Development of framework for performance prediction of flexible road pavement in Nigeria using Fuzzy logic theory

References

• AASHTO, 1993. AASHTO guide for design of pavement structures. Washington, DC: American Association of State Highways and Transportation Officials.
   Google Scholar
• AASHTO T274-82, 1986. Standard method for testing resilient modulus. Washington, DC 20001: American Association of State Highway and transportation Officials.
   Google Scholar
• AASTHO, 2012. Pavement management guide. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: American Association of State Highways and Transportation Officials.
   Google Scholar
• Abaza, K. A., 2016. Back-calculation of transition probabilities for markovian-based pavement performance prediction models. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 17 (3), 253–264. Doi: 10.1080/10298436.2014.993185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abaza, K. A., 2018. Empirical-Markovian model for predicting the overlay design thickness for asphalt concrete pavement. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 19 (7), 1617–1635. Doi: 10.1080/14680629.2017.1338188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abiola, O. S., et al., 2010. Investigation into causes of premature failure of highway pavements in Nigeria and remedies. In: proceedings of the Nigeria Institution of Civil Engineers (NICE) conference. Abuja, Nigeria.
   Google Scholar
• Abiola, O. S., et al., 2012. Application of dynamic artificial neural network for modelling ruts depth for Lagos-Ibadan expressway, Nigeria. Asian Research Publishing Network (ARPN)-Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 7 (8), 986–991.
   Google Scholar
• Aggarwal, P. and Kumar, N., 2015. Fuzzy model for road roughness index. In: International Conference on biological, Civil and Environmental Engineering, 3–4 February, Bali, Indonesia.
   Google Scholar
• Alharbi, F., 2018. Predicting pavement performance utilizing artificial neural network (ANN) models. Thesis (PhD), Iowa State University Capstones, Ames, IA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Arliansyah, J., Maruyama, T., and Takahashi, O, 2003. A development of Fuzzy pavement condition assessment. Proceedings of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, 746, 275–285.
   Google Scholar
• Ayed, A., 2016. Development of empirical and mechanistic empirical performance models at project and network levels. Thesis (PhD), Department of Civil Engineering, University of Waterloo, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Bai, Y., Zhuang, H. and Wang, D., 2006. Advanced fuzzy logic technologies in industrial applications. London: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Bandara, N. and Gunaratne, M, 2001. Current and future pavement maintenance prioritization based on rapid visual condition evaluation. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 127 (2), 116–123. Doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2001)127:2(116).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bianchini, A. and Bandini, P, 2010. Prediction of pavement performance through neuro-fuzzy reasoning. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 25 (1), 39–54. Doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8667.2009.00615.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandran, S., Isaac, K.P. and Veeraragavan, A., 2007. Prioritization of low-volume pavement sections for maintenance by using fuzzy logic. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1989-1 (1), 53–60. doi:10.3141/1989-06.
   Google Scholar
• Chassiakos, A. P., 2006. A fuzzy-based system for Maintenance planning or road pavements. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on computers. July, 2006,Vouliagmeni, Athens, Greece. Wisconsin, USA: World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society (WSEAS). 535–540.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, C., and Flintsch, G. W., 2008. Calibrating fuzzy-logic-based rehabilitation decision models using the LTPP database. In: 7th International Conference on Managing Pavement assets. Calgary Alberta, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, G., and Pham, T. T., 2001. Introduction to Fuzzy sets, Fuzzy logic, and Fuzzy control systems. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cheu, R. L., Wang, Y., and Fwa, T. F, 2004. Genetic algorithm-simulation methodology for pavement maintenance scheduling. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 19, 446–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claros, G., Carmichael, R. F., and Harvey, J, 1986. Development of pavement evaluation unit and rehabilitation procedure for overlay design method. Lagos: Texas Research and Development Foundation for the Nigeria Federal Ministry of works and Housing.
   Google Scholar
• Dabous, S. A., et al., 2019. Distress-based evidential reasoning method for pavement infrastructure condition assessment and rating. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 22 (4), 1–12. doi:10.1080/10298436.2019.1622012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EUROSTAT, 2019. European statistics. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/main/data/database.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Government of Nigeria, 2012. Public private partnership manual for Nigeria. Abuja: Infrastructure Concession Regulatory Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Ministry of Power, Works and Housing (FMPWH), 2016. General specifications for roads and bridges, Vol. II, Revised. Abuja: Government of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.
   Google Scholar
• Fwa, T. F. and Shanmugam, R., 1998. Fuzzy logic technique for pavement condition rating and maintenance-needs assessment. In: Fourth International Conference on managing pavements. Durban, South Africa, 465–476.
   Google Scholar
• Gogoi, R. and Dutta, B., 2019. Maintenance prioritization of interlocking concrete block pavement using fuzzy logic. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, Chinese Society of Pavement Engineering. In press.
   Google Scholar
• Golroo, A., and Tighe, S.L, 2009. Fuzzy set approach to condition assessments of novel sustainable Pavements in the Canadian climate. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 36, 754–764.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haas, R, 2003. Good technical foundations are essential for successful pavement management. In: Key note paper, Proceedings of MAIREPAV’ 03. Guimaraes, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Hamed, R. I., and Kakarash, Z. A, 2016. Evaluate the asphalt pavement performance of rut depth based on intelligent method. International Journal of Engineering and Computer Science, 5 (1), 15474–15481.
   Google Scholar
• Heiman, G. W, 2011. Basic Statistics for behavioral sciences. 6th ed. Belmont, Canada: Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, Y.H., 2004. Pavement analysis and design (2nd ed.). Prentice Hall: Pearson Prentice Hall, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Jeong, H., et al., 2017. Prediction of flexible pavement deterioration in relation to climate change using Fuzzy logic. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 23 (4), 04017008–1. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karagahin, M., and Terzi, S, 2014. Performance model for asphalt concrete pavement based on the fuzzy logic approach. Transport, 29 (1), 18–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaur, D., and Tekkedil, D., 2000. Fuzzy Expert system for asphalt pavement performance prediction. In: Conference proceedings. Dearborn, USA: IEEE Intelligent Transport Sysytems.
   Google Scholar
• Koduru, H.K., et al., 2010. Using Fuzzy logic and expert system approaches in evaluating flexible pavement distress: Case study. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 136, 149–157.
   Google Scholar
• Li, N., Haas, R., and Xie, W. C., 1997. Investigation of relationship between deterministic and probabilistic prediction models in pavement management, In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board (1592), Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC, 70–79.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., and Sun, M., 2007. Fuzzy optimization BP neural network model for pavement performance assessment. In: Grey systems and Intelligent services GSIS, IEEE International conference. Nanjing, China, 1031–1034.
   Google Scholar
• Mahmood, M., et al., 2013. A Fuzzy logic approach for pavement section classification. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, Chinese Society of Pavement Engineering, 6 (5), 620–626. DOI: 10.6135/ijprt.org.tw/2013.6(5).620.
   Google Scholar
• Mahmood, M. S., 2015. Network-level maintenance decisions for flexible pavement using A soft computing-based framework. Thesis (PhD), Nottingham Trent University, United Kingdom.
   Google Scholar
• Mahmood, M., et al., 2015. Pavement Management: data centric rules and uncertainty management in section classification by a Fuzzy inference system. Bituminous Mixtures and Pavement, 6, 533–541.
   Google Scholar
• Mane, A.S., etal, 2016. Methodology for pavement condition assessment and maintenance of rural roads. In: A national conference on fifteen years of transport engineering group, Civil Engineering Department, Indian Institution of Technology Roorkee, 6–7 August 2016, Roorkee.
   Google Scholar
• Marcelino, P., et al., 2019. Machine learning approach for pavement performance prediction. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 22 (3), 1–14. doi:10.1080/10298436.2019.1609673.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MATLAB, 2015. User guide manual. Mathworks Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Miradi, M., 2009. Knowledge discovery and pavement performance: intelligent data mining. A PhD Thesis submitted to the Section of Road and Railway Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Moazami, D., Behbahani, H., and Muniandy, R, 2011. Pavement rehabilitation and maintenance prioritization of urban roads using Fuzzy logic. Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 12869–12879.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammadi, A., Amador-Jimenez, L., and Elsaid, F, 2019. Simplified pavement performance modeling with only Two-time series observations: a case study of Montreal Island. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements, 145 (4), 05019004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munakata, T., 2008. Fundamentals of new artificial intelligence, neural evolutionary, fuzzy and more. (2nd ed). London: Springer-Verlag London Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Murana, A. A., 2016. Characterisation of subgrade materials from some Nigerian sources for Use in the Nigeria empirical-mechanistic pavement analysis and design system. Thesis (PhD), Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Ahmadu Bello Universiy Zaria, Nigeria.
   Google Scholar
• Nawir, D. and Prihartanto, E., 2019. Decision-making analysis of road maintenance in north Kalimantan region using technology of fuzzy logic (case study: Liang Bunyu street section, west Sebatik sub district, Nunukan district). International Conference on Green Energy and Environment 2019, IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 353 (2019), 1–6. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/353/1/012054.
   Google Scholar
• Olowosulu, A. T., et al., 2020. Investigating surface condition classification of flexible road pavement using data mining techniques. International Journal of Pavement Engineering. Doi:10.1080/10298436.2020.1847285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Acebo, H., et al., 2020. A skid resistance prediction model for an entire road network. Construction and Building Materials, 262, 120041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Premkumar, L., and Vavrik, W. R, 2016. Enhancing pavement performance prediction models for the illinois tollway system. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, 9, 14–19. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijprt.2015.12.002
   Google Scholar
• Prozzi, J. A., 2001. Modeling pavement performance by combining field and experimental data. Thesis (PhD). Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California Berkeley, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Salpisoth, H., 2014. Simple evaluation methods for road pavement management in developing countries. Thesis (PhD). Graduate School of Engineering, Kyoto University, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Santos, J., etal., 2020. A fuzzy logic expert system for selecting optimal and sustainable life cycle maintenance and rehabilitation strategies for road pavements. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 1–13. doi:10.1080/10298436.2020.1751161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Setyawan, A., Nainggolan, J., and Budiarto, A., 2015. Predicting the remaining service life of road using pavement condition index. In: The 5th International Conference of euro Asia civil engineering forum.
   Google Scholar
• Shoukry, S.N., Martinelli, D.R. and Reigle, J.A., 1997. Universal pavement distress evaluator based on fuzzy sets. Transportation Research Record 1592: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 971418, 180–186.
   Google Scholar
• Surendrakuma, K., Prashant, N. and Mayuresh, P., 2013. Application of Markovian probabilistic process to develop a decision support system for pavement maintenance management. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 2 (8), 295–303.
   Google Scholar
• Transport Research Board of the National Academies, 2007. Transport research circular E-C118 - pavement lessons learned from the AASHO road test and performance of the interstate highway system, Washington, DC 20001.
   Google Scholar
• Uddin, W. (2006). Pavement management systems. In: T.F. Fwa, ed. The handbook of highway engineering. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, 18-1–18-70.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, K. C. P., and Li, L., 2011. Pavement smoothness prediction based on Fuzzy and Gray theories. In: Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, Blackwell Publishing Inc, 26 (1), 69–76.
   Google Scholar