A simulation-based study for optimizing proportional-integral-derivative controller gains for different control strategies of an active upper extremity model using experimental data

References

• Andersson S. 2013. Active muscle control in human body model simulations: implementation of a feedback control algorithm with standard keywords in LS-DYNA. Göteborg: Chalmers University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Beeman SM, Kemper AR, Madigan ML, Duma SM. 2011. Effects of bracing on human kinematics in low-speed frontal sled tests. Ann Biomed Eng. 39(12):2998–3010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budziszewski P, van Nunen E, Mordaka JK, Kędzior K. 2008. Active controlled muscles in numerical model of human arm for movement in two degrees of freedom. IRCOBI Conference Proceedings, International Conference on the Biomechanics of impact; Bern, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Cappon H, Mordaka J, Van Rooij L, Adamec J, Praxl N, Muggenthaler H. 2007. A computational human model with stabilizing spine: a step towards active safety. SAE Technical Paper 2007-01-1171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4271/2007-01-1171
   Google Scholar
• Chan H, Albert DL, Gayzik FS, Kemper AR. 2022. Occupant kinematics of braced 5th percentile female and 50th percentile male volunteers in low-speed frontal and frontal-oblique sled tests. IRCOBI.
   Google Scholar
• Choi HY, Sah SJ, Lee B, Cho HS, Kang SJ, Mun MS, Lee I, Lee J. 2005. Experimental and numerical studies of muscular activations of bracing occupant. 19th ESV Conference Paper. Washington D.C., USA.
   Google Scholar
• Devane K, Chan H, Albert D, Kemper AR, Gayzik FS. 2022. Implementation and calibration of active small female and average male human body models using low-speed frontal sled tests. Traffic Inj Prev. DOI: 10.1080/15389588.2022.2114078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devane K, Johnson D, Gayzik FS. 2019. Validation of a simplified human body model in relaxed and braced conditions in low-speed frontal sled tests. Traffic Inj Prev. 20(8):832–837.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gehre C, Stahlschmidt S. 2011. Assessment of dummy models by using objective rating methods. 22nd International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles; Washington D.C., USA.
   Google Scholar
• Han M, Choi HY. 2016. Elbow joint model with active muscle force. J Mech Sci Technol. 30(12):5847–5853. English.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwamoto M, Nakahira Y. 2015. Development and validation of the Total HUman Model for Safety (THUMS) version 5 containing multiple 1d muscles for estimating occupant motions with muscle activation during side impacts. SAE Technical Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Iwamoto M, Nakahira Y, Kimpara H, Sugiyama T, Min K. 2012. Development of a human body finite element model with multiple muscles and their controller for estimating occupant motions and impact responses in frontal crash situations. SAE Technical Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Kato D, Nakahira Y, Atsumi N, Iwamoto M. 2018. Development of Human‐Body Model THUMS Version 6 containing Muscle Controllers and Application to Injury Analysis in Frontal Collision after Brake Deceleration. IRCOBI conference; Athens, Greece.
   Google Scholar
• Kato D, Nakahira Y, Iwamoto M. 2017. A study of muscle control with two feedback controls for posture and reaction force for more accurate prediction of occupant kinematics in low-speed frontal impacts. 25th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV) National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Kirschbichler S, Huber P, Prüggler A, Steidl T, Sinz W, Mayer C, DAddetta GA. 2014. Factors influencing occupant kinematics during braking and lane change maneuvers in a passenger vehicle. IRCOBI; Berlin, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Matsuda T, Yamada K, Hayashi S, Kitagawa Y. 2018. Simulation of occupant posture changes due to evasive manoeuvres and injury predictions in vehicle frontal and side collisions. Athens, Greece: International Research Council on Biomechanics of Injury.
   Google Scholar
• Meijer R, Van Hassel E, Broos J, Elrofai H, Van Rooij L, Van Hooijdonk P. 2012. Development of a multi-body human model that predicts active and passive human behaviour. Proceedings of the International Conference on Biomechanics of Impact IRCOBI; Dublin-Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• Nie B, Sathyanarayan D, Ye X, Crandall JR, Panzer MB. 2018. Active muscle response contributes to increased injury risk of lower extremity in occupant–knee airbag interaction. Traffic Inj Prev. 19(Suppl 1):S76–S82.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ólafsdóttir JM, Östh J, Brolin K. 2019. Modelling reflex recruitment of neck muscles in a finite element human body model for simulating omnidirectional head kinematics. Florence, Italy: IRCOBI.
   Google Scholar
• Osth J, Brolin K, Brase D. 2015. A human body model with active muscles for simulation of pretensioned restraints in autonomous braking interventions. Traffic Inj Prev. 16:304–313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osth J, Brolin K, Carlsson S, Wismans J, Davidsson J. 2012a. The occupant response to autonomous braking: a modeling approach that accounts for active musculature. Traffic Inj Prev. 13(3):265–277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osth J, Brolin K, Happee R. 2012b. Active muscle response using feedback control of a finite element human arm model. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 15(4):347–361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osth J, Eliasson E, Happee R, Brolin K. 2014. A method to model anticipatory postural control in driver braking events. Gait Posture. 40(4):664–669.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putra IPA, Iraeus J, Thomson R, Svensson MY, Linder A, Sato F. 2019. Comparison of control strategies for the cervical muscles of an average female head-neck finite element model. Traffic Inj Prev. 20(Suppl 2):S116–S122.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schwartz D, Guleyupoglu B, Koya B, Stitzel JD, Gayzik FS. 2015. Development of a computationally efficient full human body finite element model. Traffic Inj Prev. 16(Suppl 1):S49–S56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegmund GP, Sanderson DJ, Myers BS, Inglis JT. 2003. Awareness affects the response of human subjects exposed to a single whiplash-like perturbation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 28(7):671–679.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stander N, Roux W, Basudhar A, Eggleston T, Goel T, Craig K. 2015. LS-OPT user’s manual – a design optimization and probabilistic analysis tool for the engineering analyst. Version 5.2. Livermore (CA): Livermore Software Technology Corporation.
   Google Scholar