Development of ternary binder mixing formulation for asphalt pavement recycling

References

• Ahmed, R.B., and Hossain, K, 2020. Waste cooking oil as an asphalt rejuvenator: A state-of-the-art review. Construction and Building Materials, 230, 116985.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Qadi, I.L., Qazi, A., and Carpenter, S.H., 2012. Impact of high RAP content on structural and performance properties of asphalt mixtures. Research Report FHWA-ICT-12-002, Illinois Center for Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• American Society of Testing Material (ASTM) Standard D2172–05, 2005. Standard test methods for quantitative extraction of bitumen from bituminous paving mixtures. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
   Google Scholar
• American Society of Testing Materials (ASTM) Standard D4887, 2016. Standard practice for preparation of viscosity blends for hot recycled bituminous materials. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
   Google Scholar
• American Society of Testing Materials (ASTM) Standard D7152, 2016. Standard practice for calculating viscosity of a blend of petroleum products. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
   Google Scholar
• Andrade, E.N.D.C, 1930. The viscosity of liquids. Nature, 125 (3148), 309–310.
   Google Scholar
• Asphalt Institute, 2014. MS-2 asphalt mix design methods. The Asphalt Institute manual series no. 2. 6th ed. Lexington, KY.
   Google Scholar
• Austroads, 2000. Framework specifications for asphalt recycling. Publication No. AP-T02/00, Sydney, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Bajaj, A., et al., 2020. Evaluation and classification of recycling agents for asphalt binders. Construction and Building Materials, 260, 119864.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker, T.B. and Milivojevich, A., 2016. Quality by experimental design. New York: CRC Press, 607–633.
   Google Scholar
• Behnood, A, 2019. Application of rejuvenators to improve the rheological and mechanical properties of asphalt binders and mixtures: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 231, 171–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blomberg, T., Makowska, M., and Pellinen, T, 2016. Laboratory simulation of bitumen aging and rejuvenation to mimic multiple cycles of reuse. Transportation Research Procedia, 14 (11), 694–703.
   Google Scholar
• Booshehrian, A., Mogawer, W.S., and Bonaquist, R, 2013. How to construct an asphalt binder master curve and assess the degree of blending between RAP and virgin binders. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 25 (12), 1813–1821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bressi, S., et al., 2015. Particle clustering phenomena in hot asphalt mixtures with high content of reclaimed asphalt pavements. Construction and Building Materials, 100, 207–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• British Standard Institution, BS EN 13108-1, 2016. Bituminous mixture – material specification – part 1. London: Asphalt Concrete.
   Google Scholar
• Button, J.W., Estakhri, C.K., and Little, D.N, 1995. Performance and cost of selected hot in-place recycling projects. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Record. 1507, 51–61
   Google Scholar
• Cavalli, M.C., et al., 2018. Aging effect on rheology and cracking behaviour of reclaimed binder with bio-based rejuvenators. Journal of Cleaner Production, 189, 88–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centeno, G., et al., 2011. Testing various mixing rules for calculation of viscosity of petroleum blends. Fuel, 90 (12), 3561–3570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centeno, G., Sánchez-Reyna, G., and Ancheyta, J, 2015. Calculating the viscosity of crude oil blends by binary interaction parameters using literature data. Petroleum Science and Technology, 33, 893–900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaffin, J.M., et al., 1995. Viscosity mixing rules for asphalt recycling. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Record, 1507, 78–85.
   Google Scholar
• Chakkoth, U., et al., 2020. Component blending for bitumen production for Indian refineries. Sadhana, 45 (1), 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, X., and Wang, H, 2018. Life cycle assessment of asphalt pavement recycling for greenhouse gas emission with temporal aspect. Journal of Cleaner Production, 187, 148–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, D.W., Anderson, D.A., and Rowe, G.M, 2017. Relaxation spectra of asphalt binders and the Christensen–Anderson rheological model. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 18 (1), 382–403.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, W.P., and Merz, E.H, 1958. Correlation of dynamic and steady flow viscosities. Journal of Polymer Science, 28, 619–622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daly, W.H., 2017. Relationship between chemical makeup of binders and engineering performance (No. Project 20-015 (Topic 47-13)). NCHRP Synthesis 511, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Díaz, R.M., et al., 1996. Prediction of the viscosity of lubricating oil blends at any temperature. Fuel, 75 (5), 574–578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elkashef, M., et al., 2019. Using viscosity models to predict the properties of rejuvenated reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) binders. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 20 (2), S767–S779.
   Google Scholar
• Epps, J.A., et al., 1980. Guidelines for recycling pavement materials. NHCRP 224, National Cooperative Highway Research Program. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board
   Google Scholar
• Epps, A. J., 1990. Cold-recycled bituminous concrete using bituminous materials. NCHRP Synthesis 160, National Cooperative Highway Research Program. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
   Google Scholar
• European Standard, EN 12591, 2009. Bitumen and bituminous binders. Specifications for paving grade bitumens, Brussels, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• Finnish Asphalt Specifications, 2017. Finnish pavement technology advisory council. Helsinki: PANK Edita Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Fort, R.J., and Moore, W.R, 1966. Viscosities of binary liquid mixtures. Transactions of the Faraday Society, 62, 1112–1119.
   Google Scholar
• Forton, A., et al., 2020. Properties of blends of fresh and RAP binders with rejuvenator: Experimental and estimated results. Construction and Building Materials, 236, 117555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, Y., and Li, K, 2012. New models for calculating the viscosity of mixed oil. Fuel, 95, 431–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grunberg, L., and Nissan, A.H, 1949. The energies of vaporisation, viscosity and cohesion and the structure of liquids. Transactions of the Faraday Society, 45, 125–137.
   Google Scholar
• Hernández, E.A., Sánchez-reyna, G., and Ancheyta, J, 2019. Comparison of mixing rules based on binary interaction parameters for calculating viscosity of crude oil blends. Fuel, 249 (1), 198–205.
   Google Scholar
• Im, S., et al., 2014. Impacts of rejuvenators on performance and engineering properties of asphalt mixtures containing recycled materials. Construction and Building Materials, 53, 596–603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irving, J.B., 1977. Viscosities of binary liquid mixtures: the effectiveness of mixture equations. Report 631, National Engineering Laboratory, Glasgow.
   Google Scholar
• Jaczewski, M., et al., 2019. Impact of reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) on low-temperature properties of asphalt concrete. Roads and Bridges-Drogi i Mosty, 18 (4), 303–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandhal, P.S., et al., 1995. Performance of recycled hot-mix asphalt mixtures in Georgia. Auburn: National Center for Asphalt Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Kandhal, P.S., and Mallick, R.B., 1997. Pavement recycling guidelines for state and local governments. Report No. FHWA-SA-98-042. FHWA, National Center for Asphalt Technology, Auburn.
   Google Scholar
• Karlsson, R., and Isacsson, U, 2006. Material-related aspects of asphalt recycling—state-of-the-art. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 18 (1), 81–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlsson, R., and Isacsson, U, 2011. Bitumen rejuvenator diffusion as influenced by ageing. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 3 (2), 167–182.
   Google Scholar
• Kendall, J., and Monroe, K.P, 1917. Viscosity of liquids. III. Ideal solutions of solids in liquids. Journal of American Chemical Society, 39, 1802–1806.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, T.W., Moulthrop, J.S., and Huber, G.A, 1993. Development of SHRP specification and design and analysis system. Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, 62, 508–528.
   Google Scholar
• Kriz, P., et al., 2014. Blending and diffusion of reclaimed asphalt pavement and virgin asphalt binders. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 15, 78–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, X., and Williams, R.C, 2012. A practical dynamic modulus testing protocol. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 40 (1), 100–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, S.P., Zhao, G., and Chen, H.Y, 2005. The relationship between steady shear viscosity and complex viscosity. Journal of Dispersion Science and Technology, 26 (4), 415–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDaniel, R., et al., 2001. Recommended use of reclaimed asphalt pavement in the Superpave mix design method : Guidelines. technician’s manual. NCHRP Rep. No. 452, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Mehrotra, A.K, 1992. A model for the viscosity of bitumen/bitumen fractions - diluent blends. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 31, 28.
   Google Scholar
• Mehrotra, A.K., Monnery, W.D., and Svrcek, W.Y, 1996. A review of practical calculation methods for the viscosity of liquid hydrocarbons and their mixtures. Fluid Phase Equilibria, 117 (1), 344–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mogawer, W.S., et al., 2013. Evaluating the effect of rejuvenators on the degree of blending and performance of high RAP, RAS, and RAP/RAS mixtures. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 14 (2), 193–213.
   Google Scholar
• Moghaddam, T. B., and Baaj, H, 2016. The use of rejuvenating agents in production of recycled hot mix asphalt: A systematic review. Construction and Building Materials, 114, 805–816.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen, J.C., et al., 1994. Binder characterization and evaluation. SHRP-A-367. Washington, DC: Strategic Highway Research Program, National Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, F.L., Kandhal, P.S., and Brown, E. R., 1996. Hot mix asphalt materials, mixture design, and construction. 2nd ed. Lanham: NCAT-Auburn University.
   Google Scholar
• Shu, W.R, 2008. A viscosity correlation for mixtures of heavy oil, bitumen, and petroleum fractions. Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, 24 (03), 277–282.
   Google Scholar
• Soleymani, H.R., Bahia, H.U., and Bergan, A.T, 1999. Blending charts based on performance-graded asphalt binder specification. Transportation Research Record, 1661, 7–14.
   Google Scholar
• Tarsi, G., Tataranni, P., and Sangiorgi, C, 2020. The challenges of using reclaimed asphalt pavement for new asphalt mixtures: A review. Materials, 13 (18), 4052.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tran, N., Taylor, A., and Willis, R., 2014. Effect of rejuvenator on performance properties of HMA mixtures with high RAP contents. In: Asphalt Pavements - Proceedings of the International Conference on Asphalt Pavements, Netherlands: ISAP 2014.
   Google Scholar
• West, R., Willis, J.R., and Marasteanu, M., 2013. Improved mix design, evaluation, and materials management practices for hot mix asphalt with high reclaimed asphalt pavement content. NCHRP 752. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
   Google Scholar
• Winter, H.H, 2009. Three views of viscoelasticity for Cox – Merz materials. Rheologica Acta, 48 (3), 241–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, J., et al., 2020. Rejuvenating effect of soft bitumen, liquid surfactant, and bio-rejuvenator on artificial aged asphalt. Construction and Building Materials, 254, 119336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaumanis, M., et al., 2014. Influence of six rejuvenators on the performance properties of Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement (RAP) binder and 100% recycled asphalt mixtures. Construction and Building Materials, 71, 538–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaumanis, M., and Mallick, R.B, 2015. Review of very high-content reclaimed asphalt use in plant-produced pavements: State of the art. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 16 (1), 39–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaumanis, M., Mallick, R.B., and Frank, R, 2013. Evaluation of rejuvenator’s effectiveness with conventional mix testing for 100% RAP mixtures. Transportation Research Record, 2370 (1), 17–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaumanis, M., Mallick, R.B., and Frank, R, 2014a. 100% recycled hot mix asphalt: A review and analysis. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 92, 230–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaumanis, M., Mallick, R.B., and Frank, R, 2014b. Determining optimum rejuvenator dose for asphalt recycling based on Superpave performance grade specifications. Construction and Building Materials, 69, 159–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., et al., 2020. Effect of different viscous rejuvenators on chemical and mechanical behavior of aged and recovered bitumen from RAP. Construction and Building Materials, 239, 117755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar