Systematic error patterns in dynamic modulus predictive models of asphalt concrete

References

• Abu Abdo, A.M., 2012. Sensitivity analysis of a new dynamic modulus (|E*|) model for asphalt mixtures. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 13 (3), 549–555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Khateeb, G., et al., 2006. A new simplistic model for dynamic modulus predictions of asphalt paving mixtures. Journal of Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, 75, 1254–1293.
   Google Scholar
• Azari, H., et al., 2007. Comparison of simple performance test |E*| of accelerated loading facility mixtures and prediction |E*|. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1998, 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Bari, J., 2005. Development of a new revised version of the Witczak E* predictive models for hot mix asphalt mixtures. Doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University, Tempe, Ariz.
   Google Scholar
• Birgisson, B., Sholar, G., and Roque, R., 2005. Evaluation of a predicted dynamic modulus for Florida mixtures. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1929 (1), 200–207.
   Google Scholar
• Ceylan, H., Gopalakrishnan, K., and Kim, S., 2009a. Looking to the future: the next-generation hot mix asphalt dynamic modulus prediction models. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 10 (5), 341–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceylan, H., et al., 2009b. Accuracy of predictive models for dynamic modulus of hot-mix asphalt. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 21 (6), 286–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, Y.H., Park, D.W., and Hwang, S.D., 2010. A predictive equation for dynamic modulus of asphalt mixtures used in Korea. Construction and Building Materials, 24 (4), 513–519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, D.W., and Bonaquist, R., 2015. Improved Hirsch model for estimating the modulus of hot-mix asphalt. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 16 (2), 254–274.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, D.W., Pellinen, T., and Bonaquist, R., 2003. Hirsch model for estimating the modulus of asphalt concrete. Journal of Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, 72, 97–121.
   Google Scholar
• Daneshvar, D., and Behnood, A., 2020. Estimation of the dynamic modulus of asphalt concretes using random forests algorithm. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 1–11. doi:10.1080/10298436.2020.1741587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dongre, R., et al., 2005. Field evaluation of Witczak and Hirsch models for predicting dynamic modulus of hot-mix asphalt (with discussion). Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, 74, 381–442.
   Google Scholar
• El-Badawy, S., Abdel Hakim, R., and Awed, A., 2018. Comparing artificial neural networks with regression models for hot-mix asphalt dynamic modulus prediction. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 30 (7), 04018128. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Badawy, S., Bayomy, F., and Awed, A., 2012. Performance of MEPDG dynamic modulus predictive models for asphalt concrete mixtures: local calibration for Idaho. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 24 (11), 1412–1421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esfandiarpour, S.S., and Shalaby, A., 2017. Alternatives for calibration of dynamic modulus prediction models of asphalt concrete containing RAP. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, 10 (3), 203–218.
   Google Scholar
• Esfandiarpour, S., and Shalaby, A., 2018. Effect of local calibration of dynamic modulus and creep compliance models on predicted performance of asphalt mixes containing RAP. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, 11 (5), 517–529.
   Google Scholar
• Far, M.S.S., 2011. Development of New dynamic modulus (E*) predictive models for Hot Mix asphalt mixtures. Doctoral dissertation, North Carolina State University, NC, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Georgouli, K., Loizos, A., and Plati, C., 2016. Calibration of dynamic modulus predictive model. Construction and Building Materials, 102, 65–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghasemi, P., et al., 2018. Modeling rutting susceptibility of asphalt pavement using principal component pseudo inputs in regression and neural networks. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, 11 (7), 679–690.
   Google Scholar
• Islam, M.R., Kalevela, S.A., and Mendel, G., 2019. How the mix factors affect the dynamic modulus of hot-mix asphalt. Journal of Composites Science, 3 (3), 72.
   Google Scholar
• Khattab, A.M., El-Badawy, S.M., and Elmwafi, M., 2014. Evaluation of Witczak E* predictive models for the implementation of AASHTOWare-Pavement ME Design in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Construction and Building Materials, 64, 360–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khattab, A., et al., 2017. Comparison of Witczak NCHRP 1-40D & Hirsh dynamic modulus models based on different binder characterization methods: A case study. In: Proceedings of the international conference on advances in sustainable construction materials & civil engineering systems (ASCMCES-17). Sharjah, United Arab Emirates, April 18–20.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S., and Kim, H., 2016. A new metric of absolute percentage error for intermittent demand forecasts. International Journal of Forecasting, 32 (3), 669–679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y.R., et al., 2011. LTPP computed parameter: dynamic modulus (No. FHWA-HRT-10-035). United States. Federal Highway Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Li, J., Zofka, A., and Yut, I., 2012. Evaluation of dynamic modulus of typical asphalt mixtures in northeast US region. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 13 (2), 249–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onifade, I., and Birgisson, B., 2020. Improved models for the prediction of asphalt binder dynamic shear modulus and phase angle. Construction and Building Materials, 250, 118753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robbins, M.M., and Timm, D.H., 2011. Evaluation of dynamic modulus predictive equations for southeastern United States asphalt mixtures. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2210 (1), 122–129.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, C.W., et al., 2013. Global sensitivity analysis of mechanistic–empirical performance predictions for flexible pavements. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2368 (1), 12–23.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, H., and Swamy, A.K., 2016. Development of probabilistic fatigue curve for asphalt concrete based on viscoelastic continuum damage mechanics. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, 9 (4), 270–279.
   Google Scholar
• Sivilevičius, H., and Vansauskas, V., 2013. Research and evaluation of ruts in the asphalt pavement on Lithuanian highways. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 19 (5), 609–621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tashman, L., and Elangovan, M., 2013. Dynamic modulus of HMA and its relationship to actual and predicted field performance using MEPDG. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 27 (3), 334–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen, Y., and Wang, Y., 2019. Effect of oxidative aging on dynamic modulus of hot-mix asphalt mixtures. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 31 (1), 04018348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witczak, M.W., and Fonseca, O.A, 1996. Revised predictive model for dynamic (complex) modulus of asphalt mixtures. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1540, 15–23.
   Google Scholar
• Witczak, M.W., El-Basyouny, M., and El-Badawy, S., 2007. Incorporation of the new (2005) E* predictive model in the MEPDG. NCHRP 1-40D Inter-Team Technical Report, Tempe: Arizona State University.
   Google Scholar
• Yousefdoost, S., et al., 2013. Evaluation of dynamic modulus predictive models for typical Australian asphalt mixes. In: Delivering New Age solutions: 15th AAPA International flexible pavements conference, 22-25.
   Google Scholar
• Ziehn, T., and Tomlin, A.S., 2009. GUI–HDMR – A software tool for global sensitivity analysis of complex models. Environmental Modelling & Software, 24 (7), 775–785.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaman, M., et al., 2010. Neural network modeling of resilient modulus using routine subgrade soil properties. International Journal of Geomechanics, 10 (1), 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar