Regulating for creativity and cultural diversity: the case of collective management organisations and the music industry

References

• Alexander, P., 1996. Entropy and popular culture: product diversity in the popular music recording industry. American sociological review, 61 (1), 171–174.10.2307/2096412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry, B., 2001. Culture and equality. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Burkart, P., 2010. Music and cyberliberties. Middletown: Wesleyan University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, A., 1996. How effective are international copyright conventions in the music industry? Journal of cultural economics, 20 (1), 51–66.10.1007/s10824-005-1060-z
   Google Scholar
• Christianen, M., 1995. Cycles in symbol production? a new model to explain concentration, diversity and innovation in the music industry. Popular music, 14, 55–93.10.1017/S0261143000007637
   Google Scholar
• Cloonan, M. and Williamson, J., 2007. Rethinking the music industry. Popular music, 26 (2), 305–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clydesdale, G., 2006. Creativity and competition: the beatles. Creativity research journal, 18 (2), 129–139.10.1207/s15326934crj1802_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietz, A., 2014. The European Commission’s proposal for a directive on collecting societies and cultural diversity – a missed opportunity. International journal of music business research, 3 (1), 7–25.
   Google Scholar
• Dowd, T., 2004. Concentration and diversity revisited: production logics and the U.S. mainstream recording market, 1940–1990. Social forces, 82 (4), 1411–1455.10.1353/sof.2004.0067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowd, T. and Blyler, M., 2002. Charting race. Poetics, 30, 87–110.10.1016/S0304-422X(02)00008-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission, 2013. Public Consultation on the Review of EU Copyright Rules. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/consultations/2013/copyright-rules/index_en.htm
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, 2014. Directive on collective management of copyright and related rights and multi-territorial licensing of rights in musical works for online use in the internal market ( 2014/26/EU).
   Google Scholar
• European Parliamentary Research Service, 2014. TTIP and the cultural exception. Available from: http://epthinktank.eu/2014/08/29/ttip-and-the-cultural-exception/
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, F. and Waldfogel, J., 2013. Pop internationalism: has half a century of world music trade displaced local culture? The economic journal, 123, 634–664.10.1111/ecoj.12003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, M., 2005. Market power in music retailing: the case of Wal-Mart. Popular music and society, 28 (4), 501–519.10.1080/03007760500159054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredriksson, M., 2014. Copyright culture and pirate politics. Cultural Studies, 28 (5–6), 1022–1047.10.1080/09502386.2014.886483
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frith, S., 1988. The pleasures of the hearth – the making of BBC light entertainment. In: S. Frith, ed. Music for pleasure. Cambridge: Polity, 24–44.
   Google Scholar
• Frith, S. and Marshall, L., eds., 2004. Music and copyright. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gaines, J., 1991. Contested culture: the image, the voice, and the law. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina.
   Google Scholar
• Graber, C.B., 2012. Collective rights management, competition policy and cultural diversity: EU lawmaking at a crossroads. The WIPO journal, 4 (1), 35–43.
   Google Scholar
• Guibault, L. and Van Gompel, S., 2012. Collective Management in the European Union. Amsterdam Law School Research Paper, No. 2012-08. Available from: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1984015
   Google Scholar
• Hardy, P., 2012. Download: how the internet transformed the record business. London: Omnibus.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, I., 2011. Digital opportunity: A review of intellectual property and growth. London: Intellectual Property Office.
   Google Scholar
• Haunss, S., 2013. The changing role of collecting societies in the internet. Internet policy review, 2 (3), 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Hebdige, D., 1979. Subculture: the meaning of style. London: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Hesmondhalgh, D., Lee, D., Nisbett, M. and Oakley, K., 2015. Culture, economy and politics: the case of New Labour. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Hilty, R. and Nerisson, S., 2013. Collective copyright management. In: R. Towse and C. Handke, eds. Handbook on the digital creative economy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 222–234.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M., 2012. The music industries. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137027061
   Google Scholar
• Jowell, T., 2004. Government and the value of culture. London: DCMS.
   Google Scholar
• Kretschmer, M., 2002. Copyright societies do not administer individual rights: the incoherence of institutional traditions in Germany and the UK. In: R. Towse, ed. Copyright in the cultural industries. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 140–164.
   Google Scholar
• Kretschmer, M., 2007. Access and reward in the information society: Regulating the collective management of copyright. CIPPM Working paper. Available from: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2739837 [Last Accessed 25 April 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Kretschmer, M., Klimis, G., and Wallis, R., 1999. The changing location of intellectual property rights in music: a study of music publishers, collecting societies and media conglomerates. Prometheus, 17 (2), 163–186.
   Google Scholar
• Laing, D., 2004. Copyright, politics and the international music industry. In: S. Frith and L. Marshall, eds. Music and copyright. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 70–88.
   Google Scholar
• Lena, J., 2006. Social context and musical content of rap music, 1979–1995. Social forces, 85 (1), 479–495.10.1353/sof.2006.0131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewisohn, M., 2013. The beatles: tune in. London: Little, Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Lieberson, S., 2000. A matter of taste: how names, fashions, and culture change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Looseley, D., 1995. The politics of fun: cultural policy and debate in contemporary France. Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Looseley, D., 2003. Popular music in contemporary France: authenticity, politics, debate. Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Lopes, P., 1992. Innovation and diversity in the popular music industry, 1969 to 1990. American sociological review, 57 (1), 56–71.10.2307/2096144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod, K. and DiCola, P., 2011. Creative license. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.10.1215/9780822393528
   Google Scholar
• Nash, K., 2010. Contemporary political sociology: globalization, politics and power. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Negus, K., 1999. Music genres and corporate cultures. London: Sage.10.4324/9780203169469
   Google Scholar
• Negus, K. and Pickering, M., 2004. Creativity, communication and cultural value. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Parekh, B., 2000. Rethinking multiculturalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, R., 1990. Why 1955? Explaining the advent of rock music. Popular music, 9 (1), 97–116.10.1017/S0261143000003767
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, R. and Berger, D., 1975. Cycles in symbol production: the case of popular music. American sociological review, 40, 158–173.10.2307/2094343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, R. and Berger, D., 1996. Measuring industry concentration, diversity, and innovation in popular music. American sociological review, 61 (1), 175–178.10.2307/2096413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plamenatz, J., 1977. Democracy and illusion: an examination of certain aspects of modern democratic theory. London: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Rochlandet, F., 2003. Are copyright collecting societies efficient? An evaluation of collective administration of copyright in Europe. In: W.J. Gordon and R. Watt, eds. The economics of copyright – developments in research and analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 176–198.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, P., 2005. Cycles in symbol production research: foundations, applications, and future directions. Popular music and society, 28 (4), 473–487.10.1080/03007760500158973
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savage, J., 1991. England’s dreaming. Sex pistols and punk rock. London: Faber.
   Google Scholar
• Schlesinger, P., 2013. Expertise, the academy and the governance of cultural policy. Media, culture and society, 35 (1), 27–35.10.1177/0163443712464555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J., 1976/1942. Capitalism, socialism and democracy. London: George Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Stein-Sacks, S. 2012. On quotas as they are found in broadcasting music. Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunication Commission. Available from: http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/publications/reports/rp12039c.htm
   Google Scholar
• Street, J., 2011. The popular, the diverse and the excellent: political values and UK cultural policy. International journal of cultural policy, 17 (4), 380–393.10.1080/10286632.2010.546839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Towse, R., 2000a. Copyright, risk and artists. International journal of cultural policy, 6 (1), 91–107.
   Google Scholar
• Towse, R., 2000b. Creativity, incentive and reward. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Towse, R., ed., 2002. Copyright in the cultural industries. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Towse, R., 2006a. Copyright and artists: a view from cultural economics. Journal of economic surveys, 20 (4), 567–585.10.1111/joes.2006.20.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Towse, R., 2006b. Copyright and creativity: cultural economics for the 21st century. Review of economic research on copyright issues, 3 (2), 83–91.
   Google Scholar
• Towse, R., 2012. Economics of copyright collecting societies and digital rights: is there a case for a centralised digital copyright exchange? Review of economic research on copyright issues, 9 (2), 31–58.
   Google Scholar
• Towse, R., 2013. The economic effects of digitization on the administration of musical copyrights. Review of economic research on copyright issues, 10 (2), 55–67.
   Google Scholar
• Towse, R. and Handke, C., 2007. Regulating Copyright Collecting Societies: Current Policy in Europe, paper for Society for Economic Research on Copyright Issues (SERCI). Annual Congress 2007 at Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin/Centre for British Studies, 12-13 July 2007.
   Google Scholar
• UK Music, 2010. Liberating creativity. London: UK Music.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO, 2005. The 2005 convention. Available from: https://en.unesco.org/creativity/
   Google Scholar
• Waldfogel, J., 2012. Copyright protection, technological change, and the quality of new products: evidence from recorded music since napster. The journal of law and economics, 55 (4), 715–740.10.1086/665824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallis, R., 2004. Copyright and the composer. In: S. Frith and L. Marshall, eds. Music and copyright. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 103–122.
   Google Scholar
• Wallis, R., Baden-Fuller, C., Kretschmer, M. and Klimis, G., 1999. Contested collective administration of intellectual property rights in music: the challenge to the principles of reciprocity and solidarity. European journal of communication, 14 (1), 5–35.10.1177/0267323199014001001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, P., 2013. The Hargreaves review of intellectual property, SN/HA/6430. Westminster: House of Commons Library.
   Google Scholar
• Wikstrom, P., 2009. The music industry. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar