From problem to solution? Why it is difficult to restrict the remit of public broadcasters

References

• Agreement on public service broadcasting. 2016. Oslo: The Norwegian Parliament.
   Google Scholar
• Barraclough, L. 2015. “U.K.’s Right-Wing Government Invites Commercial Rivals to Critique Publicly Owned BBC.” Variety, July 12. https://variety.com/2015/tv/global/u-k-s-right-wing-government-invites-commercial-rivals-to-critique-publicly-owned-bbc-1201538722/
   Google Scholar
• BBC. 2015. “British Bold Creative”. The BBC’s submission to the Department for Culture, Media and Sport’s Charter Review public consultation, October.
   Google Scholar
• BBC. 2016. “BBC Response to the Government White Paper”, 12 May.
   Google Scholar
• BBC. 2020. “New Covid-safe TV Licence Scheme for over 75s Confirmed to Start on 1 August”, 9 June.
   Google Scholar
• BBC Trust. 2015. “Response to the Department for Culture, Media and Sport’s Chart Review Consultation”, October.
   Google Scholar
• Blumler, J. G. 2016. “To Be Independent or Not to Be Independent, that Is the Question. BBC-UK Government Relations, 2016.” Publizistik 61: 305–320. doi:10.1007/s11616-016-0284-6.
   Google Scholar
• Brevini, B. 2013. Public Service Broadcasting Online. A Comparative European Policy Study of PSB 2.0. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Brüggeman, M., E. Humprecht, R. K. Nielsen, K. Karppinen, A. Cornia, and F. Esser. 2016. “Framing the Newspaper Crisis. How Debates on the State of the Press are Shaped in Finland, France, Germany, Italy, United Kingdom and United State.” Journalism Studies 17 (5): 533–551. doi:10.1080/1461670X.2015.1006871.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brüggemann, M., S. Engesser, F. Büchel, E. Humprecht, and L. Castro. 2014. “Hallin and Mancini Revisited: Four Empirical Types of Western Media Systems.” Journal of Communication 64 (6): 1037–1065. doi:10.1111/jcom.12127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cairney, P., and M. D. Jones. 2016. “Kingdon’s Multiple Streams Approach: What Is the Empirical Impact of This Universal Theory?” Policy Studies Journal 44 (1): 37–85. doi:10.1111/psj.12111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clementi, D. 2016. A Review of the Governance and Regulation of the BBC. March 1. London: Department of Digital, Culture, Media & Sport.
   Google Scholar
• Curran, J., and T. Aalberg. 2012. How Media Inform Democracy: A Comparative Approach. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• D’Arma, A. 2018. “How Do Public Service Broadcasters Make a Case for Themselves? An Analysis of BBC’s “Charter Manifestos.” Journal of Information Policy 8: 199–226. doi:10.5325/jinfopoli.8.2018.0199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DCMS. 2015. “BBC Charter Review Public Consultation”. 16 July.
   Google Scholar
• DCMS. 2016a. “A BBC for the Future: A Broadcaster of Distinction”. May.
   Google Scholar
• DCMS. 2016b “BBC Charter Review Consultation: Summary of Responses”. March.
   Google Scholar
• Donders, K. 2012. Public Service Media and Policy in Europe. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Donders, K. 2013. “Fighting a (Lost) Battle? An Analysis of 20 Years of Private Television Complaints against the Funding of Public Service Broadcasting.” ch. 15. In Private Television in Western Europe: Content, Market, Policies, edited by K. Donders, C. Pauwels, and J. Loisen, 214–228. Houndmills, NY: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Donders, K., and T. Raats. 2012. “Analysing National Practices after European State Aid Control: Are Multi-stakeholder Negotiations Beneficial for Public Service Broadcasting?” Media, Culture and Society 34 (2): 162–180. doi:10.1177/0163443711430756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enli, G., T. Raats, T. Syvertsen, and K. Donders. 2019. “Media Policy for Private Media in the Age of Digital Platforms.” European Journal of Communications 34 (4): 395–409. doi:10.1177/0267323119861512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evens, T., and K. Donders. 2018. Platform Power and Policy in Transforming Television Markets. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, D., and V. Goblot, eds. 2018. A Future for Public Service Television. London: Goldsmith Press.
   Google Scholar
• FrP. 2013. “Handlingsprogram for perioden 2013–2017 [Political Action Program for 2013–2017]”.
   Google Scholar
• Gabrielsen, T. S., A. Jakubanecs, H. J. Kind, Ø. A. Nilsen, F. Skjervet, L. Sørgard, H. Thorbjørnsen, and H. Østbye. 2015. “Konkurransemessige virkninger av noen utvalgte NRK-tjenester [Competitive Effects of Selected NRK Services]”. Financed by the Norwegian Ministry of Culture. SNF Rapport nr. 5/2015.
