Performance measurement as policy rhetoric: the case of federal arts councils

References

• Ammons, David. 2013. “Signs of Performance Measurement Progress among Prominent City Governments.” Public Performance & Management Review 36 (4): 507–528.10.2753/PMR1530-9576360401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baekgaard, Martin, and Søren Serritzlew. 2015. “Interpreting Performance Information: Motivated Reasoning or Unbiased Comprehension.” Public Administration Review 76 (1): 73–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behn, Robert D. 2014. The Performance Stat Potential: A Leadership Strategy for Producing Results. Washington, D.C: Brookings Institution Press and Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation.
   Google Scholar
• Belfiore, Eleonora. 2004. “Auditing Culture.” International Journal of Cultural Policy 10 (2): 183–202.10.1080/10286630042000255808
   Google Scholar
• Belfiore, Eleonora, and Oliver Bennett. 2010. “Beyond the “Toolkit Approach”: Arts Impact Evaluation Research and the Realities of Cultural Policy‐making.” Journal for Cultural Research 14 (2): 121–142.10.1080/14797580903481280
   Google Scholar
• Bevan, Gwyn, and Christopher Hood. 2006. “What’s Measured is What Matters: Targets and Gaming in the English Public Health Care System.” Public Administration 84 (3): 517–538.10.1111/padm.2006.84.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bird, Sheila M., Sir David Cox, Vern T. Farewell, Harvey Goldstein, Tim Holt, and Peter C. Smith. 2005. “Performance Indicators: Good, Bad, and Ugly.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series a (Statistics in Society) 168 (1): 1–27.10.1111/rssa.2005.168.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohte, John, and Kenneth J. Meier. 2000. “Goal Displacement: Assessing the Motivation for Organizational Cheating.” Public Administration Review 60 (2): 173–182.10.1111/puar.2000.60.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brudney, Jeffrey L., F. Ted Hebert, and Deil S. Wright. 1999. “Reinventing Government in the American States: Measuring and Explaining Administrative Reform.” Public Administration Review 59 (1): 19–30.10.2307/977476
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cave, Martin. 1997. The Use of Performance Indicators in Higher Education: The Challenge of the Quality Movement. 3rd ed. London and Bristol, Pennsylvania: Jessica Kingsley.
   Google Scholar
• Charbonneau, Étienne, and Gregg G. Van Ryzin. 2015. “Benchmarks and Citizen Judgments of Local Government Performance: Findings from a Survey Experiment.” Public Management Review 17 (2): 288–304.10.1080/14719037.2013.798027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dias, Janice Johnson, and Steven Maynard-Moody. 2007. “For-profit Welfare: Contracts, Conflicts, and the Performance Paradox.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 17 (2): 189–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dull, Matthew. 2009. “Results-model Reform Leadership: Questions of Credible Commitment.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 19 (2): 255–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florida, Richard. 2002. “Bohemia and Economic Geography.” Journal of Economic Geography 2 (1): 55–71.10.1093/jeg/2.1.55
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frederickson, David G., and H. George Frederickson. 2006. Measuring the Performance of the Hollow State. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilmour, John B., and David E. Lewis. 2006a. “Assessing Performance Budgeting at OMB: The Influence of Politics, Performance, and Program Size.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16 (2): 169–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilmour, John B., and David E. Lewis. 2006b. “Does Performance Budgeting Work? An Examination of the Office of Management and Budget’s PART Scores.” Public Administration Review 66 (5): 742–752.10.1111/puar.2006.66.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, Clive. 2008. “Instrumental Policies: Causes, Consequences, Museums and Galleries.” Cultural Trends 17 (4): 209–222.10.1080/09548960802615349
   Google Scholar
• Hatry, Harry P. 2002. “Performance Measurement: Fashions and Fallacies.” Public Performance & Management Review 25 (4): 352–358.
   Google Scholar
• Hatry, Harry P. 2006. Performance Measurement: Getting Results. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heilig, Julian Vasquez, and Linda Darling-Hammond. 2008. “Accountability Texas-style: The Progress and Learning of Urban Minority Students in a High-stakes Testing Context.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 30 (2): 75–110.10.3102/0162373708317689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinrich, Carolyn J., and Gerald Marschke. 2010. “Incentives and Their Dynamics in Public Sector Performance Management Systems.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 29 (1): 183–208.10.1002/pam.v29:1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, Christopher. 2006. “Gaming in Targetworld: The Targets Approach to Managing British Public Services.” Public Administration Review 66 (4): 515–521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacob, Brian A., and Steven D. Levitt. 2003. “Rotten Apples: An Investigation of the Prevalence and Predictors of Teacher Cheating.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 118 (3): 843–877.10.1162/00335530360698441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr, Steven. 1975. “On the Folly of Rewarding A, While Hoping for B.” Academy of Management Journal 18 (4): 769–783.10.2307/255378
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, Karen, and Mark Blaug. 1976. “Does the Arts Council Know What it is Doing?” In The Economics of the Arts, edited by Mark Blaug, 101–125. London: Martin Robinson.
   Google Scholar
• de Lancer Julnes, Patria. 2008. “Performance Measurement: Beyond Instrumental Use.” In Performance Information in the Public Sector: How it is Used, edited by Wouter Van Dooren and Steven Van de Walle, 58–71. Houndmills: Palgrave.10.1007/978-1-137-10541-7
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, Gregory B., and Michael Rushton. 2007. “Understanding State Spending on the Arts, 1976–99.” State and Local Government Review 39 (2): 107–114.10.1177/0160323X0703900205
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, Kevin F., Elizabeth H. Ondaatje, Laura Zakaras, and Arthur Brooks. 2004. Gifts of the Muse: Reframing the Debate about the Benefits of the Arts. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
   Google Scholar
• McConnell, Maureen, and Honee Hess. 1999. “A Controversy Timeline.” Journal of Museum Education 23 (3): 4–6.
   Google Scholar
• Moe, Ronald C. 1994. “The ‘Reinventing Government’ Exercise: Misinterpreting the Problem, Misjudging the Consequences.” Public Administration Review 54 (2): 111–122.10.2307/976519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moynihan, Donald P. 2008. The Dynamics of Performance Management. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moynihan, Donald P. 2009. “Through a Glass, Darkly: Understanding the Effects of Performance Regimes.” Public Performance & Management Review 32 (4): 586–598.
   Google Scholar
• Moynihan, Donald P. 2010. “Performance-Based Bureaucracy.” In The Oxford Handbook of American Bureaucracy, edited by Robert F. Durant. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• NEA (National Endowment for the Arts). 1999. National Endowment for the Arts: Strategic Plan in Brief, 1999–2004. Washington, DC: National Endowment for the Arts.
   Google Scholar
• NEA (National Endowment for the Arts). 2003. National Endowment for the Arts: Strategic Plan, FY 2003–2008. Washington, DC: National Endowment for the Arts.
   Google Scholar
• NEA (National Endowment for the Arts). 2009. National Endowment for the Arts: A History: 1965–2008. Edited by Mark Bauerlein with Ellen Grantham. Washington, DC: National Endowment for the Arts.
   Google Scholar
• NEA (National Endowment for the Arts). 2012. How the United States Funds the Arts. Washington, DC: National Endowment for the Arts.
   Google Scholar
• NEA (National Endowment for the Arts). 2013. U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis and National Endowment for the Arts Release Preliminary Report on Impact of Arts and Culture on U.S. Economy [Press Release]. Accessed October 26, 2016. https://www.arts.gov/news/2013/us-bureau-economic-analysis-and-national-endowment-arts-release-preliminary-report-impact
   Google Scholar
• NEA (National Endowment for the Arts). 2015. ACPSA Issue Brief #6: The Impact of New Demand for Arts and Culture. Washington, DC: National Endowment for the Arts. Accessed October 25, 2016. https://www.arts.gov/sites/default/files/ADP6-6_Impact_New_Demand_Arts.pdf
   Google Scholar
• NEA (National Endowment for the Arts). 2016. Arts and Cultural Production Contributed $704.2 Billion to the U.S. Economy in 2013 [Press Release]. Accessed October 25, 2016. https://www.arts.gov/news/2016/arts-and-cultural-production-contributed-7042-billion-us-economy-2013
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, Poul A., and Martin Baekgaard. 2015. “Performance Information, Blame Avoidance, and Politicians’ Attitudes to Spending and Reform: Evidence from an Experiment.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 25 (2): 545–569.10.1093/jopart/mut051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noonan, Douglas S. 2015. “Arts of the States in Crisis – Revisiting Determinants of State-level Appropriations to Arts Agencies.” Poetics 49 (1): 30–42.10.1016/j.poetic.2015.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Hagan, John. 2016. “Objectives of Arts Funding Agencies Often Do Not Map Well on to Societal Benefits.” Cultural Trends 25 (4): 249–262.10.1080/09548963.2016.1241343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen, Asmus Leth. 2015. “Citizen (Dis)Satisfaction: An Experimental Equivalence Framing Study.” Public Administration Review 75 (3): 469–478.10.1111/puar.12337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen, Asmus Leth. 2016. “Human Interest or Hard Numbers? Experiments on Citizens’ Selection, Exposure, and Recall of Performance Information.” Public Administration Review. doi:10.1111/puar.12638.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poister, Theodore H., Obed Q. Pasha, and Lauren Hamilton Edwards. 2013. “Does Performance Management Lead to Better Outcomes? Evidence from the U.S. Public Transit Industry.” Public Administration Review 73 (4): 625–636.10.1111/puar.2013.73.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollitt, Christopher, Stephen Harrison, George Dowswell, Sonja Jerak-Zuiderent, and Roland Bal. 2010. “Performance Regimes in Health Care: Institutions, Critical Junctures and the Logic of Escalation in England and the Netherlands.” Evaluation 16 (1): 13–29.10.1177/1356389009350026
   Google Scholar
• Radin, Beryl A. 2006. Challenging the Performance Movement: Accountability, Complexity, and Democratic Values. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Radnor, Zoe. 2008. “Hitting the Target and Missing the Point? Developing and Understanding of Organizational Gaming.” In Performance Information in the Public Sector: How It is Used, edited by Wouter Van Dooren and Steven Van De Walle, 98–109. Houndmills: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Ravitch, Diane. 2010. The Death and Life of the Great American School System: How Testing and Choice Are Undermining Education. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Rushton, Michael. 1992. “Paying the Piper, Calling the Tune: A Transaction Cost Politics Analysis of the National Endowment for the Arts.” Poetics 31: 133–150.
   Google Scholar
• Sá, Creso M., Andrew Kretz, and Kristjan Sigurdson. 2013. “Accountability, Performance Assessment, and Evaluation: Policy Pressures and Responses from Research Councils.” Research Evaluation 22 (1): 105–117.
   Google Scholar
• Sanger, Mary Bryna. 2012. “Does Measuring Performance Lead to Better Performance?” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 32 (1): 185–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuster, J. Mark. 1997. “The Performance of Performance Indicators in the Arts.” Nonprofit Management and Leadership 7 (3): 253–269.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Chris. 2003. “Valuing Culture”. Speech, Valuing Culture, Demos, London. https://www.demos.co.uk/files/File/VACUCSmith.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Soss, Joe, Richard Fording, and Sanford F. Schram. 2011. “The Organization of Discipline: From Performance Management to Perversity and Punishment.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 21 (Suppl. 2): i203–i232.10.1093/jopart/muq095
   Google Scholar
• Stensaker, Bjorn, and Lee Harvey, eds. 2010. Accountability in Higher Education: Global Perspectives on Trust and Power. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, James D. 1967. Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Umbricht, Mark R., Frank Fernandez, and Justin C. Ortagus. 2015. “An Examination of the (Un)Intended Consequences of Performance Funding in Higher Education.” Educational Policy. doi:10.1177/0895904815614398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vendramini, Emanuele, Francesca Lecci, and Cristina Filannino. 2014. “When the Rubber Meets the Road: Isomorphism, Rhetoric, and (Mis)Management of Interinstitutional Performance.” International Journal of Public Administration 37 (13): 980–986.10.1080/01900692.2014.944992
   Google Scholar