The true impact of shorter and longer copyright durations: from authors’ earnings to cultural creativity and diversity

References

• Akerlof, G. A., K. J. Arrow, T. F. Bresnahan, J. M. Buchanan, R. H. Coase, L. R. Cohen, M. Friedman, et al. 2002. The Copyright Term Extension Act of 1988: An Economic Analysis. Washington, DC: AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Aksikas, J., and S. J. Andrews. 2014. “Neoliberalism, Law and Culture: A Cultural Studies Intervention after ‘The Juridical Turn’ Introduction.” Cultural Studies 28 (5–6): 742–780. doi:10.1080/09502386.2014.886479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Productivity Commission. 2016. “Intellectual Property Arrangements.” Inquiry Report, No. 78, December. Canberra: Productivity Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Balázs, B. 2011. “Coda: A Short History of Book Piracy.” In Media Piracy in Emerging Economies, edited by J. Karaganis, 399–413. Brooklyn, N.Y.: Social Science Research Council. Accessed 24 December 2019. http://piracy.americanassembly.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/MPEE-PDF-1.0.4.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, P. 2014. The Copyright Wars: Three Centuries of Trans-Atlantic Battle. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benkler, Y. 2006. The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boldrin, M., and D. K. Levin. 2008. Against Intellectual Monopoly. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buccafusco, C., and P. J. Heald. 2013. “Do Bad Things Happen When Works Enter the Public Domain? Empirical Tests of Copyright Term Extension.” Berkeley Technology Law Journal 28 (1): 1–43.
   Google Scholar
• Callahan, M., and J. Rogers. 2017. A Critical Guide to Intellectual Property. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Cargill, O., and P. A. Moran. 1971. “Copyright Duration V. The Constitution.” Wayne Law Review 17: 917–929.
   Google Scholar
• Caves, R. E. 2000. Creative Industries: Contracts between Art and Commerce. Cambridge, and London: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chamberlain, C. 2016. “Tailoring Copyright Duration.” Lewis & Clark Law Review 20 (1): 303–331.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2008. Impact Assessment on the Legal and Economic Situation of Performers and Record Producers in the European Union, SEC. 2008. 2287. Accessed 2 October 2019. http://www.ipex.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/document/SEC20082287FIN.do
   Google Scholar
• European Union (EU). 1993. “Council Directive 93/98/EEC Harmonizing the Term of Protection of Copyright and Certain Related Rights.” Official Journal of the European Communities L290 36 (November 24): 9–13.
   Google Scholar
• Giblin, R. 2017. “Reimagining Copyright’s Duration.” In What If We Could Reimagine Copyright?, edited by G. Rebecca and K. Weatherall, 117–221. Acton: Australian National University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gillespie, T. 2009. “Wired Shut, Copyright and the Shape of Digital Culture.” Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 7 (2/3): 213–218.
   Google Scholar
• Gowers, A. 2006. Gowers Review of Intellectual Property. London: Her Majesty Treasury.
   Google Scholar
• Hatch, O. G. 1998. “Toward a Principled Approach to Copyright Legislation at the Turn of the Millennium.” University of Pittsburgh Law Review 719: 719–757.
   Google Scholar
• Hesmondhalgh, D. 2009. “3a. Digitalisation, Music and Copyright.” In Creativity, Innovation and the Cultural Economy, edited by A. C. Pratt and P. Jeffcutt, 57–73. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hugenholtz, B. P., M. van Eechoud, S. van Gompel, and N. Helberger 2012. “The Recasting of Copyright & Related Rights for the Knowledge Economy.” Amsterdam Law School Research Paper No. 2012-44; Institute for Information Law Research Paper No. 2012-38. Accessed 1 October 2019 https://ssrn.com/abstract=2018238
   Google Scholar
• Johns, A. 2009. Piracy: The Intellectual Property Wars from Gutenberg to Gates. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karaganis, J., ed. 2011. Media Piracy in Emerging Economies. Brooklyn, N.Y: Social Science Research Council. Accessed 24 December 2019. http://piracy.americanassembly.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/MPEE-PDF-1.0.4.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kretschmer, M. 2008. “Creativity Stifled? A Joined Academic Statement on the Proposed Copyright Term Extension for Sound Recordings.” European Intellectual Property Review 30 (9): 341–374.
   Google Scholar
• Kretschmer, M. 2010. “Copyright and Contract Law: Regulating Creator Contracts: The State of the Art and a Research Agenda.” Journal of Intellectual Property Law 18 (1): 141–172.
   Google Scholar
• Kretschmer, M., and F. Kawohl. 2004. “The History and Philosophy of Copyright.” In Music and Copyright, edited by S. Frith and L. Marshall, 21–53. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Landes, W. M., and R. A. Posner. 1989. “An Economic Analysis of Copyright Law.” Journal of Legal Studies 18: 325–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landes, W. M., and R. A. Posner. 2003. “Indefinitely Renewable Copyright.” The University of Chicago Law Review 70 (2): 471–518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lessig, L. 2004. Free Culture: How Big Media Uses Technology and the Law to Lock down Culture and Control Creativity. New York: Penguin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liebowitz, S. J. 2007. “What are the Consequences of the European Union Extending Copyright Length for Sound Recordings?” Prepared for International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (IFPI).
   Google Scholar
• McInytyre, H. 2014. “At 2 Billion Views, ‘Gangnam Style’ Has Made Psy a Very Rich Man.” Forbes, 16 June. Accessed 21 August 2020 https://www.forbes.com/sites/hughmcintyre/2014/06/16/at-2-billion-views-gangnam-style-has-made-psy-a-very-rich-man/#647877a33fdb
   Google Scholar
• Narayana, M. P. 1985. “Managerial Incentives for Short-Term Results.” The Journal of Finance 40: 1469–1484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parc, J. 2020. “Rethinking Copyrights: The Impact of Copying on Cultural Creativity and Diversity.” In Creative Context: Creativity and Innovation in the Media and Cultural Industries, edited by N. Otmazgin and E. Ben-Ari, 143–162. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Parc, J., and N. Kawashima. 2018. “Wrestling with or Embracing Digitization in the Music Industry: The Contrasting Business Strategies of J-pop and K-pop.” Kritika Kultura 30 (31): 23–48.
   Google Scholar
• Parc, J., and S. D. Kim. 2020. “The Digital Transformation of the Korean Music Industry and the Global Emergence of K-pop.” Sustainability 12 (18). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187790
   Google Scholar
• Parc, J., and H.-C. Moon. 2019. “Accumulated and Accumulable Cultures: The Case of Public and Private Initiatives toward K-Pop.” Kritika Kultura 32: 429–452.
   Google Scholar
• Parc, J., P. A. Messerlin, and H.-C. Moon. 2016. “The Secret to the Success of K-pop: The Benefits of Well-Balanced Copyrights.” In Corporate Espionage, Geopolitics, and Diplomacy Issues in International Business, edited by B. Christiansen and F. Kasarci, 130–148. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Rajan, M. T. S. 2011. Moral Rights: Principles, Practices and New Technology. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reichman, J. H. 1996. “The Duration of Copyright and the Limits of Cultural Policy.” Cardozo Arts and Entertainment Law Journal 14: 625–654.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, J. 2013. “Death by Digital?” In The Death and Life of the Music Industry in the Digital Age, edited by J. Rogers, 25–70. London, New Delhi, New York and Sydney: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, M. 1993. Authors and Owners: The Invention of Copyright. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schlesinger, P. 2017. “The Creative Economy: Invention of a Global Orthodoxy.” Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 30 (1): 73–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlesinger, P., and C. Waelde. 2012. “Copyright and Cultural Work: An Exploration.” Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 25 (1): 11–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spender, L. 2009. Digital Culture, Copyright Maximalism and the Challenge to Copyright Law. Sydney: University of Western Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). 2017. Copyright. Accessed 3 March 2019. http://www.unesco.org/new/en/culture/themes/creativity/creative-industries/copyright/
   Google Scholar
• The United States Copyright Office. 2017. Copyright Law of the United States. Accessed 3 March 2019. https://www.copyright.gov/title17/
   Google Scholar
• Theofilos, S. 2013. “A Copyright Extension for EU Recordings.” Music Business Journal. December. Accessed 3 March 2019. http://www.thembj.org/2013/12/copyright-extension-for-european-sound-recordings/
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, J. B. 2010. Merchants and Culture: The Publishing Business in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Towse, R. 1999. “Copyright and Economic Incentives: An Application to Performers’ Rights in the Music Industry.” Kyklos 52 (3): 369–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Towse, R. 2003. “Copyright and Cultural Policies for Creative Industries.” In Economics, Law and Intellectual Property, edited by O. Granstrand, 419–438. Boston, Dordrecht and London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Vaidhyanathan, S. 2001. Copyrights and Copywrongs: The Rise of Intellectual Property and How It Threatens Creativity. New York and London: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). 2017. Copyright. Accessed 3 March 2019. http://www.wipo.int/copyright/en
   Google Scholar