The autonomous world reversed: comparing liberal policy and autonomy in the performing arts

References

• ACE, 2010. Achieving great art for everyone. London: Arts Council England.
   Google Scholar
• Bakke, M., 2003. Cultural policy in Norway. In: P. Duelund, ed. The Nordic cultural model. Copenhagen: Nordic Cultural Institute, 147–180.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, A., 1992. Politics and cultural policy in Great Britain. Talking politics, the journal of the politics association, 4 (3), 139–142.
   Google Scholar
• Belfiore, E., 2002. Art as a means of alleviating social exclusion: Does it really work? A critique of instrumental cultural policies and social impact studies in the UK. International journal of cultural policy, 8 (1), 91–106. doi:10.1080/102866302900324658.
   Google Scholar
• Belfiore, E. and Bennett, O., 2008. The social impact of the arts. An intellectual history. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230227774
   Google Scholar
• Bellah, R.N., 1985. Habits of the heart: individualism and commitment in American life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bell-Villada, G.H., 1996. Art for art’s sake & literary life. How politics and markets helped shape the ideology & culture of aestheticism 1790–1990. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bertelli, A.M., et al., 2013. Politics, management, and the allocation of arts funding. Evidence from public support for the arts in the UK. International journal of cultural policy, 20 (3), 341–359. doi:10.1080/10286632.2013.786057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blomgren, R., 2012. Autonomy or democratic cultural policy: that is the question. International journal of cultural policy, 18 (5), 519–529. doi:10.1080/10286632.2012.708861.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., 1993. The field of cultural production. Essays on art and literature. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. and Wacquant, L.J.D., 2001. Newliberalspeak: Notes on the new planetary vulgate. Radical philosophy, 105 (January/February), 2–5.
   Google Scholar
• Christman, J.P. and Anderson, J., 2005. Autonomy and the challenges to liberalism. New essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511610325
   Google Scholar
• Cummings, M.C. and Katz, R.S., 1987. The patron state. Government and the arts in Europe, North America, and Japan. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duelund, P., 2008. Nordic cultural policies: a critical view. International journal of cultural policy, 14 (1), 7–24. doi:10.1080/10286630701856468.
   Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen, G., [1990] 2012. The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ferragina, E. and Seeleib-Kaiser, M., 2011. Thematic review: welfare regime debate: past, present, futures? Policy & politics, 39 (4), 583–611. Available from: http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/tpp/pap/2011/00000039/00000004/art00010. doi:10.1332/030557311X603592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forster, E.M., [1951] 1965. Two cheers for democracy. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Gellert, C., 1985. State interventionism and institutional autonomy: university development and state interference in England and West Germany. Oxford review of education, 11 (3), 283–293. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1050179.10.1080/0305498850110308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamersveld, I.V., 2009. Cultural policy in the Netherlands. The Hague: Boekmanstudies.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, T., 2015. Bildning as a central concept in the cultural policy of the Swedish government – from Arthur Engberg to Alice bah Kuhnke. Nordisk kulturpolitisk tidsskrift, 18 (2). Available from: http://www.idunn.no/ts/nkt/2015/02/bildning_as_a_central_concept_in_the_cultural_policy_of_the.
   Google Scholar
• Heikkinen, M., 2003. The Nordic model for supporting artists. Public support for artists in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden. Helsinki: Arts Council of Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Hesmondhalgh, D., et al., 2014. Were new labour’s cultural policies neo-liberal? International journal of cultural policy, 21 (1), 97–114. doi:10.1080/10286632.2013.879126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilman-Chartrand, H. and McCaughey, C., 1989. The arm’s length principle and the arts: an international perspective – past, present and future. In: M.C. Cummings and J.M.D. Schuster, eds. Who’s to pay for the arts? The international search for models of arts support. New York: American Council for the Arts, 43–80.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C., 1991. A public management for all seasons? Public administration, 69 (1), 3–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hylland, O.M., 2009. Om egenverdi – et forsøk på en kritisk begrepsanalyse. Nordisk kulturpolitisk tidskrift, 12 (2), 8–25.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, I., 1914. Kant’s critique of judgement, translated with introduction and notes by J.H. Bernard. 2nd rev. ed. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kawashima, N., 1995. Comparing cultural policy. Towards the development of comparative study. International journal of cultural policy, 1 (2), 289–307. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10286639509357987 [Accessed 13 March 2015].10.1080/10286639509357987
   Google Scholar
• Kleppe, B., Mangset, P., and Røyseng, S., 2010. Kunstnere i byråkratisk jernbur? Kunstnerisk arbeid i utøvende kunstinstitusjoner [Artists in an iron cage? Artists’ work in performing arts institutions]. Bø: Telemarksforsking.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, H.-K., 2008. Uses of civilising claims: three moments in British theatre history. Poetics, 36 (4), 287–300. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304422X08000211.10.1016/j.poetic.2008.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mangset, P., 1995. Kulturpolitiske modeller i vest-europa. In: G. Arnestad, ed. Kulturårboka 2005. Oslo: Norsk kulturråd/Samlaget, 12–41.
   Google Scholar
• Mangset, P., 2009. The arm’s length principle and the art funding system. A comparative approach. In: M. Pyykkönen, N. Simanainen, and S. Sokka, eds. What about cultural policy. Interdisciplinary perspectives on culture and politics. Helsinki: Minerva, 273–298.
   Google Scholar
• Mangset, P., Kleppe, B., and Røyseng, S., 2012. Artists in an iron cage? Artists’ work in performing arts institutions. The journal of arts management, law, and society, 42 (4), 156–175. doi:10.1080/10632921.2012.727773.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mangset, P., et al., 2008. Nordic cultural policy. International journal of cultural policy, 14 (1), 1–5. doi:10.1080/10286630701856435.
   Google Scholar
• McGuigan, J., 2005. Neo‐liberalism, culture and policy. International journal of cultural policy, 11 (3), 229–241. doi:10.1080/10286630500411168.
   Google Scholar
• Moulin, R., 1992. L’artiste, l’institution et le marché. Paris: Flammarion.
   Google Scholar
• Mulcahy, K.V., 2001. Preface: the social-democratic model of cultural patronage. The journal of arts management, law, and society, 31 (1), 3–4. doi:10.1080/10632920109599575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OCW, 2012. Cultuur in cijfers. Den Haag: Ministerie van Onderwijs Cultutur en Wetenshappen.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, J.P., 2009. Democratic government, institutional autonomy and the dynamics of change. West European politics, 32 (3), 439–465. doi:10.1080/01402380902779048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oorschot, W.V., 2006. The Dutch welfare state. Recent trends and challenges in historical perspective. European journal of social security, 8, 57–76.
   Google Scholar
• Pritchard, R.M.O., 1998. Academic freedom and autonomy in the United Kingdom and Germany. Minerva, 36 (2), 101–124. doi:10.1023/A:1004301400289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn, R.B.M., 1997. Distance or intimacy? – the arm’s length principle, the British government and the arts council of Great Britain. International journal of cultural policy, 4 (1), 127–159. doi:10.1080/10286639709358066.
   Google Scholar
• Raad Voor Cultuur, 2013. Slagen in cultuur. Culturelle basisinfrastructuur 2013–2016. Den Haag: Raad Voor Cultuur.
   Google Scholar
• Ridley, F.F., 1987. Tradition, change, and crisis in Great Britain. In: M. Cummings and R.S. Katz, eds. The patron state. Government and the arts in Europe, North America, and Japan. New York: Oxford University Press, 225–253.
   Google Scholar
• Røyseng, S., 2008. Arts management and the autonomy of art. International journal of cultural policy, 14 (1), 37–48. doi:10.1080/10286630701856484.
   Google Scholar
• Røyseng, S., 2009. Godhet og galskap. Peripeti. Tidsskrift for dramaturgiske studier, 12, 5–18.
   Google Scholar
• Scruton, R., 1982. Kant. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trägårdh, L., 1997. Statist individualism: on the culturality of the Nordic welfare state. In: Ø. Sørensen and B. Stråth, eds. The cultural construction of Norden. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press, 253–285.
   Google Scholar
• Van Maanen, H., 2002. The Dutch theatre system. A world of independents. Theatre research international, 2, 178–191.
   Google Scholar
• Vestheim, G., 1994. Instrumental cultural policy in Scandinavian countries: a critical historical perspective. The European journal of cultural policy, 1 (1), 57–71. doi:10.1080/10286639409357969.
   Google Scholar
• Vestheim, G., 2009. The autonomy of culture and the arts – from the early bourgeois era to late modern ‘runaway world’. In: M. Pyykkönen, N. Simanainen, and S. Sokka, eds. What about cultural policy? Helsinki: Minerva, 31–53.
   Google Scholar
• Vike, H., 2012. Varianter av vest-europeiske statsformasjoner – utkast til en historisk antropologi. Norsk antropologisk tidsskrift, 23 (02). Available from: http://www.idunn.no/ts/nat/2012/02/varianter_av_vest-europeiske_statsformasjoner_-_utkast_til_.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, R., 1989. The arts council. In: R. Gable, ed. Resources of hope: culture, democracy and socialism. London: Verso, 41–55.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R.K., 1994. Case study research. Design and methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar