Extraction of patient-specific boundary conditions from 4D-DSA and their influence on CFD simulations of cerebral aneurysms

References

• Bonnefous O, Pereira VM, Ouared R, Brina O, Aerts H, Hermans R, van Nijnatten F, Stawiaski J, Ruijters D. 2012. Quantification of arterial flow using digital subtraction angiography. Med Phys. 39(10):6264–6275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cebral JR, Raschi M. 2013. Suggested connections between risk factors of intracranial aneurysms: a review. Ann Biomed Eng. 41(7):1366–1383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis B, Royalty K, Kowarschik M, Rohkohl C, Oberstar E, Aagaard-Kienitz B, Niemann D, Ozkan O, Strother C, Mistretta C. 2013. 4D digital subtraction angiography: implementation and demonstration of feasibility. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 34(10):1914–1921.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Detmer FJ, Chung BJ, Mut F, Slawski M, Hamzei-Sichani F, Putman C, Jiménez C, Cebral JR. 2018. Development and internal validation of an aneurysm rupture probability model based on patient characteristics and aneurysm location, morphology, and hemodynamics. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 13(11):1767–1779.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford MD, Alperin N, Lee SH, Holdsworth DW, Steinman DA. 2005. Characterization of volumetric flow rate waveforms in the normal internal carotid and vertebral arteries. Physiol Meas. 26(4):477–488.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujimura S, Takao H, Suzuki T, Dahmani C, Ishibashi T, Mamori H, Yamamoto M, Murayama Y. 2018. A new combined parameter predicts re-treatment for coil-embolized aneurysms: a computational fluid dynamics multivariable analysis study. J Neurointerv Surg. 10(8):791–796.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isoda H, Takehara Y, Kosugi T, Terada M, Naito T, Onishi Y, Tanoi C, Amaya K, Sakahara H. 2015. MR-based computational fluid dynamics with patient-specific boundary conditions for the initiation of a sidewall aneurysm of a basilar artery. Magn Reson Med Sci. 14(2):139–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen IGH, Schneiders JJ, Potters WV, Van Ooij P, Van Den Berg R, Van Bavel E, Marquering HA, Majoie CB. 2014. Generalized versus patient-specific inflow boundary conditions in computational fluid dynamics simulations of cerebral aneurysmal hemodynamics. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 35(8):1543–1548.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karmonik C, Klucznik R, Benndorf G. 2008. Blood flow in cerebral aneurysms: comparison of phase contrast magnetic resonance and computational fluid dynamics-preliminary experience. Rofo. 180(3):209–215.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kaszczewski P, Elwertowski M, Leszczynski J, Ostrowski T, Galazka Z. 2020. Volumetric carotid flow characteristics in Doppler ultrasonography in healthy population over 65 years old. JCM. 9(5):1375.
   Google Scholar
• Kato N, Yuki I, Hataoka S, Dahmani C, Katharina O, Abe Y, Kakizaki S, Nagayama G, Maruyama F, Ikemura A, et al. 2020. 4D digital subtraction angiography for the temporal flow visualization of intracranial aneurysms and vascular malformations. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 29(12):105327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulcsár Z, Ugron A, Marosfoi M, Berentei Z, Paál G, Szikora I. 2011. Hemodynamics of cerebral aneurysm initiation: the role of wall shear stress and spatial wall shear stress gradient. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 32(3):587–594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendes Pereira V, Ouared R, Brina O, Bonnefous O, Satwiaski J, Aerts H, Ruijters D, van Nijnatten F, Perren F, Bijlenga P, et al. 2014. Quantification of internal carotid artery flow with digital subtraction angiography: validation of an optical flow approach with Doppler ultrasound. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 35(1):156–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng H, Tutino VM, Xiang J, Siddiqui A. 2014. High WSS or low WSS? Complex interactions of hemodynamics with intracranial aneurysm initiation, growth, and rupture: toward a unifying hypothesis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 35(7):1254–1262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajabzadeh-Oghaz H, van Ooij P, Veeturi SS, Tutino VM, Zwanenburg JJ, Meng H. 2020. Inter-patient variations in flow boundary conditions at middle cerebral artery from 7T PC-MRI and influence on computational fluid dynamics of intracranial aneurysms. Comput Biol Med. 120:103759.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaughnessy G, Schafer S, Speidel MA, Strother CM, Mistretta CA. 2018. Measuring blood velocity using 4D-DSA: a feasibility study. Med Phys. 45(10):4510–4518.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shojima M, Oshima M, Takagi K, Torii R, Hayakawa M, Katada K, Morita A, Kirino T. 2004. Magnitude and role of wall shear stress on cerebral aneurysm: computational fluid dynamic study of 20 middle cerebral artery aneurysms. Stroke. 35(11):2500–2505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki T, Takao H, Rapaka S, Fujimura S, Ioan Nita C, Uchiyama Y, Ohno H, Otani K, Dahmani C, Mihalef V, et al. 2020. Rupture risk of small unruptured intracranial aneurysms in Japanese adults. Stroke. 51(2):641–643.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takao H, Murayama Y, Otsuka S, Qian Y, Mohamed A, Masuda S, Yamamoto M, Abe T. 2012. Hemodynamic differences between unruptured and ruptured intracranial aneurysms during observation. Stroke. 43(5):1436–1439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UCAS Japan Investigators. 2012. The natural course of unruptured cerebral aneurysms in a Japanese cohort. N Eng J Med. 366(26):2474–2482.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu Y, Shaughnessy G, Hoffman CA, Oberstar EL, Schafer S, Schubert T, Ruedinger KL, Davis BJ, Mistretta CA, Strother CM, et al. 2018. Quantification of blood velocity with 4D digital subtraction angiography using the shifted least-squares method. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 39(10):1871–1877.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiang J, Natarajan SK, Tremmel M, Ma D, Mocco J, Hopkins LN, Siddiqui AH, Levy EI, Meng H. 2011. Hemodynamic-morphologic discriminants for intracranial aneurysm rupture. Srtoke. 42(1):144–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar