Laboratory and field performance comparison of dense graded and stone mastic asphalt as a runway surface

References

• AAA, 2017. Airfield pavement essential. Airport Practice Note 12. Canberra, Australia: Australian Airports Association.
   Google Scholar
• AAPA, 2018. Performance-based Airport Asphalt Model Specification. Melbourne, VIC, Australia: Australian Asphalt Pavement Association, ver. 1.0, January.
   Google Scholar
• Austroads, 2014. Specification framework for polymer modified binders. Austroads, Report AGPT/T190, February.
   Google Scholar
• CACC, 2016. Practice on Asphalt overlay in China. ICAO 4th Aerodromes Operations and Planning Working Group, Bangkok, Thailand, May.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, C, 1999. The use of stone mastic Asphalt on aircraft pavements. Submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for SEN713 Research/Professional Practice Projects, School of Engineering and Technology, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia, December.
   Google Scholar
• CASA, 2019. Manual of standards: part 139 – Aerodromes. Canberra, Australia: Civil Aviation Safety Authority. 5 September.
   Google Scholar
• EAPA, 2003. Airfield use of Asphalt. European Asphalt Pavement Association. May.
   Google Scholar
• Embleton, K, 2017. Next generation airport asphalt. In: AAA pavement and lighting forum. Sydney, NSW, Australia. 1–3 May.
   Google Scholar
• FAA, 1997. Measurement construction and maintenance of skid-resistant airport pavement surfaces, advisory circular 150/5320-12C. District of Columbia, Washington, USA: Federal Aviation Administration of the United States of America.
   Google Scholar
• Hakim, B, et al., 2014. UK airfield pavement design using French asphalts. Transportation, 1 (167), 27–35.
   Google Scholar
• ICAO, 2013. Aerodrome design and operations. Annex 14, volume 1, to the conventions on international civil aviation. Montreal, Canada: International Civil Aviation Organization. February.
   Google Scholar
• Jamieson, S, 2019. Stone mastic Asphalt for Australian Airport Asphalt. A thesis submitted for the award of Master of Science in Civil Engineering. University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, Queensland, Australia, 17 June.
   Google Scholar
• Jamieson, S and White, G, 2018. Review of stone mastic asphalt as a high performance ungrooved runway surfacing. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 21 (4), 886–905. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2018.1545688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamieson, S, and White, G, 2019. Developing a performance-based specification for stone mastic asphalt as an ungrooved runway surface. In: International airfield and highway pavements conference, 21–24 July, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, MP, 1973. Friction overlay improves runway skid resistance. Civil Engineering, 43 (3), 45–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunn, ME, 1994. Evaluation of Stone Mastic Asphalt (SMA): a high stability wearing course material. UK: Transport Research Laboratory, Wokingham, TRL Report PR 65.
   Google Scholar
• Qiu, YF, and Lum, KM, 2006. Design and performance of stone mastic asphalt. Journal of transportation engineering, 132 (12), 956–963. doi: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2006)132:12(956)
   Google Scholar
• Sivilevičius, H, and Šukevičius, Š, 2009. Manufacturing technologies and dynamics of hot-mix asphalt mixture production. Journal of civil engineering and management, 15 (2), 169–179. doi: https://doi.org/10.3846/1392-3730.2009.15.169-179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, TD, 1976. Field performance of porous friction surface course. Department of Transportation, Washington, District of Columbia, USA, Report Number FAA-RD-74-38, April.
   Google Scholar
• White, TD, 1985. Marshall procedures for design and quality control of asphalt mixture. Proceedings asphalt pavement technology, 54, 265–285.
   Google Scholar
• White, G, 2018. State of the Art: asphalt for airport pavement surfacing. International journal of pavement research and technology, 11 (1), 77–98. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijprt.2017.07.008
   Google Scholar
• White, G, and Azevedo, R, 2020. Managing the evolution of early-life runway surface friction. In: 11th International conference on managing pavement Assets, 23–26 August, Chicago, Illinois, USA , article-in-press.
   Google Scholar
• White, G, and Jamieson, S, 2018. Introduction of stone mastic asphalt to Australian runways. In: 1st International conference on stone matrix asphalt, 5–7 November, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
   Google Scholar
• White, G, and Jamshidi, A, 2019. Resetting dense graded airport asphalt production and construction tolerances. International Journal of Construction Management, article-in-press. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2019.1641889.
   Google Scholar
• White, G, Ward, C, and Jamieson, S, 2019. Field evaluation of a handheld laser meter for pavement surface macro texture measurement. International journal of pavement engineering, article-in-press. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2019.1654103.
   Google Scholar
• Widyatmoko, I, Hakim, B, and Fergusson, C, 2011. Pavement sustainability and performance improvement: case studies. In: XXIVth PIARC congress – airfield pavement seminar, 27–30 September, Mexico City, Mexico.
   Google Scholar
• Zuzelo, 2014. The Benefits of runway grooving. In: Presented to the airfield engineering and maintenance summit, 25–28 March, Singapore: Furama Riverfront.
   Google Scholar