Mechanical characterisation of interface shear strain of multi-layer composite pavement

References

• Al Nageim, H., and Al Hakim, B., 1999. Bonding conditions between pavement layers and their influence on pavement layer moduli and remaining life. In: Proc., 3rd European symposium on performance and durability of bituminous materials and hydraulic stabilised composites, Leeds, Great Britain, 725–736.
   Google Scholar
• Bae, A., et al., 2010. Effects of temperature on interface shear strength of emulsified tack coats and its relationship to rheological properties. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2180 (-1), 102–109. doi: 10.3141/2180-12
   Google Scholar
• Blankenship, P., Iker, N., and Drbohlav, J., 2004. Interlayer and design considerations to retard reflective cracking. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 1896, 177–186. doi: 10.3141/1896-18
   Google Scholar
• Bocci, E., and Canestrari, F., 2012. Analysis of structural compatibility at interface between asphalt concrete pavements and orthotropic steel deck surfaces. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC, 2293, 1–7. doi:10.3141/2293-01.
   Google Scholar
• Canestrari, F., et al., 2005. Advanced testing and characterization of interlayer shear resistance. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC, 1929, 69–78. doi: 10.1177/0361198105192900109
   Google Scholar
• Chen, J.S., and Huang, C.C, 2010. Effect of surface characteristics on bonding properties of bituminous tack coat. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC, 2180 (-1), 142–149. doi:10.3141/2180-16.
   Google Scholar
• Collop, A.C., et al., 2009. Shear bond strength between asphalt layers for laboratory prepared samples and field cores. Construction and Building Materials, 23 (6), 2251–2258. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.11.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, K., et al., 2016. Detection of delamination in the HMA layer of runway pavement structure using asphalt strain gauges. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 142, 11. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000869.
   Google Scholar
• Das, R., et al., 2017. Effects of tack coat application on interface bond strength and short-term pavement performance. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2633, 1–8. doi:10.3141/2633-02.
   Google Scholar
• Donovan, E. P., Al-Qadi, I. L., and Loulizi, A., 2000. Optimization of tack coat application rate for geocomposite membrane on bridge decks. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 1740, 143–150. doi: 10.3141/1740-18
   Google Scholar
• Hachiya, Y., and Sato, K., 1997. Effect of tack coat on bonding characteristics at interface between asphalt concrete layers. In: Proc., 8th International Conference on asphalt Pavements, Seattle, Washington, Vol. I, 349–361.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, X., and Walubita, L. F, 2011. Effects of layer interfacial bonding conditions on the mechanistic responses in asphalt pavements. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 137 (1), 28–36. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000184.
   Google Scholar
• Kulikov, G.M., Plotnikova, S.V., and Kulikov, M. G., 2017. Strong SaS formulation for free and forced vibrations of laminated composite plates. Composite Structures, 180 (15), 286–297. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.08.008
   Google Scholar
• Leng, Z., et al., 2008. Interface bonding between hot-mix asphalt and various Portland cement concrete surfaces laboratory assessment. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC, 2057, 46–53. doi:10.3141/2057-06.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leutner, R, 1979. Untersuchung des Schichtenverbundes beim bituminösen Oberbau. Bitumen, 41, 84–91.
   Google Scholar
• Li, S., Liu, X., and Liu, Z., 2014. Interlaminar shear fatigue and damage characteristics of asphalt layer for asphalt overlay on rigid pavement. Construction and Building Materials, 68, 341–347. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.06.053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammad, L.N., et al., 2010. Effects of pavement surface type and sample preparation method on tack coat interface shear strength. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC, 2180, 93–101. doi:10.3141/2180-11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammad, L. N., et al., 2012. “Optimization of Tack Coat for HMA Placement.” NCHRP Report 712, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Nikolova, S., and Grossey, K., 1997. Study of the influence of types of emulsions on the shear stress. In: Proc., 2nd World Congress on Emulsion, Bordeaux, France.
   Google Scholar
• Nishiyama, T., Lee, H., and Bhatti, A., 1933. Investigation of bonding condition in concrete overlay by laboratory testing, finite element modeling, and field evaluation. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC, 1933, 15–23. doi: 10.1177/0361198105193300103
   Google Scholar
• Ozer, H., Al-Qadi, I. L., and Leng, Z., 2008. Fracture-based friction model for pavement interface characterization. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2057, 54–63. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC doi:10.3141/2057-07.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Partl, M. N., and Raab, C., 1999. Shear adhesion between top layers of fresh asphalt pavements in Switzerland. In: Proc., 7th Conference on asphalt Pavements for Southern Africa, Victory Falls, Zimbabwe, 5.130–5.137.
   Google Scholar
• Raab, C., and Partl, M. N., 2004. Interlayer shear performance: Experience with different pavement structures. In: Proc., 3rd Eurobitume Eurasphalt Congress. Vienna, Austria, 535–545.
   Google Scholar
• Raab, C., and Partl, M. N., 2009. Interlayer bonding of binder, base and subbase layers of asphalt pavements: Long-term performance. Construction and Building Materials, 23 (8), 2926–2931. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.02.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabiot, D., and Morizur, M., 1996. Polymer-modified bitumen emulsions an advantage for the various road applications. In: Proc., Eurasphalt & Eureobitume Congress. Strasbourg, France.
   Google Scholar
• Salinas, A., et al., 2013. Interface layer tack coat optimization. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2372 (-1), 53–60. doi: 10.3141/2372-07
   Google Scholar
• Shahin, M. Y., Kirchner, K., and Blackmon, E., 1987. Analysis of asphalt concrete layer slippage and its effect on pavement performance and rehabilitation design. In: Proc., 6th International Conference Structural Design of Asphalt pavements. Ann Arbor, MI. Vol. I, 958–964.
   Google Scholar
• Sholar, G. A., et al., 2004. Upshaw, and H. L. Moseley. Preliminary investigation of a test method to evaluate bond strength of bituminous tack Coats. In: Proc., Annual Meeting of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists. Baton Rouge, Louisiana.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, Y, et al., 2018. Analysis of the fatigue crack propagation process of the stress-absorption layer of composite pavement based on reliability. Applied Sciences, 8, 11.
   Google Scholar
• Tayebali, A. A., et al., 2004. “A Mechanistic Approach to Evaluate Contribution of Prime and Tack Coat in Composite Asphalt Pavements.” Publication North Carolina Department of Transportation, FHWA/NC/2004-05, NCDOT 2001-04.
   Google Scholar
• Tozzo, C., D’Andrea, A., and Al-Qadi, I.L., 2016. Dilatancy in the analysis of interlayer cyclic shear test results. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 28 (12), doi:10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uzan, J, 1976. Influence of the interface condition on stress distribution in a layered system (abridgement). Transportation Research Board, 616, 71–73.
   Google Scholar
• Uzan, J., Livneh, M., and Eshed, Y., 1978. Investigation of adhesion properties between asphaltic-concrete layers. Asphalt Paving Technology, 47, 495–521.
   Google Scholar
• Xie, J., Waas, A.M., and Rassaian, M., 2017. Analytical predictions of delamination threshold load of laminated composite plates subject to flexural loading. Composite Structures, 179 (1), 181–194. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.07.009
   Google Scholar
• Xu, Y., Shan, L., and Sun, Z., 2014. Effect of a sand mix interlayer on thermal cracking in overlays. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 26 (9), 04014049. : 1–7. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar