Acquisition and expression of sucrose conditioned flavor preferences following dopamine D1, opioid and NMDA receptor antagonism in C57BL/6 mice

References

• Bodnar RJ, Lewis-Levy SR, Kest B. Feeding and drinking. Behavioral genetics of the mouse, volume I: genetics of behavioral phenotypes. Section 3: autonomous and motor behaviors, chapter 12. In: Crusio WE, Sluyter F, Gerlai RT, Pietropaolo S, (eds.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2013. p. 97–108.
   Google Scholar
• Crawley JN, Belknap JK, Collins A, Crabbe JC, Frankel W, Henderson N, et al. Behavioral phenotypes of inbred mouse strains: implications and recommendations for molecular studies. Psychopharmacol (Berl) 1997;132:107–24. doi: 10.1007/s002130050327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lariviere WR, Chesler RJ, Mogil JS. Transgenic studies of pain and analgesia: mutation or background genotype? J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2001;297:467–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voikar V, Koks S, Vasar E, Rauvasa H. Strain and gender differences in the behavior of mouse lines commonly used in transgenic studies. Physiol Behav 2001;72:271–81. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9384(00)00405-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zurita R, Chagoyen M, Cantero M, Alonso R, Gonzalez-Neira A, Lopez-Jimenez A, et al. Genetic polymorphisms among C57BL/6 mouse inbred strains. Transgenic Res 2011;20:481–9. doi: 10.1007/s11248-010-9403-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masayoshi M, Sakimura K. Conditional gene targeting on the pure C57BL/6 genetic background. Neurosci. Res 2007;58:105–12. doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2007.01.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachmanov AA, Tordoff MJ, Beauchamp GK. Sweetener preference of C57BL/6ByJ and 129P3/J mice. Chem Senses 2001;26:905–13. doi: 10.1093/chemse/26.7.905
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sclafani A, Sucrose motivation in sweet “sensitive” (C57BL/6J) and “subsensitive” (129P3/J) mice measured by progressive ratio licking. Physiol Behav 2006;87:734–44. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2006.01.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sclafani A. Oral, post-oral and genetic interactions in sweet appetite. Physiol Behav 2006;89:525–30. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2006.03.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sclafani A, Glendinning JJ, Sugar and fat conditioned flavor preferences in C57BL/6J and 129 mice: oral and postoral interactions. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2005;289:R712–20. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00176.2005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sclafani A. Enhanced sucrose and polycose preference in sweet “sensitive” (C57BL/6J) and “subsensitive” (129P3/J) mice after experience with these saccharides. Physiol Behav 2006;87:745–56. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2006.01.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis SR, Ahmed S, Dym C, Khaimova E, Kest B, Bodnar RJ. Inbred mouse strain survey of sucrose intake. Physiol Behav 2005;85:546–56. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2005.06.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sclafani A. Gut–brain nutrient signaling. Appetition vs. satiation. Appetite 2013;71:454–8. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2012.05.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sclafani A, Zukerman S, Ackroff K, Fructose- and glucose-conditioned preferences in FVB mice: strain differences in post-oral sugar appetition. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2014;307:R1448–57. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00312.2014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sclafani A, Zukerman S, Ackroff K, Post-oral glucose sensing, not caloric content, determines sugar reward in C57BL/6J mice. Chem Senses 2015;40: 245–58. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjv002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraft TT, Huang D, Lolier M, Warshaw D, LaMagna S, Natanova E, et al. BALB/c and SWR inbred mice differ in post-oral fructose appetition as revealed by sugar versus non-nutritive sweetener tests. Physiol Behav 2016;153:64–69. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.10.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dym CT, Pinhas A, Ginzberg M, Kest B, Bodnar RJ, Genetic variance contributes to naltrexone-induced inhibition of sucrose intake in inbred and outbred mouse strains. Brain Res 2007;1135:136–45. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.12.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dym CT, Pinhas A, Robak M, Sclafani A, Bodnar RJ, Genetic variance contributes to dopamine receptor antagonist-induced inhibition of sucrose intake in inbred and outbred mouse strains. Brain Res 2009;1257:40–52. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.12.042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraft TT, Huang D, Natanova E, Lolier M, Yakubov Y, LaMagna S, et al. Dopamine D1 and opioid receptor antagonist-induced reductions of fructose and saccharin intake in BALB/c and SWR mice. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2015;131:13–18. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2015.01.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourie F, Olsson K, Iskhakov B, Buras A, Fazilov G, Shenouda M, et al. Murine genetic variance in muscarinic cholinergic receptor antagonism of sucrose and saccharin solution intakes in three inbred mouse strains. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2017;163:50–56. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2017.10.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sclafani A. How food preferences are learned: laboratory animal models. Proc Nutr Soc 1995;54:419–27. doi: 10.1079/PNS19950011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu WZ, Sclafani A, Delamater A, Bodnar RJ. Pharmacology of flavor preference conditioning in sham-feeding rats: effects of naltrexone. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 1999;64:573–84. doi: 10.1016/S0091-3057(99)00124-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker RM, Shah MJ, Sclafani A, Bodnar RJ, Dopamine D1 and D2 antagonists reduce the acquisition and expression of flavor-preferences conditioned by fructose in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2003;75:55–65. doi: 10.1016/S0091-3057(03)00039-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, WZ, Silva RM, Sclafani A, Delamater AR, Bodnar RJ. Pharmacology of flavor preference conditioning in sham-feeding rats: effects of dopamine receptor antagonists. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2000;65:635–47. doi: 10.1016/S0091-3057(99)00239-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, RW, Li Y, Lee MG, Sclafani A, Bodnar RJ. Naltrexone does not prevent acquisition or expression of flavor preferences conditioned by fructose in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2004;78:239–46. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2004.03.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golden GJ, Houpt TA. NMDA receptor in conditioned flavor-taste preference learning: blockade by MK-801 and enhancement by D-cycloserine. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2007;86:587–96. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2007.02.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinhas A, Aviel M, Koen M, Gurgov S, Acosta V, Israel M, et al. Strain differences in sucrose- and fructose-conditioned flavor preferences in mice. Physiol Behav 2012;105:451–9. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.09.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaMagna S, Olsson K, Warshaw D, Fazilov G, Iskhakov B, Buras A, et al. Prior exposure to nutritive or artificial sweeteners differentially alters the magnitude and persistence of sucrose-conditioned flavor preferences in BALB/c and C57BL/6 inbred mouse strains. Nutr Neurosci 2018, in press.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dym CT, Kraft TT, Bae VS, Yakubov Y, Touzani K, Sclafani A, et al. Double-dissociation of D1 and opioid receptor antagonism effects on the acquisition of sucrose-conditioned flavor preferences in BALB/c and SWR mice. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2012;103:26–32. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2012.07.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraft TT, Yakubov Y, Huang D, Fitzgerald G, Natanova E, Sclafani A, et al. Dopamine D1 and opioid receptor antagonists differentially reduce the acquisition and expression of fructose-conditioned flavor preferences in BALB/c and SWR mice. Physiol Behav 2015;151:213–20. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.07.028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraft TT, Huang D, Lolier M, Warshaw D, LaMagna S, Natanova E, et al. NMDA receptor antagonism differentially reduces acquisition and expression of sucrose- and fructose-conditioned flavor preferences in BALB/c and SWR mice, Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2016;148:76–83. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2016.06.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iskhakov B, Bourie FR, Shenouda M, Fazilov G, Buras A, Bhattacharjee D, et al. Murine genetic variance in muscarinic cholinergic receptor antagonism of acquisition and expression of sucrose-conditioned flavor preferences in three inbred mouse strains. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2018;172:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2018.06.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kastin AJ, Pearson MA, Banks WA. EEG evidence that morphine and an enkephalin analog cross the blood-brain barrier. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 1991;40:771–4. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(91)90084-F
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farde L, Halldin C, Stone-Elander S, Sedvall G. PET analysis of human dopamine receptor subtypes using 11C-SCH 23390 and 11C-raclopride. Psychopharmacol (Berl) 1987;92:278–84. doi: 10.1007/BF00210831
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens MK, Yaksh TL. Systematic studies on the effects of the NMDA receptor antagonist MK-801 on cerebral blood flow and responsivity, EEG and blood-brain barrier following complete reversible cerebral ischemia. J Ceren Blood Flow and Metab 1990;10:77–88. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.1990.10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodnar RJ. Conditioned flavor preferences in animals: merging pharmacology, brain sites and genetic variance. A Festschrift to Drs. Anthony Sclafani and Karen Ackroff. Appetite 2018;122:17–25. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.12.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar