Out of (another) frying pan…? Case studies of the implementation of Curriculum 2005 in some mathematics classrooms

References

• Acharya, C. (2003). Outcome-based education (OBE): A new paradigm for learning, CDT Link, 7(3). Retrieved on 12 May 2005 from http://www.cdtl.nus.edu.sg/link/nov2003/obe.htm
   Google Scholar
• Apple, M. W. (1992). The text and cultural politics. Educational Researcher, 21 (7), 4–11+19.
   Google Scholar
• Barcan, A. (2001). Education: New assessment can mean almost anything. News Weekly, Issue: 24. Retrieved on 12 May 2003 from http://www.newsweekly.com.au/articles/2001mar24_education.html
   Google Scholar
• Battista, M. T. (1999). Fifth graders' enumeration of cubes in 3D arrays: Conceptual progress in an inquiry-based classroom. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30 (4), 417–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bengu, S. M. E. (1997). Foreword in Curriculum 2005: Lifelong learning for the 21^st century. Pretoria: Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Bennie, K., Olivier, A., & Linchevski, L. (1999). Everyone can learn mathematics: Addressing the fundamental assumptions and goals of curriculum 2005. Paper presented at the 5th Annual Congress of the Association for Mathematics Education of South Africa (AMESA), Port Elizabeth, July 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Bouslama, F., Lansari, A., Al-Rawi, A. & Abonamah, A. A. (2003). A novel outcome-based educational model and its effect on student learning, curriculum development, and assessment. Journal of Information Technology Education, 2, 203–214.
   Google Scholar
• Briars, D. and Resnick, L. (2000). Standards, Assessments—and What Else? The Essential Elements of Standards-Based School Improvement. Los Angeles, CA: The National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
   Google Scholar
• Brindley, G. (1998). Outcomes-based assessment and reporting in language learning programmes: A review of the issues. Language Testing, 15 (1), 45–85.
   Google Scholar
• Brodie, K. (2006). Teaching mathematics for equity: learner contributions and lesson structure. African Journal for Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 10 (1), 13–24.
   Google Scholar
• Costello, J. (1991). Teaching and learning mathematics 11–16. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education. (1997). Curriculum 2005. Pretoria: Department of Education. Retrieved on 28 November 2003 from http://www.policy.org.za/govdocs/misc/curr2005.html
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education. (1997a). Outcomes-based education South Africa: Background information for educators. Pretoria: Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education. (2000). Instructional leadership. School management teams. Pretoria: Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education. (2000a). Policy document intermediate phase. Grade 4–6. Pretoria: Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education. (2002). Revised National Curriculum Statement. Teacher's guide for development of learning programme: Policy naturals sciences. Grade R—9 (Schools). Pretoria: Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Etzioni, A. (1975). A comparative analysis of organizations (2nd ed.). New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graven, M. (2002). Coping with new mathematics teacher roles in a contradictory context of curriculum change. The Mathematics Educator, 12 (2), 21–27.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, C. N. & Organ, D. W. (1973). An evaluation of casual models linking the received role with job satisfaction. Administrative Science Quarterly, 18 (1), 95–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiebert, J. (1999). Relationships between research and the NTCM standards. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30 (1), 3–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, M., Gawe, N. & Vakalisa, N. (2000). Teaching-learning dynamics: A participative approach to OBE. Johannesburg: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Jansen, J. D. (1998). Curriculum reform in South Africa: A critical analysis of outcomes-based education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 28 (3), 321–331.
   Google Scholar
• Lichakane, T. E. (2005). Teaching methods used by educators at Marquard sub-district: An OBE perspective. M Ed dissertation, University of the Free State. Retrieved on 14 February 2007 from http://www.fsdoe.fs.gov.za/orginfo/research/teachingmethods.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Manouchehri, A. & Goodman, T. (1998). Mathematics curriculum reform and teachers: Understanding the connections. Journal of Educational Research 92 (1), 27–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mkhize, D. (1999). Are teachers out of step with what their mathematics learners value? An analysis of views held by learners and educators on cooperative group work.Proceedings of the International Conference on Mathematics Education into the 21st Century: Societal Challenges, Issues and Approaches. Cairo, November 1999. Retrieved 2 March 2007 from http://math.unipa.it/∼grim/EMkhize9.PDF
   Google Scholar
• Owen, J. E. (1995). Cooperative learning in secondary schools. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Revised National Curriculum Statement. (2002). Teacher's guide for development of learning programme: Policy naturals sciences. Grade R—9 (Schools). Pretoria: Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Rogan, J. M. (2004). Out of the frying pan…?: Case studies of the implementation of Curriculum 2005 in some science classrooms. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 8 (2), 165–179.
   Google Scholar
• Schmoker, M. & Marzano, R. J. (1999). Using standards and assessments realizing the promise of standards- based education. Educational Leadership, 56 (6), 17–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld, A. H. (2002). Making mathematics work for all children: Issues of standards, testing, and equity. Educational Researcher, 31 (1), 13–25.
   Google Scholar
• Spady, W. (1994). Outcomes-based education: Critical issues and answers, The American Association of School Administrators, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Spady, W. G. & Marshall, KJ. (1991). Beyond traditional outcomes-based education. Educational Leadership 49 (2), 67–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stecher, B. M. & Barron, S. Kaganoff, T. & Goodwin, J. (1998). The effects of standards-based assessment on classroom practices: Results of the 1996–97 RAND survey of Kentucky teachers of mathematics and writing. CSE Technical Report 482. National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards and Student Testing (CRESST) RAND Education.
   Google Scholar
• Treloar, D. (2002). Outcomes-based education and standards for the University of Western Australia. Retrieved on 16 March 2003 from http://www.murdoch.edu.au/elaw/issues/v9n3/jones93_text.html
   Google Scholar
• Verspoor, A. (1989). Pathways to change. Improving the quality of education in developing countries. Washington D. C.: The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Vithal, R. & Gopal, N. (2003). Grade 8 mathematics learners' perspectives on the new South African curriculum reforms. Paper presented as part of the conference of the Learner's Perspective Study international research team, Melbourne, December 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Woodman, W. F. (1977). Role satisfaction, compliance and classroom role performance: A two model test. Teaching Sociology, 4 (4), 271–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar