Design and finite element analysis of femoral stem prosthesis using functional graded materials

References

• Ahirwar H, Gupta VK, Nanda HS. 2021. Finite element analysis of fixed bone plates over fractured femur model. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 24(15):1742.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahirwar H, Zhou Y, Mahapatra C, Ramakrishna S, Kumar P, Nanda HS. 2020. Materials for orthopedic bioimplants: Modulating degradation and surface modification using integrated nanomaterials. Coatings. 10(3):264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alonso-Rasgado T, Jimenez-Cruz D, Bailey CG, Mandal P, Board T. 2012. Changes in the stress in the femoral head neck junction after osteochondroplasty for hip impingement: A finite element study. J Orthop Res. 30(12):1999–2006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson AE, Ellis BJ, Weiss JA. 2007. Verification, validation and sensitivity studies in computational biomechanics. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 10(3):171–184.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arifin A, Sulong AB, Muhamad N, Syarif J, Ramli MI. 2014. Material processing of hydroxyapatite and titanium alloy (HA/Ti) composite as implant materials using powder metallurgy: A review. Mater Des. 55:165–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen J, Rungsiyakull C, Li W, Chen Y, Swain M, Li Q. 2013. Multiscale design of surface morphological gradient for osseointegration. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 20:387–397.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng J, Lin F. 2005. Approach of heterogeneous bio-modeling based on material features. CAD Comput. Aided Des. 37(11):1115–1126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christen P. 2014. Bone remodelling in humans is load-driven but not lazy. Nat. Commun. 5(1):1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Dhanopia A, Bhargava M. 2017. Finite element analysis of human fractured femur bone implantation with PMMA thermoplastic prosthetic plate. Procedia Eng. 173:1658–1665.
   Google Scholar
• Falcinelli C, Di Martino A, Gizzi A, Vairo G, Denaro V. 2020. Fracture risk assessment in metastatic femurs: a patient-specific CT-based finite-element approach. Meccanica. 55(4):861–881.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falcinelli C, Whyne C. 2020. Image-based finite-element modeling of the human femur. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 23(14):1138–1161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feyen H, Shimmin AJ. 2014. Is the length of the femoral component important in primary total hip replacement? Bone Joint J. 96(4):442–448.
   Google Scholar
• Geetha M, Singh AK, Asokamani R, Gogia AK. 2009. Ti based biomaterials, the ultimate choice for orthopaedic implants - A review. Prog Mater Sci. 54(3):397–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geng Y, McCarthy É, Brabazon D, Harrison N. 2020. Ti6Al4V functionally graded material via high power and high speed laser surface modification. Surf Coat Technol. 398:126085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert RP, Liu Y, Groby JP, Ogam E, Wirgin A, Xu Y. 2009. Computing porosity of cancellous bone using ultrasonic waves, II: The muscle, cortical, cancellous bone system. Math. Comput. Model. 50(3–4):421–429.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta V, Kasana KS, Tandon P. 2010. Computer Aided Design Modeling for Heterogeneous Objects. Int J Comput Sci Issues. 7(2):31–38.
   Google Scholar
• Kichi MK, Torkaman R, Mohammadi H, Toutounchi A, Kharaziha M, Alihosseini F. 2020. Electrochemical and in vitro bioactivity behavior of poly (ε-caprolactone)(PCL)-gelatin-forsterite nano coating on titanium for biomedical application. Mater Today Commun. 24:101326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kou XY, Tan ST. 2007. Heterogeneous object modeling: A review. CAD Comput. Aided Des. 39(4):284–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim JJ. 1975. Thermogravimetric analysis of human femur bone. J Biol Phys. 3(3):111–129.
   Google Scholar
• Mahamood RM, Akinlabi ET. 2017. Types of functionally graded materials and their areas of application. In: Functionally graded materials. Cham: Springer; p. 9–21.
   Google Scholar
• Mahmoud D, Elbestawi MA. 2017. Lattice structures and functionally graded materials applications in additive manufacturing of orthopedic implants: a review. JMMP. 1(2):13.
   Google Scholar
• Merxhani A. 2016. An introduction to linear poroelasticity:1–38.
   Google Scholar
• Oshkour AA, Osman NAA, Bayat M, Afshar R, Berto F. 2014. Three-dimensional finite element analyses of functionally graded femoral prostheses with different geometrical configurations. Mater Des. 56:998–1008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oshkour AA, Osman NAA, Yau YH, Tarlochan F, Abas WABW. 2013. Design of new generation femoral prostheses using functionally graded materials: A finite element analysis. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 227(1):3–17.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ozbolat IT, Koc B. 2011. Multi-directional blending for heterogeneous objects. CAD Comput. Aided Des. 43(8):863–875.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pahr DH, Zysset PK. 2016. Finite element-based mechanical assessment of bone quality on the basis of in vivo images. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 14(6):374–385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parihar RS, Setti SG, Sahu RK. 2018. Recent advances in the manufacturing processes of functionally graded materials: a review. Sci Engin Compos Mater. 25(2):309–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petit C, Montanaro L, Palmero P. 2018. Functionally graded ceramics for biomedical application: Concept, manufacturing, and properties. Int J Appl Ceram Technol. 15(4):820–840.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridzwan MIZ, Shuib S, Hassan AY, Shokri AA, Mohamad Ib MN. 2007. Problem of stress shielding and improvement to the hip implant designs: A review. J Med Sci. 7(3):460–467.
   Google Scholar
• Saleh B, Jiang J, Fathi R, Al-Hababi T, Xu Q, Wang L, Song D, Ma A. 2020. 30 Years of functionally graded materials: An overview of manufacturing methods, Applications and Future Challenges. Composites Part B: Engin. 201:108376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi H, Zhou P, Li J, Liu C, Wang L. 2021. Functional gradient metallic biomaterials: Techniques, current scenery, and future prospects in the biomedical field. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 8:1510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simões JA, Marques AT. 2005. Design of a composite hip femoral prosthesis. Mater Des. 26(5):391–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sola A, Bellucci D, Cannillo V. 2016. Functionally graded materials for orthopedic applications - an update on design and manufacturing. Biotechnol Adv. 34(5):504–531.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokes IA, Chegini S, Ferguson SJ, Gardner-Morse MG, Iatridis JC, Laible JP. 2010. Limitation of finite element analysis of poroelastic behavior of biological tissues undergoing rapid loading. Ann Biomed Eng. 38(5):1780–1788.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar