The pulsatile 3D-Hemodynamics in a doubly afflicted human descending abdominal artery with iliac branching

References

• Aggarwal S, Qamar A, Sharma V, Sharma A. 2011. Abdominal aortic aneurysm: A comprehensive review. Exp Clin Cardiol. 16(1):11–15.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ahmed SA, Giddens DP. 1983. Flow disturbance measurements through a constricted tube at moderate Reynolds numbers. J Biomech. 16(12):955–963.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alishahi M, Alishahi MM, Emdad H. 2011. Sharif University of Technology Numerical simulation of blood flow in a flexible stenosed abdominal real aorta. Sci Iran 18(6):1297–1305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aulivola B. 2008. Abdominal aortic aneurysm. Common Surg Dis. 24:97–100.
   Google Scholar
• Baskurt OK, Meiselman HJ. 2003. Blood rheology and hemodynamics. Semin Thromb Hemost. 29(5):435–450.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benim AC, Nahavandi A, Assmann A, Schubert D, Feindt P, Suh SH. 2011. Simulation of blood flow in human aorta with emphasis on outlet boundary conditions. Appl Math Model. 35(7):3175–3188.
   Google Scholar
• Bodnár T, Sequeira A, Prosi M. 2011. On the shear-thinning and viscoelastic effects of blood flow under various flow rates. Appl Math Comput. 217(11):5055–5067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boutsianis E, Guala M, Olgac U, Wildermuth S, Hoyer K, Ventikos Y, Poulikakos D. 2009. CFD and PTV steady flow investigation in an anatomically accurate abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Biomech Eng131(1):1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bukač M, Čanić S, Tambača J, Wang Y. 2019. Fluid–structure interaction between pulsatile blood flow and a curved stented coronary artery on a beating heart: A four stent computational study. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 350:679–700.
   Google Scholar
• Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cardiovascular-diseases-(cvds.) [accessed 2021 Dec 22].
   Google Scholar
• Contijoch FJ, Horowitz M, Masutani E, Kligerman S, Hsiao A. 2020. 4D Flow Vorticity Visualization Predicts Regions of Quantitative Flow Inconsistency for Optimal Blood Flow Measurement. Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging2(1):e190054.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Doost SN, Zhong L, Su B, Morsi YS. 2016. The numerical analysis of non-Newtonian blood flow in human patient-specific left ventricle. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 127:232–247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwidmuthe PD, Dastane GG, Mathpati CS, Joshi JB. 2021. Study of blood flow in stenosed artery model using computational fluid dynamics and response surface methodology. Can J Chem Eng. 99(S1):820–837.
   Google Scholar
• Frauenfelder T, Lotfey M, Boehm T, Wildermuth S. 2006. Computational fluid dynamics: Hemodynamic changes in abdominal aortic aneurysm after stent-graft implantation. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 29(4):613–623.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fry DL. Acute vascular endothelial changes associated with increased blood velocity gradients. http://ahajournals.org. [accessed 2021 Jun 24].
   Google Scholar
• Gay M, Zhang L. 2009. Numerical studies of blood flow in healthy, stenosed, and stented carotid arteries. Int J Numer Meth Fluids 61(4):453–472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harita K, Anburajan M. 2013. Patient specific CAD model of useful carotid artery (CA) for CFD analysis of CA with plaque condition. Int Conf Commun Signal Process. 377–381.
   Google Scholar
• Huang RF, Yang TF, Lan YK. 2010. Pulsatile flows and wall-shear stresses in models simulating normal and stenosed aortic arches. Exp Fluids 48(3):497–508.
   Google Scholar
• Isselbacher EM. 2005. Thoracic and abdominal aortic aneurysms. Circulation 111(6):816–828.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Javadzadegan A, Fakhim B, Behnia M, Behnia M. 2014. Fluid-structure interaction investigation of spiral flow in a model of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Eur J Mech B/Fluids 46:109–117.
   Google Scholar
• Jozwik K, Obidowski D. 2010. Numerical simulations of the blood flow through vertebral arteries. J Biomech. 43(2):177–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karimi S, Dabagh M, Vasava P, Dadvar M, Dabir B, Jalali P. 2014a. Effect of rheological models on the hemodynamics within human aorta : CFD study on CT image-based geometry. J Nonnewton Fluid Mech. 207:42–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karimi S, Dabagh M, Vasava P, Dadvar M, Dabir B, Jalali P. 2014b. Effect of rheological models on the hemodynamics within human aorta: CFD study on CT image-based geometry. J Non-Newton Fluid Mech. 207:42–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelsey LJ, Miller K, Norman PE, Powell JT, Doyle BJ. 2016. The influence of downstream branching arteries on upstream haemodynamics. J Biomech. 49(13):3090–3096.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ku DN, Woodruff GW. 1997. Blood flow in arteries. Annu Rev Fluid Mech. 29(1):399–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• kumar S, Deoghare AB. 2018. Modelling of human abdominal artery for blood flow analysis. Mater Today Proc. 5(5):12877–12885.
   Google Scholar
• Mahé G, Kaladji A, Faucheur A, Le Jaquinandi V, Rosa, S, De. 2015. Internal iliac artery stenosis: diagnosis and how to manage it in 2015. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2:33–39.[26664904
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nowak M, Melka B, Rojczyk M, Gracka M, Nowak AJ, Golda A, Adamczyk WP, Isaac B, Białecki RA, Ostrowski Z. 2019. The protocol for using elastic wall model in modeling blood flow within human artery. Eur J Mech B/Fluids 77:273–280.
   Google Scholar
• Pinho N, Castro CF, António CC, Bettencourt N, Sousa LC, Pinto SIS. 2019. Correlation between geometric parameters of the left coronary artery and hemodynamic descriptors of atherosclerosis: FSI and statistical study. Med Biol Eng Comput. 57(3):715–729.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinho N, Sousa LC, Castro CF, António CC, Carvalho M, Ferreira W, Ladeiras-Lopes R, Ferreira ND, Braga P, Bettencourt N, et al. 2019. The impact of the right coronary artery geometric parameters on hemodynamic performance. Cardiovasc Eng Technol. 10(2):257–270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinto SIS, Romano E, António CC, Sousa LC, Castro CF. 2020. The impact of non-linear viscoelastic property of blood in right coronary arteries hemodynamics — A numerical implementation. Int J Non Linear Mech. 123:103477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piskin S, Serdar Celebi M. 2013. Analysis of the effects of different pulsatile inlet profiles on the hemodynamical properties of blood flow in patient specific carotid artery with stenosis. Comput Biol Med. 43(6):717–728.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Raptis A, Tasso P, Batzalexis K, Gallo D, Xenos M, Morbiducci U, Giannoukas A. 2021. Remodeling effects of carotid artery stenting versus endarterectomy with patch angioplasty in terms of morphology and hemodynamics. Comput Biol Med. 140:105072.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Romano E, Sousa LC, António CC, Castro CF, Pinto SIS. 2020a. Non-linear or quasi-linear viscoelastic property of blood for hemodynamic simulations. Adv Struct Mater. 132:127–139.
   Google Scholar
• Romano E, Sousa LC, António CC, Castro CF, Pinto SIS. 2020b. WSS descriptors in a patient RCA taking into account the non-linear viscoelasticity of blood. Adv Struct Mater. 132:141–152.
   Google Scholar
• Siouffi M, Pelissier R, Farahifar D, Rieu R. 1984. The effect of unsteadiness on the flow through stenoses and bifurcations. J Biomech. 17(5):299–315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumner DS. 1988. Buttock claudication from isolated bilateral internal iliac arterial stenoses. J Vasc Surg. 7:446–448.
   Google Scholar
• Tabe R, Ghalichi F, Hossainpour S, Ghasemzadeh K. 2011. Numerical simulation of transitional blood flow in large arteries. Iran Conf Biomed Eng. 2011(December):68–71.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor CA, Hughes TJR, Zarins CK. 1998. Finite element modeling of blood flow in arteries. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 158(1–2):155–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian FB, Zhu L, Fok PW, Lu XY. 2013. Simulation of a pulsatile non-Newtonian flow past a stenosed 2D artery with atherosclerosis. Comput Biol Med. 43(9):1098–1113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tripathi J, Vasu B, Bég OA, Gorla RSR, Kameswaran PK. 2021. Computational simulation of rheological blood flow containing hybrid nanoparticles in an inclined catheterized artery with stenotic, aneurysmal and slip effects. Comput Biol Med. 139(July):105009.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tsubota K, Wada S, Kamada H, Kitagawa Y. 2006. A particle method for blood flow simulation, – application to flowing red blood cells and platelets. J Earth Simulator 5(March):2–7.
   Google Scholar
• Vasava P. 2011. Application of computational fluid dynamics in modelling blood flow in human thoracic aorta. Lappeenranta University of Technology, Lappeenranta, Finland. ISBN 978-952-265-196-9. UDC: 004.94:611.1:519.62/.64
   Google Scholar
• Vasava P, Jalali P, Dabagh M, Kolari PJ. 2012. Finite element modelling of pulsatile blood flow in idealized model of human aortic arch: Study of hypotension and hypertension. Comput Math Methods Med. 2012:861837.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vignon-Clementel IE, Alberto Figueroa C, Jansen KE, Taylor CA. 2006. Outflow boundary conditions for three-dimensional finite element modeling of blood flow and pressure in arteries. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 195(29–32):3776–3796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volpi SL, Antonelli M, Lazzerini B, Marcelloni F, Stefanescu DC. 2009. Segmentation and reconstruction of the lung and the mediastinum volumes in CT images. Int Symp Appl Sci Biomed Commun Technol. 2009:255–259.
   Google Scholar
• Vorp D a. 2007. Biomechanics of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Biomech. 40(9):1887–1902.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong KKL, Dong J, Tu J. 2012. Numerical study of stenosed carotid bifurcation models based on wall shear stress distribution. In 2012 2nd International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Technology (Vol 34, pp. 40–44). Singapore: IACSIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Xie X, Wang Y, Zhou H. 2013. Impact of coronary tortuosity on the coronary blood flow: A 3D computational study. J Biomech. 46(11):1833–1841.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yilmaz F, Gundogdu MY. 2008. A critical review on blood flow in large arteries; Relevance to blood rheology, viscosity models, and physiologic conditions. Korea Aust Rheol J. 20(4):197–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar