Family group conferences in child welfare: the fit with restorative justice

References

• Banks , S. 2006 . Ethics and values in social work , (3rd ed.) , New York : Palgrave .
   Google Scholar
• Birmingham , J. , Berry , M. and Bussey , M. 1996 . Certification for child welfare protective services staff members: ‘The Texas initiative’ . Child Welfare , 75 : 727
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braithwaite , J. 1999 . A future where punishment is marginalised: Realistic or utopian? . UCLA Law Review , 46 : 1727 – 1750 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braithwaite , J. 2002 . Restorative justice and responsive regulation , New York : Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Braithwaite , J. 2006 . Doing justice intelligently in civil society . Journal of Social Issues , 62 : 393 – 409 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briar‐Lawson , K. , Schmid , D. and Harris , N. 1997 . The partnership journey: First decade . Child Welfare , 55 (2) : 4
   Google Scholar
• Burford , G. 2005 . Families: Their role as architects of civil society and social inclusion . Practice , 17 : 79 – 88 .
   Google Scholar
• Children, Young Persons and Their Families Act . 1989 . Wellington, , New Zealand : New Zealand Government .
   Google Scholar
• Connolly , M. 1999 . Effective participatory practice: Family group conferencing in child welfare , New York : Aldine de Gruyter .
   Google Scholar
• Connolly , M. 2006 . Fifteen years of family group conferencing: Coordinators talk about their experiences in Aotearoa New Zealand . British Journal of Social Work , 36 : 523 – 540 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connolly , M. 2007a . Learning from the past and repositioning the future: The FGC in contemporary practice . Social Work Now , 36 : 8 – 14 .
   Google Scholar
• Connolly , M. 2007b . Practice frameworks: Conceptual maps to guide interventions in child welfare . British Journal of Social Work , 37 : 825 – 837 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connolly , M. and Ward , T. 2008 . Morals, rights and practice in human services: Effective and fair decision‐making in health, social care and criminal justice , London : Jessica Kingsley .
   Google Scholar
• Crampton , D. 2003 . Family group decision making in Kent Count, Michigan: The family and community compact . Protecting Children , 18 : 81 – 83 .
   Google Scholar
• Doolan , M. 2006 . Special feature: Restorative practices and family empowerment: Both/and or either/or? . Court in the Act , 21 March : 12 – 14 .
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson , H. 2006 . Protecting children in time: Child abuse, child protection and the consequences of modernity , Basingstoke, , UK : Palgrave Macmillan .
   Google Scholar
• Grauwiler , P. and Mills , L. 2004 . Moving beyond the criminal justice paradigm: A radical restorative justice approach to intimate abuse . Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare , 31 (1) Retrieved May 23, 2007, from http://findarticles.com/p.articles/mi_mocyz/is_1_31/ai_n6065939/print
   Google Scholar
• Gunderson , K. , Cahn , K. and Wirth , J. 2003 . The Washington State long‐term outcome study . Protecting Children , 18 : 42 – 47 .
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell , G. and Morris , A. 2006 . Youth justice in New Zealand: Restorative justice in practice? . Journal of Social Issues , 62 : 239 – 258 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministerial Advisory Committee on a Maori Perspective for the Department of Social Welfare . 1986 . Puao‐te‐ata‐tu [Daybreak] , Wellington, , New Zealand : Department of Social Welfare .
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Justice . 2004 . Part B: Principles of best practice for restorative justice processes in criminal cases Retrieved February 6, 2007, from http://www.justice.govt.nz/restorative-justice/partb.html
   Google Scholar
• Morris , A. 2002 . “ Children and family violence: Restorative messages from New Zealand ” . In Restorative justice and family violence , Edited by: Strang , H. and Braithwaite , J. 89 – 107 . Cambridge, , UK : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Pecora , P.J. , Whittaker , J.K. and Maluccio , A.N. 1992 . The child welfare challenge: Policy, practice and research , New York : Aldine de Gruyter .
   Google Scholar
• Pennell , J. 2004 . Family group conferencing in child welfare: Responsive and regulatory interfaces . Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare , 31 : 117 – 135 .
   Google Scholar
• Roche , D. 2006 . Dimensions of restorative justice . Journal of Social Issues , 62 : 217 – 238 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott , D. Sewing the seeds of innovation in child protection . Paper presented at the Tenth Australasian Conference on Child Abuse and Neglect . Wellington, New Zealand. month .
   Google Scholar
• Spratt , T. 2001 . The influence of child protection orientation on child welfare practice . British Journal of Social Work , 31 : 933 – 954 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thoennes , N. 2003 . Family group decision making in Colorado . Protecting Children , 18 : 74 – 80 .
   Google Scholar
• Titcomb , A. and LeCroy , C. 2003 . Evaluation of Arizona’s family group decision making program . Protecting Children , 18 : 58 – 64 .
   Google Scholar
• Wachtel , T. and McCold , P. Building a global alliance for restorative practices and family empowerment, Part 2 . Paper presented at the IIRP’s fifth international conference on Conferencing, Circles and Other Restorative Practices . Vancouver, Canada. August . Retrieved May 22, 2007, from http://www.realjustice.org/library/bc04_wachtel.html
   Google Scholar
• Wheeler , C.E. and Johnson , S. 2003 . Evaluating family group decision making: The Santa Clara example . Protecting Children , 18 : 65 – 69 .
   Google Scholar