Lamenting the list: a partial test of Sherman’s defiance theory as applied to female sex offenders

References

• Adam Walsh Act of 2006, Public Law 109-248. (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Adkins, G., Huff, D., & Stateberg, P. (2000). The Iowa sex offender registry and recidivism. Des Moines, IA: Iowa Department of Human Rights Division of Criminal and Juvenile Justice Planning and Statistical Analysis Center.
   Google Scholar
• Avrahamiam, K. (1998). A critical perspective: Do Megan’s Laws really shield children from sex-predators? Journal of Juvenile Law, 19, 301–317.
   Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, J. (1989). Crime, shame, and reintegration. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511804618
   Google Scholar
• Brannon, Y. N., Levenson, J. S., Fortney, T., & Baker, J. N. (2007). Attitudes about community notification: A comparison of sexual offenders and the non-offending public. Sex Abuse, 19, 369–379. doi:10.1007/s11194-007-9055-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burchfield, K. B., & Mingus, W. (2008). Not in my neighborhood: Assessing registered sex offenders’ experiences with local social capital and social control. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35, 356–374. doi:10.1177/009385480731137510.1177/0093854807311375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaffin, M. (2008). Our minds are made up – Don’t confuse us with the facts: Commentary on policies concerning children with sexual behavioral problems and juvenile sex offenders. Child Maltreatment, 13, 356–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesney-Lind, M. (2006). Patriarchy, crime and justice: Feminist criminology in an era of backlash. Feminist Criminology, 1, 6–26.10.1177/1557085105282893
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, S. (1972). Folk devils and moral panics: The creation of the mods and rockers. London: MacGibbon & Kee.
   Google Scholar
• Collwell, L. H., Miller, H. A., Miller, R. S., & Lyons Jr., P. M. (2006). U.S. police officers’ knowledge regarding behaviors indicative of deception: Implications for eradicating erroneous beliefs through training. Psychology, Crime & Law, 12, 489–503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, I. A., Eldridge, H. J., Ashfield, S., & Beech, A. R. (2010). Exploring risk: Potential static, dynamic, protective and treatment factors in the clinical histories of female sex offenders. Journal of Family Violence, 25, 595–602. doi:10.1007/s10896-010-9322-810.1007/s10896-010-9322-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Embry, R., & Lyons Jr., P. M. (2012). Sex-based sentencing: Sentencing discrepancies between male and female sex offenders. Feminist Criminology, 7, 146–162. doi:10.1177/155708511143021410.1177/1557085111430214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farnworth, M., & Teske Jr., R. H. C. (1995). Gender differences in felony court processing. Women and Criminal Justice, 6, 23–44.10.1300/J012v06n02_02
   Google Scholar
• Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE). (2010). Complete list of female sexual offenders. Unpublished listing.
   Google Scholar
• Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE). (2011). Retrieved from http://offender.fdle.state.fl.us/offender/homepage.do
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, J., Liossis, P., & David, N. (2006). Deterrence, defiance and deviance: An investigation into a group of recidivist drunk drivers’ self-reported offending behaviors. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 39(1), 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonnerman, J. (2007, December 30). The house where they live. New York Magazine.
   Google Scholar
• Green, S. B. (1991). How many subjects does it take to do a regression analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 26, 499–510.10.1207/s15327906mbr2603_7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jacob Wetterling Act of 1994, Public Law 103-322. (1994).
   Google Scholar
• Janus, E. S. (2006). Failure to protect: America’s sexual predatory laws and the rise of the preventive state. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, P. P. (2004). Moral panic: Changing concepts of the child molester in modern America. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kernsmith, P., Comartin, E., Craun, S., & Kernsmith, R. (2009). The relationship between sex offender registry utilization and awareness. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 21, 181–193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, J. L., Rukus, J., & Zambrana, K. (2012). Do societal reactions lead to increased experiences of shame and strain for registered female sex offenders? Justice Policy Journal, 9(2). Retrieved from http://www.cjcj.org/uploads/cjcj/documents/Do_Societal.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Koons-Witt, B. A. (2002). The effect of gender on the decision to incarcerate before and after the introduction of sentencing guidelines. Criminology, 40, 297–328.10.1111/crim.2002.40.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koss, M. P., Gidycz, C. A., & Wisniewski, N. (1987). The scope of rape: Incidence and prevalence of sexual aggression and victimization in a national sample of higher education students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 162–170.10.1037/0022-006X.55.2.162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruttschnitt, C., Uggen, C., & Shelton, K. (2000). Predictors of desistance among sex offenders: The interaction of formal and informal social controls. Justice Quarterly, 17, 61–87.10.1080/07418820000094481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levenson, J., & Cotter, L. (2005). The effect of Megan’s Law on sex offender reintegration. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 21, 49–66.10.1177/1043986204271676
   Google Scholar
• Levenson, J., & D’Amora, D. A. (2007). Social policies designed to prevent sexual violence: The emperor’s new clothes? Criminal Justice Policy Review, 18, 168–199.10.1177/0887403406295309
   Google Scholar
• Levenson, J., D’Amora, D. A., & Hern, A. L. (2007). Megan’s Law and its impact on community re-entry for sex offenders. Behavioral Science & the Law, 25, 587–602. doi:10.1002/bsl.770
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levenson, J., & Hern, A. L. (2007). Sex offender residence restrictions: Unintended consequences and community reentry. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 25(1), 1–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieb, R. (2003). State policy perspecitves on sexual predator laws. In B. J. Winick & J. Q. La Fond (Eds.), Protecting society from sexually dangerous offenders: Law, justice, and therapy (pp. 41–59). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.10.1037/10492-000
   Google Scholar
• Lieb, R., & Nunlist, C. (2008). Community notification as viewed by Washington citizens: A ten-year follow up. Olympia, WA: Washington Institute for Public Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Lieb, R., Quinsey, V., & Berliner, L. (1998). Sexual predators and social policy. Crime and Justice, 23, 43–114.10.1086/449269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madden, S. (2008). The labeling of sex offenders. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
   Google Scholar
• Maruna, S. (2011). Reentry as a rite of passage. Punishment & Society, 13, 3–28. doi:10.1177/1462474510385641
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maruna, S., & King, A. (2004). Public opinion and community penalties. In T. Bottoms, S. Rex, & G. Robinson (Eds.), Alternatives to prison: Options for an insecure society (pp. 83–112). Cullompton: Willan.
   Google Scholar
• Mathews, R., Hunter, J. A., & Vuz, J. (1997). Juvenile female sexual offenders: Clinical characteristics and treatment issues. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 9, 187–199.
   Google Scholar
• Megan’s Law of 1996, Public Law 104-145. (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Meloy, M., Saleh, Y., & Wolff, N. (2007). Sex offender laws in America: Can panic-driven legislation ever create safer societies? Criminal justice studies, 20, 423–443.10.1080/14786010701758211
   Google Scholar
• Minnesota Department of Corrections (2003). Level 3 sex offenders’ residential placement issues. Minneapolis, MN: Minnesota Department of Corrections.
   Google Scholar
• Office of Justice Programs (2008). The national guidelines for sex offender registration and notification. Washington, DC: Department of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Ost, S. (2002). Children at risk: Legal and societal perceptions of the potential threat that the possession of child pornography poses to society. Journal of Law and Society, 29, 436–460.10.1111/1467-6478.00227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersilia, J. (2003). When prisoners come home: Parole and prisoner reentry. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Petrosino, A., & Petrosino, C. (1999). The public safety potential of Megan’s Law in Massachusetts: An assessment from a sample of criminal sexual psychopaths. Crime and Delinquency, 45, 140–158.10.1177/0011128799045001008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrunik, M., & Deutschmann, L. (2008). The exclusion–inclusion spectrum in state and community response to sex offenders in Anglo-American and European jurisdictions. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 52, 499–519.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prescott, J., & Rockoff, J. (2008). Do sex offender registration and notification laws affect criminal behavior? University of Michigan Legal Working Paper Series. Retrieved from http://law.bepress.com.lp.hscl.ufl.edu/umichlwps/olin/art85/10.3386/w13803
   Google Scholar
• Proctor, J. L., Badzinski, D. M., & Johnson, M. (2002). The impact of media on knowledge and perceptions of Megan’s Law. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 13, 356–379.10.1177/088740302237804
   Google Scholar
• Rosencrans, B. (1997). The last secret: Daughters sexually abused by mothers. Orwell, VT: Safe Society Press.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, D. E. H. (1983). The prevalence and incidence of forcible rape and attempted rape of females. Victimology: An International Journal, 7, 81–93.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, D. E. H. (1984). Sexual exploitation: Rape, child sexual abuse and workplace harassment. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sample, L., & Kadleck, C. (2008). Sex offender laws: Legislators’ accounts of the need for policy. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 19, 40–62.10.1177/0887403407308292
   Google Scholar
• Sandler, J., Freeman, N., & Socia, K. (2008). Does a watched pot boil? A time-series analysis of New York State’s sex offender registration and notification law. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 14, 284–302.10.1037/a0013881
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandler, J., & Freeman, N. J. (2011). Female sex offenders and the criminal justice system: A comparison of arrests and outcomes. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 17, 61–76. doi:10.1080/13552600.2010.53738010.1080/13552600.2010.537380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheff, T. J., & Retzinger, S. M. (1991). Emotions and violence: Shame and rage in destructive conflicts. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Schram, D., & Milloy, C. (1995). Community notification: A study of offender characteristics and recidivism. Seattle, WA: Urban Policy Research.
   Google Scholar
• Sherman, L. (1993). Defiance, deterrence, and irrelevance: A theory of the criminal sanction. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30, 445–473.10.1177/0022427893030004006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherman, L. (2006). Defiance theory. In F. Cullen & R. Agnew (Eds.), Criminological theory: Past to present (pp. 286–293). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Szymkowiak, K., & Fraser, T. (2002). Registered sex offenders in Hawaii. Honolulu, HI: Department of the Hawaii Attorney General.
   Google Scholar
• Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach's alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55.10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tewksbury, R. (2004). Experiences and attitudes of registered female sex offenders. Federal Probation, 68, 30–33.
   Google Scholar
• Tewksbury, R. (2005). Collateral consequences of sex offender registration. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 21, 67–81.10.1177/1043986204271704
   Google Scholar
• Tewksbury, R., & Connor, D. P. (2012). Incarcerated sex offenders’ perceptions of family relationships: Previous experiences and future expectations. Western Criminology Review, 13, 25–35.
   Google Scholar
• Tewksbury, R., Connor, D. P., Cheeseman, K., & Rivera, B. L. (2012). Female sex offenders’ anticipations for re-entry: Do they really know what they’re in for? Journal of Crime and Justice, 35, 451–463.10.1080/0735648X.2012.691240
   Google Scholar
• Tewksbury, R., & Lees, M. B. (2007). Perceptions of punishment: How registered sex offenders view registries. Crime & Delinquency, 53, 380–407. doi:10.1177/0011128706286915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tewksbury, R., & Zgoba, K. M. (2010). Perceptions and coping with punishment: How registered sex offenders respond to stress, internet restrictions, and the collateral consequences of registration. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 54, 537–551. doi:10.1177/0306624X0933918010.1177/0306624X09339180
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2006). Extent, nature and consequences of rape victimization: Findings from the national violence against women survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers Disease Control Prevention, National Institute of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. (1990). Why people obey the law. Princeton, NJ: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• US Department of Justice (2005). Uniform crime reports, 2004. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Vandiver, D. M., Dial, K., & Worley, R. M. (2008). A qualitative assessment of registered female sex offenders: Judicial processing experiences and perceived effects of a public registry. Criminal Justice Review, 33, 177–198. doi:10.1177/073401680831844810.1177/0734016808318448
   Google Scholar
• Vandiver, D. M., & Walker, J. T. (2002). Female sex offenders: An overview and analysis of 40 cases. Criminal Justice Review, 27, 284–300. doi:10.1177/07340168020270020510.1177/073401680202700205
   Google Scholar
• Veysey, B., Zgoba, K. M., & Dalessandro, M. (2008). A preliminary step towards evaluating the impact of Megan’s Law: A trend analysis of sexual offenses in New Jersey from 1985 to 2005. Justice Research and Policy, 10(2), 1–18.10.3818/JRP.10.2.2008.1
   Google Scholar
• Welchans, S. (2005). Megan’s Law: Evaluations of sexual offender registries. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 16, 123–140.10.1177/0887403404265630
   Google Scholar
• Wijkman, M., Bijleveld, C., & Hendriks, J. (2010). Women don’t do such things! Characteristics of female sex offenders and offender types. Sex Abuse, 22, 135–156. doi:10.1177/1079063210363826
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, R. G. (2004). Protection or illusion: A policy analysis of Massachusetts and federal sex offender legislation (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Massachusetts, Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, R. G. (2008a). Sex offender post-incarceration sanctions: Are there any limits? New England Journal of Criminal and Civil Confinement, 34, 17–50.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, R. G. (2008b). Introduction: The failure of sex offender policies. In R. G. Wright (Ed.), Sex offender laws: Failed policies, new directions (pp. 3–15). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Young, C. (2008). Children sex offenders: How the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act hurts the same children it is trying to protect. New England Journal of Criminal and Civil Confinement, 34, 459–484.
   Google Scholar
• Zevitz, R., & Farkas, M. A. (2000). Sex offender community notification: Managing high risk criminals or exacting further vengeance? Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 18, 375–391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar