functional requirements of developing world lower extremity paediatric prosthetics: a review of current material and technology trends. Mater Sci Forum. 828–829:499–505.
   Google Scholar
• Moosabhoy MA, Gard SA. 2006. Methodology for determining the sensitivity of swing leg toe clearance and leg length to swing leg joint angles during gait. Gait Posture. 24(4):493–501. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2005.12.004. 16439130
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MOSPI. 2011. Disabled Persons in 2011. India: Statistics. India: Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation [accessed 2021 July 18]. http://mospi.nic.in › sites › files › publication_reports.
   Google Scholar
• Munoz-Cesar JJ, HectorHernandez-Gomez L, Lopez-Suarez OI, Urriolagoitia-Sosa G, Alfonsa J, Fernandez B, Colderon GU, Pava-Chipol ND, Quintero-Gomez IJ. 2013. Optimization of the design of four-bar mechanism for a lower-limb prosthesis using the taboo search algorithm. Adv Bio-Mech Syst Mater Adv Struct Mater. 40:107–125.
   Google Scholar
• Petuya V, Macho E, Altuzarra O, Pinto C, Hernández C. 2014. Educational software tools for the kinematic analysis of mechanisms. Comput Appl Eng Educ. 22(1):72–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeifer S, Riener R, Vallery H. 2012. An actuated transfemoral prosthesis with optimized polycentric knee joint. In: The Fourth IEEE RAS/EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Bio-mechatronics, Roma, Italy; June 24–27; IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.
   Google Scholar
• Poliakov O, Chepenyuk O, Pashkov Y, Kalinin M, Kramar V. 2012. Multicriteria synthesis of a polycentric knee prosthesis for transfemoral amputees. World Acad Sci Eng Technol Open Sci Index. 6(5):1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Radcliffe CW. 1977. The Knud Jansen lecture: above-knee prosthetics. Prosthet Orthot Int. 1(3):146–160.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Radcliffe CW. 1994. Four-bar linkage prosthetic knee mechanisms: Kinematics, alignment and prescription criteria. Prosthet Orthot Int. 18(3):159–173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radcliffe CW. 2003. Biomechanics of Knee Stability Control with Four-Bar Prosthetic Knees. ISPO Australia Annual Meeting Melbourne. November.
   Google Scholar
• Roy L, Sen Chetia RP, Borah MJ. 2008. Analysis and synthesis of four bar mechanism. Int J Theor Appl Mech. 3(2):171–186.
   Google Scholar
• SAM. 2012. Mechanism design software 2012. [accessed 20 April 2020]. https://www.artas.nl/en/downloads.
   Google Scholar
• Sancisi N, Caminati R, Parenti-Castelli V. 2009. Optimal four bar linkage for the stability and the motion of the human knee prostheses. In: Attidel XIX CONGRESSO dell’Associazione Italiana di Meccanica Teorica e Applicata, Ancona, 14–17, September 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Sensinger JW, Intawachirarat N, Gard SA. 2013. Contribution of prosthetic knee and ankle mechanisms to swing-phase foot clearance. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 21(1):74–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seymour R. 2002. Prosthetics and orthotics: lower limb and spinal. Philadelphia, CA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Shandilya VK, Devmurari P, Shandilya AV, Parmar LD. 2021. Functional outcomes in trans femoral amputees using indigenously developed safe gait prosthetic knee joint. Int J Curr Res Rev. 13(7):167–171.
   Google Scholar
• Silver-Thorn M B, Glaister CL. 2009. Functional Stability of transfemoral amputee gait using the 3R80 and total knee 2000. Prosthetic knee units. J Prosthetic Orthotic. 21(1):18–31.
   Google Scholar
• Soriano JF, Rodríguez JE, Valencia LA. 2020. Performance comparison and design of an optimal polycentric knee mechanism. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng. 42(5):221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staros A, Murphy EF. 1964. Properties of fluid flow applied to above-knee prostheses. Bull Prosthetic Res. 10(1):40–65.
   Google Scholar
• Thair Al-Maliky F, Chiad JS. 2021. A review study for measurement, analysis and evaluation four bar polycentric knee. IOP Conf Ser: Mater Sci Eng. 1094 (1):012113.
   Google Scholar
• Winter DA. 1992. Foot trajectory in human gait: a precise and multifactorial motor control task. Phys Ther. 72(1):45–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yokogushi K, Narita H, Uchiyama E, Chiba S, Nosaka T, Yamakoshi K-i. 2004. Biomechanical and clinical evaluation of a newly designed polycentric knee of transfemoral prosthesis. J Rehabil Res Dev. 41(5):675–682.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhauyt A, Alipov K, Sakenova A, Zhankeldi A, Abdirov R, Abilkaiyr Z. 2016. The synthesis of four-bar mechanism. Vibroengineering Procedia. 10:486–491.
   Google Scholar