Delimiting community: examining the punitive implications of reformist and abolitionist discourse encoding an ‘us-them’ binary

References

• Agamben, G. (1998). Homo sacer: Sovereign power and bare life. (1st ed., D. Heller-Roazen Trans.). Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bacchi, C. (2009). Analysing policy: What’s the problem represented to be?. Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Bacchi, C., & Eveline, J. (2010). Approaches to gender mainstreaming: What’s the problem represented to be? In C. Bacchi & J. Eveline (Eds.), Mainstreaming politics: Gendering practices and feminist theory (pp. 111–138). Adelaide University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beccaria, C. (1995). Beccaria: “on crimes and punishments” and other writings. (R. Bellamy, Ed.; R. Davies, Trans.). Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1764). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511802485
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Moshe, L. (2020). Decarcerating disability: Deinstitutionalization and prison abolition. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bentham, J. (1995). The panopticon writings. (M. Bozovic, Ed.). Verso. (Original work published 1791).
   Google Scholar
• Bentham, J. (2007). An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation (the collected works of Jeremy Bentham). Dover. ( Original work published 1789).
   Google Scholar
• Bianchi, H. T. (1994). Justice as sanctuary: Toward a new system of crime control. Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, M., & Schept, J. (2017). New abolition, criminology and a critical carceral studies. Punishment and Society, 19(4), 440–462. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474516666281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrier, N. (2011). Critical criminology meets radical constructivism. Critical Criminology, 19(4), 331–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-010-9129-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrier, N. (2022). Monstrosity, correctional healing, and the limits of penal abolitionism. Crime Media Culture, 19(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/17416590221086536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrier, N., & Piché, J. (2015). Blind spots of abolitionist thought in academia. On longstanding and emerging challenges. Champ Pénal/Penal Field, XII. http://journals.openedition.org/champpenal/9162Vol.XII10.4000/champpenal.9162
   Google Scholar
• Carrier, N., Piché, J., & Walby, K. (2019). Abolitionism and decarceration. In M. Deflem (Ed.), The handbook of social control (pp. 319–332). John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, S. (1979). The punitive city: Notes on the dispersal of social control. Contemporary Crises, 3(4), 339–363. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00729115
   Google Scholar
• Cullors, P. (2019). Abolition and reparations: Histories of resistance, transformative justice, and accountability. Harvard Law Review, 132(6), 1686–1687.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, A. (2003). Are prisons obsolete? Seven Stories Press.
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, E. (1951). Suicide: A study in sociology (2nd ed.). Routledge. ( Original work published 1897).
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, E. (1972). Forms of social solidarity. In A. Giddens (Ed.), Emile Durkheim: Selected writings (pp. 123–140). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (2009). Alternatives to the prison: Dissemination or decline of social control? Theory, Culture and Society, 26(6), 12–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276409353775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garland, D. (2001). Introduction: The meaning of mass incarceration. Punishment and Society, 3(1), 5–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/14624740122228203
   Google Scholar
• Hulsman, L. (1991). The abolitionist case: Alternative crime policies. Israel Law Review, 24(3–4), 681–709. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021223700010694
   Google Scholar
• Ignatieff, M. (1981). State, civil society, and total institutions: A critique of recent social histories of punishment. Crime and Justice, 3, 153–192. https://doi.org/10.1086/449079
   Google Scholar
• Kramer, R., & Oleson, J. C. (2022). Contesting crime science: Our misplaced faith in crime prevention technology. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kramer, R., Rajah, V., & Sung, H. (2013). Neoliberal prisons and cognitive treatment: Calibrating the subjectivity of incarcerated young men to economic inequalities. Theoretical Criminology, 17(4), 535–556. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480613497780
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruse, C. (2015). The social life of forensic evidence. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lombroso, C. (2006). Criminal man. (M. Gibson, & N. H. Rafter, Trans.). Duke University Press. ( Original work published 1876).
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (2002). Theories of distinction: Redescribing the descriptions of modernity (J. O’Neil, E. Schreiber, K. Behnke, & W. Whobrey, Trans.). Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mathiesen, T. (1986). The politics of abolition. Contemporary Crises, 10(1), 81–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00728497
   Google Scholar
• Mathiesen, T. (2015). The politics of abolition revisited. Routledge. ( Original work published 1974).
   Google Scholar
• McLeod, A. M. (2015). Prison abolition and grounded justice. University of California Los Angeles Law Review, 62, 1156–1239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nietzsche, F. (2002). Beyond good and evil. Cambridge University Press. ( Original work published 1886).
   Google Scholar
• Petersilia, J., & Cullen, F. T. (2014). Liberal but not stupid: Meeting the promise of downsizing prisons. Stanford Journal of Criminal Law and Policy, 2, 1–43. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2458024
   Google Scholar
• Ruggiero, V. (2010). Penal abolitionism. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schept, J. (2012). Contesting the “justice campus”: Abolitionist resistance to liberal carceral expansion. Radical Criminology, 1(1), 37–66.
   Google Scholar
• Scull, A. (1981). Deinstitutionalization and the rights of the deviant. Journal of Social Issues, 37(3), 6–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1981.tb00825.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spivakovsky, C., & Seear, K. (2017). Making the abject: Problem-solving courts, addiction, mental illness and impairment. Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, 31(3), 458–469. https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2016.1275152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sudbury, J. (2004). A world without prisons: Resisting militarism, globalized punishment, and empire. Social Justice, 31(1/2), 9–30.
   Google Scholar
• Weil, S. (2020). The power of words. Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar