Discourse, justification and critique: towards a legitimate digital copyright regime?

References

• Association of Independent Music (AIM), 2011. Submission to the Hargreaves review of intellectual property and growth. Available from: http://www.ipo.gov.uk/ipreview-c4e-sub-aim.pdf [Accessed 25 July 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Baker, C.E., 2002. Media, markets, and democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bendelack/Industry Trust for IP Awareness, 2010. You make the movies. Available from: http://www.connectedtobritishfilmandtv.co.uk/#/you-make-the-movies [Accessed 31 October 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Bettig, R., 1996. Copyrighting culture: the political economy of intellectual property. Boulder, CO: Westview.
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L. and Chiapello, È., 2005. The new spirit of capitalism. Trans. G. Elliott. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L. and Thévenot, L., 2006. On justification: economies of worth. New ed. Trans. C. Porter. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bowrey, K., 2005. Law and internet cultures. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boyle, J., 2010. The public domain: enclosing the commons of the mind. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• British Recorded Music Industry (BPI), 2006. The Gowers review of intellectual property: a response from the British Phonographic Industry. Available from:http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/d/british_phonographic_industry_306_160 kb.pdf [Accessed 31 October 2012].
   Google Scholar
• British Recorded Music Industry (BPI), 2011. Independent review of intellectual property and growth: response of the BPI. Available from: http://www.ipo.gov.uk/ipreview-c4e-sub-bpi.pdf [Accessed 29 October 2012].
   Google Scholar
• British Video Association (BVA), 2006. Gowers review of intellectual property: BVA. Available from:http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/d/british_video_association_260_372 kb.pdf [Accessed 31 October 2012].
   Google Scholar
• British Video Association (BVA), 2011. Response to the independent review of IP & growth. Available from:http://www.ipo.gov.uk/ipreview-c4e-sub-bva.pdf [Accessed 29 October 2012].
   Google Scholar
• BPI, 2012. Digital revenues overtake physical in UK recording market. Available from: http://www.bpi.co.uk/media-centre/digital-revenues-overtake-physical-in-uk-recorded-music-market.aspx [Accessed 18 August 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Chiapello, E. and Fairclough, N., 2002. Understanding the new management ideology: a transdisciplinary contribution from critical discourse analysis and new sociology of capitalism. Discourse & society, 13 (2), 185–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creative Commons, 2011. The power of open. Available from:http://thepowerofopen.org/ [Accessed 25 July 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Creative Commons, 2006. Submission to the Gowers review of intellectual property. Available from:http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/media/3/2/creative_commons_418_p1_936 kb.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• David, M., 2010. Peer to peer and the music industry: the criminalization of sharing. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Deazley, R., 2006. Rethinking copyright. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.10.4337/9781847201621
   Google Scholar
• Department for Business, Innovation and Skills/Intellectual Property Office, 2009. © The way ahead: a strategy for copyright in the digital age. London: Department for Business, Innovation and Skills.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (BERR), 2008. Consultation on legislative options to address illicit peer-to-peer (P2P) file-sharing. London: BERR.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Business, Innovation and Skills/Department of Culture Media and Sport (BIS/DCMS), 2009. Digital Britain final report. London: The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Culture, Media and Sport Select Committee (DCMS), 2007. New media and the creative industries. London: The Stationery Office, Fifth Report.
   Google Scholar
• Drahos, P., 1996. A philosophy of intellectual property. Dartmouth: Dartmouth Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Drahos, P. and Braithwaite, J., 2002. Information feudalism: who owns the knowledge economy. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Duff, A., 2008. The normative crisis of the information society. Cyberpsychology: journal of psychosocial research on cyberspace, 2 (1). Available from:http://cyberpsychology.eu/view.php?cisloclanku=2008051201&article= [Accessed 4 November 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, L., Klein, B., Lee, D., Moss, G., and Philip, F., 2013. Isn’t it just a way to protect Walt Disney’s rights?: Media user perspectives on copyright, New Media & Society [online]. doi:10.1177/1461444813511402.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, L., Klein, B., Lee, D., Moss, G. and Philip, F., forthcoming. Communicating copyright: Discourse and disagreement in the digital age. In: Matthew David and Debora Halbert, eds. SAGE handbook of intellectual property. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N., 2003. Analysing discourse: textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N., 2004. Critical discourse analysis and change in management discourse and ideology: a transdisciplinary approach to strategic critique. University of Lancaster. Available from:http://www.ling.lancs.ac.uk/staff/norman/paper5.doc [Accessed 31 July 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Featured Artists Coalition/Music Managers Forum (FAC/MMF), 2011. The FAC and MMF submission to the Hargreaves review. Available from:http://www.ipo.gov.uk/ipreview-c4e-sub-featured.pdf [Accessed 31 October 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Freedman, D., 2008. The politics of media policy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gowers, A., 2006. Gowers review of intellectual property. London: HM Treasury.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J., 1989. The theory of communicative action. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J., 1991. Communication and the evolution of society. Oxford: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J., 1997. Between facts and norms: contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. London: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, I., 2011. Digital opportunity: a review of intellectual property and growth. London: HM Treasury.
   Google Scholar
• Hesmondhalgh, D., 2006. Digital sampling and cultural inequality. Social & legal studies, 15 (1), 53–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesmondhalgh, D., 2007. The cultural industries. 2nd ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Industry Trust for IP Awareness, 2009. Connected to British film & TV campaign. Available from:http://www.connectedtobritishfilmandtv.co.uk/ [Accessed 29 October 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Industry Trust for IP Awareness, 2011. Moments worth paying for. Available from:http://www.copyrightaware.co.uk/about-the-industry-trust/mwpf/moments-worth-paying-for-videos.asp [Accessed 20 October 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Industry Trust for IP Awareness, 2012a. Our campaigns. Available from:http://www.copyrightaware.co.uk/ [Accessed 31 October 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Industry Trust for IP Awareness, 2012b. Behind the scenes. Available from:http://www.copyrightaware.co.uk/ [Accessed 31 October 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Industry Trust for IP Awareness, 2012c. Copyright theft. Available from:http://www.copyrightaware.co.uk/ [Accessed 31 October 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Intellectual Property Office (IPO), 2013. How long copyright lasts. Available from:http://www.ipo.gov.uk/types/copy/c-duration.htm [Accessed 15 August 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B., 2002. The future of the capitalist state. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kawashima, N., 2010. The rise of ‘user creativity’ – web 2.0 and a new challenge for copyright law and cultural policy. International journal of cultural policy, 16 (3), 337–353.10.1080/10286630903111613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kretschmer, M. and Kawohl, F., 2004. The history and philosophy of copyright. In: S. Frith and L. Marshall, eds. Music and copyright. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 21–53.
   Google Scholar
• Lessig, L., 2004. Free culture: how big media uses technology and the law to lock down culture and control creativity. New York: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Lessig, L., 2008. Remix. London: Bloomsbury.10.5040/9781849662505
   Google Scholar
• Lindgren, S., 2013. Pirate panics: comparing news and blog discourse on illegal file sharing in Sweden. Information, communication & society. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1369118X.2012.757632#tabModule [Accessed 14 August 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Macmillan, F., 1998. Copyright, culture and private power. Prometheus, 16 (3), 305–316.10.1080/08109029808629284
   Google Scholar
• May, C., 2003. Digital rights management and the breakdown of social norms. First monday, 8 (11). Available from: http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/viewArticle/1097/1017 [Accessed 1 November 2012].
   Google Scholar
• May, C., 2004. Commodifying the ‘information age’: intellectual property rights, the state and the internet. SCRIPT-ed, 1 (3), 408–419.10.2966/scrip.010304
   Google Scholar
• Mayhew, L.H., 1997. The new public. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511520785
   Google Scholar
• Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA), 2004. Piracy. It’s a crime. Available from:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HmZm8vNHBSU.
   Google Scholar
• Music Matters, 2012. The campaign. Available from: http://www.whymusicmatters.com [Accessed 10 December 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Open Rights Group (ORG), 2006. Open rights group submission to the Gowers review. Available from:http://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/Gowers_Review_Submission [Accessed 25 October 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Open Rights Group (ORG), 2011. Hargreaves review of IP and growth: Open Rights Group (ORG) submission. Available from:http://www.ipo.gov.uk/ipreview-c4e-sub-org.pdf [Accessed 28 October 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Open Rights Group (ORG), 2012a. Website. Available from:http://www.openrightsgroup.org/ [Accessed 5 May 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Open Rights Group (ORG), 2012b. Copyright reform. Available from:http://www.openrightsgroup.org/issues/copyright-reform [Accessed 5 May 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Open Rights Group (ORG), 2012c. Why copyright law needs a sense of humour. Available from:http://www.openrightsgroup.org/ [Accessed 5 May 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Open Rights Group (ORG), 2012d. Our work. Available from:https://www.openrightsgroup.org/ourwork/ [Accessed 5 May 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Pang, L., 2008. China who makes and fakes: a semiotics of the counterfeit. Theory, culture & society, 25 (6), 117–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Postigo, H., 2008. Capturing fair use for the youtube generation: the digital rights movement, the electronic frontier foundation and the user-centered framing of fair use. Information, communication & society, 11 (7), 1008–1027.
   Google Scholar
• Postigo, H., 2011. Cultural production and the digital rights movement. Information, communication & society, 15 (8), 1165–1185.
   Google Scholar
• Producers Alliance for Cinema and Television (PACT), 2011. Response to independent review of intellectual property and growth: PACT. Available from:http://www.ipo.gov.uk/ipreview-c4e-sub-pact.pdf [Accessed 31 October 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Rutter, J., 2010. Consumers, crime and the downloading of music. Prometheus, 28 (4), 411–418.10.1080/08109028.2010.543001
   Google Scholar
• Rutter, J. and Bryce, J., 2008. The consumption of counterfeit goods: ‘Here Be Pirates?’. Sociology, 42 (6), 1146–1164.10.1177/0038038508096938
   Google Scholar
• Smiers, J., 2005. Arts under pressure: promoting cultural diversity in the age of globalization. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Svensson, M. and Larsson, S., 2012. Intellectual property law compliance in Europe: illegal file sharing and the role of social norms. New media & society, 14 (7), 1147–1163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Towse, R., 1999. Copyright, risk and the artist: an economic approach to policy for artists. International journal of cultural policy, 6 (1), 91–107.10.1080/10286639909358113
   Google Scholar
• UK Music, 2011. UK Music response to the call for evidence of the independent review of intellectual property and growth. Available from:http://www.ipo.gov.uk/ipreview-c4e-sub-ukmusic.pdf [Accessed 31 October 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Wang, S. and Zhu, J., 2003. Mapping film piracy in China. Theory, culture & society, 20 (4), 97–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner Bros. Entertainment UK, 2006. Submission to the Gowers review of UK IP laws. Available from:http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/d/warner_brothers_entertainment_uk_097_35 kb.pdf [Accessed 31 October 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Yar, M., 2008. The rhetorics and myths of anti-piracy campaigns: criminalization, moral pedagogy and capitalist property relations in the classroom. New media & society, 10 (4), 605–623.10.1177/1461444807087911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, I.M., 2002. Inclusion and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0198297556.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Young, I., 2009. Why music artists need a voice [BBC Online]. Available from:http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/7939035.stm [Accessed 1 June 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Zittrain, J., 2012. Don’t let software patents stop us standing on the shoulders of giants. The Guardian, 18 April. Available from:http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/apr/18/software-patents-shoulders-of-giants [Accessed 1 December 2012].
   Google Scholar