Symmetrical structure design of PLGA Biodegradable sinus stents and structure optimization based on surrogate models

References

• Adriaensen G, Lim KH, Fokkens WJ. 2017. Safety and efficacy of a bioabsorbable fluticasone propionate-eluting sinus dressing in postoperative management of endoscopic sinus surgery: a randomized clinical trial. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 7(8):813–820. doi: 10.1002/alr.21963.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu Z, Li X, Li Y, et al. 2017. Effects of different fluid shear stress patterns on the in vitro degradation of poly(lactide-co-glycolide) acid membranes. J Biomed Mater Res A. 105:23–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu Z, Zheng Q, Guo M, et al. 2016. The effect of fluid shear stress on the in vitro degradation of poly(lactide-co-glycolide) acid membranes. J Biomed Mater Res A. 104:2315–2324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drakoulas G, Kokkinos C, Fotiadis DI, et al. 2021. Coupled FEA model with continuum damage mechanics for the degradation of polymer-based coatings on drug-eluting stents. 43rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC) 2021:4319-4323. doi: 10.1109/EMBC46164.2021.9631074.
   Google Scholar
• Forrester AIJ, Keane AJ. 2009. Recent advances in surrogate-based optimization. Prog Aerosp Sci. 45(1-3):50–79. doi: 10.1016/j.paerosci.2008.11.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grogan JA, Leen SB, McHugh PE. 2013. Optimizing the design of a bioabsorbable metal stent using computer simulation methods. Biomaterials. 34(33):8049–8060. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.07.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo M, Chu Z, Yao J, Feng W, Wang Y, Wang L, Fan Y. 2016. The effects of tensile stress on degradation of biodegradable PLGA membranes: a quantitative study. Polym Degrad Stab. 124:95–100. doi: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2015.12.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han JK, Kern RC. 2019. Topical therapies for management of chronic rhinosinusitis: steroid implants. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 9(S1):S22–s26. doi: 10.1002/alr.22344.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hastan D, Fokkens WJ, Bachert C, Newson RB, Bislimovska J, Bockelbrink A, Bousquet PJ, Brozek G, Bruno A, Dahlén SE, et al. 2011. Chronic rhinosinusitis in Europe–an underestimated disease. A GA2LEN study. Allergy. 66(9):1216–1223. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2011.02646.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayman D, Bergerson C, Miller S, Moreno M, Moore JE. 2014. The effect of static and dynamic loading on degradation of PLLA stent fibers. J Biomech Eng. 136(8):136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juliani MA, Gomes WJS. 2021. An efficient Kriging-based framework for computationally demanding constrained structural optimization problems. Struct Multidisc Optim. 65, 4. doi: 10.1007/s00158-021-03095-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khosravi A, Bahreinizad H, Bani MS, Karimi A. 2017. A numerical study on the application of the functionally graded materials in the stent design. Materials Science & Engineering. C, Materials for Biological Applications. 73:182–188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koyama K, Yoneyama K, Mitarai T, et al. 2014. In-stent protrusion after implantation of a drug-eluting stent in a honeycomb-like coronary artery structure: complete resolution over 6 months and the role of optical coherence tomography imaging in the diagnosis and follow-up. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 7:e39-40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li P, Feng X, Jia X, Fan Y. 2010. Influences of tensile load on in vitro degradation of an electrospun poly(L-lactide-co-glycolide) scaffold. Acta Biomater. 6:2991–2996.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu YC, Hsu LI, Lin CF, et al. 2023. Biomechanical characteristics of self-expanding sinus stents during crimping and deployment_A comparison between different biomaterials. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 138:105669.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mizzi L, Attard D, Casha A, Grima JN, Gatt R. 2014. On the suitability of hexagonal honeycombs as stent geometries. Phys Status Solidi B. 251(2):328–337. doi: 10.1002/pssb.201384255.
