499
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Calibration of smartphone sensors to evaluate the ride quality of paved and unpaved roads

, , , &
Pages 1529-1539 | Received 31 Mar 2020, Accepted 06 Aug 2020, Published online: 25 Aug 2020

References

  • Agbovi, H. K. 2012. Effects of low temperatures, repetitive stresses and chemical aging on thermal and fatigue cracking in asphalt cement pavements on Highway 417. Master Thesis. Queen's University at Kingston.
  • Aleadelat, W., et al., 2018. Evaluation of pavement roughness using an android-based smartphone. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements, 144 (3), 04018033.
  • Alessandroni, G., et al., 2015. Sensing road roughness via mobile devices: A study on speed influence. 2015 9th International Symposium on Image and Signal Processing and Analysis (ISPA). IEEE, 270–275.
  • Bhushan, M., and Rengaswamy, R, 2000. Design of sensor location based on various fault diagnostic observability and reliability criteria. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 24 (2-7), 735–741.
  • Bridgelall, R, 2013. Connected vehicle approach for pavement roughness evaluation. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 20 (1), 04013001.
  • Bridgelall, R., et al., 2016. Precision enhancement of pavement roughness localization with connected vehicles. Measurement Science and Technology, 27 (2), 025012.
  • Bridgelall, R., et al., 2017. Wavelength sensitivity of a connected vehicle method of ride quality Characterizations. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 20 (5), 566–572.
  • Bridgelall, R., and Tolliver, D, 2020. Accuracy enhancement of anomaly localization with participatory sensing vehicles. Sensors, 20 (2), 409.
  • Brown, D., Liu, W., and Henning, T. F, 2010. Identifying pavement deterioration by enhancing the definition of road roughness. Journal of Transportation Research Board, 430, 66.
  • Buttlar, W. G. and Islam, M., 2014. Integration of smart-phone-based pavement roughness data collection tool with asset management system. US: NEXTRANS Center, Technical Report for Project No. 098IY04.
  • Cebon, D, 1998. Theoretical road damage due to dynamic tyre forces of heavy vehicles part 2: simulated damage caused by a tandem-axle vehicle. Proceedings of the institution of mechanical engineers. Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 202 (2), 109–117.
  • Chan, C. Y., et al., 2010. Investigating effects of asphalt pavement conditions on traffic accidents in Tennessee based on the pavement management system (PMS). Journal of Advanced Transportation, 44 (3), 150–161.
  • Darawade, K., et al., 2016. Estimation of road surface roughness condition from android smartphone sensors. International Journal of Recent Trends in Engineering & Research, 2 (3), 339–346.
  • Douangphachanh, V., and Oneyama, H, 2016. A study on the use of smartphones for road roughness condition estimation. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 10, 1551–1564.
  • Eriksson, J., et al., 2008. The pothole patrol: using a mobile sensor network for road surface monitoring. Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Mobile systems. In: Applications, and services, 29-39.
  • Ghose, A., et al., 2012. Road condition monitoring and alert application: using in-vehicle smartphone as internet-connected sensor. 2012 IEEE international conference on pervasive computing and communications workshops. IEEE, 489-491.
  • Ghasemi, A. R., Taheri-Behrooz, F., and Shokrieh, M. M, 2014. Measuring residual stresses in composite materials using the simulated hole-drilling method. In: M.M. Shokrieh, ed. Residual stresses in composite materials. Cambridge, UK: Woodhead Publishing, 76–120. doi:https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857098597.1.76.
  • Feldbusch, A., Sadegh-Azar, H., and Agne, P, 2017. Vibration analysis using mobile devices (smartphones or tablets). Procedia Engineering, 199, 2790–2795.
  • Golabi, K., Kulkarni, R. B., and Way, G. B, 1982. A statewide pavement management system. Interfaces, 12 (6), 5–21.
  • Huang, H.-B., Yi, T.-H., and Li, H.-N, 2017a. Bayesian combination of weighted principal-component analysis for diagnosing sensor faults in structural monitoring systems. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 143 (9), 04017088.
  • Huang, H.-B., Yi, T.-H., and Li, H.-N, 2017b. Sensor fault diagnosis for structural health monitoring based on statistical hypothesis test and missing variable approach. Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 30 (2), B4015003.
  • I-Iarte, S., Rahmanl, A., and Razeeb, K., 2005. Fault tolerance in sensor networks using self-diagnosing sensor nodes.
  • Janani, L., Sunitha, V., and Mathew, S, 2020. Influence of surface distresses on smartphone-based pavement roughness evaluation. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 1–14. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2020.1714045.
