References
- AASHTO T 240-13, 2017. Standard method of test for effect of heat and air on a moving film of asphalt binder (rolling thin-film oven test). Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
- AASHTO T315-14, 2014. Standard method of test for determining the rheological properties of asphalt binder using a Dynamic Shear Rheometer (DSR). Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
- AASHTO T 350-14, 2014. Standard method of test for Multiple Stress Creep Recovery (MSCR) test of asphalt binder using a Dynamic Shear Rheometer (DSR). Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
- AASHTO TP 101-12, 2016. Estimating fatigue resistance of asphalt binders using the Linear Amplitude Sweep. Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
- Abdelrahman, M.A. and Carpenter, S.H., 1999. Mechanism of interaction of asphalt cement with Crumb Rubber Modifier. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1661, 106–113.
- Airey, G.D., Rahman, M.M., and Collop, A.C., 2003. Absorption of bitumen into Crumb Rubber using the basket drainage method. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 4 (2), 105–119. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1029843032000158879.
- Airey, G., Rahman, M., and Collop, A.C., 2004. Crumb Rubber and bitumen interaction as a function of crude source and bitumen viscosity. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 5 (4), 453–475. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2004.9689981.
- Asgharzadeh, S.M., et al., 2018. Fatigue properties of Crumb Rubber asphalt mixtures used in railways. Construction and Building Materials, 238. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.06.189.
- Attia, M. and Abdelrahman, M., 2009. Enhancing the performance of Crumb Rubber-Modified binders through varying the interaction conditions. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 10 (6), 423–434. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10298430802343177.
- Bahia, H. and Anderson, M., 1995. SHRP binder rheological parameters: background and comparison with conventional properties. Transportation Research Record, 1488 (1), 32–39.
- Bahia, H.U. and Davies, R., 1994. Effect of Crumb Rubber Modifiers (CRM) on performance-related properties of asphalt binders. Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, 63, 414–449.
- Bahia, H.U., Zhai, H., and Rangel, A., 1998. Evaluation of stability, nature of modifier, and short-term aging of modified binders using new tests: LAST, PAT, and modified RTFO. Transportation Research Record, 1638 (1), 64–71. doi:https://doi.org/10.3141/1638-08.
- Caltrans, 2009. Asphalt rubber usage guide. State of California Department of Transportation, Materials Engineering and Testing Services.
- Carlson, D.D. and Zhu, H., 1999. Asphalt-rubber an anchor to Crumb Rubber markets. Third Joint 270 UNCTAD/IRSG workshop on rubber and the environment, October 1999. Veracruz, Mexico: International Rubber Forum.
- Chen, Z., et al., 2019. Low temperature and fatigue characteristics of treated Crumb Rubber Modified asphalt after a long term aging procedure. Journal of Cleaner Production, 234. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.147.
- D’Angelo, J., 2009. The relationship of the MSCR test to rutting. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 10, 61–80.
- Dong, D., et al., 2012. Swelling process of rubber in asphalt and its effect on the structure and properties of rubber and asphalt. Construction and Building Materials, 29, 316–322.
- Epps, J.A., 1994. Uses of recycled rubber tires in highways. NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice, 198.
- Hanson, D. and Duncan, G., 1995. Characterization of Crumb Rubber Modified binders using SHRP technology. Transportation Research Record, 1488 (1), 21–31.
- Heitzman, M.A., 1992. State of the practice – design and construction of asphalt paving materials with Crumb Rubber Modifier. Publication Number: FHWA-SA-92-022.
- Hicks, R.G., Lundy, J.R., and Epps, J.A., 1999. Life cycle costs for asphalt-rubber paving material. Tempe, AZ: Rubber Pavements Association.
- Hintz, C., et al., 2011. Modification and validation of Linear Amplitude Sweep test for binder fatigue specification. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2207, 99–106.
- Hou, X., et al., 2018. Identification of asphalt aging characterization by spectrophotometry technique. Fuel, 226, 56–65. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.04.030.
- Jamrah, A.A. and Kutay, M.E., 2020. Comparison of linear viscoelastic properties of Crumb Rubber–Modified binders measured using parallel-plate and concentric cylinder geometries with asphalt mixture dynamic modulus. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 32 (2), 04019352. doi:https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003007.
- Jamrah, A., Kutay, M.E., and Varma, S., 2015. Backcalculation of swollen Crumb Rubber modulus in asphalt rubber binder and its relation to performance. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2505, 99–107.
- Jones, D., Liang, Y., and Harvey, J., 2017. Performance base specifications: increasing Crumb Rubber usage by using small amounts of CRM in HMA. Available from http://www.ucprc.ucdavis.edu/PDF/UCPRC-TM-2017-05.pdf.
- Kim, Y.R., 2009. Modeling of asphalt concrete (1st ed.). McGraw Hill: ASCE Press.
- Lougheed, T.J. and Papagiannakis, A.T., 1996. Viscosity characteristics of rubber-modified asphalts. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 8 (3), 153–156.
- McGennis, R.B., 1995. Evaluation of physical properties of fine Crumb Rubber-Modified asphalt binders. Transportation Research Record, 1488 (1), 62–71.
- Medina, J.R. and Underwood, B.S., 2017. Micromechanical shear modulus modeling of activated Crumb Rubber Modified asphalt cements. Construction and Building Materials, 150, 56–65.
- Natu, G.S. and Tayebali, A.A., 2000. Viscoelastic behavior of Crumb Rubber Modified asphalt binders. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 1 (1-2), 119–129. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2000.9689887.
- Palit, S.K., Reddy, K.S., and Pandey, B.B., 2004. Laboratory evaluation of Crumb Rubber Modified asphalt mixes. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 16 (1), 45–53.
- Paul, B., 1960. Prediction of elastic constants of multiphase materials (Technical Report No. 3). Brown Univ., Providence.
- Pouranian, M.R., et al., 2020. Rheological and environmental characteristics of Crumb Rubber asphalt binders containing non-foaming warm mix asphalt additives. Construction and Building Materials, 238. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117707.
- Putman, B., Thompson, J., and Amirkhanian, S., 2005. High temperature properties of Crumb Rubber Modified binders. The fourth international conference on maintenance and rehabilitation of pavements and technological control.
- Shu, X., 2007. Application of particulate-filled composite (PFC) theory to hot-mix asphalt (HMA) Mixtures. (Doctoral Dissertation), University of Tennessee. Available from http://trace.tennessee.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1356&context=utk_graddiss.
- Tayebali, A.A., Vyas, B., and Malpass, G., 1997. Effect of Crumb Rubber particle size and concentration on performance grading of rubber modified asphalt binders. In: R.N. Jester, ed. Progress of superpave (superior performing asphalt pavement): evaluation and implementation, ASTM STP 1322. American Society for Testing and Materials, 30–47.
- Way, G., 2000. Flagstaff I-40 asphalt rubber overlay project: nine years of success. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1723, 45–52. doi:https://doi.org/10.3141/1723-06.
- Xiao, F., Amirkhanian, S., and Juang, C.S., 2007. Rutting resistance of rubberized asphalt concrete pavements containing reclaimed asphalt pavement mixtures. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 19 (6), 475–483.