Who’s afraid of penal populism? Technocracy and ‘the people’ in the sociology of punishment

References

• Abizadeh, A. (2008). The passions of the wise: Phronesis, rhetoric, and Aristotle’s passionate practical deliberation. In R. Kingston & L. Ferry (Eds.), Bringing the passions back in: The emotions in political philosophy (pp. 60–77). Vancouver: UBC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Adorjan, M., & Chui, W. H. (2013). Colonial responses to youth crime in Hong Kong: Penal elitism, legitimacy and citizenship. Theoretical Criminology, 17, 159–177.10.1177/1362480612472784
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alschuler, A. W. (1991). The failure of sentencing guidelines: A plea for less aggregation. The University of Chicago Law Review, 58, 901–951.10.2307/1599992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arneson, R. J. (2009). The supposed right to a democratic say. In T. Christiano & J. Christman (Eds.), Contemporary debates in political philosophy (pp. 197–213). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Baert, P., & da Silva, F. C. (2010). Social theory in the twentieth century and beyond. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beccaria, C. (1764/1995a). On crimes and punishments. In R. Bellamy (Ed.), On crimes and punishments and other writings (pp. 1–114). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beccaria, C. (1771/1995b). Reflections on manners and customs. In R. Bellamy (Ed.), On crimes and punishments and other writings (pp. 149–159). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beckett, K. (2000). Making crime pay: Law and order in contemporary America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bentham, J. (1776/1988). A fragment on government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Borge, B. H. (1998). Forsoningen som uteble: Norges oppgjør med landssvikerne [The reconciliation that never was: Norway's legal purges]. In B. A. Andreassen & E. Skaar (Eds.), Forsoning eller rettferdighet? Om beskyttelse av menneskerettighetene gjennom sannhetskommisjoner og rettstribunaler [Reconciliation or justice? On the protection of human rights through truth and reconciliation commissions and legal tribunals] (pp. 62–92). Oslo: Cappelen Damm.
   Google Scholar
• Bottoms, A. (1995). The philosophy and politics of punishment and sentencing. In C. Clarkson & R. Morgan (Eds.), The politics of sentencing reform (pp. 17–49). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1979). Public opinion does not exist. In A. Matelart & S. Siegelaub (Eds.), Communication and class struggle (Vol. I, pp. 124–130). New York, NY: International General/IMMRC.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1990a). The scholastic point of view. Cultural Anthropology, 5, 380–391.10.1525/can.1990.5.4.02a00030
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1990b). In other words. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (2002). Against the policy of depoliticization. Studies in Political Economy, 69, 31–41.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (2014). On the state. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. (1999). On the cunning of imperialist reason. Theory, Culture & Society, 16, 41–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, J. (2003). Principles of restorative justice. In A. von Hirsch, J. V. Roberts & A. Bottoms (Eds.), Restorative justice and criminal justice: Competing or reconcilable paradigms? (pp. 1–20) Oxford: Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2015). Prisoners under the jurisdiction of state or federal correctional authorities, December 31, 1978–2014. Retrieved July 29, 2015, from http://www.bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=nps
   Google Scholar
• Burke, P. (1978/2009). Popular Culture in Early Modern Europe. Surrey: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, M. C. (2014). The emergence of penal extremism in California: A dynamic view of institutional structures and political processes. Law & Society Review, 48, 377–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canovan, M. (1984). ‘People’, politicians and populism. Government and Opposition, 19, 312–327.10.1111/goop.1984.19.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Central Bureau of Statistics of Norway. (1954). Statistics on treason and collaboration, 1940–1945. Oslo: Statistisk Sentralbyrå.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, H.-J. (2014). Economics: The user’s guide. London: Pelican.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. (1985). Controlling nuclear weapons: Democracy versus guardianship. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Didriksen, B. (1946). Gjenopprettelsen av landssvikerne. Et aktuelt sosialt spørsmål [The reinstatement of traitors. A contemporary social issue]. Sosialt Arbeid, 6–7, 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Dzur, A. (2010). The myth of penal populism: Democracy, citizen participation, and American hyperincarceration. The Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 24, 354–379.10.1353/jsp.2010.0016
   Google Scholar
• Dzur, A., & Mirchandani, R. (2007). Punishment and democracy: The role of public deliberation. Punishment & Society, 9, 151–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elias, N. (1939/2000). The civilizing process: Sociogenetic and psychogenetic investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Fenwick, M. (2013). ‘Penal populism’ and penological change in contemporary Japan. Theoretical Criminology, 17, 215–231. doi: 10.1177/1362480613476785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferry, L., & Kingston, R. (2008). Introduction: The emotions and the history of political thought. In R. Kingston & L. Ferry (Eds.), Bringing the passions back in: The emotions in political philosophy (pp. 3–18). Vancouver: UBC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, S. (1995). Central-bank independence revisited. American Economic Review, 85, 201–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankel, M. E. (1972). Criminal sentences: Law without order. New York, NY: Hill and Wang.
