A comparative environmental impact analysis of asphalt mixtures containing crumb rubber and reclaimed asphalt pavement using life cycle assessment

References

• Airey, G.D., Rahman, M.M., and Collop, A.C, 2003. Absorption of bitumen into crumb rubber using the basket drainage method. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 4 (2), 105–119. doi: 10.1080/1029843032000158879
   Google Scholar
• Athena Institute, 2006. A life cycle perspective on concrete and asphalt roadways: embodied primary energy and global warming potential. Ottawa: Cement Association of Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Autostrade-per-l’Italia, 2011. Sustainability report: estimate of emissions and CO2 savings derived from the adoption of in situ pavement recycling activities (in Italian).
   Google Scholar
• Azarijafari, H., Yahia, A., and Ben Amor, M, 2016. Life cycle assessment of pavements: reviewing research challenges and opportunities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 2187–2197. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bressi, S., et al., 2018b. A comparative life-cycle assessment of asphalt mixtures for railway sub-ballast containing alternative materials. Resource, Conservation and Recycling, 137, 76–88. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.05.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bressi, S., Colinas-Armijo, N., and Di Mino, G., 2018a. Analytical approach for the mix design optimisation of bituminous mixtures with crumb rubber. Materials and Structures, 51 (1), 26. doi: 10.1617/s11527-018-1152-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bressi, S., Dumont, A.G., and Partl, M.N, 2016. A new laboratory methodology for optimization of mixture design of asphalt concrete containing reclaimed asphalt pavement material. Materials and Structures, 49 (12), 4975–4990. doi: 10.1617/s11527-016-0837-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CalRecovery, Inc., 2004. Evaluation of waste tire devulcanization technologies. Sacramento, CA: California Environmental Protection Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Cao, W, 2007. Study on properties of recycled tire rubber modified asphalt mixtures using dry process. Construction and Building Materials, 21, 1011–1015. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castorena, C., Pape, S., and Mooney, C, 2016. Blending Measurements in mixtures with reclaimed asphalt. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2574, 57–63. doi: 10.3141/2574-06
   Google Scholar
• Cavalli, M.C., et al., 2016. Multiscale imaging and characterization of the effect of mixing temperature on asphalt concrete containing recycled components. Journal of Microscopy, 264 (1), 22–33. doi: 10.1111/jmi.12412
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coffey, S., et al., 2013. Determining the impact of degree of blending and quality of reclaimed asphalt pavement on predicted pavement performance using pavement ME design. Construction and Building Materials, 48, 473–478. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.06.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong, D., et al., 2012. Swelling process of rubber in asphalt and its effect on the structure and properties of rubber and asphalt. Construction and Building Materials, 29, 316–322. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.10.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EAPA, 2016. Guidance document for preparing Product Category Rules (PCR) and Environmental Product Declarations (EPD) for Asphalt Mixtures by the European Asphalt Association. 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Ecopneus, 2013. Evaluation of the carbon footprint of the production of crumb rubber from end-of- life tires (in Italian). Milan: Ecopneus.
   Google Scholar
• Ekvall, T. and Tillman, A.M, 1997. Open-loop recycling: criteria for allocation procedures. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2, 155–162. doi: 10.1007/BF02978810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estakhri, C., Button, J., and Fernando, E, 1992. Use, availability and cost effectiveness of asphalt rubber in Texas. Transportation Research Record, 1339, 30–37.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission – Joint Research Centre – Institute for Environment and Sustainability, 2010. International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) handbook – General guide for life cycle assessment – Detailed guidance. Constraints.
   Google Scholar
• Farina, A., et al., 2017. Life cycle assessment applied to bituminous mixtures containing recycled materials: Crumb rubber and reclaimed asphalt pavement. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 117, 204–212. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.10.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FHWA, 1997. User guidelines for waste and byproduct materials in pavement construction [online]. Report FHWA-RD-97-148. Available from: https://www.fhwa.gov/publications/research/infrastructure/pavements/97148/index.cfm [Accessed 20 August 2003].
   Google Scholar
• Fukumori, K., and Matsushita, M, 2003. Material recycling technology of crosslinked rubber waste. R&D Review of Toyota CRDL, 38 (1), 39–47.
   Google Scholar
• GaBi ts, 2017. Databases 2017 Edition, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Goedkoop, M., et al., 2013 . Recipe 2008: A life cycle impact assessment method which comprises harmonised category indicators at the midpoint and the endpoint level. First edition (version 1.08). Report I: Characterisation.
   Google Scholar
• Han, L., Zheng, M., and Wang, C, 2016. Current status and development of terminal blend tyre rubber modified asphalt. Construction and Building Materials, 128, 399–409. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.10.080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey J., et al., 2016. Pavement Life Cycle Assessment Framework. FHWA-HIF-16-014.
   Google Scholar
• Hernandez-Olivares, F., et al., 2009. Rubber-modified hot-mix asphalt pavement by dry process. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 10 (4), 277–288. doi: 10.1080/10298430802169416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertwich, E, 2014. Understanding the climate mitigation benefits of product systems: comment on “using attributional life cycle assessment to estimate climate-change Mitigation … ”. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 18 (3), 464–465. doi: 10.1111/jiec.12150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, B., Zhang, Z., Kingery, W., and Zuo, G., 2004. Fatigue crack characteristics of HMA mixtures containing RAP. In: C. Petit, I. Al-Qadi and A. Millien, eds. Fifth international RILEM conference on reflective cracking in pavements. RILEM Publications SARL, 631–638.
   Google Scholar
• ISO 14040, 2006. ISO 14040:2006 – environmental management – life cycle assessment – principles and framework. Geneve.
   Google Scholar
• ISO 14044, 2006. ISO 14044:2006 - environmental management – life cycle assessment – requirements and guidelines. Geneve.
   Google Scholar
• Jullien, A., et al., 2006. Air emissions from pavement layers composed of varying rates of reclaimed asphalt. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 47 (4), 356–374. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2005.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, W., et al., 2014. A life cycle assessment case study of ground rubber production from scrap tires. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 19 (11), 1833–1842. doi: 10.1007/s11367-014-0793-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo Presti, D., et al., 2019. On the degree of binder activity of reclaimed asphalt and degree of blending with recycling agents. Road Materials and Pavement Design, doi:10.1080/14680629.2019.1607537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mangili, I, 2015. Mechanical and rheological properties of natural rubber compounds containing devulcanized ground tire rubber from several methods. Polymer Degradation and Stability, 121, 369–377. doi: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2015.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews, H.S., Hendrickson, C.T., and Matthews, D.H., 2015. Life cycle assessment: Quantitative approaches for decisions that matter. http://www.lcatextbook.com.
   Google Scholar
• McDaniel, R.S., et al., 2000. Recommended use of reclaimed asphalt pavement in the superpave mix design method. NCHRP Web document 30 (project D9-12). Washington, DC: Transportation Reserach Board 0f National Academics.
   Google Scholar
• National Asphalt Pavement Association (NAPA), 2017. Product Category Rules (PCR) For Asphalt Mixtures.
   Google Scholar
• The Norwegian EPD Foundation, 2010. Product-Category Rules (PCR) for preparing an Environmental Product Declaration (EPD) for Product Group Asphalt and crushed stone, (November), 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Porot, L., et al., 2016 . Life cycle evaluation for reusing Reclaimed Asphalt with a bio-rejuvenating agent. Proceedings of 6th Eurasphalt & Eurobitume Congress, 1st–3rd June 2016, June, 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Rader, C., et al., 1995. Plastics, rubber, and paper recycling. A pragmatic approach. American Chemical Society.
   Google Scholar
• Rafique, R.M.U, 2012. Life cycle assessment of waste car tyres at Scandinavian enviro systems. Göteborg: Chalmers University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Rajan, V. V., et al., 2006. Science and technology of rubber reclamation with special attention to NR-based waste latex products. Progress in Polymer Science (Oxford, 31 (9), 811–834. doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2006.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruban, A, 2012. Life cycle assessment of plastic Bag production. Uppsala: Uppsala University.
   Google Scholar
• Santagata, E., et al., 2016. Analysis of bitumen-crumb rubber affinity for the formulation of rubberized dry mixtures. Materials and Structures, 49, 1947–1954. doi: 10.1617/s11527-015-0625-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santero, N.J., Masanet, E., and Horvath, A, 2011a. Life-cycle assessment of pavements. part I: Critical review. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 55 (9–10), 801–809. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.03.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santero, N.J., Masanet, E., and Horvath, A, 2011b. Life-cycle assessment of pavements. part II: Filling the research gaps. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 55 (9–10), 801–809. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.03.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos, J., et al., 2019. SUP&r DSS: A sustainability-based decision support system for road pavements. Journal of Cleaner Production, 206, 524–540. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos, J., Ferreira, A., and Flintsch, G, 2015. A life cycle assessment model for pavement management: road pavement construction and management in Portugal. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 16 (4), 315–336. doi: 10.1080/10298436.2014.942862
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schrijvers, D.L., Loubet, P., and Sonnemann, G, 2016. Critical review of guidelines against a systematic framework with regard to consistency on allocation procedures for recycling in LCA. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 21 (7), 994–1008. doi: 10.1007/s11367-016-1069-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shirodkar, P., et al., 2011. A study to determine the degree of partial blending of reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) binder for high RAP hot mix asphalt. Construction and Building Materials, 25 (1), 150–155. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.06.045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, H.M.R.D., Oliveira, J.R.M., and Jesus, C.M.G, 2012. Are totally recycled hot mix asphalts a sustainable alternative for road paving? Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 60, 38–48. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.11.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turgeon, C.M., 1989. The use of asphalt-rubber products in Minnesota. In: National seminar on asphalt-rubber. Kansas City, MO.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, T., et al., 2018. Energy consumption and environmental impact of rubberized asphalt pavement. Journal of Cleaner Production, 180, 139–158. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, P, et al., 2010. Modeling climate change impacts of pavement production and construction. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 54, 776–782. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, R, 2014. Development of a pavement life cycle assessment tool utilizing regional data and introducing an asphalt binder model. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
   Google Scholar
• Zapata, P, and Gambatese, JA, 2005. Energy consumption of asphalt and reinforced concrete pavement materials and construction. Journal Infrastructure System, 11, 9–20. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2005)11:1(9)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaumanis, M., et al., 2012. Calculation of asphalt production energy flow to compare warm and hot mix asphalt. In: Proceedings of 5th Eurasphalt & Eurobitume Congress. Istanbul: EAPA, 216–225.
   Google Scholar