From data to decision: integrated approach to pavement preservation in Iowa through treatment effectiveness analysis

References

• Abaza, K. A., 2004. Deterministic performance prediction model for rehabilitation and management of flexible pavement. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 5 (2), 111–121.
   Google Scholar
• Abaza, K. A., 2017. Empirical approach for estimating the pavement transition probabilities used in non-homogenous Markov chains. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 18 (2), 128–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdelaty, A., et al., 2016. Enhancing life cycle cost analysis with a novel cost classification framework for pavement rehabilitation projects. Construction Management and Economics, 34 (10), 724–736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amin, M. S. R., 2015. The pavement performance modeling: deterministic vs. stochastic approaches. In: S. Kadry, and A. El Hami, eds.Numerical methods for reliability and safety assessment. Springer International Publishing Switzerland, 179–196.
   Google Scholar
• Amin, S. R., and Amador-Jiménez, L. E., 2017. Backpropagation neural network to estimate pavement performance: dealing with measurement errors. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 18 (5), 1218–1238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arezoumand, S., et al., 2021. Automatic pavement rutting measurement by fusing a high speed-shot camera and a linear laser. Construction and Building Materials, 283, 122668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arezoumand, S., Sassani, A., and Smadi, O., 2023. Data-driven approach to decision-making for pavement preservation. Engineering Proceedings, 36 (1), 61.
   Google Scholar
• ASCE, 2023. Report card for America’s infrastructure. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE).
   Google Scholar
• Azad, S., and Mirghaderi, S. E. S. R., 2021. Numerical investigation of steel and composite beam-to-encased composite column connection via a through-plate. Structures, 31, 14–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babashamsi, P., et al., 2016. Evaluation of pavement life cycle cost analysis: review and analysis. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, 9 (4), 241–254.
   Google Scholar
• Bektas, F., Smadi, O. G., and Al-Zoubi, M., 2014. Iowa State University pavement management performance modeling : evaluating the existing PCI equations.
   Google Scholar
• Buss, A., and Claypool, B. S., 2022. Analytical methods to determine effectiveness of slurry seals in Wet/freeze climate using pavement management information systems. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 23 (5), 992–1010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buss, A., Claypool, B., and Bektas, F., 2019. Effectiveness of pavement preservation techniques.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, S., et al., 2011. Pavement preservation: a solution for sustainability. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2235, 36–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu, C.-Y., and Durango-Cohen, P. L., 2008. Empirical comparison of statistical pavement performance models. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 14 (2), 138–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dadashova, B., Dobrovolny, C. S., and Tabesh, M., 2021. Detecting pavement distresses using crowdsourced dashcam camera images.
   Google Scholar
• De La Garza, J. M., et al., 2011. Network-level optimization of pavement maintenance renewal strategies. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 25 (4), 699–712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donev, V., and Hoffmann, M., 2020. Optimisation of pavement maintenance and rehabilitation activities, timing and work zones for short survey sections and multiple distress types. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 21 (5), 583–607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finch, H., 2022. Applied regularization methods for the social sciences. Boca Raton, FL: CRC/Chapman & Hall, Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Fuentes, L., et al., 2021. Modelling pavement serviceability of urban roads using deterministic and probabilistic approaches. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 22 (1), 77–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García de Soto, B., et al., 2018. Predicting road traffic accidents using artificial neural network models. Infrastructure Asset Management, 5 (4), 132–144.
   Google Scholar
• Goh, K. C., Goh, H. H., and Chong, H.-Y., 2019. Integration model of fuzzy AHP and life-cycle cost analysis for evaluating highway infrastructure investments. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 25 (1), 4018045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gransberg, D., et al., 2015. Quantifying the costs and benefits of pavement retexturing as a pavement preservation tool.
   Google Scholar
• Hassan, R., Lin, O., and Thananjeyan, A., 2017. A comparison between three approaches for modelling deterioration of five pavement surfaces. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 18 (1), 26–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IDOT, 2010. Chapter 53 Pavement preservation. In: Bureau of design and environment manual. Springfield, IL: Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT), 53-1.1 –53-6.1.
   Google Scholar
• Khan, D. M., et al., 2021. Applications of robust regression techniques: an econometric approach. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2021, 1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamptey, G., Labi, S., and Li, Z., 2008. Decision support for optimal scheduling of highway pavement preventive maintenance within resurfacing cycle. Decision Support Systems, 46 (1), 376–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmoudzadeh, A., etal 2020. 3D pavement surface reconstruction using An RGB-D sensor. In: S. Mariani, T. B. Messervey, A. Vallan, and S. Bosse, eds. Proceedings 2020. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, 42, 47. https://doi.org/10.3390/ecsa-6-06641.
   Google Scholar
• Mandiartha, I. P., et al., 2010. Stochastic based models for low volume road (LVR) network management. In: 24 h ARRB conference (Hudson 1992), 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Maryland DOT. 2021. Pavement system preservation report. Hanover, MD: Maryland Department of Transportation (Maryland DOT).
   Google Scholar
• Michigan DOT. 2010. Capital preventive maintenance. Lansing, MI: Michigan Department of Transportation (Michigan DOT).
   Google Scholar
• MnDOT. 2020. Pavement condition annual report. St Paul, MN: Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT).
   Google Scholar
• Moeinizade, S., and Hu, G. 2020. Predicting metropolitan crime rates using machine learning techniques. In: H. Yang, R. Qiu, W. Chen, eds. Springer proceedings in business and economics. Nanjing: Springer Science and Business Media B.V, 77–86.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-Acebo, H., et al., 2020. IRI performance models for flexible pavements in two-lane roads until first maintenance and/or rehabilitation work. Coatings, 10 (2), 97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Acebo, H., Bejan, S., and Gonzalo-Orden, H., 2018. Transition probability matrices for flexible pavement deterioration models with half-year cycle time. International Journal of Civil Engineering, 16 (9), 1045–1056.
   Google Scholar
• Plati, C., Georgiou, P., and Papavasiliou, V., 2016. Simulating pavement structural condition using artificial neural networks. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 12 (9), 1127–1136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pour, S. A., and Jeong, D. H. S., 2012. Realistic life-cycle cost analysis with typical sequential patterns of pavement treatment through association analysis. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2304, 104–111.
   Google Scholar
• Pulugurta, H., Shao, Q., and Chou, Y. J., 2009. Pavement condition prediction using Markov process. Journal of Statistics and Management Systems, 12 (5), 853–871.
   Google Scholar
• Saha, P., Ksaibati, K., and Atadero, R., 2017. Developing pavement distress deterioration models for pavement management system using Markovian probabilistic process. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2017. Article ID 8292056. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/8292056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakhaeifar, M., et al., 2019. Compilation of local studies and regional calibration of pavement ME design for rigid and flexible pavements in Oklahoma.
   Google Scholar
• Salem, O., AbouRizk, S., and Ariaratnam, S., 2003. Risk-based life-cycle costing of infrastructure rehabilitation and construction alternatives. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 9 (1), 6–15.
   Google Scholar
• South Dakota Department of Transportation (SDDOT), 2021. Pavement preservation guidelines.
   Google Scholar
• Swei, O., Gregory, J., and Kirchain, R., 2013. Probabilistic characterization of uncertain inputs in the life-cycle cost analysis of pavements. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2366, 71–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabesh, M., and Sakhaeifar, M. S., 2020. Local calibration and implementation of AASHTOWARE pavement ME performance models for Oklahoma pavement systems. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 24 (1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2021.1924375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UDOT, 2023. UDOT preserve infrastructure. Taylorsville, UT: Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT). Available from: https://www.udot.utah.gov/strategic-direction/preserve-infrastructure.html.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, G., Morian, D., and Frith, D., 2013. Cost-benefit analysis of thin surface treatments in pavement treatment strategies and cycle maintenance. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 25 (8), 1050–1058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamany, M. S., and Abraham, D. M., 2021. Hybrid approach to incorporate preventive maintenance effectiveness into probabilistic pavement performance models. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements, 147 (1), 04020077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamany, M. S., Saeed, T. U., and Volovski, M., 2019. Performance prediction of interstate flexible pavement across the Midwestern United States: random-parameter regression vs artificial neural network. In: Transportation Research Board 98th annual meeting (November).
   Google Scholar