   Google Scholar
• Frase, R. (2013a). Just sentencing: Principles and procedures for a workable system. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frase, R. (2013b). The Minnesota sentencing guidelines. In A. Freiberg & K. Gelb (Eds.), Penal populism, sentencing councils and sentencing policy (pp. 83–102). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Freiberg, A. (2013). The Victorian sentencing advisory council: Incorporating community views into the sentencing process. In A. Freiberg & K. Gelb (Eds.), Penal populism, sentencing councils and sentencing policy. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Garland, D. (2000). The culture of high crime societies: Some preconditions of recent ‘law and order’ policies. British Journal of Criminology, 40, 347–375.10.1093/bjc/40.3.347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garland, D. (2001). The culture of control: Crime and social order in contemporary society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gastil, J., Deess, E. P., Weiser, P. J., & Simmons, C. (2010). The jury and democracy: How jury deliberation promotes civic engagement and political participation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geuss, R. (2008). Philosophy and real politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400835515
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, P., Page, J., & Phelps, M. (2015). The long struggle: An agonistic perspective on penal development. Theoretical Criminology, 19, 315–335. doi: 10.1177/1362480614547151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, D. A. (2008). When children kill children: Penal populism and political culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199230969.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Harcourt, B. (2011). The illusion of free markets: Punishment and the myth of natural order. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayo, B., & Hefeker, C. (2002). Reconsidering central bank independence. European Journal of Political Economy, 18, 653–674.10.1016/S0176-2680(02)00113-1
   Google Scholar
• Jones, T., & Newburn, T. (2006). Three strikes and you’re out: Exploring symbol and substance in American and British crime control policies. British Journal of Criminology, 46, 781–802.10.1093/bjc/azl007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judt, T. (2007). Postwar: A history of Europe since 1945. London: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Kalt, B. C. (2003). The exclusion of felons from jury service. American University Law Review, 53, 65–189.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, I. (1784/1991). An answer to the question: ‘What is enlightenment?’ In H. S. Reiss (Ed.), Political writings (pp. 54–60). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knowles, E. (Ed.). (2001). The Oxford dictionary of quotations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krause, S. R. (2008). Civil passions: moral sentiment and democratic deliberation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400837281
   Google Scholar
• Krugman, P. (2014). Who wants a depression? New York Times, 10 July. Retrieved October 1, 2015, from http://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/11/opinion/paul-krugman-who-wants-a-depression.html
   Google Scholar
• Lacey, N. (2008). The prisoners’ dilemma: Political economy and punishment in contemporary democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511819247
   Google Scholar
• Loader, I. (2006). Fall of the ‘Platonic guardians’: Liberalism, criminology and political responses to crime in England and Wales. British Journal of Criminology, 46, 561–586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loader, I. (2010). For penal moderation: Notes towards a public philosophy of punishment. Theoretical Criminology, 14, 349–367.10.1177/1362480610370166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, N. (2013). ‘Contrasts in tolerance’ in a single jurisdiction: The case of New Zealand. International Criminal Justice Review, 23, 217–232.10.1177/1057567713498094
   Google Scholar
• Marcus, G. E. (2002). The sentimental citizen: Emotion in democratic politics. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marcus, G. E., Neuman, W. R., & Mackuen, M. (2000). Affective intelligence and political judgment. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, R. (2005). The myth of punitiveness. Theoretical Criminology, 9, 175–201.10.1177/1362480605051639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miao, M. (2013). Capital punishment in China: A populist instrument of social governance. Theoretical Criminology, 17, 233–250.10.1177/1362480613476788
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines Commision. (1981). Minnesota sentencing guidelines and commentary. St. Paul, MN: MSGC. Retrieved October 1, 2015, from http://mn.gov/sentencing-guidelines/assets/1981-Sentencing%20Guidelines_tcm30-31768.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines Commission. (1989). Minnesota sentencing guidelines and commentary. St. Paul, MN: MSGC. Retrieved October 1, 2015, from http://mn.gov/sentencing-guidelines/images/1989%2520Guidelines2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines Commision. (2001). Minnesota sentencing guidelines and commentary. St. Paul, MN: MSGC. Retrieved October 1, 2015, from http://mn.gov/sentencing-guidelines/assets/2001-Sentencing%20Guidelines_tcm30-31127.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines Commission. (2014). 2013 sentencing practices: Annual summary statistics for felony offenders. St. Paul, MN: MSGC. Retrieved October 1, 2015, from http://mn.gov/sentencing-guidelines/images/2013%2520Data%2520Report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Morris, N., & Tonry, M. (1990). Between prison and probation: Intermediate punishments in a rational sentencing system. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, C. (2004). The populist zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39, 542–563.10.1111/goop.2004.39.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norwegian Correctional Services. (1954). Report of the prison administration, 1931–1950. Oslo: Fengselsstyret.
   Google Scholar
• Norwegian Ministry of Justice. (1945). Rettsoppgjöret med landssvikerne [Court Proceedings against the National Traitors]. Stockholm: Statens reproduktionsanstalt.
   Google Scholar
• Parry, G. (1969/2005). Political elites. Colchester: ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pettit, P. (2002). Is criminal justice politically feasible? Buffalo Criminal Law Review, 5, 427–450.10.1525/nclr.2002.5.2.427
   Google Scholar
• Porter, T. (1995). Trust in numbers: The pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pratt, J. (2007). Penal populism. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pratt, J., & Clark, M. (2005). Penal populism in New Zealand. Punishment & Society, 7, 303–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, A. (2008). The collapse of Fortress Bush: The crisis of authority in American government. New York, NY: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, J. V., & de Keijser, J. W. (2014). Democratising punishment: Sentencing, community views and values. Punishment & Society, 16, 474–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, J. V., Stalans, L. S., Indermaur, D., & Hough, M. (2003). Penal populism and public opinion: Lessons from five countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrik, D. (2006). Goodbye Washington consensus, hello Washington confusion? A review of the World Bank’s economic growth in the 1990s: Learning from a decade of reform. Journal of Economic Literature, 44, 973–987.10.1257/jel.44.4.973
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousseau, J.-J. (1755/1996). Discourse on political economy. In V. Gourevitch (Ed.), The social contract and other later political writings (pp. 3–38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rowan, M. (2011). Democracy and punishment: A radical view. Theoretical Criminology, 16, 43–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, J. (2014). Mass incarceration on trial: A remarkable court decision and the future of prisons in America. New York, NY: The New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, G. (2009). Democratic innovations: Designing institutions for citizen participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511609848
   Google Scholar
• Solem, E. (1945). Landssvikanordningen: (prov. anordn. av 15. desbr. 1944 med tillegg) [The National Treason Act: (provisional act, 15 December 1944, with addendum)]. Oslo: Tanum.
   Google Scholar
• Stanley, B. (2008). The thin ideology of populism. Journal of Political Ideologies, 13, 95–110.10.1080/13569310701822289
   Google Scholar
• Stiglitz, J. (1998). Central banking in a democratic society. De Economist, 146, 199–226.10.1023/A:1003272907007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stith, K., & Cabranes, J. A. (1998). Fear of judging: Sentencing guidelines in the federal courts. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stith, K., & Koh, S. Y. (1993). The politics of sentencing reform: The legislative history of the federal sentencing guidelines. Wake Forest Law Review, 28, 223–290.
   Google Scholar
• Tham, H. (2013). Law and order from below or from above? The challenge for criminologists. European Journal of Criminology, 10, 387–393.10.1177/1477370812474533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonry, M. (2004). Punishment and politics: Evidence and emulation in the making of English crime control policy. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Tonry, M. (2007). Determinants of penal policy. Crime and Justice, 36, 1–48. doi: 10.1086/518582
   Google Scholar
• Turner, L. (2014). Penal populism, deliberative methods, and the production of ‘public opinion’ on crime and punishment. The Good Society, 23, 87–102.10.5325/goodsociety.23.1.0087
   Google Scholar
• Urbinati, N. (2014). Democracy disfigured: Opinion, truth, and the people. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674726383
   Google Scholar
• Wacquant, L. (1993). From ruling class to field of power: An interview with Pierre Bourdieu on La noblesse d’État. Theory, Culture & Society, 10, 19–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wacquant, L. (2009a). Prisons of poverty. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wacquant, L. (2009b). Punishing the poor: The neoliberal government of social insecurity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.10.1215/9780822392255
   Google Scholar
• Wacquant, L. (2012). The prison is an outlaw institution. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 51(1), 1–15.10.1111/j.1468-2311.2011.00686.x
   Google Scholar
• Walker, J. L. (1966). A critique of the elitist theory of democracy. The American Political Science Review, 60, 285–295.10.2307/1953356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Windlesham, L. (1998). Politics, punishment, and populism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zimring, F. E., Hawkins, G., & Kamin, S. (2001). Punishment and democracy: Three strikes and you’re out in California. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar