Understanding Victim Retraction in Cases of Domestic Violence: Specialist Courts, Government Policy, and Victim‐Centred Justice

References

• ACT Department of Justice and Community Safety . 2001 . Evaluation of the ACT Family Violence Intervention Program Phase II: Final Report , Canberra : Australia .
   Google Scholar
• Anderson , P. , Boyle , K. , Cook , D. , Hartley , G. and Roberts , M. 2001 . All Saints and Blakenhall community district: Domestic violence research project , United Kingdom : University of Wolverhampton . Regional Research Institute,
   Google Scholar
• Bennett , L. , Goodman , L. and Dutton , M. A. 1999 . Systemic obstacles to the criminal prosecution of a battering partner: A victim perspective . Journal of Interpersonal Violence , 14 (7) : 761 – 772 .
   Google Scholar
• Berk , S. F. and Loseke , D. R. 1981 . ‘Handling’ family violence: Situational determinants of police arrest in domestic disturbances . Law and Society Review , 15 : 317 – 346 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braithwaite , J. 1999 . Restorative justice: Assessing optimistic and pessimistic accounts . Crime and Justice: A Review of Research , 25 : 1 – 127 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook , D. , Burton , M. , Robinson , A. and Vallely , C. 2004 . Evaluation of Specialist Domestic Violence Courts/Fast Track Systems London Crown Prosecution Service and Department of Constitutional Affairs,
   Google Scholar
• Cook , D. 2003 . Evaluation of Wolverhampton Specialist Domestic Violence Court , United Kingdom : University of Wolverhampton . Regional Research Institute,
   Google Scholar
• Cook , D. 2002 . Consultation for a change? Engaging users and communities in the policy process . Social Policy and Administration , 3 (5) : 516 – 531 .
   Google Scholar
• Cretney , A. and Davis , G. 1997 . Prosecuting domestic assault: Victims failing courts, or courts failing victims? . The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice , 36 (2) : 146 – 157 .
   Google Scholar
• Davis , R. C. , Smith , B. E. and Nickles , L. 1997 . Prosecuting Domestic Violence Cases with Reluctant Victims: Assessing Two Novel Approaches in Milwaukee , Washington, DC : National Institute of Justice .
   Google Scholar
• Dawson , M. and Dinovitzer , R. 2001 . Victim cooperation and the prosecution of domestic violence in a specialized court . Justice Quarterly , 18 (3) : 593 – 622 .
   Google Scholar
• Home Office . 2005 . Domestic Violence: A National Report , London : Home Office .
   Google Scholar
• Ford , D. A. 1991 . Prosecution as a victim power resource: A note on empowering women in violent conjugal relationships . Law and Society Review , 25 : 313 – 334 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HALT . 2004 . I Couldn’t Have Got Through Without your Support: Women’s Experiences of HALT Leeds, , England Available at http://www.halt.org.uk/
   Google Scholar
• Hartman , J. L. and Belknap , J. 2003 . Beyond the gatekeepers: Court professionals’ self‐reported attitudes about experiences with misdemeanour domestic violence cases . Criminal Justice and Behaviour , 30 (3) : 349 – 373 .
   Google Scholar
• Hirschel , D. and Hutchison , I. W. 2001 . The relative effects of offence, offender, and victim variables on the decision to prosecute domestic violence cases . Violence against Women , 7 (1) : 46 – 59 .
   Google Scholar
• Hirschel , D. and Hutchinson , I. W. 2003 . The voices of domestic violence victims: Predictors of victim preference for arrest and the relationship between preference for arrest and re‐victimisation . Crime and Delinquency , 49 (2) : 313 – 336 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoyle , C. and Sanders , A. 2000 . Police response to domestic violence: From victim choice to victim empowerment? . British Journal of Criminology , 40 : 14 – 36 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HMIC/HMCPSI . 2004 . Joint thematic inspection of the investigation and prosecution of cases involving domestic violence Available at http://www.hmcpsi.gov.uk/reports/jointins.shtml.
   Google Scholar
• Home Office Communication Directorate . 2003 . A New Deal for Victims and Witnesses – National Strategy Available at http://www.crimereduction.gov.uk/victims24.htm
   Google Scholar
• HMSO . 2002 . Justice for All , White Paper, Cmnd 5563 London : HMSO . Available at http://www.cjsonline.org.uk
   Google Scholar
• Justice Gap Task Force . 2002 . Narrowing the Justice Gap Available at http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/docs3/justicegap.html
   Google Scholar
• Kelitz , S. 2001 . Specialization of domestic violence case management in the courts: A national survey , National Center for State Courts . Available at http://www.ncsconline.org/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Lewis , R. 2004 . Making justice work: Effective legal interventions for domestic violence . British Journal of Criminology , 44 : 204 – 224 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin , M. E. 1994 . Mandatory arrest for domestic violence: The courts’ response . Criminal Justice Review , 19 : 212 – 227 .
   Google Scholar
• Maxfield , M. G. and Babbie , E. 1998 . Research Methods for Criminal Justice and Criminology , 2nd , Belmont, CA : Wadsworth .
   Google Scholar
• Mills , L. G. 2003 . Insult to Injury: Rethinking our Responses to Intimate Abuse , Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press .
   Google Scholar
• NWNJ Project Team . 2003 . No Witness, No Justice Available at http://www.cps.gov.uk/publications/docs/NWNJ_pilot_evaluation_report_291004.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Olson , D. E. and Stalans , L. J. 2001 . Violent offenders on probation: Profile, sentence, and outcome differences among domestic violence and other violent probationers . Violence Against Women , 7 (10) : 1164 – 1185 .
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom , B. J. 2003 . Domestic violence courts . Criminology and Public Policy , 3 (1) : 105 – 108 .
   Google Scholar
• Rauma , D. 1984 . Going for the gold: Prosecutorial decision making in cases of wife assault . Social Science Research , 13 : 321 – 351 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson , A. L. 2003 . The Cardiff Women’s Safety Unit: A Multi‐Agency Approach to Domestic Violence , School of Social Sciences : Cardiff University .
   Google Scholar
• Sacks , E. 2002 . Creating a Domestic Violence Court: Guidelines and Best Practices , Family Violence Prevention Fund . Available at http://endabuse.org/
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt , J. and Steury , E. 1989 . Prosecutorial discretion in filing charges in domestic violence cases . Criminology , 27 : 487 – 510 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Standing Together . 2003 . Heard not Judged: Consultation with Survivors of Domestic Violence in the Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham 2002–3 , London : Home Office .
   Google Scholar
• Uekert , B. K. 2003 . The value of co‐ordinated community responses . Criminology and Public Policy , 3 (1) : 133 – 136 .
   Google Scholar
• Walby , S. and Allen , J. 2004 . Domestic Violence, Sexual Assault and Stalking: Findings from the British Crime Survey , London : Home Office: . HORS 276.
   Google Scholar
• Women’s Aid . 2002 . “ Women’s Aid Federation of England Domestic Violence Statistical Factsheet 2002 ” . Available at http://www.womensaid.org.uk/dv/dvfactsh2002.htm
   Google Scholar
• Worden , R. E. 1989 . Situational and attitudinal explanations of police behaviour: A theoretical reappraisal and empirical assessment . Law and Society Review , 23 : 677 – 711 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worden , R. E. and Pollitz , A. A. 1984 . Police arrests in domestic disturbances: A further look . Law and Society Review , 18 : 105 – 119 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar