The most important aspects of algebra: Responses from practising South African teachers

References

• Adler, J., & Davis, Z. (2006). Opening another black box: Researching mathematics for teaching in mathematics teacher education. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education. 5 (4), 270–296.
   Google Scholar
• Bednarz, N., Kieran, C., & Lee, L. (1996). Approaches to Algebra: Perspective for Research and Teaching. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Branca, N. (1985). Mathematical problem solving: Lessons from the British experience. In E. A. Silver (Ed.), Teaching and learning mathematical problem solving: Multiple research perspectives (pp. 71–80). London: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Doerr, H. (2004). Teachers' knowledge and the teaching of algebra. In K. Stacey, H. Chick & M. Kendal (Eds.), The Future of Teaching and Learning of Algebra. The 12th ICMI Study (pp. 267–290). Boston: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, M., & Farrell, W. (1988). Secondary Mathematics Instruction: An Integrated Approach. Dedham, Massachusetts: Janson.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. (1998). Doing Grounded Theory: Issues and Discussions. Mill Valley, California: Sociology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1974). Theory and Practice. London: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Harley, K., & Wedekind, V. (2004). Political change, curriculum change, and social formation. In Chisholm, L. (Ed.), Changing Class: Education and Social Change in Post-Apartheid South Africa (pp. 195220). Cape Town: HSRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harry, B., Sturges, K., & Klingner, J. (2005). Mapping the process: An exemplar of process and challenge in Grounded Theory Analysis. Educational Researcher, 34 (2), 3–13.
   Google Scholar
• Hogben, L. (1945). Mathematics for the Million. London: Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Jaeckle, S. (2010). Managing yourself and your learning. In T. Bruce (Ed.), Early childhood: A guide for students 2nd ed. (pp. 1–10). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, S. (2001). Learning to teach algebra in the UK: Trainee Teachers' experience. In H. Chick, K. Stacey, J. Vincent, & J. Vincent (Eds.), The Future of the Teaching and Learning of Algebra. Proceedings of the 12th ICMI Study Conference (pp. 336–343). Melbourne, Australia: University of Melbourne Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Long, C., De Temple, D., & Millman, R. (2008). Mathematical reasoning for elementary teachers. Boston: Pearson-Addison Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and Teaching Elementary Mathematics: Teachers' Understanding of Fundamental Mathematics in China and the United States. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Manouchehri, A. (1997). School mathematics reforms: Implications for mathematics teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 48 (3), 197–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menzel, B. (2001). Language conceptions of algebra are idiosyncratic. In H. Chick, K. Stacey, J. Vincent, and J. Vincent (Eds.), The Future of the Teaching and Learning of Algebra. Proceedings of the 12th ICMI Study Conference (pp. 446–453). Melbourne, Australia: University of Melbourne Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) (2000). Principals and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, Virginia: NCTM.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, D. (2006). Grade 10–12 mathematics curriculum reform in South Africa: A textual analysis of new national curriculum statements. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 10 (2), 59–63.
   Google Scholar
• Sfard, A. (1995). The development of algebra: Confronting historical and psychological perspectives. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 14, 15–39.
   Google Scholar
• South African Department of Education (DoE). (2002). Revised National Curriculum Statement, Grades R-9 (Schools): Mathematics. Pretoria: Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• South Africa Department of Education (DoE). (2003). National Curriculum Statement, Grades 10–12 (General): Mathematics. Pretoria: Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Stacey, K., Chick, H., & Kendal, M. (Eds.) (2004). The Future of Teaching and Learning of Algebra. The 12th ICMI Study. Boston: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, D. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27, 219–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Usiskin, Z. (1988). Conceptions of school algebra and uses of variables. In A. F. Coxford (Ed.), The Ideas of Algebra, K-12. 1988 Yearbook (pp. 8–19). Reston, Virginia: NCTM.
   Google Scholar
• Wheeler, D. (1996). Backwards and forwards: Reflections on different approaches to algebra. In N. Bednarz, C. Kieran, & L. Lee (Eds.), Approaches to Algebra: Perspectives for research and teaching (pp. 317–326). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar