Parties, promises and politics: exploring manifesto discourse on arts policy in Westminster, Scottish, Welsh and Northern Irish elections 1945–2011

References

• Belfiore, E., 2002. Art as a means of alleviating social exclusion: does it really work? A critique of instrumental cultural policies and social impact studies in the UK. International journal of cultural policy, 8 (1), 91–106.
   Google Scholar
• Bertelli, A., et al., 2014. Politics, management, and the allocation of arts funding: evidence from public support for the arts in the UK. International journal of cultural policy, 20 (3), 341–359.10.1080/10286632.2013.786057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birrell, D., 2009. The impact of devolution on social policy. Bristol: Policy Press.10.1332/policypress/9781847422255.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Boyatzis, R., 1998. Transforming qualitative information. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Brademas, J., 1991. Arts and public policy. Journal of arts management and law, 21 (1), 79–97.10.1080/07335113.1991.9943128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brighton, A., 2006. Consumed by the political: the ruination of the arts council. Critical quarterly, 48, 1–13.10.1111/criq.2006.48.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budge, I. and Hofferbert, R., 1990. Mandates and policy outputs: U.S. party platforms and federal expenditures. The American political science review, 84 (1), 111–131.10.2307/1963632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunting, C., 2005. Social stratification of cultural consumption: a policy response from arts council England. Cultural trends, 14 (3), 213–216.10.1080/09548960500436808
   Google Scholar
• Carter, N., 2006. Party politicization of the environment in Britain. Party politics, 12 (6), 747–767.10.1177/1354068806068599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caust, J., 2003. Putting the “art” back into arts policy making: how arts policy has been “captured” by the economists and the marketers. International journal of cultural policy, 9 (1), 51–63.10.1080/1028663032000089723
   Google Scholar
• Chaney, P. and Drakeford, M., 2004. The primacy of ideology: social policy and the first term of the National Assembly for Wales. Social policy review, 16, 121–142. Bristol: The Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cherbo, J. and Wyszomirski, M., 2000. The public life of the arts in America. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clegg MP, N., Monday, February 08, 2010. “The Power of Creativity” – launching a new arts policy. Available from: http://www.libdems.org.uk/press_releases_detail.aspx?title=Don_Foster_launches_'The_Power_of_Creativity'&pPK=ca6948f2–4fc7–4199-ac1d-f2de72ecc5df [Accessed 14 February 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Cobb, R.W. and Ross, M.H., 1997. Agenda setting and the denial of agenda access: key concepts. In: R.W. Cobb and M.H. Ross, eds. Cultural strategies of agenda denial. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas, 35–36.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, B., 1963. The press and foreign policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Colebatch, H., 2002. Policy. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Conservative Party, 1945. Mr. Churchill’s declaration of policy to the electors. London: Conservative Party.
   Google Scholar
• Conservative Party, 1959. The next five years. London: Conservative Party.
   Google Scholar
• Conservative Party, 1964. Prosperity with a purpose. London: Conservative Party.
   Google Scholar
• Conservative Party, 1974. Firm action for a fair Britain. London: Conservative Party.
   Google Scholar
• Conservative Party, 1979. Conservative party general election manifesto. London: Conservative Party.
   Google Scholar
• Conservative Party, 1983. The challenge of our times. London: Conservative Party.
   Google Scholar
• Conservative Party, 1987. The next moves forward. London: Conservative Party.
   Google Scholar
• Conservative Party, 1992. The best future for Britain. London: Conservative Party.
   Google Scholar
• Conservative Party, 2001. Time for Common Sense. London: Conservative Party.
   Google Scholar
• Conservative Party, 2005. Are you thinking what we’re thinking? It’s time for action. London: Conservative Party.
   Google Scholar
• Conservative Party, 2010. The future of the arts with a conservative government. London: Conservative Party.
   Google Scholar
• Cowell, B., 2012. Arts philanthropy: the facts, trends and potential. Cultural trends, 21 (3), 261–264.10.1080/09548963.2012.698562
   Google Scholar
• Craik, J., 2005. Dilemmas in policy support for the arts and cultural sector. Australian journal of public administration, 64 (4), 6–19.10.1111/ajpa.2005.64.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creed, W., Langstraat, J., and Scully, M., 2002. Picture of the frame: frame analysis as technique and as politics. Organizational research methods, 5 (1), 34–55.10.1177/1094428102051004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danson, M. and de Souza, P., 2012. Regional development in northern Europe: peripherality, marginality and border issues. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Culture, Media and Sport, 1998. Creative industries mapping document. London: DCMS.
   Google Scholar
• Fearon, J., 2003. Electoral accountability and the control of politicians: selecting good types versus sanctioning poor performance. In: Democracy, accountability, and representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 179–192.
   Google Scholar
• Fendrich, J. and St. Angelo, D., 1981. The Reagan election and mandate: their fiscal policy implications for the welfare state. Journal of society and social welfare, 54 (1), 553–568.
   Google Scholar
• Gamble, A., 2006. The constitutional revolution in the United Kingdom. Publius, 36 (1), 19–35.10.1093/publius/pjj011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamson, W.A. and Modigliani, A., 1989. Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power. American journal of sociology, 95 (1), 1–37.10.1086/ajs.1989.95.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garnham, N., 2005. From cultural to creative industries: an analysis of the implications of the “creative industries” approach to arts and media policy making in the United Kingdom. International journal of cultural policy, 11 (1), 15–29.10.1080/10286630500067606
   Google Scholar
• Grampp, W., 1989. Rent-seeking in arts policy. Public choice, 60 (2), 113–121.10.1007/BF00149239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, C., 2002. Local government and the arts. Local government studies, 28 (1), 77–90.10.1080/714004133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassan, G. and Shaw, E., 2012. The strange death of labour Scotland. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, 1965. A policy for the arts – the first steps. London: HMSO. Cmnd. 2601, February 1965.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, C., 2010. Shadow culture secretary Jeremy Hunt: 'It is going to be tough'. The guardian, 22 February. Available from: http://www.theguardian.com/culture/2010/feb/22/jeremy-hunt-arts-funding [Accessed 11 Dec 13].
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C., 1991. A public management for all seasons? Public administration, 69 (1), 3–19.10.1111/padm.1991.69.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphreys, P., 2000. New labour policies for media and the arts. In: D. Coates and P. Lawler, eds. New labour into power. Manchester, NH: Manchester University Press, 221–239.
   Google Scholar
• Kpessa, M. and Lecours, A., 2011. Nationalism, development, and social policy: the politics of nation-building in sub-Saharan Africa. Ethnic and racial studies, 34 (12), 2115–2133.10.1080/01419870.2011.574717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. and Bock, M., 2008. The content analysis reader. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Labour Party, 1950. Let us win through together: a declaration of labour policy for the consideration of the nation. London: Labour Party.
   Google Scholar
• Labour Party, 1970. Now britain’s strong – let’s make it great to live in. London: Labour Party.
   Google Scholar
• Labour Party, 1983. The new hope for Britain. London: Labour Party.
   Google Scholar
• Labour Party, 1992. It’s time to get Britain working again. London: Labour Party.
   Google Scholar
• Labour Party, 1997. Because Britain deserves better. London: Labour Party.
   Google Scholar
• Labour Party, 2001. Ambitions for Britain. London: Labour Party.
   Google Scholar
• Labour Party, 2005. Britain forward not back. London: Labour Party.
   Google Scholar
• Labour Party, 2010. A fair future for all. London: Labour Party.
   Google Scholar
• Labour Party manifesto, 2010. Creative Britain: labour’s cultural manifesto. London: Labour Party.
   Google Scholar
• Laffin, M., Shaw, E., and Taylor, G., 2007. The new sub-national politics of the British labour party. Party politics, 13 (1), 88–108.10.1177/1354068806071265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitas, R., 2005. The Inclusive society? Social exclusion and new labour. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230511552
   Google Scholar
• Libbrecht, L., Maddens, B., Swenden, W., and Fabre, E., 2009. Issue-salience in regional party manifestos in Spain. European journal of political research, 48 (1), 58–79.10.1111/ejpr.2009.48.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liberal Democrats, 1992. Changing Britain for good. London: Liberal Democrats.
   Google Scholar
• Liberal Democrats, 2001. Freedom, justice, honesty. London: Liberal Democrats.
   Google Scholar
• Liberal Democrats, 2005. The real alternative. London: Liberal Democrats.
   Google Scholar
• Liberal Democrats, 2010. The power of creativity. London: Liberal Democrats.
   Google Scholar
• Maguire, P. and Woodham, J., 1998. Design and cultural politics in postwar Britain. Leceister: Leicester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meyers, M.K., Glaser, B., and Donald, K.M., 1998. On the front lines of welfare delivery: are workers implementing policy reforms? Journal of policy analysis and management, 17 (1), 22–31.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, T. and Oxleya, Z., 1999. Issue framing effects on belief importance and opinion. The journal of politics, 61 (4), 1040–1067.10.2307/2647553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Faircheallaigh, C., Wanna, J., and Weller, P., 1999. The arts industry: reluctant clients’ in public sector management in Australia. 2nd ed. Macmillan: Melbourne, 273–289.
   Google Scholar
• Pankratz, D., 1993. Multiculturalism and public arts policy. Portsmouth, NH: Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perone, D., 2004. Searching for a national policy on the arts. Review of policy research, 21 (4), 485–504.10.1111/ropr.2004.21.issue-4
   Google Scholar
• Petrocik, J., 1996. Issue ownership in presidential elections, with a 1980 case study. American journal of political science, 40 (3), 825–850.10.2307/2111797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plaid Cymru, 2003. Manifesto 2003. Cardiff: Plaid Cymru.
   Google Scholar
• Plaid Cymru, 2011. Ambition is critical: a manifesto for a better Wales. Cardiff: Plaid Cymru.
   Google Scholar
• Przeworski, A., Stokes, S., and Manin, B., eds., 1999. Elections and representation, chapter one in democracy, accountability, and representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Quinn, R., 2009. Distance or intimacy? The arm’s length principle, the British government and the arts council of Great Britain. International journal of cultural policy, 4 (1), 127–159.
   Google Scholar
• Radcliff, B., 2001. The political economy of human happiness. American political science review, 95 (4), 939–952.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RePass, D., 1971. Issue-salience and party choice. American political science review, 65 (1), 389–400.10.2307/1954456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Pose, A. and Gill, N., 2003. The global trend towards devolution and its implications. Environment and planning C: government and policy, 21 (3), 333–351.10.1068/c0235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sage, D., 2012. A challenge to liberalism? The communitarianism of the Big Society and Blue Labour. Critical social policy, 32, 365–382.10.1177/0261018312444411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuster, J., 1987. Making compromises to make comparisons in cross-national arts policy research. Journal of cultural economics, 11 (2), 1–36.10.1007/BF00711860
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Labour Party, 2003. On your side. Edinburgh: Scottish Labour.
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Labour Party, 2007. Building Scotland. Edinburgh: Scottish Labour.
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Labour Party, 2011. Fighting for what really matters. Edinburgh: Scottish Labour.
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Liberal Democratic Party, 1999. Raising the standard. Edinburgh: Scottish Labour.
   Google Scholar
• Scottish National Party, 1999. Enterprise, compassion, democracy. Edinburgh: SNP.
   Google Scholar
• Scottish National Party, 2007. It’s time. Edinburgh: SNP.
   Google Scholar
• Sinn Fein, 2007. Leadership across Ireland. Dublin: Sinn Fein.
   Google Scholar
• Skilling, P., 2005. Trajectories of arts and culture policy in New Zealand. Australian journal of public administration, 64, 20–31.10.1111/ajpa.2005.64.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Social Democratic and Labour Party, 2007. Let’s deliver real progress. Belfast: SDLP.
   Google Scholar
• Strom, E. and Cook, A., 2004. Old pictures in new frames: issue definition and federal arts policy. Review of policy research, 21, 505–522.10.1111/ropr.2004.21.issue-4
   Google Scholar
• Strom, E. and Wyszomirski, M., 2004. New directions in arts and cultural policy: forward by the editors. Review of Policy Research, 21, 465–467.
   Google Scholar
• Titmuss, R., 1968. Commitment to welfare. London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Tonkiss, F., 2004. Analysing text and speech: content and discourse analysis. In: A. Searle, ed. Researching society and culture. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 112–121.
   Google Scholar
• Treisman, D., 2007. The architecture of government: rethinking political decentralization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511619151
   Google Scholar
• Volkens, A., 2001. Manifesto research since 1979: from reliability to validity. In: M. Laver, ed. Estimating the policy positions of political actors. London: Routledge, 56–61.
   Google Scholar
• Welsh Conservative Party, 2007. Vote Welsh Conservative for a change. Cardiff: Welsh Labour Party.
   Google Scholar
• Welsh Labour Party, 1999. Working hard for Wales. Cardiff: Welsh Labour Party.
   Google Scholar
• Welsh Labour Party, 2003. Working together for Wales. Cardiff: Welsh Labour Party.
   Google Scholar
• Welsh Labour Party, 2011. Standing up for Wales. Cardiff: Welsh Labour Party.
   Google Scholar
• Whiteside, N., 1996. Creating the welfare state in Britain, 1945–1960. Journal of social policy, 25, 83–103.10.1017/S0047279400000076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, R., 1989. The politics of modernism. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar