Digital twin-driven dynamic monitoring system of the upper limb force

References

• Adams RJ, Lichter MD, Ellington A, White M, Armstead K, Patrie JT, Diamond PT. 2018. Virtual activities of daily living for recovery of upper extremity motor function. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 26(1):252–260. doi:10.1109/tnsre.2017.2771272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho AA, Filho E, Nascimento RS, Medeiros SFD, Lima NM, Cacho E, Cacho RO. 2019. Analysis of muscle activation during reaching movement in active, active-assisted and self-assisted conditions in post-stroke patients. Fisioter Pesqui. 26:31–36.
   Google Scholar
• Carol YS, Janet LR. 2006. Sensitivity of a Hill-based muscle model to perturbations in model parameters. J Biomech. 39:2055–2063. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.06.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlos Q, João F, Jorge A, Jacinto M. 2012. A multibody biomechanical model of the upper limb including the shoulder girdle. Multibody Syst Dyn. 28:83–108. doi:10.1007/s11044-011-9297-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbone V, Van der Krogt MM, Koopman HF, Verdonschot N. 2016. Sensitivity of subject-specific models to Hill muscle–tendon model parameters in simulations of gait. J Biomech. 49(9):1953–1960. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.04.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delp SL, Anderson FC, Arnold AS, Loan P, Habib A, John CT, Guendelman E, Thelen DG. 2007. OpenSim: open source to create and analyze dynamic simulations of movement. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 54(11):1940–1950. doi:10.1109/tbme.2007.901024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elayan H, Aloqaily M, Guizani M. 2021. Digital twin for intelligent context-aware IoT healthcare systems. IEEE Internet Things J. 8(23):16749–16757. doi:10.1109/JIOT.2021.3051158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fanning E, Daniels K, Cools A, Miles J, Falvey E. 2021. Biomechanical upper-extremity performance tests and isokinetic shoulder strength in collision and contact athletes. J Sports Sci. 39(16):1873–1881. doi:10.1080/02640414.2021.1904694.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussein A, Abdullah C, Tarry R, Datta GS, Mittal M. 2007. Dynamic biomechanical model for assessing and monitoring robot-assisted upper-limb therapy. J Rehabil Res Dev. 44(1):43–62. doi:10.1682/jrrd.2006.03.0025.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hussain I, Hossain MA, Park SJ. 2021. A healthcare digital twin for diagnosis of stroke. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Biomedical Engineering, Computer and Information Technology for Health; December 4-5; Bangladesh. Dhaka: institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Holzbaur KR, Murray WM, Delp SL. 2005. A model of the upper extremity for simulating musculoskeletal surgery and analyzing neuromuscular control. Ann Biomed Eng. 33(6):829–840. doi:10.1007/s10439-005-3320-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan MMR, Sunny MSH, Ahmed T, Shahria MT, Modi PP, Zarif MII, De Caro JDS, Ahamed SI, Ahmed HU, Ketchum EMM, et al. 2023. Development of a robot-assisted telerehabilitation system with integrated IIoT and digital twin. IEEE Access. 11:70174–70189. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3291803.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu Y, Liu C, Wang K, Huang H, Xu X. 2020. Digital twin-driven smart manufacturing: connotation, reference model, applications and research issues. Rob Comput Integr Manuf. 61:101837. doi:10.1016/j.rcim.2019.101837.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manal K, Gonzalez RV, Lloyd DG, Buchanan TS. 2002. A real-time EMG-driven virtual arm. Comput Biol Med. 32(1):25–36. doi:10.1016/s0010-4825(01)00024-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miao S, Shen C, Feng X, Zhu Q, Shorfuzzaman M, Lv Z. 2021. Upper limb rehabilitation system for stroke survivors based on multi-modal sensors and machine learning. IEEE Access. 9:30283–30291. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3055960.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pacifico I, Scano A, Guanziroli E, Moise M, Morelli L, Chiavenna A, Romo D, Spada S, Colombina G, Molteni F, et al. 2020. An experimental evaluation of the proto-mate: a novel ergonomic upper-limb exoskeleton to reduce workers’ physical strain. IEEE Robot Automat Mag. 27(1):54–65. doi:10.1109/MRA.2019.2954105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennestri E, Stefanelli R, Valentini P, Vita L. 2007. Virtual musculo-skeletal model for the biomechanical analysis of the upper limb. J Biomech. 40(6):1350–1361. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.05.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romero F, Alonso FJ. 2016. A comparison among different Hill-type contraction dynamics formulations for muscle force estimation. Mech Sci. 7(1):19–29. doi:10.5194/ms-7-19-2016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• San O. 2021. The digital twin revolution. Nat Comput Sci. 1(5):307–308. doi:10.1109/access.2022.3156062.
   Google Scholar
• Shu L, Yamamoto K, Yoshizaki R, Yao J, Sato T, Sugita N. 2022. Multiscale finite element musculoskeletal model for intact knee dynamics. Comput Biol Med. 141:105023. doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.105023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trinler U, Leboeuf F, Hollands K, Jones R, Baker R. 2018. Estimation of muscle activation during different walking speeds with two mathematical approaches compared to surface EMG. Gait Posture. 64:266–273. doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.06.115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vijayvargiya A, Singh P, Kumar R, Dey N. 2022. Hardware implementation for lower limb surface EMG measurement and analysis using explainable AI for activity recognition. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas. 71:1–9. doi:10.1109/TIM.2022.3198443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincent H, Nasser R, Julien JB, Philippe G. 2016. Human upper-limb force capacities evaluation with robotic models for ergonomic applications: effect of elbow flexion. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 19:440–449. doi:10.1080/10255842.2015.1034117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vluggen TPMM, van Haastregt JCM, Tan FE, Verbunt JA, van Heugten CM, Schols JMGA. 2021. Effectiveness of an integrated multidisciplinary geriatric rehabilitation programme for older persons with stroke: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMC Geriatr. 21(1):134. doi:10.1186/s12877-021-02082-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verstraeten LMG, van Wijngaarden JP, Pacifico J, Reijnierse EM, Meskers CGM, Maier AB. 2021. Association between malnutrition and stages of sarcopenia in geriatric rehabilitation inpatients: RESORT. Clin Nutr. 40(6):4090–4096. doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2021.02.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang W, He Y, Li F, Li J, Liu J, Wu X. 2023. Digital twin rehabilitation system based on self-balancing lower limb exoskeleton. Technol Health Care. 31(1):103–115. doi:10.3233/THC-220087.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilke J, Krause F. 2019. Myofascial chains of the upper limb: a systematic review of anatomical studies. Clin Anat. 32(7):934–940. doi:10.1002/ca.23424.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winby CR, Lloyd DG, Besier TF, Kirk TB. 2009. Muscle and external load contribution to knee joint contact loads during normal gait. J Biomech. 42(14):2294–2300. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.06.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang H, Qi H, Xu M, Tang Y, Yao J, Yan X, et al. 2014. Research on the Relationship between Classic Denavit-Hartenberg and Modified Denavit-Hartenberg. In Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Design; December 13-14; China. Hangzhou: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Wu Q, Dey N, Fong S, Ashour AS. 2020. Deep back propagation–long short-term memory network based upper-limb sEMG signal classification for automated rehabilitation. Biocybern Biomed Eng. 40(3):987–1001. doi:10.1016/j.bbe.2020.05.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Żuk M, Syczewska M, Pezowicz C. 2018. Use of the surface electromyography for a quantitative trend validation of estimated muscle forces. Biocybern Biomed Eng. 38(2):243–250. doi:10.1016/j.bbe.2018.02.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar