Towards optimised decisions for resource and carbon-efficient structural design

References

• Acree Guggemos, A., and A. Horvath. 2005. “Comparison of Environmental Effects of Steel- and Concrete-Framed Buildings.” Journal of Infrastructure Systems 11 (2): 93–101. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2005)11:2(93).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adhikari, P., H. Mahmoud, A. Xie, K. Simonen, and B. Ellingwood. 2020. “Life-Cycle Cost and Carbon Footprint Analysis for Light-Framed Residential Buildings Subjected to Tornado Hazard.” Journal of Building Engineering 32: 101657. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352710220308482.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, C. E., K. Kanafani, R. Kjær Zimmermann, F. Nygaard Rasmussen, and H. Birgisdóttir. 2020. “Comparison of GHG Emissions from Circular and Conventional Building Components.” Buildings and Cities 1 (1): 379–392. https://doi.org/10.5334/bc.55.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, C. E., F. N. Rasmussen, G. Habert, and H. Birgisdóttir. 2021. “Embodied GHG Emissions of Wooden Buildings–Challenges of Biogenic Carbon Accounting in Current LCA Methods.” Frontiers in Built Environment 7: 120. https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fbuil.2021.729096.
   Google Scholar
• Arehart, Jay H., Jim Hart, Francesco Pomponi, and Bernardino D'Amico. 2021. “Carbon Sequestration and Storage in the Built Environment.” Sustainable Production and Consumption 27: 1047–1063. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235255092100066X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aye, L., T. Ngo, R. H. Crawford, R. Gammampila, and P. Mendis. 2012. “Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Energy Analysis of Prefabricated Reusable Building Modules.” Energy and Buildings47: 159–168. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378778811005950.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barg, Steve, Forest Flager, and Martin Fischer. 2018. “An Analytical Method to Estimate the Total Installed Cost of Structural Steel Building Frames During Early Design.” Journal of Building Engineering 15: 41–50. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235271021730503X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauforumstahl. 2021. “Kosten im Stahlbau 2021, Basisinformationen zur Kalkulation.”
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, A. H., and B. G. Honey. 1994. “Energy and Carbon Dioxide Implications of Building Construction.” Energy and Buildings 20 (3): 205–217. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0378778894900248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bundesamt, DESTATIS. Statistisches. 2021. “Bautätigkeit und Wohnungen. Fachserie 5 / Reihe 1. Bautätigkeit.” https://www.destatis.de.
   Google Scholar
• Bundesamt, DESTATIS. Statistisches. 2022. “Volkswirtschaftliche Gesamtrechnungen, Bruttoinlandsprodukt (BIP).” https://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Wirtschaft/Volkswirtschaftliche-Gesamtrechnungen-Inlandsprodukt/Tabellen/bip-bubbles.html.
   Google Scholar
• Bundesregierung. 2022. Klimaschutzbericht 2022. Report. Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Klimaschutz.
   Google Scholar
• Cabeza, L. F., L. Rincón, V. Vilariño, G. Pérez, and A. Castell. 2014. “Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and Life Cycle Energy Analysis (LCEA) of Buildings and the Building Sector: A Review.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 29: 394–416. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032113005777.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calgaro, J. A., and H. Gulvanessian. 2001. “Management of Reliability and Risk in the Eurocode System.” In Safety, Risk and Reliability – Trends in Engineering: International Conference, Malta, 155–160. Zurich: International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering (IABSE).
   Google Scholar
• Camp, C. V., and F. Huq. 2013. “CO2 and Cost Optimization of Reinforced Concrete Frames Using a Big Bang-Big Crunch Algorithm.” Engineering Structures 48: 363–372. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029612004828.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CEN. 2002a. “EN1990. Eurocode – Basis of Structural Design.”
   Google Scholar
• CEN. 2002b. “EN1991-1-1. Eurocode 1: Actions on Structures – Part 1-1: General Actions – Densities, Self-Weight, Imposed Loads for Buildings.”
   Google Scholar
• CEN. 2005. “EN1993-1-1. Eurocode 3: Design of Steel Structures – Part 1-1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings.”
   Google Scholar
• CEN. 2010. “EN15643-1:2010. Sustainability of Construction Works – Sustainability Assessment of Buildings – Part 1: General Framework.”
   Google Scholar
• CEN. 2011. “EN15978:2011. Sustainability of Construction Works – Assessment of Environmental Performance of Buildings – Calculation Method.”
   Google Scholar
• CEN. 2020. “prEN1990. Eurocode – Basis of Structural and Geotechnical Design.”
   Google Scholar
• CEN. 2022. Draft JRC Report – Reliability Background of the Eurocodes – 2022-02-11. Report. CEN/TC 250/ SC10 N 5553.
   Google Scholar
• Chaudhary, Tariq, and Awais Piracha. 2013. “Effective Contribution of Structural Engineers to Green Buildings and Sustainability.” Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 40 (1): 97–100. doi:10.1139/cjce-2012-0154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CIB. 1999. Agenda 21 on Sustainable Construction. Report. International Council for Research and Innovation in Building and Construction (CIB), Comission W81.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, D. H. 2013. What Colour is Your Building? Measuring and Reducing the Energy and Carbon Footprint of Buildings: Information Paper 12 – Embodied Carbon Case Studies for Office Buildings. Positive Zero Pty Limited and Cundall Johnston and Partners LLP. https://www.positivezero.com.au/wciyb.
   Google Scholar
• Collings, David. 2022. “The Carbon Footprint of Bridges.” Structural Engineering International 32 (4): 501–506. https://doi.org/10.1080/10168664.2021.1917326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D'Amico, Bernardino, and Francesco Pomponi. 2018. “Accuracy and Reliability: A Computational Tool to Minimise Steel Mass and Carbon Emissions at Early-Stage Structural Design.” Energy and Buildings168: 236–250. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378778817336198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• deQo. 2021. “Database of Embodied Quantity Outputs (deQo).” https://www.carbondeqo.com; accessed in 09/2021.
   Google Scholar
• De Wolf, C., E. Hoxha, A. Hollberg, C. Fivet, and J. Ochsendorf. 2020. “Database of Embodied Quantity Outputs: Lowering Material Impacts Through Engineering.” Journal of Architectural Engineering 26 (3): 04020016. https://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/.
   Google Scholar
• De Wolf, C., F. Yang, D. Cox, A. Charlson, A. S. Hattan, and J. Ochsendorf. 2016. “Material Quantities and Embodied Carbon Dioxide in Structures.” Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers – Engineering Sustainability 169 (4): 150–161. doi:10.1680/ensu.15.00033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimoudi, A., and C. Tompa. 2008. “Energy and Environmental Indicators Related to Construction of Office Buildings.” Resources, Conservation and Recycling 53 (1): 86–95. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344908001481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, Grace K. C. 2008. “Sustainable Construction – the Role of Environmental Assessment Tools.” Journal of Environmental Management86 (3): 451–464. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479706004270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong, Yan, Simona Miraglia, Stefano Manzo, Stylianos Georgiadis, Hjalte Jomo Danielsen Sørup, Elena Boriani, Tine Hald, Sebastian Thöns, and Michael Z. Hauschild. 2018. “Environmental Sustainable Decision Making – the Need and Obstacles for Integration of LCA into Decision Analysis.” Environmental Science & Policy 87: 33–44. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901118302776.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eaton, K. J., and A. Amato. 1998. “A Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Steel and Concrete Framed Office Buildings.” Journal of Constructional Steel Research 46 (1-3): 286–287. doi:10.1016/S0143-974X(98)00074-1.
   Google Scholar
• Eberhardt, Leonora Charlotte Malabi, Harpa Birgisdottir, and Morten Birkved. 2019. “Life Cycle Assessment of a Danish Office Building Designed for Disassembly.” Building Research and Information47 (6): 666–680. doi:10.1080/09613218.2018.1517458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eberhardt, Leonora Charlotte Malabi, Morten Birkved, and Harpa Birgisdottir. 2020. “Building Design and Construction Strategies for a Circular Economy.” Architectural Engineering and Design Management 18: 93–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452007.2020.1781588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eleftheriadis, S., P. Duffour, P. Greening, J. James, B. Stephenson, and D. Mumovic. 2018. “Investigating Relationships Between Cost and CO2 Emissions in Reinforced Concrete Structures Using a BIM-Based Design Optimisation Approach.” Energy and Buildings 166: 330–346. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378778817320133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellingwood, B. R., and J. Y. Lee. 2016. “Life Cycle Performance Goals for Civil Infrastructure: Intergenerational Risk-Informed Decisions.” Structure and Infrastructure Engineering 12 (7): 822–829. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2015.1064966.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Comission. 2021a. https://climate.ec.europa.eu/eu-action/eu-emissions-trading-system-eu-ets.
   Google Scholar
• European Comission. 2021b. “Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research (EDGAR), Release EDGAR v6.0 (1970–2018).” https://edgar.jrc.ec.europa.eu.
   Google Scholar
• Faber, M. H., and R. Rackwitz. 2004. “Sustainable Decision Making in Civil Engineering.” Structural Engineering International 14 (3): 237–242. https://doi.org/10.2749/101686604777963919.
   Google Scholar
• Faber, M. H., and J. D. Sørensen. 2003. “Reliability-Based Code Calibration: The JCSS Approach.” In Applications of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering, edited by A. D. Kiureghian, M. Samer, and J. M. Pestana, Vol. 2, 927–935. Rotterdam: Millpress.
   Google Scholar
• Feria, Margarida, and Miguel Amado. 2019. “Architectural Design: Sustainability in the Decision-Making Process.” Buildings 9 (5): 135. https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/9/5/135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreiro-Cabello, Javier, Esteban Fraile-Garcia, Eduardo Martinez de Pison Ascacibar, and Francisco Javier Martinez de Pison Ascacibar. 2016. “Minimizing Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Costs for Structures with Flat Slabs.” Journal of Cleaner Production 137: 922–930. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652616310496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• fib. 2022. “fib Model Code, Chapter 12: Principles of Structural Design and Assessment, Draft 2022.”
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, K., and M. H. Faber. 2012. “The LQI Acceptance Criterion and Human Compensation Costs for Monetary Optimization – A Discussion Note.” In LQI Symposium in Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark: Joint Committee on Structural Safety (JCSS).
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, K., C. Viljoen, J. Köhler, and M. H. Faber. 2019. “Optimal and Acceptable Reliabilities for Structural Design.” Structural Safety 76: 149–161. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167473017302394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foraboschi, Paolo, Mattia Mercanzin, and Dario Trabucco. 2014. “Sustainable Structural Design of Tall Buildings Based on Embodied Energy.” Energy and Buildings 68: 254–269. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378778813005653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GABC. 2020. 2020 Global Status Report for Buildings and Construction. Report. Global Alliance for Buildings and Construction. United Nations Environment Programme.
   Google Scholar
• Gan, Vincent J. L., Jack C. P. Cheng, Irene M. C. Lo, and C. M. Chan. 2017. “Developing a CO2-e Accounting Method for Quantification and Analysis of Embodied Carbon in High-rise Buildings.” Journal of Cleaner Production 141: 825–836. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652616314676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Segura, T., and V. Yepes. 2016. “Multiobjective Optimization of Post-Tensioned Concrete Box-Girder Road Bridges Considering Cost, CO2 Emissions, and Safety.” Engineering Structures 125: 325–336. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029616303406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Segura, T., V. Yepes, J. Alcalá, and E. Pérez-López. 2015. “Hybrid Harmony Search for Sustainable Design of Post-Tensioned Concrete Box-Girder Pedestrian Bridges.” Engineering Structures 92: 112–122. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029615001510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gervásio, H., and L. S. da Silva. 2008. “Comparative Life-Cycle Analysis of Steel-Concrete Composite Bridges.” Structure and Infrastructure Engineering 4 (4): 251–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732470600627325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GLOBE. 2022. “Joint Committee on the Global Consensus on Sustainability in the Built Environment.” Decarbonizing Global Construction – Draft, September. https://www.rilem.net/globe.
   Google Scholar
• Gollier, Christian. 2010. “Ecological Discounting.” Journal of Economic Theory 145 (2): 812–829. Judgment Aggregation, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002205310900115X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustavsson, L., and A. Joelsson. 2010. “Life Cycle Primary Energy Analysis of Residential Buildings.” Energy and Buildings 42 (2): 210–220. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378778809002102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustavsson, L., K. Pingoud, and R. Sathre. 2006. “Carbon Dioxide Balance of Wood Substitution: Comparing Concrete- and Wood-Framed Buildings.” Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 11 (3): 667–691. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-006-7207-1.
   Google Scholar
• Hájek, P., C. Fiala, and M. Kynčlová. 2011. “Life Cycle Assessments of Concrete Structures – a Step Towards Environmental Savings.” Structural Concrete 12 (1): 13–22. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/suco.201000026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammond, G. P., and C. I. Jones. 2008. “Embodied Energy and Carbon in Construction Materials.” Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers – Energy and Buildings 161 (2): 87–98. doi:10.1680/ener.2008.161.2.87.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, Jim, Bernardino D'Amico, and Francesco Pomponi. 2021. “Whole-Life Embodied Carbon in Multistory Buildings: Steel, Concrete and Timber Structures.” Journal of Industrial Ecology 25 (2): 403–418. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jiec.13139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, W., S. Cooper, S. Allen, J. Roynon, and T. Ibell. 2021. “Embodied Carbon Assessment Using a Dynamic Climate Model: Case-Study Comparison of a Concrete, Steel and Timber Building Structure.” Structures 33: 90–98. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352012420307323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hingorani, Ramon, Peter Tanner, Miguel Prieto, and Carlos Lara. 2020. “Consequence Classes and Associated Models for Predicting Loss of Life in Collapse of Building Structures.” Structural Safety 85: 101910. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167473019303741.
   Google Scholar
• Holický, M., and M. Sýkora. 2021. “Reliability Approaches Affecting the Sustainability of Concrete Structures.” Sustainability 13 (5) 2627. doi:10.3390/su13052627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honfi, D. 2014. “Serviceability Floor Loads.” Structural Safety 50: 27–38. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167473014000228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, L., R. A. Bohne, A. Bruland, P. D. Jakobsen, and J. Lohne. 2015. “Life Cycle Assessment of Norwegian Road Tunnel.” The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 20 (2): 174–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-014-0823-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, L., G. Krigsvoll, F. Johansen, Y. Liu, and X. Zhang. 2018. “Carbon Emission of Global Construction Sector.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 81: 1906–1916. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IBU, Institut Bauen und Umwelt e.V. 2018. “Environmental Product Declaration as per /ISO 14025/ and /EN 15804. Structural Steel: Sections and Plates. Declaration Number: EPD-BFS-20180116-IBG2-EN.” https://www.ibu-epd.com.
   Google Scholar
• Ismail, Mohamed A., and Caitlin T. Mueller. 2021. “Minimizing Embodied Energy of Reinforced Concrete Floor Systems in Developing Countries Through Shape Optimization.” Engineering Structures 246: 112955. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029621010993.
   Google Scholar
• ISO. 2015. “ISO 2394. General Principles on Reliability for Structures, 4th Edition.”
   Google Scholar
• Jönsson, A., T. Björklund, and A. M. Tillman. 1998. “LCA of Concrete and Steel Building Frames.” The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 3 (4): 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02977572.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaethner, S. C., and J. A. Burridge. 2012. “Embodied CO2 of Structural Frames.” Structural Engineer90 (5): 33–40. https://www.istructe.org/journal/volumes/volume-90-(2012)/issue-5/embodied-co2-of-structural-frames/
   Google Scholar
• Kalusche, W., and S. Herke. 2020. BKI Baukosten 2020 Neubau. Statistische Kostenkennwerte für Gebäude. Stuttgart: BKI, Baukosteninformationszentrum.
   Google Scholar
• Kaveh, A. 2017. Cost and CO2 Emission Optimization of Reinforced Concrete Frames Using Enhanced Colliding Bodies Optimization Algorithm, 319–350. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48012-1_17.
   Google Scholar
• Kaveh, A., R. A. Izadifard, and L. Mottaghi. 2020. “Optimal Design of Planar RC Frames Considering CO2 Emissions Using ECBO, EVPS and PSO Metaheuristic Algorithms.” Journal of Building Engineering28: 101014. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352710219316341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KC, S., and D. Gautam. 2021. “Progress in Sustainable Structural Engineering: A Review.” Innovative Infrastructure Solutions 6: 68. doi:10.1007/s41062-020-00419-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, F. R., and J. Rankine. 1981. Tall Building Systems and Concepts. New York: American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE).
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S., J.-H. Moon, Y. Shin, G.-H. Kim, and D.-S. Seo. 2013. “Life Comparative Analysis of Energy Consumption and CO2 Emissions of Different Building Structural Frame Types.” The Scientific World Journal 2013: 175702. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/175702.
   Google Scholar
• Köhler, Jochen, and Michele Baravalle. 2019. “Risk-Based Decision Making and the Calibration of Structural Design Codes – Prospects and Challenges.” Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems36 (1): 55–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286608.2019.1615477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriegler, E., K. Riahi, N. Petermann, V. Bosetti, P. Capros, D. P. van Vuuren, P. Criqui, et al. 2014. Assessing Pathways Toward Ambitious Climate Targets at the Global and European Levels. A Synthesis of Results from the AMPERE Project. Report. https://ampere-project.eu.
   Google Scholar
• Lausselet, Carine, Johana Paola Forero Urrego, Eirik Resch, and Helge Brattebø. 2021. “Temporal Analysis of the Material Flows and Embodied Greenhouse Gas Emissions of a Neighborhood Building Stock.” Journal of Industrial Ecology 25 (2): 419–434. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jiec.13049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. Y., and B. R. Ellingwood. 2015. “Ethical Discounting for Civil Infrastructure Decisions Extending Over Multiple Generations.” Structural Safety 57: 43–52. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167473015000466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lentz, A. 2007. “Acceptability of Civil Engineering Decisions Involving Human Consequences.” Thesis.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, H. R., A. El Hanandeh, and B. P. Gilbert. 2017. “A Comparative Life Cycle Study of Alternative Materials for Australian Multi-Storey Apartment Building Frame Constructions: Environmental and Economic Perspective.” Journal of Cleaner Production 166: 458–473. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095965261731781X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKinsey. 2017. “Reinventing Construction: A Route to Higher Productivity.” Press Release, February 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Meinen, N. E., and R. D. J. M. Steenbergen. 2018. “Reliability Levels Obtained by Eurocode Partial Factor Design – a Discussion on Current and Future Reliability Levels.” Heron 63 (3): 243–302.
   Google Scholar
• Mergos, P. E. 2018. “Contribution to Sustainable Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete Members Through Embodied CO2 Emissions Optimization.” Structural Concrete 19 (2): 454–462. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/suco.201700064.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D., and J.-H. Doh. 2015. “Incorporating Sustainable Development Principles into Building Design: A Review from a Structural Perspective Including Case Study.” The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings 24 (6): 421–439. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/tal.1172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D., J.-H. Doh, and M. Mulvey. 2015. “Concrete Slab Comparison and Embodied Energy Optimisation for Alternate Design and Construction Techniques.” Construction and Building Materials80: 329–338. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950061815001051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon, K. S. 2008. “Sustainable Structural Engineering Strategies for Tall Buildings.” The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings 17 (5): 895–914. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/tal.475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mottaghi, L., R. A. Izadifard, and A. Kaveh. 2021. “Factors in the Relationship Between Optimal CO2 Emission and Optimal Cost of the RC Frames.” Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering 65 (1): 1–14. https://pp.bme.hu/ci/article/view/16790.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, Daniel B., Gang Liu, Amund N. Løvik, Roja Modaresi, Stefan Pauliuk, Franciska S. Steinhoff, and Helge Brattebø. 2013. “Carbon Emissions of Infrastructure Development.” Environmental Science and Technology 47 (20): 11739–11746. https://doi.org/10.1021/es402618m.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nahangi, Mohammad, Gursans Guven, Bolaji Olanrewaju, and Shoshanna Saxe. 2021. “Embodied Greenhouse Gas Assessment of a Bridge: A Comparison of Preconstruction Building Information Model and Construction Records.” Journal of Cleaner Production 295: 126388. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126388.
   Google Scholar
• Nishijima, K., M. H. Faber, and D. Straub. 2007a. “Inter-Generational Distribution of the Life-Cycle Cost of an Engineering Facility.” Journal of Reliability of Structures and Materials 1 (3): 33–46.
   Google Scholar
• Nishijima, K., M. H. Faber, and D. Straub. 2007b. “Sustainable Decisions for Life-Cycle Based Design and Maintenance.” Australian Journal of Civil Engineering 4 (1): 59–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/14488353.2007.11463928.
   Google Scholar
• Niu, Y., R. Hingorani, G. Fink, and J. Köhler. 2022. “Design Concept for the Sustainable Use of Timber in Structures.” In ICOSSAR 2021–22, 13th International Conference on Structural Safety and Reliability. Shanghai: International Association for Structural Safety and Reliability (IASSAR).
   Google Scholar
• Nordhaus, W. 2017. “Revisiting the Social Cost of Carbon.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114 (7): 1518. https://www.pnas.org/content/114/7/1518.abstract.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oladazimi, A., S. Mansour, and S. A. Hosseinijou. 2020. “Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Steel and Concrete Construction Frames: A Case Study of Two Residential Buildings in Iran.” Buildings 10 (3): 54. doi:10.3390/buildings10030054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paya-Zaforteza, I., V. Yepes, A. Hospitaler, and F. González-Vidosa. 2009. “CO2-Optimization of Reinforced Concrete Frames by Simulated Annealing.” Engineering Structures 31 (7): 1501–1508. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029609000996.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pindyck, R. S. 2017. “Coase Lecture–Taxes, Targets and the Social Cost of Carbon.” Economica 84 (335): 345–364. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecca.12243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pindyck, R. S. 2017. “The Use and Misuse of Models for Climate Policy.” Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 11 (1): 100–114. https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/rew012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pomponi, Francesco, and Alice Moncaster. 2016. “Embodied Carbon Mitigation and Reduction in the Built Environment – What Does the Evidence Say?” Journal of Environmental Management 181: 687–700. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479716305746.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rackwitz, R. 2000. “Optimization – the Basis of Code-Making and Reliability Verification.” Structural Safety 22 (1): 27–60. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167473099000375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rackwitz, R., A. Lentz, and M. Faber. 2005. “Socio-Economically Sustainable Civil Engineering Infrastructures by Optimization.” Structural Safety 27 (3): 187–229. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167473004000487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Röck, Martin, Marcella Ruschi Mendes Saade, Maria Balouktsi, Freja Nygaard Rasmussen, Harpa Birgisdottir, Rolf Frischknecht, Guillaume Habert, Thomas Lützkendorf, and Alexander Passer. 2020. “Embodied GHG Emissions of Buildings – the Hidden Challenge for Effective Climate Change Mitigation.” Applied Energy 258: 114107. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261919317945.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Nikl, T., J. W. Christiansen, and K. Walters. 2012. “Reliability-Based Life Cycle Assessment of Green Concrete Structures.” In ACI Symposium, Vol. 289, 1–13. American Concrete Institute (ACI)
   Google Scholar
• Sakai, K. 2005. “Environmental Design for Concrete Structures.” Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology 3 (1): 17–28. doi:10.3151/jact.3.17.
   Google Scholar
• Sakai, K., T. Shibata, A. Kasuga, and H. Nakamura. 2016. “Sustainability Design of Concrete Structures.” Structural Concrete17 (6): 1114–1124. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/suco.201600069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SAKO. 1999. Basis of design of structures. Proposals for Modification of Partial Safety Factors in Eurocodes. Report. Joint Committee of Nordic Committee on Building Regulations (NKB) and Nordic Standardization in the Construction Field (INSTA-B).
   Google Scholar
• Sarkisian, M., and D. Shook. 2014. “Embodied Carbon in Structures and Cities.” In IABSE Symposium Madrid: Engineering for Progress, Nature and People, 3166–3173. Zurich: International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering (IABSE).
   Google Scholar
• Sartori, I., and A. G. Hestnes. 2007. “Energy Use in the Life Cycle of Conventional and Low-energy Buildings: A Review Article.” Energy and Buildings 39 (3): 249–257. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378778806001873.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saxe, Shoshanna, Gursans Guven, Lucas Pereira, Alessandro Arrigoni, Tamar Opher, Adrien Roy, Aldrick Arceo, et al. 2020. “Taxonomy of Uncertainty in Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Infrastructure Projects.” Environmental Research Letters 15 (8): 083003. https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab85f8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonen, K., B. Rodriguez, and C. De Wolf. 2017. “Benchmarking the Embodied Carbon of Buildings.” Technology, Architecture + Design 1 (2): 208–218. doi:10.1080/24751448.2017.1354623.
   Google Scholar
• Skullestad, Julie Lyslo, Rolf André Bohne, and Jardar Lohne. 2016. “High-Rise Timber Buildings as a Climate Change Mitigation Measure – a Comparative LCA of Structural System Alternatives.” Energy Procedia 96: 112–123. Sustainable Built Environment Tallinn and Helsinki Conference SBE16, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876610216307512.
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, J. D., I. B. Kroon, and M. H. Faber. 1994. “Optimal Reliability-Based Code Calibration.” Structural Safety 15 (3): 197–208. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/016747309490040X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanner, P., J. L. Bellod, and D. Sanz. 2018. “Paper and Pencil in the Age of BIM.” Structural Engineering International 28 (4): 396–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/10168664.2018.1496782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanner, P., and R. Hingorani. 2015. “Acceptable Risks to Persons Associated with Building Structures.” Structural Concrete 16 (3): 314–322. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/suco.201500012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tol, R. S. J. 2019. “A Social Cost of Carbon for (Almost) Every Country.” Energy Economics 83: 555–566. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014098831930218X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vilutiene, Tatjana, Gvidas Kumetaitis, Arvydas Kiaulakis, and Darius Kalibatas. 2020. “Assessing the Sustainability of Alternative Structural Solutions of a Building: A Case Study.” Buildings 10 (2): 36. doi:10.3390/buildings10020036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Virguez, E., and M. H. Faber. 2011. “Supporting Decisions on Global Health and Life Safety Investments.” In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering (ICASP), 434–443. Zurich: CRC Press/Balkema.
   Google Scholar
• Vukotic, L., R. A. Fenner, and K. Symons. 2010. “Assessing Embodied Energy of Building Structural Elements.” Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers – Engineering Sustainability 163 (3): 147–158. https://www.icevirtuallibrary.com/doi/abs/10.1680/ensu.2010.163.3.147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb, D., and B. M. Ayyub. 2017. “Sustainability Quantification and Valuation. I: Definitions, Metrics, and Valuations for Decision Making.” ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering 3 (3): E4016001. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.0000893.
   Google Scholar
• Weikard, Hans-Peter, and Xueqin Zhu. 2005. “Discounting and Environmental Quality: When Should Dual Rates be Used?” Economic Modelling 22 (5): 868–878. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264999305000453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiik, M. K., E. Selvig, M. Fuglseth, C. Lausselet, E. Resch, I. Andresen, H. Brattebø, and U. Hahn. 2020. “GHG Emission Requirements and Benchmark Values for Norwegian Buildings.” In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. Vol. 588, 022005. IOP Publishing Ltd. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/588/2/022005.
   Google Scholar
• Yepes, V., J. V. Martí, and T. García-Segura. 2015. “Cost and CO2 Emission Optimization of Precast–Prestressed Concrete U-Beam Road Bridges by a Hybrid Glowworm Swarm Algorithm.” Automation in Construction 49: 123–134. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0926580514002246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ženíšek, M., J. Pežta, M. Tipka, V. Kočí, and P. Hájek. 2020. “Optimization of RC Structures in Terms of Cost and Environmental Impact–Case Study.” Sustainability 12 (20): 8532. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/20/8532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Chao, Muhammad Amaduddin, and Lee Canning. 2011. “Carbon Dioxide Evaluation in a Typical Bridge Deck Replacement Project.” Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers – Energy 164 (4): 183–194. doi:10.1680/ener.2011.164.4.183.
   Google Scholar