   Google Scholar
• Gerring, J. 2013. “The Case Study: What It Is and What It Does.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Science, edited by R. E. Goodin, 1–40, Oxford Handbooks Online. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons, T. 2017. “Restraining the BBC: The 2016 Charter Settlement.” Journal of Media Law 9 (1): 28–44. doi:10.1080/17577632.2017.1334438.
   Google Scholar
• Greenslade, R. 2015 “The BBC’s Future: What the National Newspapers, Predictable Say”, The Guardian, 17 July.
   Google Scholar
• Gulyas, Á., and F. Hammer, eds. 2013. Public Service Media in the Digital Age: International Perspectives. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars.
   Google Scholar
• Hallin, D. C., and P. Mancini. 2004. Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Herzog, C., and K. Karppinen. 2014. “Policy Streams and Public Service Media Funding Reforms in Germany and Finland.” European Journal of Communication 29 (4): 416–432. doi:10.1177/0267323114530581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horowitz, M. A., and J. Clark. 2014. “Multi-stakeholderism: Value for Public Service Media.” In The Value of Public Service Media. Ripe@2013, edited by G. F. Lowe and F. Martin, 165–183. Göteborg: Nordmedia.
   Google Scholar
• House of Lords. 2016. Select Committee on Communications. Charter Review: Reith Not Revolution. February 24. London: Parliament. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201516/ldselect/ldcomuni/96/9602.htm
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, M., and M. Ramesh. 2003. Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems. Second Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ibarra, K. A., E. Nowak, and R. Kuhn, eds. 2015. Public Service Media in Europe: A Comparative Approach. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Iosifidis, P. 2007. Public Television in the Digital Era Technological Challenges and New Strategies for Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Isofides, P., ed. 2010. Reinventing Public Service Communication. European Broadcasters and Beyond. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Johannessen, L. E. F., T. W. Rafoss, and E. B. Rasmussen. 2018. Hvordan bruke teori? Nyttige verktøy i kvalitative analyse [How to Use Theory? Useful Tools in Qualitative Analysis]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Kingdon, J. W. 1995. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. 2nd ed. New York: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• KUD. 2014. “Høring av NRK-plakaten [Hearing on NRK Obligations]”, 6 June.
   Google Scholar
• Mann, C. 2016. “BBC White Paper”. Industry Reactions.
   Google Scholar
• MBL. 2014a. “Hva nå NRK? [What Now, NRK?]”. Report. 20 November.
   Google Scholar
• MBL. 2014b. “Respons to Government White Paper”. 3 September.
   Google Scholar
• Meld. St. 15. 2016–2017. Eit moderne og framtidsretta NRK – Finanisering og innhaldsplikter [A Modern and Future-oriented NRK – Financing and Content Obligations]. Oslo: The Norwegian Ministry of Culture.
   Google Scholar
• Meld. St. 38. 2014–2015. Open og opplyst. Allmennkringkasting og mediemangfold [Open and Illuminated. Public Service Broadcasting and Media Diversity]. Oslo: The Norwegian Ministry of Culture.
   Google Scholar
• Mintrom, M., and P. Norman. 2009. “Policy Entrepreneurship and Policy Change.” Policy Studies Journal 37 (4): 649–667. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2009.00329.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moe, H. 2011. “Defining Public Service beyond Broadcasting: The Legitimacy of Different Approaches.” International Journal of Cultural Policy 17 (1): 52–68. doi:10.1080/10286630903049912.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MTG. 2014. “Response to Government White Paper”, 26 August.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, R. K., R. Fletcher, A. Sehl, and D. Levy. 2016. Analysis of the Relation Between and Impact of Public Service Media and Private Media. Report by The Reuters Institute for Study of Journalism (RISJ) University of Oxford, financed by the Danish Ministry of Culture.
   Google Scholar
• Norwegian Government. 2013. “Political Platform for a Government Formed by the Conservative Party and the Progress Party”, 7 October.
   Google Scholar
• NOU. 2017. 7 Det norske mediemangfoldet. En styrket mediepolitikk for borgerne [The Norwegian Media Diversity. A Strengthened Media Policy for the Citizens]. Oslo: The Media Diversity Commission.
   Google Scholar
• NRK. 2014a. “Response to the Government White Paper”. August 26.
   Google Scholar
• NRK. 2014b. “Widvey varsler stor NRK-gjennomgang [Widvey Warns Great NRK Review]”, 7 May.
   Google Scholar
• NRK Beta. 2014. “Response to Government White Paper”. 26 August.
   Google Scholar
• Ofcom. 2014. Public Service Content in a Connected Society. Ofcom, 15 December. London.
   Google Scholar
• Ofcom. 2016. Ofcom’s Preparations for Regulation of the BBC. Ofcom, 16 December. London.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver & Ohlbaum and Oxera. 2016. “BBC Television, Radio and Online Services: An Assessment of Market Impact and Distinctiveness”. Prepared for DCMS.
   Google Scholar
• Osloeconomics. 2015a. “Fortrenger eller forsterker allmennkringkasterne. En analyse av samvariasjon mellom allmennkringkastere og andre mediers nettsatsning [Displaces or Amplifies Public Services Broadcasters. An Analysis of Covariation between Public Broadcasters and Other Media Online]”. Report financed by NRK. OE rapport 2015-2.
   Google Scholar
• Osloeconomics. 2015b. “NRKs kulturregnskap. En analyse av hvordan NRKs aktiviteter bidrar til verdiskapning i kultursektoren [NRK’s Cultural Account. An Analysis of How NRK’s Activities Create Value in the Cultural Sector]”. Report financed by NRK. OE rapport 2015-8.
   Google Scholar
• Plunkett, J. 2016 “BBC White Paper: Key Points at a Glance”, The Guardian, 12 May.
   Google Scholar
• Raats, T., and C. Pauwels. 2013. “Best Frienemies Forever? Public and Private Broadcasting Partnerships in Flanders.” ch. 14. In Private Television in Western Europe: Content, Market, Policies, edited by K. Donders, C. Pauwels, and J. Loisen, 199–213. Houndmills, NY: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ramnefjell, G. 2015. “NRK er i ferd med å bli den dneste feite purka i norsk mediebransje [NRK Is Becoming the Only Fat Sow in the Norwegian Media Industry]”, Dagbladet, 21 November.
   Google Scholar
• Schibsted. 2014 “Response to the Government White Paper”, 26 August.
   Google Scholar
• Sjøvaag, H., T. A. Pedersen, and Y. Owren. 2019. “Is Public Service Broadcasting a Threat to Commercial Media?” Media, Culture & Society 41 (6): 808–827. doi:10.1177/0163443718818354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skogli, E., L. Grünfeld, E. Gotaas, and I. Amble. 2014. “Analyse av modeller for Finansiering av NRK AS [Analysis of Models for Financing NRK AS]”. Rapport 33/2014. Menon Business Economics. Financed by the Norwegian Ministry of Culture.
   Google Scholar
• Stanistreet, M. 2015. “It’s Not the BBC’s Fault the Local Press Is in Trouble”, The Guardian, 15 July
   Google Scholar
• Staude, T. 2015. “NRK tilfreds, Frp halvfornøyd [NRK Satisfied, FrP Half Satisfied]”, NRK, 19 June.
   Google Scholar
• Steemers, J. 2017. “Industry Engagement with Policy on Public Service Television for Children: BBC Charter Review and the Public Service Content Fund.” Media Industries 4 (1): 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Steen-Johnsen, K., V. S. Sundet, and B. Enjolras. 2019. “Theorizing Policy-industry Processes: A Media Policy Field Approach.” European Journal of Communication 34 (2): 190–204. doi:10.1177/0267323119830047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundet, V. S., K. A. Ihlebæk, and K. Steen-Johnsen. 2019. “Policy Windows and Converging Frames: A Longitudinal Study of Digitalization and Media Policy Change.” Media, Culture & Society. doi:10.1177/0163443719867287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syvertsen, T., G. Enli, O. J. Mjøs, and H. Moe. 2014. The Media Welfare State: Nordic Media in the Digital Era. Ann Arbour: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tambini, D. 2015. “Problems and Solutions for Public Service Broadcasting: Reflections on a 56 Country Study.” In Public Service Media in Europe: A Comparative Approach, edited by K. A. Ibarra, E. Nowak, and R. Kuhn, 41–52. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• The Economist. 2016. “Leaving Auntie Alone. The BBC Dodges an Existential Crisis”, no author, 13 May.
   Google Scholar
• TV 2. 2014. “Response to the Government White Paper”. 26 August.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Bulck, H., and K. Donders. 2014. “Analyzing European Media Policy: Stakeholders and Advocacy Coalitions.” In The Palgrave Handbook of European Media Policy, edited by K. Donders, C. Pauwels, and J. Loisen, 16–35. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Bulck, H. 2019. “Analyzing Policy-Making I: Stakeholder and Advocacy Coalition Framework Analysis.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Methods for Media Policy Research, edited by H. Van den Bulck, M. Puppis, K. Donders, and L. Van Audenhove, 451–469. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Bulck, H. L. D., and T. Raats. 2018. “Public Service Media in Western Europe Today: Ten Countries Compared.” In Comparative Media Policy, Regulation and Governance in Europe. Unpacking the Policy Cycle, edited by L. H. S. D’Haenes and J. Trappel, 93–116. Bristol: Intellect.
   Google Scholar
• Widvey, T. 2014. “Regjeringens mål for NRK [The Government’s Goal for the NRK]”, DN, 27 April.
   Google Scholar
• Wintour, P. 2015 “New Political Battle over BBC’s Future to Begin This Week”, The Guardian, 17 February.
   Google Scholar
• Zahariadis, N. 2014. “Ambiguity and Multiple Streams.” In Theories of the Policy Process., edited by P. A. Sabatier and C. M. Weible, 27–58. 3rd ed. Boulder, Co: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar