Development of pavement roughness models using Artificial Neural Network (ANN)

References

• AASHTO, 2008. Mechanistic-empirical Pavement Design Guide: A Manual of Practice. Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO).
   Google Scholar
• AASHTO, 2012. Pavement Management Guide. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO).
   Google Scholar
• Abaza, K., 2016. Back-calculation of transition probabilities for Markovian-based pavement performance prediction models. International journal of pavement engineering, 17 (3), 253–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abaza, K., 2018. Empirical-Markovian model for predicting the overlay design thickness for asphalt concrete pavement. Road materials and pavement design, 19 (7), 1617–1635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdelaziz, N., et al., 2018. International Roughness Index prediction model for flexible pavements. International journal of pavement engineering, 21 (1), 88–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Achmadi, F., Suprapto, M., and Setyawan, A., 2016. The priority of road rehabilitation in karanganyar regency using IRI estimation from roadroid. In: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Volume 176, International Conference on Advanced Materials for Better Future. Surakarta, Indonesia: IOP Publishing Ltd, 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Rousan, T., Asi, I., and Abu Baker, A, 2010. Roughness evaluation of jordan highway network. In: 24th ARRB Conference – Building on 50 years of road and transport research. 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Alatoom, Y. I., 2021. Pavement roughness evaluation of arterial streets in Amman city using smartphone. Master Thesis. Jordan University of Science and Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Aleadelat, W., et al., 2018. Evaluation of pavement roughness using an android-based smartphone. Journal of transportation engineering, part B: pavements, 144 (3), 04018033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anguita, D., et al., 2010. Model selection for support vector machines: advantages and disadvantages of the machine learning theory. In: The 2010 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN). Barcelona, Spain: IEEE, 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Anitha, R., Deepak, M., and Snehesh, T., 2015. Road quality and condition detection using GPS and a Raspberry pi. International journal of innovative research and creative technology, 1 (6), 527–529.
   Google Scholar
• Asphalt Institute, 1983. Asphalt overlays for highway and street rehabilitation (MS-17). Asphalt Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Baladi, G., et al., 2017. Pavement performance measures and forecasting and the effects of maintenance and rehabilitation strategy on treatment effectiveness federal highway administration (NO. FHWA-HRT-17-095). The Federal Highway Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Bellman, R., 1978. An introduction to artificial intelligence: can computers think? San Francisco: Boyd & Fraser.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, C, 1995. Natural networks for pattern recognition (1st ed). Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burkov, A., 2019. The hundred-page machine learning book. Andriy Burkov.
   Google Scholar
• Ceylan, H., Bayrak, M., and Gopalakrishnan, K., 2014. Neural networks applications in pavement engineering: A recent survey. International journal of pavement research and technology, 7 (6), 434–444.
   Google Scholar
• Corley-Lay, J., 2014. Pavement performance measures. Transportation research record: journal of the transportation research board, 2431 (1), 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Dalla Rosa, F., Liu, L., and Gharaibeh, N., 2017. IRI prediction model for use in network-level Pavement Management systems. Journal of transportation engineering, part B: pavements, 143 (1), 04017001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Veaux, R., and Ungar, L., 1994. Multicollinearity: A tale of two nonparametric regressions. Selecting models from data, 89, 393–402. https://rd.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4612-2660-4_40.
   Google Scholar
• Douangphachanh, V., and Oneyama, H., 2014. A study on the use of smartphones under realistic settings to estimate road roughness condition. EURASIP journal on wireless communications and networking, 2014 (1), 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Du, Y., et al., 2016. Application of vehicle mounted accelerometers to measure pavement roughness. International journal of distributed sensor networks, 12 (6), 8413146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elhadidy, A., El-Badawy, S., and Elbeltagi, E., 2019. A simplified pavement condition index regression model for pavement evaluation. International journal of pavement engineering, 22 (5), 643–652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, L., and Zhang, Z., 2008. Robust Optimization for managing pavement maintenance and rehabilitation. Transportation research record: journal of the transportation research board, 2084 (1), 55–61.
   Google Scholar
• Garg, A., and Tai, K., 2013. Comparison of statistical and machine learning methods in modelling of data with multicollinearity. International journal of modelling, identification and control, 18 (4), 295.
   Google Scholar
• Georgiou, P., Plati, C., and Loizos, A., 2018. Soft computing models to predict pavement roughness: A comparative study. Advances in civil engineering, 2018, 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong, H., et al., 2018. Use of random forests regression for predicting IRI of asphalt pavements. Construction and building materials, 189, 890–897.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, S, 2010. Measuring displacement signal with an accelerometer. Journal of mechanical science and technology, 24 (6), 1329–1335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson, T., Cameron, C., and Hildebrand, E., 2014. Evaluation of low-cost consumer-level mobile phone technology for measuring international roughness index (IRI) values. Canadian journal of civil engineering, 41 (9), 819–827.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hossain, M., Gopisetti, L., and Miah, M., 2017. Prediction of international roughness index of flexible pavements from climate and traffic data using artificial neural network modeling. In: International Conference on Highway Pavements and Airfield Technology. 256–267.
   Google Scholar
• Hossain, M., Gopisetti, L., and Miah, M., 2019. International roughness index prediction of flexible pavements using neural networks. Journal of transportation engineering, part B: pavements, 145 (1), 04018058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hossain, M., Gopisetti, L., and Miah, M., 2020. Artificial neural network modelling to predict international roughness index of rigid pavements. International journal of pavement research and technology, 13 (3), 229–239.
   Google Scholar
• Hosseini, S., and Smadi, O., 2021. How prediction accuracy can affect the decision-making process in Pavement Management system. Infrastructures, 6 (2), 28.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, Y., 2003. Pavement analysis and design. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, Y., and Moore, R, 1997. Roughness level probability prediction using artificial neural networks. Transportation research record: journal of the transportation research board, 1592 (1), 89–97.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, C., et al., 2011. Guidelines for quality related Pay adjustment factors for pavement (NCHRP project No. 10–79). Austin, Texas: NATIONAL COOPERATIVE HIGHWAY RESEARCH PROGRAM, TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD.
   Google Scholar
• Hung, S., and Adeli, H., 1993. Parallel backpropagation learning algorithms on CRAY Y-MP8/864 supercomputer. Neurocomputing, 5 (6), 287–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islam, S., et al., 2014. Measurement of pavement roughness using android-based smartphone application. Transportation research record: journal of the transportation research board, 2457 (1), 30–38.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, Y., and Li, S., 2005. Gray system model for estimating the pavement international roughness index. Journal of performance of constructed facilities, 19 (1), 62–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kheirati, A., and Golroo, A., 2020. Low-cost infrared-based pavement roughness data acquisition for low volume roads. Automation in construction, 119, 103363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ling, M., et al., 2017. Numerical modeling and artificial neural network for predicting J-integral of Top-down cracking in Asphalt pavement. Transportation research record: journal of the transportation research board, 2631 (1), 83–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y, 2014. Random forest algorithm in big data environment. Computer modelling & new technologies, 18 (12A), 147–151.
   Google Scholar
• Mahmoudzadeh, A., et al., 2019. Estimating pavement roughness by fusing color and depth data obtained from an inexpensive RGB-D sensor. Sensors, 19 (7), 1655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGhee, K., 2004. Automated pavement distress collection techniques (NCHRP. 334) National Cooperative Highway Research Program: Transportation Research Board.
   Google Scholar
• Meegoda, J., and Gao, S, 2014. Roughness progression model for Asphalt pavements using long-term pavement performance data. Journal of transportation engineering, 140 (8), 04014037.
   Google Scholar
• Mirtabar, Z., et al., 2020. Development of a crowdsourcing-based system for computing the international roughness index. International journal of pavement engineering, 1–10. doi:10.1080/10298436.2020.1755434.
   Google Scholar
• Mrzygłód, B., et al., 2020. Sensitivity analysis of the artificial neural networks in a system for durability prediction of forging tools to forgings made of C45 steel. The international journal of advanced manufacturing technology, 109 (5–6), 1385–1395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naheed, N., et al., 2020. Importance of features selection, attributes selection, challenges and future directions for medical imaging data: a review. Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, 125 (1), 315–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, H., et al., 2019. Adaptive network based fuzzy inference system with meta-heuristic optimizations for international roughness index prediction. Applied Sciences, 9 (21), 4715.
   Google Scholar
• Noorzaei, J., et al., 2007. Development of artificial neural networks for predicting concrete compressive strength. International journal of engineering and technology, 4 (2), 141–153.
   Google Scholar
• Obite, C., et al., 2020. Multicollinearity effect in regression analysis: a feed Forward Artificial Neural Network approach. Asian journal of probability and statistics, 6 (1), 22–33.
   Google Scholar
• Perera, R., and Kohn, S., 2002. Issues in pavement smoothness: a summary report (NCHRP Web Document 42). National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-Acebo, H., et al., 2020. IRI performance models for flexible pavements in Two-lane roads until first maintenance and/or rehabilitation work. Coatings, 10 (2), 97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Acebo, H., et al., 2021. Modeling the international roughness index performance on semi-rigid pavements in single carriageway roads. Construction and building materials, 272, 121665.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priddy, K., and Keller, P., 2005. Artificial neural networks: an introduction. Bellingham, Wash: SPIE Press.
   Google Scholar
• The Road Information Program (TRIP), 2015. Bumpy roads ahead: america’s roughest rides and strategies to make our roads smoother. Washington, D.C.: TRIP.
   Google Scholar
• Robbins, M., and Tran, N., 2016. A synthesis report: value of pavement smoothness and ride quality to roadway users and the impact of pavement roughness on vehicle operating costs (NCAT report 16–03). Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama: National Center for Asphalt Technology (NCAT).
   Google Scholar
• Sandamal, R., and Pasindu, H., 2020. Applicability of smartphone-based roughness data for rural road pavement condition evaluation. International journal of pavement engineering, 1–10. doi:10.1080/10298436.2020.1765243.
   Google Scholar
• Sauerwein, P., and Smith, B., 2013. Investigation of the implementation of a probe vehicle based pavement roughness estimation system (UVA-2010-01). University Park, PA: Mid-Atlantic Universities Transportation Center.
   Google Scholar
• Sayer, M., Gillespie, T., and Paterson, W., 1986. International experiment to establish correlations and standard calibration methods for road roughness measurement), World Bank Technical Paper 46. The World Bank, Washington, DC: World Bank Group.
   Google Scholar
• Sayer, M., Gillespie, T., and Queiroz, C., 1986b. The International Road Roughness Experiment (IRRE): establishing correlation and a calibration standard for measurements (English), World Bank Technical Paper 45. The World Bank, Washington, DC: World Bank Group.
   Google Scholar
• Sollazzo, G., Fwa, T., and Bosurgi, G., 2017. An ANN model to correlate roughness and structural performance in asphalt pavements. Construction and building materials, 134, 684–693.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talpur, N. and Hussain, K., 2017. Adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system: overview, strengths, limitations, and solutions. In: Y. Tan, H. Takagi and Y. Shi, eds. Data mining and big data. DMBD 2017. Lecture notes in computer science, Vol 10387. Cham: Springer, 527–535.
   Google Scholar
• Terzi, S., 2013. Modeling for pavement roughness using the ANFIS approach. Advances in Engineering Software, 57, 59–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uddin, W., 2006. Pavement management systems. In: T. F. Fwa, ed. The handbook of highway engineering. Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis Group, 18–64.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, K., and Li, Q., 2009. Pavement smoothness prediction based on Fuzzy and Gray theories. Computer-aided civil and infrastructure engineering, 26 (1), 69–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, T., 1998. Long-term monitoring of pavement maintenance materials test sites (No. FHWA-RD-98-073). Federal Highway Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, P. and Mantooth, H., 2013. Model-based optimization techniques. In: P. Wilson and H. Mantooth, eds. Model-based engineering for complex electronic systems. Oxford: Newnes/Elservier, 347–367.
   Google Scholar
• Yuan, Y., 1999. A review of trust region algorithms for optimization. In: ICIAM 99: Proceedings of the Fourth International Congress on Industrial & Applied Mathematics. Edinburgh: Clarendon Press, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Zang, K., et al., 2018. Assessing and mapping of road surface roughness based on GPS and accelerometer Sensors on bicycle-mounted smartphones. Sensors, 18 (3), 914.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeiada, W., et al., 2017. Investigation and modelling of asphalt pavement performance in cold regions. International journal of pavement engineering, 20 (8), 986–997.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeiada, W., et al., 2020. Machine learning for pavement performance modelling in warm climate regions. Arabian journal for science and engineering, 45 (5), 4091–4109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., et al., 2020. IRI threshold values based on riding comfort. Journal of transportation engineering, part B: pavements, 146 (1), 04020001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Z., et al., 2021. Pavement roughness evaluation method based on the theoretical relationship between acceleration measured by smartphone and IRI. International journal of pavement engineering, 1–17. doi:10.1080/10298436.2021.1881783?journalCode=gpav20.
   Google Scholar
• Ziari, H., et al., 2015. Prediction of IRI in short and long terms for flexible pavements: ANN and GMDH methods. International journal of pavement engineering, 17 (9), 776–788.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar