“And focused upon victims’ needs”: towards an assessment of the victim-friendly principles of restorative justice practice

References

• Albrecht, H. J. (2001). Restorative justice: Answers to questions that nobody has put forward. In E. Fattah & S. Parmentier (Eds.), Victim policies and criminal justice on the road to restorative justice (pp. 295–314). Leuven: Leuven University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ashworth, A. (2002). Responsibilities, rights and restorative justice. British Journal of Criminology, 42, 578–595. doi:10.1093/bjc/42.3.578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashworth, A. (2009). Responsibilities, rights and restorative justice. In B. Williams & H. Goodman Chong (Eds.), Victims and victimisation: A reader (pp. 225–243). Berkshire: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bolivar, D. (2010). Conceptualising victims’ ‘restoration’ in restorative justice. International Review of Victimology, 17, 237–265. doi:10.1177/026975801001700301.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1987). The force of law. The Hastings Law Journal, 38, 814–853. Retrieved from http://www.soc.ucsb.edu/ct/pages/JWM/Syllabi/Bourdieu/ForceofLaw.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, J. (2002). Restorative justice and responsive regulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, J., & Strang, H. (2001). Introduction: Restorative justice and civil society. In J. Braithwaite & H. Strang (Eds.), Restorative justice and civil society (pp. 1–13). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, T. (2012). Facilitating restorative conferences. In E. Zinsstag & I. Vanfraechem (Eds.), Conferencing and restorative justice (pp. 65–82). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Christie, N. (2001). Answers to atrocities. In E. Fattah & S. Parmentier (Eds.), Victim policies and criminal justice on the road to restorative justice (pp. 379–392). Leuven: Leuven University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clamp, K. (2014). Restorative justice in transition. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cotterrell, R. (2006). Law in social theory and social theory in the study of law. In A. Sarat (Ed.), The Blackwell companion to law and society (pp. 15–29). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Daly, K. (2003). Making variation a virtue: Evaluating the potential and limits of restorative justice. In E. G. M. Weitekamp & H. Kerner (Eds.), Restorative justice in context: International practice and directions (pp. 23–50). Devon: Willan Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Daly, K. (2012). Conferences and gendered violence: Practices, politics, and evidence. In E. Zinsstag & I. Vanfraechem (Eds.), Conferencing and restorative justice (pp. 117–135). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dignan, J. (2005). Understanding victims and restorative justice. Berkshire: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Doak, J. (2011). The therapeutic dimension of transitional justice: Emotional repair and victim satisfaction in international trials and truth commissions. International Criminal Law Review, 11, 263–298. doi:10.1163/157181211X559671.
   Google Scholar
• Donnelly, J. (2003). Universal human rights in theory and practice (2nd ed.). Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Farmer, P. (2004). Pathologies of power: Health, human rights, and the new war on the poor. Berkley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garbett, C. (2015). From passive objects to active agents: A comparative analysis of conceptions of victim identities at the ICTY and ICC. Journal of Human Rights, 15, 40–59. doi:10.1080/14754835.2015.1032226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garbett, C. (2015b). The concept of the civilian: Legal recognition, adjudication and the trials of international criminal justice. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Garkawe, S. (2012). Have recent changes designed to benefit victims of international crimes added to the legitimacy of international criminal justice? In G. Boas, W. A. Schabas, & M. Scharf (Eds.), International criminal justice: Legitimacy and coherence (pp. 269–303). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.10.4337/9781781005606
   Google Scholar
• Garth, B., & Sarat, A. (1998). Studying how law matters: An introduction. In B. Garth & A. Sarat (Eds.), How does law matter? (pp. 1–14). The American Bar Foundation: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, H. (2007). Reoffending and restorative justice. In G. Johnstone & D. W. Van Ness (Eds.), Handbook of restorative justice (pp. 426–444). Devon: Willan Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Heikkilä, M. (2004). International criminal tribunals and the victims of crime. Turko/Åbo: Institute for Human Rights.
   Google Scholar
• Home Office (2003). Restorative justice: The government’s strategy: A consultation document on the government’s strategy on restorative justice 22nd July 2003. UK: Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Hoyle, C. (2010). The case for restorative justice. In C. Cunneen & C. Hoyle (Eds.), Debating restorative justice (pp. 1–100). Oxford and Portland, Oregon: Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hoyle, C. (2012). Victims, the criminal process, and restorative justice. In M. Maguire, R. Morgan, & R. Reiner (Eds.), The oxford handbook of criminology (5th ed.). (pp. 398–425). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, B. (2003). Victims and offenders. In A. Von Hirsch, J. V. Roberts, A. Bottoms, K. Roach, & M. Schiff (Eds.), Restorative justice and criminal justice: Competing or reconcilable paradigms? (pp. 177–194). Oxford and Portland, Oregon: Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Johnstone, G. (2003). Introduction: Restorative approaches to criminal justice. In G. Johnstone (Ed.), Restorative practice reader: Texts, sources, context (pp. 1–18). Devon: Willan Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Johnstone, G. (2011). Restorative justice: Ideas, values, debates. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kiza, E., Rathgeber, C., & Rohne, H. (2006). Victims of war: An empirical study on war-victimization and victims’ attitudes towards addressing atrocities. Hamburg: Hamburger Edition Online.
   Google Scholar
• Lacey, N. (2006). The constitution of identity: Gender, feminist legal theory, and the law and society movement. In A. Sarat (Ed.), The Blackwell companion to law and society (pp. 471–486). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, T. (1999). Restorative justice: An overview. London: Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, G., & Morris, A. (2002). The role of shame, guilt, and remorse in restorative justice processes for young people. In E. G. M. Weitekamp & H. Kerner (Eds.), Restorative justice: Theoretical foundations (pp. 267–284). Devon: Willan Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• McEvoy, K., & Eriksson, A. (2008). Who owns justice? Community, state and the Northern Ireland transition. In J. Shapland (Ed.), Justice, community and civil society (pp. 157–189). Oxon and New York: Willan Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• McEvoy, K., & McConnachie, K. (2013). Victims and transitional justice: Voice, agency and blame. Social and Legal Studies, 22, 489–513. doi:10.1177/096466913499062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merry, S. (2005). Human rights and gender violence: Translating international law into local justice. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226520759.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Justice (2014). ‘One year on’ progress report against the 2013 restorative justice action plan. UK: Ministry of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Moon, C. (2009). Narrating political transitions: South Africa’s truth and reconciliation commission. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Safferling, C. (2011). The role of the victim in the criminal process – A paradigm shift in national German and international law. International Criminal Law Review, 11, 183–215. doi:10.1163/157181211X559653.
   Google Scholar
• Sarat, A., & Kearns, T. (1993). Beyond the great divide. In A. Sarat & T. Kearns (Eds.), Law in everyday life (pp. 21–61). USA: The Michigan: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schiff, M. (2007). Satisfying the needs and interests of stakeholders. In G. Johnstone & D. W. Van Ness (Eds.), Handbook of restorative justice (pp. 228–264). Devon: Willan Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Shapland, J. (2003). Restorative justice and criminal justice: Just responses to crime? In A. Von Hirsch, J. V. Roberts, A. Bottoms, K. Roach, & M. Schiff (Eds.), Restorative justice and criminal justice: Competing or reconcilable paradigms? (pp. 195–217). Oxford and Portland, Oregon: Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Shapland, J. (2012). Comparing conferencing and mediation. In E. Zinsstag & I. Vanfraechem (Eds.), Conferencing and restorative justice: International practices and perspectives (pp. 47–64). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shapland, J., Atkinson, A., Atkinson, H., Colledge, E., Dignan, J., Howes, M., … Sorsby, A. (2006). Situating restorative justice within criminal justice. Theoretical Criminology, 10, 505–532. doi:10.1177/1362480606068876.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapland, J., Robinson, G., & Sorsby, A. (2011). Restorative justice in practice: Evaluating what works for victims and offenders. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stover, E. (2005). The witnesses: War crimes and the promise of justice in The Hague. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.10.9783/9780812203783
   Google Scholar
• Strang, H. (2002). Repair or revenge: Victims and restorative justice. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strang, H. (2012). Conferencing and victims. In E. Zinsstag & I. Vanfraechem (Eds.), Conferencing and restorative justice: International practices and perspectives (pp. 83–98). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strang, H., & Sherman, L.W. (2003). Repairing the harm: Victims and restorative justice. Utah Law Review, 1, 15–42. Retrieved from: http://content.lib.utah.edu/cdm/singleitem/collection/utlawrev/id/462/rec/178.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, D., & Tifft, L. (2008). Introduction: The healing dimension of restorative justice – a one-world body. In D. Sullivan & L. Tifft (Eds.), Handbook of restorative justice: A global perspective (pp. 1–16). London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Umbreit, M. S. (2010). Victim meets offender: The impact of restorative Justice and mediation. Boulder and London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Umbreit, M.S., Bradshaw, W., & Coates, R.B. (2003). Victims of severe violence in dialogue with the offender: Key principles, practices, outcomes and implications. In E.G.M. Weitekamp & Kerner, H. (Eds.), Restorative justice in context: International practice and directions (pp. 123 – 144). Devon: Willan Publishing
   Google Scholar
• Van Camp, T., & Wemmers, J. (2013). Victim satisfaction with restorative justice: More than simply procedural justice. International Review of Victimology, 19, 117–143. doi:10.1177/0269758012472764.
   Google Scholar
• Van Ness, D., Morris, A., & Maxwell, G. (2001). Introducing restorative justice. In A. Morris & G. Maxwell (Eds.), Restorative justice for juveniles (pp. 3–16). Oxford and Portland, Oregon: Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Vanfraechem, I., & Zinsstag, E. (2012). Conferencing: Setting the scene. In E. Zinsstag & I. Vanfraechem (Eds.), Conferencing and restorative justice (pp. 1–8). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Von Hirsch, A., Roberts, J. V., Bottoms, A., Roach, K., & Schiff, M. (Eds.). (2003). Restorative justice and criminal justice: Competing or reconcilable paradigms?. Oxford and Portland, Oregon: Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Walgrave, L. (2001). On restoration and punishment: Favourable similarities and fortunate difference. In A. Morris & G. Maxwell (Eds.), Restorative justice for juveniles: Conferencing, mediation and circles (pp. 17–37). Oxford and Portland, Orgeon: Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, M. (2001). Justice for victims and offenders: A restorative response to Crime (2nd ed.). Winchester: Waterside Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zehr, H. (2002). The little handbook of restorative justice. Intercourse, PA: Good Books.
   Google Scholar
• Zernova, M. (2007). Restorative justice: Ideals and realities. Hampshire: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Zinsstag, E. (2012). Conferencing: A developing practice of restorative justice. In E. Zinsstag & I. Vanfraechem (Eds.), Conferencing and restorative justice: International practices and perspectives (pp. 11–32). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar