Science, art and alchemy: best practice in facilitating restorative justice

References

• Angel, C. (2014). Short term effects of restorative justice conferences on post-traumatic stress symptoms among robbery and burglary victims: A randomised controlled trial. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 10, 291–307.10.1007/s11292-014-9200-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton, C. (2003). Restorative justice: The empowerment model. Annandale: Hawkins Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bolitho, J. (2015). Putting justice needs first: A case study of best practice, victim offender conferencing in New South Wales Australia. Restorative Justice: An International Journal, 3, 256–281.10.1080/20504721.2015.1069531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolitho, J. (2017). Inside the restorative justice black box: The role of memory reconsolidation in transforming the emotional impact of violent crime on victims. International Review of Victimology.
   Google Scholar
• Bolitho, J., Bruce, J., & Mason, G. (2012). Restorative justice from juveniles to adults, Chapter 1. In J. Bolitho, J. Bruce, & G. Mason (Eds.), Restorative Justice: Adults and Emerging Practice (pp. 17–38). Australia: Federation Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bolitho, J., & Freeman, K. (2016). The use and effectiveness of restorative justice in criminal justice systems following child sexual abuse or comparable harms. Sydney: Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse.
   Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, J. (2000). Repentance rituals and restorative justice. Journal of Political Philosophy, 8, 115–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruce, J. (2008). Facilitating restorative justice: A study of conference convenors. PhD Thesis, University of New South Wales.
   Google Scholar
• Bruce, J. (2012). What standards for restorative justice and adults? Issues in practitioner training and accreditation. In J. Bolitho, J. Bruce, & G. Mason (Eds.), Restorative justice: Adults and emerging practice (pp. 173–193). Sydney: Sydney Institute of Criminology.
   Google Scholar
• Bruce, J. (2013). Understanding ‘front-stage’ and ‘back-stage’ work in restorative justice conferences: The benefits of using ethnographic techniques. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 25, 517–526.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, R. (2002). Emotionally involved: The impact of researching rape. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, J., Bolitho, J., & Bargen, J. (2016). Innovative justice response to violence. In J. Stubbs, & S. Tomsen (Eds.), Australian violence (pp. 230–247). Annandale: Federation Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, S. (2004). The nature of moral rasonsing: The framework and activities of ethical deliberation, argument and decision making. Oxford: Oxford Univesity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Connolly, M. (2006). Fifteen years of family group conferencing: Coordinators talk about their experiences in Aotearoa New Zealand. British Journal of Social Work, 36, 523–540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crocker, D. (2016). Balancing justice goals: Restorative justice practitioners’ views. Contemporary Justice Review, 19, 462–478.10.1080/10282580.2016.1226815
   Google Scholar
• Gavrielides, T. (2007). Restorative justice theory and practice: Addressing the discrepancy. Helsinki: Heuni.
   Google Scholar
• Gustafson, D. L. (2005). Exploring treatment and trauma recover implications of facilitating recovery implications of facilitating victim-offender encounters in crimes of severe violence: Lessons from the Canadian Experience. In E. Elliott, & R. M. Gordon (Eds.), New directions in restorative justice issues, practice, evaluation (pp. 193–227). New York, NY: Willan Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Jülich, S., Buttle, J., Cummins, C., & Freeborn, E. (2010). Project restore. An exploratory study of restorative justice and sexual violence. Auckland: Auckland University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Jülich, S., & Landon, F. (2014). Restorative justice and sexual violence: Overcoming the concerns of victim-survivors. In T. Gavrielides (Ed.), A victim-led criminal justice system: Addressing the paradox (pp. 41–56). Restorative Justice Series: IARS Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Jülich, S. J., McGregor, K., Annan, J., Landon, F., McCarrison, D., & McPhillips, K. (2011). Yes, there is another way!. Canterbury Law Review, 17, 222–228.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, B. (2012). The dynamics of conflict: A guide to engagement and conflict (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• McCold, P., & Wachtel, T. (2003). In pursuit of paradigm: A theory of restorative justice. Bethlehem: International Institute of Restorative Practice. Retrieved from www.iirp.edu/iirpWebsites/web/uploads/article_pdfs/paradigm.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Miller, S. (2011). After the crime: The power of restorative justice dialogues between victims and violent offenders. New York, NY: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Milner, K. (2012). Restorative justice and adult offending: Twelve years of post-sentence practice. In J. Bolitho, J. Bruce, & G. Mason (Eds.), Restorative justice: Adults and emerging practice (pp. 80–99). Annandale: Federation Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Justice in New Zealand (2004). Restorative justice best practice in new zealand. Retrieved from https://www.justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Publications/RJ-Best-practice.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Justice in New Zealand (2013a). Restorative justice standards for family violence cases. Retrieved from https://www.justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Publications/restorative-justice-standards-for-family-violence-cases.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Justice in New Zealand (2013b). Restorative justice standards for sexual offending cases. Retrieved from https://www.justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Publications/Restorative-justice-standards-for-sexual-offending-cases.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Restorative Justice Council UK. (2015). Practitioner competency framework. Retrieved from https://restorativejustice.org.uk/sites/default/files/resources/files/rjc-cf-low.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, C. (1959). A theory of therapy, personality and interpersonal relationships as developed in the client-centered framework. In S. Koch (Ed.), Formulations of the person and the social context. Vol. 3 of psychology: A study of a science (pp. 184–256). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Rossner, M. (2012). Emotion across the lifecourse: The case for restorative justice with adults. In J. Bolitho, J. Bruce, & G. Mason (Eds.), Restorative justice: Adults and emerging practice (pp. 214–230). Sydney: Federation Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shapland, J., Atkinson, A., Atkinson, H., Dignan J., Edwards, L., Hibbert, J., … Sorsby, A. (2008). Does restorative justice affect reconviction? The fourth report from the evaluation of three schemes. London: Ministry of Justice. Retrieved from https://restorativejustice.pbworks.com/f/MinistryOfJusticeJune08ReportOnRjAndRe-offending.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sherman, L., & Strang, H. (2007). Restorative justice: The evidence. London: The Smith Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Sherman, L., Strang, H., Angel, C., Woods, D., Barnes, G., Bennett, S., … Rossner, M. (2005). Effects of face-to-face restorative justice on victims of crime in four randomized controlled trials. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1, 367–395.10.1007/s11292-005-8126-y
   Google Scholar
• Sherman, L. W., Strang, H., & Woods, D. J. (2003). Captains of restorative justice: Experience, legitimacy and recidivism by type of offence. In E. G. Weitekamp, & H. J. Kerner (Eds.), Restorative justice in context: International practice and directions (pp. 229–256). Devon: Willan Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Strang, H., Sherman, L. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., Woods, D., & Ariel, B. (2013). Restorative Justice Conferencing (RJC) using face-to-face meetings of offenders and victims: Effects on offender recidivism and victim satisfaction. A systematic review (pp. 1–59). Campbell Systematic Reviews 2013:12.
   Google Scholar
• Umbreit, & Armour, M. P. (2010). Family survivors of homicide meet the offender: The impact of restorative dialogue. The Journal of Community Corrections, XIX, 25–34.
   Google Scholar
• Umbreit, M., & Armour, M. P. (2011). Restorative justice dialogue: An essential guide for research and practice. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Umbreit, M., Bradshaw, W., & Coates, R. B. (2001). Advanced mediation and dialogue in crimes of severe violence. In M. Umbreit (Ed.), The handbook of victim offender mediation (pp. 255–290). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Umbreit, M. S., Vos, B., Coates, R. B., & Armour, M. (2006). Victims of severe violence in mediated dialogue with offender: The impact of the first multi-site study in the U.S. International Review of Victimology, 13, 27–48.10.1177/026975800601300102
   Google Scholar
• van Dernoot Lipsky, L. (2009). Trauma stewardship an everyday guide for caring for self while caring for others. Oakland, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2002). Basic principles on the use of restorative justice programmes in criminal matters. Annex II in United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, Handbook of Restorative Programmes. Retrieved from www.unodc.org/pdf/criminal_justice/06-56290_Ebook.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Walters, W. A. (2015). ‘I thought ‘he’s a monster’ … [but] he was just … normal’. Examining the therapeutic benefits of restorative justice for homicide. British Journal of Criminology, 55, 1207–1225.10.1093/bjc/azv026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar