Effects of warm mix asphalt additives on bonding potential and failure pattern of asphalt-aggregate systems using strength and energy parameters

References

• AASHTO T361-16, 2016. Standard method of test for determining asphalt binder bond strength by means of the asphalt bond strength (ABS) test. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
   Google Scholar
• Akzo Nobel, Netherlands, https://surfacechemistry.nouryon.com/siteassets/pdfs/brochure-asphalt-redisetLQ.pdf [Last accessed on 04-04-2019].
   Google Scholar
• Arega, Z., et al., 2011. Influence of warm-mix additives and reduced aging on the rheology of asphalt binders with different natural wax contents. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 23 (10), 1453–1459. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASTM D2872-12e1, 2012. Standard test method for effect of heat and air on a moving film of asphalt (Rolling Thin-Film oven test). West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International. doi:10.1520/D2872-12E01.
   Google Scholar
• Bhasin, A., et al., 2006. Limits on adhesive bond energy for improved resistance of hot-mix asphalt to moisture damage. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1970 (1), 2–13. doi: 10.1177/0361198106197000101
   Google Scholar
• Bhasin, A., et al., 2007. Surface free energy to identify moisture sensitivity of materials for asphalt mixes BT – bituminous paving mixtures 2007. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, (2001), 37–45. doi: 10.3141/2001-05
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buddhala, A., et al., 2012. Effects of an amine anti-stripping agent on moisture susceptibility of Sasobit and Aspha-Min mixes by surface free energy analysis. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 40 (1), 91–99. doi:10.1520/JTE103618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Angelo, J. A., et al., 2008. Warm-mix asphalt: European practice (No. FHWA-PL-08-007).
   Google Scholar
• Das, A.K., and Singh, D, 2018. Effects of regular and nano sized hydrated lime fillers on fatigue and bond strength behavior of asphalt mastic. Transportation Research Record, 0361198118759064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghabchi, R., et al., 2013. Mechanistic evaluation of the effect of WMA additives on wettability and moisture susceptibility properties of asphalt mixes. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 41 (6), 933–942. doi: 10.1520/JTE20120317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grenfell, J., et al., 2014. Assessing asphalt mixture moisture susceptibility through intrinsic adhesion, bitumen stripping and mechanical damage. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 15 (1), 131–152. doi: 10.1080/14680629.2013.863162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habal, A., and Singh, D, 2016a. Moisture susceptibility of a crumb rubber modified binder containing WMA additives using the surface free energy approach. Geotechnical Special Publication, 245–253.
   Google Scholar
• Habal, A., and Singh, D, 2016b. Comparison of Wilhelmy plate and Sessile drop methods to rank moisture damage susceptibility of asphalt – aggregates combinations. Construction and Building Materials, 113, 351–358. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habal, A. and Singh, D, 2018. Influence of recycled asphalt pavement on interfacial energy and bond strength of asphalt binder for different types of aggregates. Transportation Research Record, 2672 (28), doi:10.1177/0361198118784377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamzah, M.O., et al., 2014. Evaluation of Rediset for use in warm-mix asphalt: a review of the literatures. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 8436 (June 2015), 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Hefer, Arno, and Little, D., 2005. Bitumen-aggregate systems and quantification of the effects of water on the adhesive bond. Report No. ICAR/505-1. Texas Transportation Institute, The Texas A&M University.
   Google Scholar
• Hesami, S., et al., 2015. Laboratory investigation of moisture susceptibility of warm-mix asphalt mixtures containing steel slag aggregates. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 16 (8), 745–759. doi: 10.1080/10298436.2014.953502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hossain, Z., et al., 2012. Evaluation for warm mix additive-modified asphalt binders using spectroscopy techniques. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurley, G.C., and Prowell, B.D, 2006. Evaluation of potential processes for use in warm mix asphalt. Asphalt Paving Technology: Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists-Proceedings of the Technical Sessions, 75, 41–90.
   Google Scholar
• Ji, J., et al., 2017. Adhesion evaluation of asphalt-aggregate interface using surface free energy method. Applied Sciences, 7 (2), 156. doi: 10.3390/app7020156
   Google Scholar
• Kandhal, P, 2010. Warm mix asphalt technologies: an overview. Journal of the Indian Roads Congress, 71 (2), 143–152.
   Google Scholar
• Kassem, E., et al., 2016. Effect of warm mix additives on the interfacial bonding characteristics of asphalt binders. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 8436 (November), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Kataware, A. V., and Singh, D, 2018. Effects of wax-based, chemical-based, and water-based warm-mix additives on mechanical performance of asphalt binders. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 30 (10), 04018237. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y.R., Zhang, J., and Ban, H, 2012. Moisture damage characterization of warm-mix asphalt mixtures based on laboratory-field evaluation. Construction and Building Materials, 31, 204–211. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koc, M., and Bulut, R., 2013. Evaluation of warm mix asphalt additive using direct contact angle measurements. International Journal of Pavement Conference, 167–161.
   Google Scholar
• Kvasnak, A.N., and West, R. C., 2009. Case study of warm-mix asphalt moisture susceptibility in Birmingham, Alabama. In: 88th Annual meeting, transportation research board, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Little, D. N., and Bhasin, A., 2006. Using surface energy measurements to select materials for HMA pavements. NCHRP Project 9-37. In: Transportation research board, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Malladi, H., et al., 2014. Laboratory evaluation of warm-mix asphalt mixtures for moisture and rutting susceptibility. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 25 (7), 864–870.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, A.E., et al., 2014. NCHRP Report 763: evaluation of the moisture susceptibility of WMA Technologies. In: Transportation research Board, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, A.E., et al., 2016. NCHRP Report 817: validation of guidelines for evaluating the moisture susceptibility of WMA technologies. In: Transportation research Board, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, C., et al., 2011. Investigating aspects of aggregate properties. Research report for DTF, H61–06-C-00021.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, C., et al., 2012. Surface energy characteristics and impact of natural minerals on aggregate-bitumen bond strengths and asphalt mixture durability. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2267 (1), 45–55. doi: 10.3141/2267-05
   Google Scholar
• Moraes, R., Velasquez, R., and Bahia, H., 2011. Measuring the effect of moisture on asphalt-aggregate bond with the Bitumen bond strength test. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2209, 70–81. doi: 10.3141/2209-09
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Namutebi, M., Birgisson, B., and Bagampadde, U, 2011. Foaming effects on binder chemistry and aggregate coatability using foamed bitumen. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 12 (4), 821–847. doi: 10.1080/14680629.2011.9713896
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PQ Corporation, Malvern, Pennsylvania, https://www.pqcorp.com/docs/default-source/recommended-literature/pq-corporation/zeolites/advera/adverawma.pdf?sfvrsn=795a309b_3 [Last accessed on 04-04-2019].
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, R. E, 1991. Chemical properties of asphalts and their relationship to pavement performance (No. SHRP-A/UWP-91-510). Washington, DC: Strategic Highway Research Program, National Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• SasolWax, Hamburg, Germany, http://www.sasolwax.com/fileadmin/user_upload/Asphalt_Additive_Sasobit.pdf [Last accessed on 04-04-2019].
   Google Scholar
• Shafabakhsh, G.H., Faramarzi, M., and Sadeghnejad, M, 2015. Use of surface free energy method to evaluate the moisture susceptibility of sulfur extended asphalts modified with antistripping agents. Construction and Building Materials, 98, 456–464. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.08.123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, D., et al., 2018. Evaluating suitability of energy efficient and anti-stripping additives for polymer and Polyphosphoric acid modified asphalt binder using surface free energy approach. Construction and Building Materials, 158, 949–960. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.10.079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Oss, C.J., Chaudhury, M.K., and Good, R.J., 1988. Interfacial Lifshitz-van der Waals and polar interactions in macroscopic systems. Chemical Reviews, 88 (6), 927–941. doi: 10.1021/cr00088a006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasiuddin, N.M., Saltibus, N.E., and Mohammad, L.N, 2011. Novel moisture-conditioning method for adhesive failure of hot- and warm-mix asphalt binders. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2208 (1), 108–117. doi: 10.3141/2208-14
   Google Scholar