A multi-stakeholder view on director remuneration guidance in South Africa

References

• Abdelmotaal, H., & Abdel-Kader, M. (2016). The use of sustainability incentives in executive remuneration contracts: Firm characteristics and impact on the shareholders’ returns. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 17(3), 311–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adithipyangkul, P., & Leung, T. (2018). Incentive pay for non-executive directors: The direct and interaction effects on firm performance. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 35(4), 943–964.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aguinis, H., Martin, G. P., Gomez-Mejia, L. R., O’Boyle, E. H., & Joo, H. (2018). The two sides of CEO pay injustice: A power law conceptualization of CEO over and underpayment. Management Research, 16(1), 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRJIAM-02-2017-0731
   Google Scholar
• Anyango, D. (2017). An exploration of possible King IV implementation challenges relating to remuneration disclosures [Unpublished master’s thesis]. University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, C. S., Ittner, C., & Larcker, D. F. (2012). Corporate governance, compensation consultants, and CEO pay levels. Review of Accounting Studies, 17(2), 322–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bebchuk, L. A., & Fried, J. M. (2003). Executive compensation as an agency problem. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(3), 71–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bender, R. (2011). Paying for advice: The role of the remuneration consultant in U.K. listed companies. Vanderbilt Law Review, 64(2), 361–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, B., Bettis, J. C., Gopalan, R., & Milbourn, T. (2017). Compensation goals and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 124(2), 307–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bezuidenhout, M. L., Bussin, M., & Coetzee, M. (2018). The chief executive officer pay-performance relationship within South African state-owned entities. South African Journal of Human Resource Management, 16(1). https://sajhrm.co.za/index.php/sajhrm/article/view/983/1444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohlander, G., & Snell, S. (2010). Managing human resources (15th ed.). Mason, OH: Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Bosch, A., & Barit, S. (2020). Gender pay transparency mechanisms: Future directions for South Africa. South African Journal of Science, 116(3/4). https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2020/6772
   Google Scholar
• Bowlin, K. O., Christ, M. H., & Griffin, J. B. (2020). Say-on-pay and the differential effects of voluntary versus mandatory regimes on investor perceptions and behaviour. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 32(1), 11–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Bruce, A., Buck, T., & Main, B. G. M. (2005). Top executive remuneration: A view from Europe. Journal of Management Studies, 42(7), 1493–1506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bugeja, M., Fohn, S., & Matolcsy, Z. (2016). Determinants of the levels and changes in non-executive director compensation. Accounting and Finance, 56(3), 627–667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bussin, M., & Ncube, M. (2017). Chief executive officer and chief financial officer compensation relationship to company performance in state-owned entities. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 20(1). https://sajems.org/index.php/sajems/article/view/1644/937
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canil, J., & Karpavičius, S. (2020). Compensation consultants: Does reputation matter? Journal of Corporate Finance, 64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101633
   Google Scholar
• Chen, M. A., Greene, D. T., & Owers, J. E. (2015). The costs and benefits of clawback provisions in CEO compensation. The Review of Corporate Finance Studies, 4(1), 108–154.
   Google Scholar
• Conyon M. J., Peck, S. I., & Sadler, G. V. (2009). Compensation consultants and executive pay: Evidence from the United States and the United Kingdom. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(1), 43–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conyon, M. J., Hass, L. H., Peck, S. I., Sadler, G. V., & Zhang, Z. (2019). Do compensation consultants drive up CEO pay? Evidence from UK public firms. British Journal of Management, 30(1), 10–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coombs, J., & Gilley, K. (2005). Stakeholder management as a predictor of CEO compensation: Main effects and interactions with financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26(9), 827–840.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., & Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 20–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deloitte. (2014). Disclosure of remuneration – A hot topic. Retrieved 18 September, 2019, from https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/za/Documents/governance-risk-compliance/ZA_DisclosureOfRemunerationAHotTopic_04042014.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Deloitte. (2017). King IV – Remuneration governance: Bolder than ever. Retrieved 14 February, 2019, from https://www2.deloitte.com/za/en/pages/africa-centre-for-corporate-goverance/articles/kingiv_remuneration_governance.html
   Google Scholar
• Denis, D. K., Jochem, T., & Rajamani, A. (2020). Shareholder governance and CEO compensation: The peer effects of say on pay. The Review of Financial Studies, 3(7), 3130–3173.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Trade and Industry. (2018). Companies Amendment Bill 2018. Government Gazette, 969(41913), South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Farmer, M., Brown, D., Reilly, P., & Bevan, S. M. (2013). Executive remuneration in the United Kingdom: Will the coalition government’s latest reforms secure improvement and what else is required? Compensation, & Benefits Review, 45(1), 26–33.
   Google Scholar
• Filatotchev, I., & Dotsenko, O. (2015). Shareholder activism in the UK: Types of activists, forms of activism, and their impact on a target’s performance. Journal of Management, & Governance, 19(1), 5–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Financial Reporting Council. (2018). The UK corporate governance code. Retrieved 6 March, 2020, from https://www.frc.org.uk/getattachment/88bd8c45-50ea-4841-95b0-d2f4f48069a2/2018-UK-Corporate-Governance-Code-FINAL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fredrickson, J. W., Davis-Blake, A., & Sanders, W. M. G. (2010). Sharing the wealth: Social comparisons and pay dispersion in the CEO’s top team. Strategic Management Journal, 31(10), 1091–1053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Marshfield, WI: Pitman Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Geiler, P., & Renneboog, L. (2011). Managerial compensation: Agency solution or problem? Journal of Corporate Law Studies, 11(1), 99–138. https://doi.org/10.5235/147359711795344136
   Google Scholar
• Harber, M. (2017). The role of institutional investors in promoting long-term value creation: A South African perspective. African Review of Economics and Finance, 9(1), 272–291.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, C., Maclean, M., & Price, M. (2020). Executive remuneration and the limits of disclosure as an instrument of corporate governance. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 69(4), 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch, B., Reichert, B. E., & Sohn, M. (2017). The impact of clawback provisions on information processing and investment behaviour. Management Accounting Research, 37(1), 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghiemstra, R., Flora, Y., & Qin, B. (2017). Does obfuscating excessive CEO pay work? The influence of remuneration report readability on say-on-pay votes. Journal of Accounting and Business Research, 47(6), 695–729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Institute of Directors in South Africa (IoDSA). (1994). King Report on corporate governance. Johannesburg, South Africa: IoDSA.
   Google Scholar
• Institute of Directors in South Africa (IoDSA). (2002). King Report on corporate governance for South Africa – 2002. Johannesburg, South Africa: IoDSA.
   Google Scholar
• Institute of Directors in South Africa (IoDSA). (2009). King Report on corporate governance. Retrieved 24 February, 2020, from https://c.ymcdn.com/sites/www.iodsa.co.za/resource/resmgr/king_iii/King_Report_on_Governance_fo.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Institute of Directors in South Africa (IoDSA). (2016). King IV Report on corporate governance for South Africa. Retrieved 19 January, 2020, from https://c.ymcdn.com/sites/iodsa.site-ym.com/resource/collection/684B68A7-B768-465C-8214-E3A007F15A5A/IoDSA_King_IV_Report_-_WebVersion.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Institute of Directors in South Africa (IoDSA). (2018). Understanding King IV and what it is intended to achieve. Retrieved 21 January, 2020, from https://www.iodsa.co.za/news/389613/Understanding-King-IV-and-what-it-is-intended-to-achieve.htm
   Google Scholar
• International Integrated Reporting Council. (2013). The International < IR > Framework. Retrieved 10 November, 2020, from https://integratedreporting.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/13-12-08-THE-INTERNATIONAL-IR-FRAMEWORK-2-1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• International Labour Organisation. (2018). Global Wage Report 2018/19: What lies behind gender pay gaps. Retrieved 21 November, 2020, from https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/—dgreports/—dcomm/—publ/documents/publication/wcms_650553.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE). (2017). JSE Limited listings requirements. Retrieved 10 November, 2020, from https://www.jse.co.za/content/JSERulesPoliciesandRegulationItems/JSE%20Listings%20Requirements.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kanapathippillai, S., Johl, S. K., & Wines, G. (2016). Remuneration committee effectiveness and narrative remuneration disclosure. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 40, 384–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirsten, E., & Du Toit, E. (2018). The relationship between remuneration and financial performance for companies listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 21(1). http://go.galegroup.com.ez.sun.ac.za/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA539690225&v=2.1&u=27uos&it=r&p=AONE&sw=w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kostiander, L., & Ikäheimo, S. (2012). “Independent” consultants’ role in the executive remuneration design process under restrictive guidelines. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 20(1), 64–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laksmana, I., Tietz, W., & Yang, Y.-W. (2012). Compensation discussion and analysis (CDandA): Readability and management obfuscation. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 31(2), 185–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, G. J. (2016). Transcending paradox in the realm of South African executive pay. In G.A. Goldman (Ed.). Critical management studies in the South African context (pp. 164–203), Cape Town, South Africa: AOSIS.
   Google Scholar
• Lemma, T. T., Mlilo, M., & Gwatidzo, T. (2020). Board remuneration, directors’ ownership and corporate performance: The South African evidence. International Review of Applied Economics, 34(4), 491–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/02692171.2020.1773654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, Y., Moroney, R., & Rankin, M. (2020). Say-on-pay judgements: The two-strikes rule and the pay-performance link. Accounting, & Finance, 60(1), 943–970.
   Google Scholar
• Maas, K. (2016). Do corporate social performance targets in executive compensation contribute to corporate social performance? Journal of Business Ethics, 148(3), 573–585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madlela, V., & Cassim, R. (2017). Disclosure of directors’ remuneration under South African company law: Is it adequate? South African Law Journal, 134(2), 383–414.
   Google Scholar
• Madlela, V., & Lehloenya, P. M. (2016). The regulation of executive remuneration in South Africa. Obiter, 37(1), 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Malope, L., & Brown, J. (2018). Big funds fight fat-cat salaries. Fin24, 15 July. Retrieved 15 January, 2021, from https://www.fin24.com/Companies/Financial-Services/big-funds-fight-fat-cats-20180715-2.
   Google Scholar
• Mans-Kemp, N., & Viviers, S. (2018). Executive performance evaluation and remuneration: Disclosure and practices of selected listed South African companies (2002-2005). South African Journal of Accounting Research, 32(2-3), 154–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGregor, M., & Dekker, S. (2017). Labour law rules! (3rd ed.). Cape Town, South Africa: Siber Ink.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. The Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, K. J., & Sandino, T. (2010). Executive pay and “independent” compensation consultants. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 49(3), 247–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myllykangas, P., Kujala, J., & Lehtimäki, H. (2010). Analyzing the essence of stakeholder relationships: What do we need in addition to power, legitimacy, and urgency? Journal of Business Ethics, 96, 65–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naik, M., Padia, N., & Callaghan, C. W. (2020). Variable executive remuneration and company performance: Insights from the Johannesburg Stock Exchange, South Africa. Acta Commercii, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.4102/ac.v20i1.790.
   Google Scholar
• Natarajan, R., & Zheng, K. (2019). Clawback provision of SOX, financial misstatements, and CEO compensation contracts. Journal of Accounting, Auditing, & Finance, 34(1), 74–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ntim, C. G., Lindop, S., Thomas, D. A., Abdou, H., & Opong, K. K. (2019). Executive pay and performance: The moderating effect of CEO power and governance structure. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(6), 921–963. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2017.1282532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, C. A., Main, B. G., & Crystal, G. S. (1988). CEO compensation as tournament and social comparison: A tale of two theories. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33(2), 257–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogden, S., & Watson, R. (2012). Remuneration committees, pay consultants and the determination of executive directors’ pay. British Journal of Management, 23(4), 502–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, J. M., & Gully, S. M. (2014). Human resources management. Mason, OH: Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC). (2018). Right on the money: Institutional investors round table on remuneration. Retrieved 5 August, 2020, from https://www.pwc.co.za/en/assets/pdf/right-on-the-money.pdf
   Google Scholar
• PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC). (2019). Executive directors: Practices and remuneration trends report. Retrieved 30 November, 2019, from https://www.pwc.co.za/en/assets/pdf/executive-directors-report-2019.pdf
   Google Scholar
• PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC). (2020). Executive directors: Practices and remuneration trends report. Retrieved 7 August, 2020, from https://www.pwc.co.za/en/assets/pdf/executive-directors-report-2020.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sandberg, J. (2013). (Re-)interpreting fiduciary duty to justify socially responsible investment for pension funds? Corporate Governance: An International Review, 21(5), 436–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholtz, H. E., & Engelbrecht, W. A. (2015). The effect of remuneration committees, directors’ shareholding and institutional ownership on the remuneration of directors in the top 100 companies in South Africa. Southern African Business Review, Special edition 2(19), 22–51.
   Google Scholar
• Seamer, M., & Melia, A. (2015). Remunerating non-executive directors with stock options: who is ignoring the regulator? Accounting Research Journal, 28(3), 251–267. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARJ-12-2013-0092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Securities Exchange Commission. (2015). Pay ratio disclosure. Retrieved 5 November, 2020, from https://www.sec.gov/rules/final/2015/33-9877.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Stathopoulos, K., & Voulgaris, G. (2015). The importance of shareholder activism: The case of say-on-pay. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24(3), 359–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stathopoulos, K., & Voulgaris, G. (2016). The importance of shareholder activism: The case of say-on-pay. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24(3), 359–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steenkamp, G., Dippenaar, M., Fourie, C., & Franken, D. (2019). Share-based remuneration: Per-director disclosure practices of selected listed South African companies. Journal of Economic and Financial Sciences, 12(1). https://jefjournal.org.za/index.php/jef/article/view/400/645.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, H.-T., Wang, E. Y., & Zhou, B. (2014). When the use of positive language backfires: The joint effect of tone, readability, and investor sophistication on earnings judgments. Journal of Accounting Research, 52(1), 273–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson, C., Carpenter, R., Harber, M., & Graham, M. (2018). An examination of the quality of the variable portion of executive directors’ remuneration for large South African listed companies. African Journal of Business and Economic Research, 13(2), 25–59.
   Google Scholar
• Tonello, M., & Gatti, M. (2019). Board-shareholder engagement practices: Findings from a survey of SEC-registered companies. The Conference Board. Retrieved 28 October, 2020, from http://www.shareholderforum.com/access/Library/20191200_TCB.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Van Heerden, A., & Roux, C. (2019). New EEA Form issued in terms of the Employment Equity Act. Retrieved 4 November, 2020, from https://www.werksmans.com/legal-updates-and-opinions/new-eea-form-issued-in-terms-of-the-employment-equity-act/.
   Google Scholar
• Viviers, S. (2015). Executive remuneration in South Africa: Key issues highlighted by shareholder activists. African Journal of Business Ethics, 9(1), 1–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viviers, S., & Smit, E. V. D. M. (2015). Institutional proxy voting in South Africa: Process, outcomes and impact. South African Journal of Business Management, 46(3), 23–34.
   Google Scholar
• Viviers, S., Mans-Kemp, N., Kallis, L., & McKenzie, K. (2019). Public “say on pay” activism in South Africa: Targets, challengers, themes and impact. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.4102/sajems.v22i1.3251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasserman, N. (2006). Stewards, agents, and the founder discount: Executive compensation in new ventures. Academy of Management Journal, 49(5), 960–976.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winchel, J. (2015). Investor reaction to the ambiguity and mix of positive and negative argumentation in favorable analyst reports. Contemporary Accounting Research, 32(3), 973–999.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, B. H. T., MacNeil, I., & Chalaczkiewicz-Ladna, K. (2020). “Say on pay” regulations and director remuneration: Evidence from the UK in the past two decades. Journal of Corporate Law Studies, 20(2), 541–577. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735970.2020.1754151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamahaki, C., & Frynas, J. G. (2016). Institutional determinants of private shareholder engagement in Brazil and South Africa: The role of regulation. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24(5), 509–527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar