Effect of short-term and long-term ageing on dynamic modulus of foamed warm mix asphalt

References

• Abbas, A. R., et al., 2013. Determining the limitations of warm mix asphalt by water injection in mix design, quality control and placement. Ohio Department of Transportation, Report No. FHWA/OH-2013/9.
   Google Scholar
• Alavi, M. Z., et al., 2012. Evaluating adhesion properties and moisture damage susceptibility of warm-mix asphalts. Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2295, 44–53. doi: 10.3141/2295-06
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alhasan, A., et al., 2014. Low-temperature characterization of foamed warm-mix asphalt produced by water injection. Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2445, 1–11. doi: 10.3141/2445-01
   Google Scholar
• Arega, Z. A., Bhasin, A., and De Kesel, T, 2013. Influence of extended aging on the properties of asphalt composites produced using hot and warm mix methods. Construction and Building Materials, 44, 168–174. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.02.081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buss, A., Elkashef, M., and Stephenson, W, 2018. Extracting more from dynamic modulus data using split-plot repeated measures analysis. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 46 (1), 351–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, S. B., Mohammad, L. N., and Elseifi, M. A, 2011. Laboratory performance characteristics of sulfur-modified warm-mix asphalt. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 23, 1338–1345. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copeland, A., et al., 2010. Field evaluation of high reclaimed asphalt pavement-warm-mix asphalt project in Florida. Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2179, 93–101. doi: 10.3141/2179-11
   Google Scholar
• Gandhi, T., and Amirkhanian, S., 2008. Laboratory simulation of warm mix asphalt (WMA) binder aging characteristics. In: Proceedings of the 2008 Airfield and Highway Pavement Conference in Bellevue, Washington, October 15–18, J. R. Roesler, H. U. Bahia, I. L. Al-Qadi, and S. D. Murrell, eds., Reston, VA: ASCE, 195–204. doi: 10.1061/41005(329)17
   Google Scholar
• Guo, N., et al., 2016. Laboratory performance of warm mix asphalt containing recycled asphalt mixtures. Construction and Building Materials, 64, 141–149. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haggag, M. M., Mogawer, W. S., and Bonaquist, R, 2011. Fatigue evaluation of warm-mix asphalt mixtures. Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2208, 26–32. doi: 10.3141/2208-04
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, K. R., and Copeland, A., 2017. Asphalt pavement industry survey on recycled materials and warm-mix asphalt usage: 2015. National Asphalt Pavement Association, Information Series 138 (6th edition).
   Google Scholar
• Jamshidi, A., Hamzah, M. O., and You, Z, 2013. Performance of warm mix asphalt containing Sasobit: state-of-the-art. Construction and Building Materials, 38, 530–553. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.08.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, H., et al., 2012. Quantification of oxidative aging of polymer-modified asphalt mixes made with warm mix technologies. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 25 (1), 1–8. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000479
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, J., et al., 2011. Laboratory evaluation of Sasobit-modified warm-mix asphalt for Alaskan conditions. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 23, 1498–1505. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, A. E., et al., 2014. Evaluation of the moisture susceptibility of WMA technologies. National Cooperative Highway Research Program, NCHRP Report 763.
   Google Scholar
• Menapace, I., et al., 2015. Microstructural properties of warm mix asphalt before and after laboratory-simulated long-term ageing. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 16, 2–20. doi: 10.1080/14680629.2015.1029692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Middleton, B., and Forfylow, R. W, 2009. Evaluation of warm-mix asphalt produced with the double barrel green process. Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2126, 19–26. doi: 10.3141/2126-03
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mogawer, W. S., Austerman, A. J., and Bahia, H. U, 2011. Evaluating the effect of warm-mix asphalt technologies on moisture characteristics of asphalt binders and mixtures. Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2209, 52–60. doi: 10.3141/2209-07
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newcomb, D., et al., 2015. Short-term laboratory conditioning of asphalt mixtures. National Cooperative Highway Research Program, NCHRP Report 815.
   Google Scholar
• Prowell, B. D., Hurley, G. C., and Crews, E, 2007. Field performance of warm-mix asphalt at National Center for Asphalt Technology test track. Journal of the Transportation Research, Board Transportation Research Record, 1998, 96–102. doi: 10.3141/1998-12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trujillo, P., 2011. Long term aging study of WMA binder. Master’s thesis. The University of Texas at Austin.
   Google Scholar
• West, R., et al., 2014. Field performance of warm mix asphalt technologies. National Cooperative Highway Research Program, NCHRP Report 779.
   Google Scholar
• Wielinski, J., Hand, A., and Rausch, D. M, 2009. Laboratory and field evaluations of foamed warm-mix asphalt projects. Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2126, 125–131. doi: 10.3141/2126-15
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao, F., et al., 2013. A long-term ultraviolet aging procedure on foamed WMA mixtures. Materials and Structures, 46 (12), 1987–2001. doi: 10.1617/s11527-013-0031-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao, F., Amirkhanian, S. N., and Zhang, R, 2011. Influence of short-term aging on rheological characteristics of non-foaming WMA binders. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 26 (2), 145–152. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, F., Martin, A. E., and Arámbula-Mercado, E, 2016. Warm-Mix asphalt moisture susceptibility evaluation for Mix design and quality assurance. Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2575, 39–47. doi: 10.3141/2575-05
   Google Scholar