  • Krunic, V., Trumpler, E., and Han, R, 2007. NodeMD: Diagnosing node-level faults in remote wireless sensor systems. Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Mobile systems, applications and services, 43–56.
  • Kumar, R., Mukherjee, A., and Singh, V, 2017. Community sensor network for monitoring road roughness using smartphones. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 31 (3), 04016059.
  • Lane, M., 2005. An introduction to wavelet analysis with SAS. SAS Conference Proceedings NESUG 2005. 1–10.
  • Lekshmipathy, J., Samuel, N. M., and Velayudhan, S, 2020. Vibration vs. vision: best approach for automated pavement distress detection. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, 13, 402–410.
  • Leverett, B. C., 2008. Effects of incentive/disincentive program on pavement performance. Dissertation (PhD). Michigan State University.
  • Liu, M, 2013. A study of mobile sensing using smartphones. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 9 (3), 272916.
  • Lu, P., et al., 2019. Intelligent Transportation systems approach to railroad infrastructure performance evaluation: track surface abnormality identification with smartphone-based App. U. S. Department of Transportation, Technical Report, No. MPC-19-384.
  • Martin, H., Groves, P., and Newman, M, 2016. The limits of in-run calibration of MEMS inertial sensors and sensor arrays. Journal of The Institute of Navigation, 63 (2), 127–143.
  • Mednis, A., Strazdins, G., Zviedris, R., Kanonirs, G., and Selavo, L., 2011. Real time pothole detection using android smartphones with accelerometers. 2011 International conference on distributed computing in sensor systems and workshops (DCOSS). IEEE, 1–6.
  • Mohan, P., Padmanabhan, V. N., and Ramjee, R., 2008. Nericell: rich monitoring of road and traffic conditions using mobile smartphones. Proceedings of the 6th ACM conference on Embedded network sensor systems, 323–336.
  • Múcka, P, 2015. Sensitivity of road unevenness indicators to distresses of composite pavements. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, 8 (2), 72.
  • Múčka, P, 2017. Road roughness limit values based on measured vehicle vibration. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 23 (2), 04016029.
  • Mukherjee, A., and Majhi, S, 2016. Characterisation of road bumps using smartphones. European Transport Research Review, 8 (2), 13.
  • National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), 2018. Road Statistics in 2018. National Transportation Safety Board.
  • Odenwald, S. F., and Bailey, C. M, 2019. Gravimetric detection of earth’s rotation using Crowdsourced smartphone Observations. IEEE Access, 7, 148131–148141.
  • Osborne, C, 1991. Statistical calibration: A review. International Statistical Review/Revue Internationale de Statistique, 59 (3), 309–336.
  • O'Sullivan, M. J., and O'Sullivan, J. P, 2016. Reservoir modeling and simulation for geothermal resource characterization and evaluation. In: Ronald DiPippo, ed. Geothermal power generation. Cambridge, UK: Woodhead Publishing, 165–199. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100337-4.00007-3.
  • Park, K., Thomas, N. E., and Wayne Lee, K, 2007. Applicability of the international roughness index as a predictor of asphalt pavement condition. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 133 (12), 706–709.
  • Paterson, W, 1986. International roughness index: relationship to other measures of roughness and riding quality. Transportation Research Record, 1084, 49–59.
  • Pawar, P. R., Mathew, A. T., and Saraf, M, 2018. IRI (international roughness index): an indicator of vehicle response. Materials Today: Proceedings, 5 (5), 11738–11750.
  • Sayers, M. W, 1986. Guidelines for conducting and calibrating road roughness measurements. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan. Transportation Research Institute.
  • Seraj, F., et al., 2015. RoADS: a road pavement monitoring system for anomaly detection using smart phones. Big data analytics in the social and ubiquitous context, Springer, 128–146.
  • Smith, K., and Ram, P, 2016. Measuring and specifying pavement smoothness. U. S. Federal Highway Administration, Technical Report No. FHWA-HIF-16-032.
  • West, S. G., Finch, J. F., and Curran, P. J., 1995. Structural equation models with nonnormal variables: Problems and remedies. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc, 56–75.
  • Zaloshnja, E. and Miller, T. R., 2009. Cost of crashes related to road conditions, United States, 2006. In: Annals of Advances in Automotive Medicine/Annual Scientific Conference. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine, 53, 141.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.