Modelling pavement serviceability of urban roads using deterministic and probabilistic approaches

References

• Abudinen, D., Fuentes, L., and Carvajal, J., 2017. Travel quality assessment of urban roads based on international roughness index. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2612, 1–10. doi: 10.3141/2612-01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aleadelat, W., Saha, P., and Ksaibati, K., 2018. Development of serviceability prediction model for county paved roads. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 19 (6), 526–533. doi: 10.1080/10298436.2016.1176167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Omari, B. and Darter, M.I, 1994. Relationships between international roughness index and present serviceability rating. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1435, 130–136.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Suleiman, T. and Shiyab, A., 2003. Prediction of pavement remaining service life using roughness data-case study in Dubai. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 4 (2), 121–129. doi: 10.1080/10298430310001634834
   Google Scholar
• American Association of State Highway Officials (AASHO), 1962. Special Report 61E: The AASHO Road Test. Report 5: Pavement Research. Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM D6433-18, 2018. Standard practice for roads and parking lots pavement condition index surveys. West Conshohocken: ASTM International. Available from: www.astm.org.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM E1926-08, 2015. Standard practice for computing international roughness index of roads from longitudinal profile measurements. West Conshohocken: ASTM International. Available from: www.astm.org.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM E1927-98, 2018. Standard guide for conducting subjective pavement ride quality ratings. West Conhohocken: ASTM International. Available from: www.astm.org.
   Google Scholar
• Caltrans, 2015. Highway design manual. Division of Design, California State highway System. California Department of Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• Cantisani, G. and Loprencipe, G., 2010. Road roughness and whole body vibration: evaluation tools and comfort limits. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 136 (9), 818–826. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey, W.N. and Irick, P.E., 1960. The pavement serviceability performance concept. In: Highway research board bulletin 250: Pavement performance concepts. Washington, DC: Highway Research Board, National Research Council, 40–58.
   Google Scholar
• De Solminihac, H., et al., 2003. Analysis of pavement serviceability for the AASHTO design method: the Chilean case. The Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 28 (2B), 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dujisin, D. and Arroyo, A., 1995. Desarrollo de una relación indice de serviciabilidad (p) - índice de rugosidad internacional (IRI). Comisión de Diseño y Evaluación de Proyectos, Cámara Chilena de la Construcción.
   Google Scholar
• FDOT, 2018. Flexible pavement design manual. Office of design, pavement management section. Florida Department of Transportarion. Tallahassee, Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), 2015. 2015 Status of the Natiońs Highways, Bridges, and Transit: Conditions & Performance. Report to Congress. U. S. Department of Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• Goenaga, B., Fuentes, L., and Mora, O., 2018. A practical approach to incorporate roughness-induced dynamic loads in pavement design and performance prediction. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 1–10. doi:10.1007/s13369-018-3414-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulen, S., et al., 1994. Correlation of present serviceability ratings with international roughness index. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1435, 27–37.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, K. and Correa, C., 1999. Estimation of present serviceability index from international roughness index. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1655, 93–99. doi: 10.3141/1655-13
   Google Scholar
• Hoang Nguyen, L., 2017. Research on the correlation between international roughness index (IRI) and present serviceability index (PSI), recommendations on evaluation rates in Vietnam's conditions. International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology, 6 (9), 266–271.
   Google Scholar
• INVIAS, 2008. Manual de Diseño de Pavimentos de Concreto para Vías con Bajos, Medios y Altos Volúmenes de Tránsito. Instituto Nacional de Vías. Medellin, Colombia.
   Google Scholar
• Karamihas, S.M., 2018. Measuring, characterizing, and reporting pavement roughness of low-speed and urban roads. National Cooperative Highway Research Program report NCHRP 10-93.
   Google Scholar
• Kırbaş, U. and Karaşahin, M., 2018. Investigation of ride comfort limits on urban asphalt concrete pavements. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 19 (10), 949–955. doi: 10.1080/10298436.2016.1224413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Torre, F., Ballerini, L., and Di Volo, N., 2002. Correlation between longitudinal roughness and user perception in urban areas. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1806, 131–139. doi: 10.3141/1806-15
   Google Scholar
• Múcka, P., 2017. International Roughness Index specifications around the world. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 18 (4), 929–965. doi: 10.1080/14680629.2016.1197144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nair, S., Ronald Hudson, W., and Lee, C., 1985. Realistic pavement serviceability equations using the 690D surface dynamics profilometer. Austin, Texas: Center for Transportation Research, Research Report 354-1F.
   Google Scholar
• Nazef, A., et al., 2008. Evaluation of surpro as a reference device for high-speed inertial profilers. Florida Department of Transportation, Research Report FL/DOT/SMO/08-512.
   Google Scholar
• NCHRP, 2004. Guide for mechanistic-empirical design of new and rehabilitated pavement structures. Final Report 1-37A. National Cooperative Highway Research Program.
   Google Scholar
• Park, K., Thomas, N., and Wayne, K., 2007. Applicability of the international roughness index as a predictor of asphalt pavement condition. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 133 (12), 706–709. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2007)133:12(706)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paterson, W., 1986. International roughness index: relationship to other measures of roughness and riding quality. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1084, 49–58.
   Google Scholar
• Paterson, W., 1987. Road deterioration and maintenance effects: models for planning and management. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Reggin, A., et al., 2008. Urban considerations for using road roughness to manage road networks. 7th international conference on managing pavement assets. Calgary, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Sayers, M.W., Gillispie, T.D., and Queiroz, C., 1986. The international road roughness experiment: establishing correlation and a calibration standard for measurements. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Shafizadeh, K. and Mannering, F, 2003. Acceptability of pavement roughness on urban highways by the driving public. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1860, 187–193. doi: 10.3141/1860-21
   Google Scholar
• Shafizadeh, K., Mannering, F., and Pierce, L., 2002. A statistical analysis of factors associated with driver-perceived road roughness on urban highways. Washington, DC: Washington State Transportation Center (TRAC), Research Report WA-RD 538.1.
   Google Scholar
• Shah, Y. U., et al., 2013. Analysis of flexible pavement serviceability using ANN for urban roads. Airfield and Highway Pavement,, 2013, 478–489.
   Google Scholar
• Uzan, J. and Lytton, R.L., 1982. Structural design of flexible pavements: a simple predictive system. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 888, 56–63.
   Google Scholar