References
- Abudinen, D., Fuentes, L.G., and Carvajal Muñoz, J.S, 2017. Travel quality assessment of urban roads based on international roughness index: case study in Colombia. Transportation Research Record, 2612 (1), 1–10. doi: https://doi.org/10.3141/2612-01
- Ahlin, K., and Granlund, N.O.J, 2002. Relating road roughness and vehicle speeds to human whole body vibration and exposure limits. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 3 (4), 207–216. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10298430210001701.
- Ainalis, D., Rouillard, V., and Sek, M, 2015. On-the-road measurements to establish the dynamic characteristics of transport vehicles. Packaging Technology and Science, 28, 657–671. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/pts.2124.
- Aleadelat, W., et al., 2018. Evaluation of pavement roughness using an android-based smartphone. journal of transportation Engineering. Part B: Pavements, 144 (3), 04018033. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1061/jpeodx.0000058.
- Amador-Jiménez, L., and Matout, N., 2014. A low cost solution to assess road ’ s roughness surface condition for Pavement Management. In: TRB 2014 Annual Meeting. 16.
- Anitha, R., Deepak, M., and Snehesh, T, 2015. Road quality and condition detection using GPS and a Raspberry pi. International Journal of Innovative Research and Creative Technology, 1 (6), 527–529.
- Arhin, S.A., Noel, E.C., and Ribbiso, A, 2015. Acceptable international roughness index thresholds based on present serviceability rating. Journal of Civil Engineering Research, 5 (4), 90–96. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5923/j.jce.20150504.03.
- ASTM E1926-08. Standard practice for computing international roughness index of roads from longitudinal profile measurements. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA.
- ASTM E867 – 06, 2012. Standard terminology relating to vehicle-pavement system. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA.
- Bridgelall, R, 2015. Inertial sensor sample rate selection for ride quality Measures. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 21 (2), 04014039. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)is.1943-555x.0000225.
- Cantisani, G., and Loprencipe, G, 2010. Road roughness and whole body vibration: evaluation tools and comfort limits. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 136 (9), 818–826. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)te.1943-5436.0000143.
- Chen, K., et al., 2011. Road condition monitoring using on-board three-axis accelerometer and GPS sensor. In: 6th International ICST Conference on Communications and Networking. Harbin, China: IEEE. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/chinacom.2011.6158308.
- Chen, K., et al., 2014. CRSM: Crowdsourcing based road surface monitoring. In: 10 th International Conference on High Performance Computing and Communications. IEEE, 2151–2158. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/hpcc.and.euc.2013.308.
- Chen, K., et al., 2016. CRSM: a practical crowdsourcing-based road surface monitoring system. Wireless Networks, 22 (3), 765–779. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-015-0996-y.
- Douangphachanh, V., and Oneyama, H., 2013a. Using smartphones to estimate road pavement condition. International Symposium for Next Generation Infrastructure. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14453/isngi2013.proc.16.
- Douangphachanh, V., and Oneyama, H, 2013b. A study on the use of smartphones for road roughness condition estimation. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 10, 1551–1564.
- Douangphachanh, V., and Oneyama, H., 2013c. Estimation of road roughness condition from smartphones under realistic settings. In: 13th International Conference on ITS Telecommunications (ITST). IEEE, 433–439. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/itst.2013.6685585.
- Douangphachanh, V., and Oneyama, H., 2014. Exploring the use of smartphone accelerometer and gyroscope to study on the estimation of road surface roughness condition. In: International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics. IEEE, 783–787. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5220/0005117407830787.
- Du, Y., et al., 2014. Measurement of international roughness index by using Z-axis accelerometers and GPS. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 1–10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/928980.
- Du, Y., et al., 2016. Application of vehicle mounted accelerometers to measure pavement roughness. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 12 (6), 8413146. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/8413146.
- El-Wakeel, A.S., et al., 2018. Towards a practical crowdsensing system for road surface conditions monitoring. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 5 (6), 4672–4685. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/jiot.2018.2807408.
- Eriksson, J., et al., 2008. The pothole patrol: using a mobile sensor network for road surface monitoring. In: International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services (MobiSys). ACM, 29–39. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/1378600.1378605.
- Forslöf, L., and Jones, H, 2015. Roadroid: continuous road condition monitoring with smart phones. Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture, 9, 485–496. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17265/1934-7359/2015.04.012.
- González, A., et al., 2008. The use of vehicle acceleration measurements to estimate road roughness. Vehicle System Dynamicss: International Journal of Vehicle Mechanics and Mobility, 46 (6), 483–499. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00423110701485050.
- Imine, H., 2010. Estimation of unknown inputs of heavy vehicle: experimental validation. In: International Symposium on Heavy Vehicle Transport Technology, 14-17 March 2010, Melbourne, Australia.
- Karamihas, S.M., et al., 1999. Guidelines for longitudinal pavement profile measurement, NCHRP Project 10-47, Transportation Research Institute.
- Kavianipour, O., Montazeri-Gh, M., and Moazamizadeh, M, 2015. Road profile measurement using the two degrees of freedom response-type mechanism. Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 229 (6), 1074–1087. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0954406214543096.
- Kırbas, U, 2018. IRI sensitivity to the influence of surface distress on flexible pavements. Coatings, 8 (8), 271. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings808027 doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings8080271
- Kırbaş, U., and Karaşahin, M, 2018. Investigation of ride comfort limits on urban asphalt concrete pavements. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 19 (10), 949–955. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2016.1224413.
- Lima, L.C., et al., 2016. Using crowdsourcing techniques and mobile devices for asphaltic pavement quality recognition. In: 2016 VI Brazilian Symposium on Computing Systems Engineering (SBESC). IEEE, 144–149. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/sbesc.2016.029.
- Mahmoudzadeh, A., et al., 2019. Estimating pavement roughness by fusing color and depth data obtained from an inexpensive RGB-D sensor. Sensors, 19 (7), 1655. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/s19071655.
- Mahmoudzadeh, A., Firoozi Yeganeh, S., and Golroo, A, 2015. Kinect, a novel cutting edge tool in pavement data collection. In: International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences - ISPRS Archives. Copernicus GmbH, 425–431. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-1-W5-425-2015.
- McGhee, K.H, 2004. Automated pavement distress collection techniques. NCHRP syn-thesis 334. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, National Research Council.
- Misra, A., et al., 2014. Crowdsourcing and its application to transportation data collection and management. Transportation Research Record, 2414 (1), 1–8. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3141/2414-01.
- Mohan, P., Padmanabhan, V. N., and Ramjee, R., 2008. Nericell. Proceedings of the 6th ACM Conference on Embedded Network Sensor Systems - SenSys ’08. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/1460412.1460444.
- Mollova, G, 2007. Effects of digital filtering in data processing of seismic acceleration records. Journal of Advances in Signal Processing, 1, 1–9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1155/2007/29502.
- Montazeri, M., et al., 2008. Vehicle ride evaluation based on a time-domain variable speed driving pattern. International Journal of Vehicle Design, 47 (1/2/3/4), 81–101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/ijvd.2008.020881.
- Mucka, P, 2017. International roughness index specifications around the world. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 18 (4), 929–965. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2016.1197144.
- Nguyen, H.L., et al., 2019. Adaptive network based fuzzy inference system with meta-heuristic optimizations for international roughness index prediction. Applied Sciences, 9 (21), 4715. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/app9214715.
- Pan, C., et al., 2016. Baseline correction of vibration acceleration signals with inconsistent initial velocity and displacement. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 8 (10), 1–11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814016675534.
- Pérez-Acebo, H., et al., 2017. Rigid pavement performance models by means of Markov Chains with half-year step time. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 1–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2017.1353390.
- Piao, B., et al., 2017. Information Search, integration, and Personlization. In: International Workshop on information Search. Integration, and Personalization, 66–81.
- Rajamohan, D., Gannu, B., and Rajan, K, 2015. MAARGHA: a prototype system for road condition and surface type estimation by fusing multi-sensor data. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 4 (3), 1225–1245. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi4031225.
- Sayers, M. W., Gillespie, T. D., and Paterson, W. D, 1986a. Guidelines for the conduct and calibration of road roughness measurements,” World Bank Technical Paper 46, The World Bank, Washington, DC, USA.
- Sayers, M. W., Gillespie, T. D., and Queiroz, A. V, 1986b. The international road roughness experiment. Establishing correlation and a calibration standard for measurements,” Tech. Rep. WTP45.
- Seraj, F., et al., 2016. RoADS: a road pavement monitoring system for anomaly detection using smart phones. Big Data Analytics in the Social and Ubiquitous Context, 128–146. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29009-6_7.
- Seraj, F., Meratnia, N., and Havinga, P.J.M., 2017. RoVi: continuous transport infrastructure monitoringramework for preventive maintenance. 2017 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications, PerCom 2017, 217–226.
- Singh, G., et al., 2017. Smart patrolling: an efficient road surface monitoring using smartphone sensors and crowdsourcing. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 40, 71–88. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmcj.2017.06.002.
- Smith, S. W, 2003. Moving average filters. Digital Signal Processing, 277–284. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-7506-7444-7/50052-2
- Smith, K. and Ram, P, 2016. Measuring and specifying pavement smoothness. Washington, DC, USA: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA).
- Strazdins, G., Mednis, A., and Kanonirs, G, 2011. Towards vehicular sensor networks with Android smartphones for road surface monitoring. In: Second International Workshop on Networks of Cooperating Objects (CONET). Chicago, 1–4.
- Wang, R.Y., Chuang, Y.T., and Yi, C.W., 2016. A crowdsourcing-based road anomaly classification system. 18th Asia-Pacific Network Operations and Management Symposium (APNOMS). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/apnoms.2016.7737244.
- Yeganeh, S.F., et al., 2019. Validation of smartphone based pavement roughness measures. arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.10699 [cs. HC].
- Zang, K., et al., 2018. Assessing and mapping of road surface roughness based on GPS and accelerometer sensors on bicycle-mounted smartphones. Sensors, 18 (3), 914. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/s18030914.
- Zhao, B., and Nagayama, T, 2017. IRI estimation by the frequency domain analysis of vehicle dynamic responses. Procedia Engineering, 188, 9–16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.04.451.