Preliminary calibration and validation of the Texas Mechanistic-Empirical flexible pavement design

References

• AASHTO, 2010. Guide for the local calibration of the mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
   Google Scholar
• AASHTO, 2015. Mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide – a manual of practice 2nd ed, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
   Google Scholar
• Byrd, R. H., Schnabel, R. B., and Shultz, G. A, 1987. A trust region algorithm for nonlinearly constrained optimization. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 24 (5), 1152–1170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceylan, H., et al., 2013. Iowa calibration of MEPDG performance prediction models (InTrans Project 11-401). Ames, IA: Iowa State University.
   Google Scholar
• Darter, M. I., et al., 2014. Calibration and implementation of the AASHTO mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide in Arizona (No. FHWA-AZ-14-606). Arizona: Department of Transportation. Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Darter, M. I., Titus-Glover, L., and Von Quintus, H. L., 2009. Draft user's guide for UDOT mechanistic-empirical pavement design (No. UT-09.11 a). Utah: Department of Transportation, Research Division.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, K.D., Xiao, D.X., and Wang, K.C.P., 2011. Calibration of the M-E PDG for Flexible Pavement Design in Arkansas, Paper presented at the Transportation Research Board annual meeting.
   Google Scholar
• Hiltunen, D.R., and Roque, R, 1993. A mechanics-based prediction model for thermal cracking of asphalt concrete pavements. Association of Asphalt Pavement Technologists, 63, 81–117.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, P. W., and Welsch, R. E, 1977. Robust regression using iteratively reweighted least-squares. Communications in Statistics – Theory and Methods, 6 (9), 813–827. doi:10.1080/03610927708827533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, S., Zhou, F., and Scullion, T, 2012. Texas ME flexible pavement design system: literature review and proposed framework (No. 6622-1). Texas Transportation Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, S., Zhou, F., and Scullion, T, 2014. Texas M-E flexible pavement design system. Technical Report: 0-6622-2. College Station, TX: Texas Transportation Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Jordahl, P.R., and Rauhut, B, 1984. Flexible pavement model VESYS IV-B, FHWA-RD-84-021 Final Report FCP 35E1-041.
   Google Scholar
• Khazanovich, L., et al., 2013. Use of the mechanistic–empirical pavement design guide and CalME to mitigate rutting in asphalt overlays of concrete pavements. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2368 (1), 36–44.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. R., et al., 2011. Local calibration of the M-E PDG for flexible pavement design, Final Report for Project FHWA\NC\2007-07.
   Google Scholar
• Mallela, J., et al., 2000. Implementation of the AASHTO mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide for Colorado (No. CDOT-2013-4). Colorado: Department of Transportation. Research Branch.
   Google Scholar
• Oscarsson, E., and Popescu, L, 2011. Evaluation of the CalME permanent deformation model for asphalt concrete layers. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, 4 (1), 21.
   Google Scholar
• Papagiannakis, A. T., et al., 2020. Calibration and validation of flexible pavement M-E design using Texas Data, Project 46-8MTIA007 Final Report.
   Google Scholar
• Paris, P., and Erdogan, F., 1963. A critical analysis of crack propagation laws. Journal of Basic Engineering, Transactions of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 528–534.
   Google Scholar
• Pierce, L. M., and McGovern, G, 2014. Implementation of the AASHTO mechanistic–empirical pavement design guide and software. NCHRP synthesis 457. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
   Google Scholar
• Tian, Y., et al., 2018. Calibrating the mechanistic–empirical pavement design guide rutting models using accelerated pavement testing. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2672 (40), 304–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ullidtz, P., et al., 2010. CalME, a mechanistic–empirical program to analyze and design flexible pavement rehabilitation. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2153 (1), 143–152.
   Google Scholar
• Von Quintus, H., et al., 2015. Implementation and calibration of the M-E PDG in Georgia, Final Report FHWA/GA-014-11-17.
   Google Scholar
• Walubita, L. F., et al., 2012. Texas flexible pavements and overlays: year 1 report, test sections, data collection, analyses, and data storage system (No. FHWA/TX-12/0-6658-1). Texas Transportation Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Walubita, L. F., et al., 2017. Texas flexible pavements and overlays: year 5 report-complete data documentation (No. FHWA/TX-15/0-6658-3). Texas Transportation Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Walubita, L. F., … Nazarian, S., 2014. Data collection and population of the database (The DSS and RDSSP) (No. 0-6658). Texas A&M Transportation Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, R., and Harvey, J., 2012. Calibration of asphalt concrete cracking models for California mechanistic-empirical design (CalME). In: 7th RILEM International Conference on Cracking in Pavements. Dordrecht: Springer, 537–547.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, F., Fernando, E., and Scullion, T, 2010. Development, calibration, and validation of performance prediction models for the Texas M-E flexible pavement design system technical report: 0-5798-2. College Station, TX: Texas Transportation Institute.
   Google Scholar