   Google Scholar
• Murr AH, Smith TL, Hwang PH, Bhattacharyya N, Lanier BJ, Stambaugh JW, Mugglin AS. 2011. Safety and efficacy of a novel bioabsorbable, steroid-eluting sinus stent. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 1(1):23–32. doi: 10.1002/alr.20020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pant S, Limbert G, Curzen NP, Bressloff NW. 2011. Multiobjective design optimisation of coronary stents. Biomaterials. 32(31):7755–7773. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.07.059.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park H-J, Yeo H-K, Jung S-Y, et al. 2018. A robust multimodal optimization algorithm based on a sub-division surrogate model and an improved sampling method. IEEE Trans Magn. 54:1–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng X, Liu G, Li J, Wu H, Jia W, Jiang S. 2023. Compression property and energy absorption capacity of 4D-printed deformable honeycomb structure. Compos Struct. 325:117591. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrini L, Migliavacca F, Auricchio F, Dubini G. 2004. Numerical investigation of the intravascular coronary stent flexibility. J Biomech. 37(4):495–501. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2003.09.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakata S-I, Ashida F, Zako M. 2008. Approximate structural optimization using kriging method and digital modeling technique considering noise in sampling data. Computers & Structures. 86(13-14):1477–1485. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2007.05.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen X, Zhu H, Jiang J, Deng Y, Ji S. 2019. Multi-objective optimization design of balloon-expandable coronary stent. Cardiovasc Eng Technol. 10(1):10–21. doi: 10.1007/s13239-019-00401-w.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi JB, Fu QL, Zhang H, Cheng L, Wang YJ, Zhu DD, Lv W, Liu SX, Li PZ, Ou CQ, et al. 2015. Epidemiology of chronic rhinosinusitis: results from a cross-sectional survey in seven Chinese cities. Allergy. 70(5):533–539. doi: 10.1111/all.12577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith KA, Orlandi RR, Oakley G, Meeks H, Curtin K, Alt JA. 2019. Long-term revision rates for endoscopic sinus surgery. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 9(4):402–408. doi: 10.1002/alr.22264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snidvongs K, Thanaviratananich S. 2017. Update on intranasal medications in rhinosinusitis. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 17(7):47. doi: 10.1007/s11882-017-0720-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soler ZM, Mace J, Smith TL. 2008. Symptom-based presentation of chronic rhinosinusitis and symptom-specific outcomes after endoscopic sinus surgery. Am J Rhinol. 22(3):297–301. doi: 10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3172.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tammareddi S, Sun G, Li Q. 2016. Multiobjective robust optimization of coronary stents. Materials & Design. 90:682–692. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.10.153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan BK, Chandra RK. 2010. Postoperative prevention and treatment of complications after sinus surgery. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 43(4):769–779. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2010.04.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torki MM, Hassanajili S, Jalisi MM. 2020. Design optimizations of PLA stent structure by FEM and investigating its function in a simulated plaque artery. Math Comput Simul. 169:103–116. doi: 10.1016/j.matcom.2019.09.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vey E, Rodger C, Booth J, Claybourn M, Miller AF, Saiani A. 2011. Degradation kinetics of poly(lactic-co-glycolic) acid block copolymer cast films in phosphate buffer solution as revealed by infrared and Raman spectroscopies. Polym Degrad Stab. 96(10):1882–1889. doi: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2011.07.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan Y, Liu L, Xu P, Gao J. 2020. Efficacy analysis of use of absorbable sinus drug stents in functional endoscopic sinus surgery. ]. Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 34:417–420.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang Y, Wu H, Fan S, Wu J, Yang S. 2023. Structure design and mechanical performance analysis of three kinds of bioresorbable poly-lactic acid (PLA) stents. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 26(1):25–37. doi: 10.1080/10255842.2022.2045485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Z. 2019. Recent advances in novel metallic honeycomb structure. Composites Part B: engineering. 166:731–741. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.02.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang X, Zhang W, Yao J, Sun A, Gao Y, Guo M, Fan Y. 2021. The differences between surface degradation and bulk degradation of FEM on the prediction of the degradation time for poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) stent. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 25(1):65–72. doi: 10.1080/10255842.2021.1931846.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Tang G, Zhao Y, et al. 2010. Effect of cyclic loading on in vitro degradation of poly(L-lactide-co-glycolide) scaffolds. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 21:53–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Q, Wu W, Liu J. 2022. Local strengthening design and compressive behavior study of the triangular honeycomb structure. Metals. 12(11):1779. doi: 10.3390/met12111779.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao Y, Qiu D, Yang Y, Tang G, Fan Y, Yuan X. 2012. Degradation of electrospun poly(L-lactide) membranes under cyclic loading. J of Applied Polymer Sci. 124(S1):E258–E266. doi: 10.1002/app.36496.
   Google Scholar